Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Third edition

Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Third edition

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 1-438

  Byrne, Barbara M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139368271     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315757421     Document Type: Book

References (362)

1. Aikin, L.S., Stein, J.A., and Bentler, P.M. (1994). Structural equation analyses of clinical sub-population differences and comparative treatment outcomes:Characterizing the daily lives of drug addicts. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 488-499.
2. Aish, A.M. and Jöreskog, K.G. (1990). A panel model for political efficacy and responsiveness:An application of LISREL 7 with weighted least squares. Quality and Quantity, 19, 716-723.
3. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
4. Allison, P.D. (1987). Estimation of linear models with incomplete data. In C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1987 (pp. 71-103). San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
5. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
6. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice:A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
7. Arbuckle, J.L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G.A. Marcoulides and R.E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243-277). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Arbuckle, J.L. (2012). IBM SPSS Amos 21 user’s guide. [Computer software and manual]. New York, NY: IBM.
9. Arbuckle, J.L. (2015). IBM SPSS Amos 23 user’s guide. [Computer software and manual]. New York, NY: IBM.
10. Arbuckle, J.L. and Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4.0 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: Smallwaters.
11. Atkinson, L. (1988). The measurement-statistics controversy: Factor analysis and subinterval data. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 361-364.
12. Austin, J.T. and Calderón, R.F. (1996). Theoretical and technical contributions to structural equation modeling: An updated bibliography. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 105-175.
13. Babakus, E. Ferguson, C.E. Jr., and Jöreskog, K.G. (1987). The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 222-228.
14. Bacharach, S.B., Bauer, S.C., and Conley, S. (1986). Organizational analysis of stress: The case of elementary and secondary schools. Work and Occupations, 13, 7-32.
15. Bandalos, D.L. (1993). Factors influencing cross-validation of confirmatory factor analysis models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 351-374.
16. Bandalos, D.L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling Journal, 9, 78-102.
17. Bandalos, D.L. and Finney, S.J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G.A. Marcoulides and R.E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-296). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
18. Bagozzi, R.P. (1993). Assessing construct validity in personality research:Applications to measures of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 49-87.
19. Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1990). Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 547-560.
20. Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1993). Multitrait-multimethod matrices in consumer research: Critique and new developments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2, 143-170.
21. Beauducel, A. and Wittmann, W.W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 41-75.
22. Beck, A., Steer, R., and Brown, G. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory manual (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Association.
23. Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., and Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571.
24. Benson, J. and Bandalos, D.L. (1992). Second-order confirmatory factor analysis of the Reactions to Tests Scale with cross-validation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 459-487.
25. Bentler, P.M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
26. Bentler, P.M. (1988). Causal modeling via structural equation systems. In J.R. Nesselroade and R.B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 317-335). New York, NY: Plenum.
27. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
28. Bentler, P.M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400-404.
29. Bentler, P.M. (2005). EQS 6 Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA:Multivariate Software Inc.
30. Bentler, P.M. and Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
31. Bentler, P.M. and Bonett, D.G. (1987). This week’s citation classic. Current Contents, 19, 16.
32. Bentler, P.M. and Chou, C-P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78-117.
33. Bentler, P.M. and Dijkstra, T. (1985). Efficient estimation via linearization in structural model. In P.R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate analysis VI (pp. 9-42). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
34. Bentler, P.M. and Yuan, K-H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples:test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 181-197.
35. Biddle, B.J. and Marlin, M.M. (1987). Causality, confirmation, credulity, and structural equation modeling. Child Development, 58, 4-17.
36. Bloxis, S.A. and Cho, Y.I. (2008). Coding and centering of time in latent curve models in the presence of interindividual time heterogeneity. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 413-433.
37. Bodner, T.E. (2008) What improves with increasing missing data imputations? Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 651-675.
38. Bollen, K.A. (1986). Sample size and Bentler and Bonett’s nonnormed fit index. Psychometrika, 51, 375-377.
39. Bollen, K.A. (1989a). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
40. Bollen, K.A. (1989b). A new incremental fit index for general structural models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17, 303-316.
41. Bollen, K.A. and Barb, K.H. (1981). Pearson’s r and coarsely categorized measures. American Sociological Review, 46, 232-239.
42. Bollen, K.A. and Long, J.S. (Eds.) (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Bollen, K.A. and Stine, R.A. (1988, August). Bootstrapping structural equation models: Variability of indirect effects and goodness-of-fit measures. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA.
44. Bollen, K.A. and Stine, R.A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 205-229.
45. Bollen, K.A. and Stine, R.A. (1993). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation modeling (pp. 111-135). In K.A. Bollen, and J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46. Bolstad, W.M. (2004). Introduction to Bayesian statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
47. Boomsma, A. (1982). The robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. In H. Wold and K. Joreskog (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation (pp. 149-173). New York, NY: Elsevier-North-Holland.
48. Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 50, 229-242.
49. Boomsma, A. and Hoogland, J.J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisted. In R. Cudeck, S. DuToit, and D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling:Present and future. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
50. Bovaird, J.A. (2007). Multilevel structural equation models for contextual factors. In T.D. Little, J.A. Bovaird, and N.A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp.149-182). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike’s information criteria (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345-370.
52. Breckler, S.J. (1990) Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology:Cause for concern? Psychological Bulletin, 107, 260-271.
53. Brookover, W.B. (1962). Self-concept of Ability Scale. East Lansing, MI: Educational Publication Services.
54. Brosseau-Liard, P., Savalei, V., and Li, L. (2014). An investigation of the sample performance of two non-normality corrections for RMSEA. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 460-470.
55. Brown, R.L. (1994). Efficacy of the indirect approach for estimating structural equation models with missing data: A comparison of five methods. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 287-316.
56. Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY:Guilford.
57. Browne, M.W. (1984a). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62-83.
58. Browne, M.W. (1984b). The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 1-21.
59. Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445-455.
60. Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen and J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
61. Bryk, A.S. and Raudenbush, S.W. (1987). Applications of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147-158.
62. Byrne, B.M. (1988a). The Self Description Questionnaire III: Testing for equivalent factorial validity across ability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 397-406.
63. Byrne, B.M. (1988b). Adolescent self-concept, ability grouping, and social comparison:Reexamining academic track differences in high school. Youth and Society, 20, 46-67.
64. Byrne, B.M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
65. Byrne, B.M. (1991). The Maslach Inventory: Validating factorial structure and invariance across intermediate, secondary, and university educators. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 583-605.
66. Byrne, B.M. (1993). The Maslach Inventory: Testing for factorial validity and invariance across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 197-212.
67. Byrne, B.M. (1994a). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 289-311.
68. Byrne, B.M. (1994b). Burnout: Testing for the validity, replication, and invariance of causal structure across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 645-673.
69. Byrne, B.M. (1994c). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
70. Byrne, B.M. (1995). Strategies in testing for an invariant second-order factor structure: A comparison of EQS and LISREL. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 53-72.
71. Byrne, B.M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the lifespan: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
72. Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS:basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Byrne, B.M. (1999). The nomological network of teacher burnout: A literature review and empirically validated model. In M. Huberman and R. Vandenberghe (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 15-37). London: Cambridge University Press.
74. Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Byrne, B.M. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis. In R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 399-402). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
76. Byrne, B.M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS Graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 272-300.
77. Byrne, B.M. (2005a). Factor analytic models: Viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 17-30.
78. Byrne, B.M. (2005b). Factor analysis: Confirmatory. In B.S. Everitt and D.C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioural science (pp. 599-606). London, UK: Wiley.
79. Byrne, B.M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
80. Byrne, B.M. (2008). Testing for time-invariant and time-varying predictors of self-perceived ability in math, language, and science: A look at the gender factor. In H.M.G. Watt and J.S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes:Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 145-169). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
81. Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
82. Byrne, B.M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
83. Byrne, B.M. (2015). Factor analysis: Confirmatory. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics reference Online, 1-9.
84. Byrne, B.M. and Baron P. (1993). The Beck Depression Inventory: Testing and cross-validating an hierarchical factor structure for nonclinical adolescents. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 26, 164-178.
85. Byrne, B.M. and Baron, P. (1994). Measuring adolescent depression: Tests of equivalent factorial structure for English and French versions of the Beck Depression Inventory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43, 33-47.
86. Byrne, B.M., Baron, P., and Balev, J. (1996). The Beck Depression Inventory: Testing for its factorial validity and invariance across gender for Bulgarian adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 641-651.
87. Byrne, B.M., Baron, P., and Balev, J. (1998). The Beck Depression Inventory: A cross-validated test of second-order structure for Bulgarian adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 241-251.
88. Byrne, B.M., Baron, P. and Campbell, T.L. (1993). Measuring adolescent depression:Factorial validity and invariance of the Beck Depression Inventory across gender. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3, 127-143.
89. Byrne, B.M., Baron, P., and Campbell, T.L. (1994). The Beck Depression Inventory (French Version): Testing for gender-invariant factorial structure for nonclinical adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 9, 166-179.
90. Byrne, B.M., Baron, P., Larsson, B., and Melin, L. (1995). The Beck Depression Inventory: Testing and cross-validating a second-order factorial structure for Swedish nonclinical adolescents. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 345-356.
91. Byrne, B.M., Baron, P., Larsson, B., and Melin, L. (1996). Measuring depression for Swedish nonclinical adolescents: Factorial validity and equivalence of the Beck Depression Inventory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37, 37-45.
92. Byrne, B.M. and Bazana, P.G. (1996). Investigating the measurement of social and academic competencies for early/late preadolescents and adolescents:A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 113-132.
93. Byrne, B.M. and Campbell, T.L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 30, 557-576.
94. Byrne, B.M. and Crombie, G. (2003). Modeling and testing change over time: An introduction to the latent growth curve model. Understanding Statistics: Statistical Issues in Psychology, Education, and the Social Sciences, 2, 177-203.
95. Byrne, B.M. and Goffin, R.D. (1993). Modeling MTMM data from additive and multiplicative covariance structures: An audit of construct validity concordance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 67-96.
96. Byrne, B.M., Lam, W.W.T., and Fielding, R. (2008). Measuring patterns of change in personality assessments: An annotated application of latent growth curve modeling. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 1-11
97. Byrne, B.M. and Shavelson, R.J. (1986). On the structure of adolescent self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 474-481.
98. Byrne, B.M. and Shavelson, R.J. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 599-613.
99. Byrne, B.M., Shavelson, R.J., and Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
100. Byrne, B.M. and Stewart, S.M. (2006). The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 287-321.
101. Byrne, B.M., Stewart, S.M., and Lee, P.W.H. (2004). Validating the Beck Depression Inventory-II for Hong Kong community adolescents. International Journal of Testing, 4, 199-216.
102. Byrne, B.M. and Worth Gavin, D.A. (1996). The Shavelson model revisited: Testing for the structure of academic self-concept across pre-, early, and late adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 215-228.
103. Campbell, D.T. and Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
104. Carlson, M and Mulaik, S.A. (1993). Trait ratings from descriptions of behavior as mediated by components of meaning. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 111-159.
105. Castro-Schilo, L., Widaman, K.F., and Grimm, K.J. (2013). Neglect the structure of multitrait-multimethod data at your peril: Implications for associations with external variables. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 181-207.
106. Castro-Schilo, L., Widaman, K.F., and Grimm, K.J. (2014). Toward improving the modelling of MTMM data: A response to Geiser, Koch, and Eid (2014). Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 524-533.
107. Chen, F.F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504.
108. Chen, F.F., Sousa, K.H., and West, S.G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 471-492.
109. Cheong, J.W., MacKinnon, D.P., and Khoo, S.T. (2003). Investigation of mediational processes using parallel process latent growth curve modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 238-262.
110. Chernick, M. (1999). Bootstrap methods: A practitioner’s guide. New York, NY: Wiley.
111. Cheung, G.W. and Rensvold, R.B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
112. Chinese Behavioral Sciences Society (2000). The Chinese version of the Beck Depression Inventory, Second Edition. Licensed Chinese translation, The Psychological Corporation, New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
113. Chou, C-P., Bentler, P.M., and Satorra, A. (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: A Monte Carlo study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 347-357.
114. Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 115-126.
115. Coenders, G. and Saris, W.E. (2000). Testing nested additive, multiplicative, and general multitrait-multimethod models. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 219-250.
116. Coenders, G., Satorra, A., and Saris, W.E. (1997). Alternative approaches to structural modeling of ordinal data: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 261-282.
117. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
118. Comrey, A.L. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
119. Conway, J.M., Scullen, S.E., Lievens, F., and Lance, C.E. (2004). Bias in the correlated uniqueness model for MTMM data. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 535-559.
120. Cooke, D.J., Kosson, D.S., and Michie, C. (2001). Psychopathy and ethnicity: Structural, item, and test generalizability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) in Caucasian and African American participants. Psychological Assessment, 13, 531-542.
121. Corten, I.W., Saris, W.E., Coenders, G., van der Veld, W., Aalberts, C.E., and Kornelis, C. (2002). Fit of different models for multitrait-multimethod experiments. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 213-232.
122. Cronbach, L.J. (1995). Giving method variance its due. In P.E. Shrout and S.T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory: A festschrift honouring Donald W. Fiske (pp. 145-157). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
123. Cronbach, L.J. and Meehl, P.H. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
124. Cudeck, R. (1988). Multiplicative models and MTMM matrices. Journal of Educational Statistics, 13, 131-147.
125. Cudeck, R. (1989). Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 317-327.
126. Cudeck, R. and Browne, M.W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147-167.
127. Cudeck, R., du Toit, S., and Sörbom, D. (2001). Structural equation modeling: Present and future. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
128. Cudeck, R and Henly, S.J. (1991). Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the “problem” of sample size: A clarification. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 512-519.
129. Curran, P.J. Bauer, D.J., and Willoughby, M.T. (2004). Testing main effects and interactions in latent curve analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 220-237.
130. Curran, P.J., Edwards, M.C., Wirth, R.J., Hussong, A.M., and Chassin, L. (2007). The incorporation of categorical measurement models in the analysis of individual growth. In T.D. Little, J.A. Bovaird and N.A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 89-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
131. Curran, P.J., West., S.G., and Finch, J.F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16-29.
132. Davey, A., Savla, J., and Luo, Z. (2005). Issues in evaluating model fit with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 578-597.
133. DeCarlo, L.T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2, 292-307.
134. Diaconis, P. and Efron, B. (1983). Computer-intensive methods in statistics. Scientific American, 248, 116-130.
135. DiStefano, C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 327-346.
136. Duncan, T.E. and Duncan, S.C. (1994). Modeling incomplete longitudinal substance use data using latent variable growth curve methodology. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 313-338.
137. Duncan, T.E. and Duncan, S.C. (1995). Modeling the processes of development via latent growth curve methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 187-205.
138. Duncan, T.E., Duncan, S.C., Okut, H., Stryker, L.A., and Li, F. (2002). An extension of the general latent variable growth modeling framework to four levels of the hierarchy. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 303-326.
139. Duncan, T.E., Duncan, S.C., and Stryker, L.A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
140. Duncan, T.E., Duncan, S.C., Stryker, L.A., Li, F., and Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
141. Edwards, M.C., Wirth, R.J., Houts, C.R., and Xi, N. (2012). Categorical data in the structural equation modeling framework. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 195-208). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
142. Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1-26.
143. Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
144. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
145. Eid, M. (2000). A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65, 241-261.
146. Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Nussbeck, F.W., and Trierweiler, L.I. (2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: A multiple-indicator CT-C(M-1) model. Psychological Methods, 8, 38-60.
147. Eid, M. and Nussbeck, F.W. (2009) The multitrait-multimethod matrix at 50! Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for Behavioral and Social Sciences, 5, 71.
148. Eid, M., Nussbeck, F.W., Geiser, C., Cole, D.A., Gollwitzer, M., and Lischetzke, T. (2008). Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: different models for different types of methods. Psychological Methods, 13, 230-253.
149. Enders, C.K. (2001a). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128-141.
150. Enders, C.K. (2001b). The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychological Methods, 6, 352-370.
151. Enders, C.K. (2008). A note on the use of missing auxiliary variables in full information maximum likelihood-based structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 434-448.
152. Enders, C.K. and Bandalos, D.L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430-457.
153. Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., and Strahan, E.J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
154. Fan, X., and Sivo, S.A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343-367.
155. Fan, X., Thompson, B., and Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83.
156. Finch, J.F., West, S.G., and MacKinnon, D.P. (1997). Effects of sample size and nonnormality on the estimation of mediated effects in latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 87-107.
157. Finney, S.J. and DiStefano, C. (2006). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G.R. Hancock and R.O. Mueller (Eds.), A second course in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
158. Floyd, F.J. and Widaman, K.F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299.
159. Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., and Rourke, B.P. (1988). Discriminant validity of lateral sensorimotor tests in children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 779-799.
160. Geiser, C., Eid, M., West, S.G., Lischetzke, T., and Nussbeck, F.W. (2012). A comparison of method effects in two confirmatory factor models for structurally different methods. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 409-436.
161. Geiser, C., Koch, T., and Eid, M. (2014). Data-generating mechanisms versus constructively defined latent variables in multitrait-multimethod analysis:A comment on Castro-Schilo, Widaman, and Grimm (2013). Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 509-523.
162. Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., and Rubin, D.B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
163. Gerbing, D.W. and Anderson, J.C. (1984). On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 572-580.
164. Gerbing, D.W. and Anderson, J.C. (1993). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness-offit indices for structural equation models. In K.A. Bollen and J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 40-65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
165. Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
166. Graham, J.W. and Coffman, D.L. (2012). Structural equation modeling with missing data. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 277-295). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
167. Green, S.B., Akey, T.M., Fleming, K.K., Hershberger, S.L., and Marquis, J.G. (1997). Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 108-120.
168. Hagtvet, K.A. and Nasser, F.M. (2004). How well do item parcels represent conceptually defined latent constructs? A two-facet approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 168-193.
169. Hancock, G.R., Kuo, W-L, and Lawrence, F.R. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 470-489.
170. Hancock, G.R. and Liu, M. (2012). Bootstrapping standard errors and data-model fit statistics in structural equation modeling. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 296-306). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
171. Hancock, G.R. and Nevitt, J. (1999). Bootstrapping and the identification of exogenous latent variables within structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 394-99.
172. Harlow, L.L., Mulaik, S.A., and Steiger, J.H. (Eds.). (1997). What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
173. Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global selfworth:A lifespan perspective. In R.J. Sternberg and J. Kolligian (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 67-97). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
174. Hayashi, K and Marcoulides, G.A. (2006). Examining identification issues in factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 631-645.
175. Hernández, A. and González-Romá, V. (2002). Analysis of multitrait-multioccasion data: Additive versus multiplicative models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 59-87.
176. Hershberger, S.L. and Fisher, D.G. (2003). A note on determining the number of imputations for missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 648-650.
177. Hertzog, C., von Oertzen, T., Ghisletta, P., and Lindenberger, U. (2008). Evaluating the power of latent growth curve models to detect individual differences in change. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 541-563.
178. Hoelter, J.W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 325-344.
179. Hofer, S.M. and Hoffman, L. (2007). Statistical analysis with incomplete data:A developmental perspective. In T.D. Little, J.A. Bovaird, and N.A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 13-32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
180. Horn, J.L., McArdle, J.J., and Mason, R. (1983). When is invariance not invariant:A practical scientist’s look at the ethereal concept of factor invariance. Southern Psychologist, 4, 179-188.
181. Horton, N.J., and Kleinman, K.P. (2007). Much ado about nothing: A comparison of missing data methods and software to fit incomplete data regression models. American Statistician, 61, 79-90.
182. Howard, W.J., Rhemtulla, M., and Little, T.D. (2015). Using principal components as auxiliary variables in missing data estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 285-299.
183. Hox, J.J. and Kleiboer, A.M. (2007). Retrospective questions or a diary method? A two-level multitrait-multimethod analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 311-325.
184. Hoyle, R.H. (Ed.) (1995a). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
185. Hoyle, R.H. (1995b). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling:Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
186. Hu, L-T., and Bentler, P.M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
187. Hu, L-T., and Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling:Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
188. Hu, L-T., and Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
189. Hu, L-T., Bentler, P.M., and Kano, Y. (1992) Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351-362.
190. Hwang, H., Takane, Y., and DeSarbo, W.S. (2007). Fuzzy clusterwise growth curve models via generalized estimating equations: An application to the antisocial behavior of children. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 233-259.
191. Ichikawa, M., and Konishi, S. (1995). Application of the bootstrap methods in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 60, 77-93.
192. James, L.R., Mulaik, S.A., and Brett, J.M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
193. Jamshidian, M. and Bentler, P.M. (1999). ML estimation of mean and covariance structures with missing data using complete data routines. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 21-41.
194. Jöreskog, K.G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183-202.
195. Jöreskog, K.G. (1971a). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109-133.
196. Jöreskog, K.G. (1971b). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409-426.
197. Jöreskog, K.G. (1990). New developments in LISREL: Analysis of ordinal variables using polychoric correlations and weighted least squares. Quality and Quantity, 24, 387-404.
198. Jöreskog, K.G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K.A. Bollen and J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
199. Jöreskog, K.G. (1994). On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix. Psychometrika, 59, 381-389.
200. Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software Inc.
201. Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
202. Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1996a). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
203. Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1996b). PRELIS: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
204. Kaplan, D. (1989). Model modification in covariance structure analysis: Application of the expected parameter change statistic. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 285-305.
205. Kaplan, D. and Depaoli, S. (2013). Bayesian statistical methods. In T.D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (pp. 407-437). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
206. Kenny, D.A. (1976). An empirical application of confirmatory factor analysis to the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 247-252.
207. Kenny, D.A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York, NY: Wiley.
208. Kenny, D.A. and Kashy, D.A. (1992). Analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165-172.
209. Kenny, D.A. and Milan, S. (2012). Identification: A nontechnical discussion of a technical issue. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 145-163). New York, NY: Guilford.
210. Kerlinger, F.N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
211. Kim, S. and Hagtvet, K.A. (2003). The impact of misspecified item parceling on representing latent variables in covariance structure modeling: A simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 101-127.
212. Kirk, R.E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.
213. Kishton, J.M. and Widaman, K.F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757-765.
214. Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
215. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guildford.
216. Kohli, N. and Harring, J.R. (2013). Modeling growth in latent variables using piecewise function. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 370-397.
217. Kotz, S., and Johnson, N.I. (1992). Breakthrough in statistics (Vols. 1 and 2). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
218. La Du, T.J. and Tanaka, J.S. (1989). Influence of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on goodness-of-fit assessments in structural equation modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 625-636.
219. LaGrange, B. and Cole, D.A. (2008). An expansion of the trait-state-occasion model:Accounting for shared method variance. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 241-271.
220. Lance, C.E., Noble, C.L., and Scullen, S.E. (2002). A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitraitmultimethod data. Psychological Methods, 7, 228-244.
221. Larsen, R. (2011). Missing data imputation versus full information maximum likelihood with second-level dependencies. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 649-662.
222. Lei, M. and Lomax, R.G. (2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 1-17.
223. Leiter, M.P. (1991). Coping patterns as predictors of burnout: The function of control and escapist coping patterns. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 123-144.
224. Li, F., Duncan, T.E., Duncan, S.C., McAuley, E., Chaumeton, N.R., and Harmer, P. (2001). Enhancing the psychological well-being of elderly individuals through Tai Chi exercise: A latent growth curve analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 493-530.
225. Little, T.D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of crosscultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53-76.
226. Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G., and Widaman, K.F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
227. Little, T.D., Lindenberger, U., and Nesselroade, J.R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good” indicators are bad and “bad” indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192-211.
228. Little, T.D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., and Schoemann, A.M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285-300.
229. Little, R.J.A. and Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley.
230. Little, R.J.A. and Rubin, D.B. (1989). The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 292-326.
231. Loehlin, J.C. (1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analyses. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
232. Long, J.S. (1983a). Confirmatory factor analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
233. Long, J.S. (1983b). Covariance structure models: An introduction to LISREL. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
234. Lunnenborg, C. (2000). Data analysis by resampling: Concepts and applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
235. MacCallum, R.C. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107-120.
236. MacCallum, R.C. (1995). Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
237. MacCallum, R.C. and Austin, J.T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.
238. MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., and Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
239. MacCallum, R.C., Roznowski, M., Mar, M. and Reith, J.V. (1994). Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 1-32.
240. MacCallum, R.C., Roznowski, M., and Necowitz, L.B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490-504.
241. MacCallum, R.C., Wegener, D.T., Uchino, B.N., and Fabrigar, L.R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185-199.
242. MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., and Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
243. Marcoulides, G.A. and Schumacker, R.E. (Eds.) (1996). Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
244. Mardia, K.V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519-530.
245. Mardia, K.V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhya, B36, 115-128.
246. Marsh, H.W. (1988). Multitrait-multimethod analyses. In J.P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research methodology, measurement, and evaluation: An international handbook (pp. 570-578). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
247. Marsh, H.W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47-70.
248. Marsh, H.W. (1992a). Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept: An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, NSW, Australia: Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney.
249. Marsh, H.W. (1992b). Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ) III: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of late adolescent self-concept: An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, NSW, Australia: Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney.
250. Marsh, H.W. (1998). Pairwise deletion for missing data in structural equation models:Nonpositive definite matrices, parameter estimates, goodness of fit, and adjusted sample sizes. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 22-36.
251. Marsh, H.W. and Bailey, M. (1991). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitraitmultimethod data: A comparison of alternative models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47-70.
252. Marsh, H.W. and Balla, J.R. (1994). Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size and model complexity. Quality and Quantity, 28, 185-217.
253. Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R. and McDonald, R.P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
254. Marsh, H.W., Byrne, B.M. and Craven, R. (1992). Overcoming problems in confirmatory factor analyses of MTMM data: The correlated uniqueness model and factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 489-507.
255. Marsh, H.W. and Grayson, D. (1994). Longitudinal stability of means and individual differences: A unified approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 317-359.
256. Marsh, H.W. and Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 177-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
257. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K-T., Balla, J.R., and Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181-220.
258. Marsh, H.W., Lüdke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A.J.S., and Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two things don’t make a right - Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18, 257-284.
259. Maslach, C. and Jackson, S.E. (1981). Maslach Burnout Inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
260. Maslach, C. and Jackson, S.E. (1986). Maslach Burnout Inventory manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
261. Matsueda, R.L. (2012). Key advances in the history of structural equation modeling. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 17-42). New York, NY: Guilford.
262. McArdle, J.J. (1994). Structural factor analysis experiments with incomplete data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 409-454.
263. McArdle, J.J. (2012). Latent curve modeling of longitudinal growth data. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling pp. 547-570. New York, NY: Guilford.
264. McArdle, J.J. and Epstein, D. (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Development, 58, 110-133.
265. McDonald, R.P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
266. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543.
267. Meredith, W. and Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107-122.
268. Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156-166.
269. Millsap, R.E. (1995). The statistical analysis of method effects in multitraitmultimethod data: A review. In P.E. Shrout and S.T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory: A festschrift honouring Donald W. Fiske (pp. 93-109). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
270. Millsap, R.E. and Kwok, O-M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factorial equivalence on selection in two populations. Psychological Methods, 9, 93-115.
271. Moustaki, I. (2001). A review of exploratory factor analysis for ordinal categorical data. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, and D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling:present and future (pp. 461-480). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software.
272. Mulaik, S.A. (2009). The foundations of factor analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.
273. Mulaik, S.A., James, L.R., Van Altine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., and Stilwell, C.D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445.
274. Muthén, B.O. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115-132.
275. Muthén, B.O. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. In A.E. Raftery (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1997 (pp. 453-481). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
276. Muthén, B. and Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171-189.
277. Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., and Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 431-462.
278. Muthén, L.K. and Muthén, B.O. (1998-2012). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
279. Noreen, E.W. (1989). Computer-intensive methods for testing hypotheses. New York, NY: Wiley.
280. O’Brien, R.M. (1985) The relationship between ordinal measures and their underlying values: Why all the disagreement? Quality and Quantity, 19, 265-277.
281. Pettegrew, L.S. and Wolf, G.E. (1982). Validating measures of teacher stress. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 373-396.
282. Pomplun, M. and Omar, M.H. (2003) Do minority representative reading passages provide factorially invariant scores for all students? Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 276-288.
283. Preacher, K.J. and MacCallum, R.C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13-43.
284. Raaijmakers, Q.A. (1999). Effectiveness of different missing data treatments in surveys with Likert-type data: Introducing the relative mean substitution approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 725-748.
285. Raftery, A.E. (1993). Bayesian model selection in structural equation models. In Bollen, K.A., and Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 163-180). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
286. Raykov, T. (2005). Analysis of longitudinal studies with missing data using covariance structure modeling with full-information maximum likelihood. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 493-505.
287. Raykov, T. and Marcoulides, G.A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
288. Raykov, T. and Widaman, K.F. (1995). Issues in structural equation modeling research. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 289-318.
289. Reise, S.P., Widaman, K.F., and Pugh, P.H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552-566.
290. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Laird, P.E., and Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354-373.
291. Rindskopf, D. and Rose, T. (1988). Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 51-67.
292. Rogers, W.M. and Schmitt, N. (2004). Parameter recovery and model fit using multidimensional composites: A comparison of four empirical parceling algorithms. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 379-412.
293. Rogosa, D.R., Brandt, D., and Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 726-748.
294. Rogosa, D.R. and Willett, J.B. (1985). Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth. Psychometrika, 50, 203-228.
295. Rosén, M. (1998). Gender differences in hierarchically ordered ability dimensions:The impact of missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 37-62.
296. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
297. Rovine, M.J. and Delaney, M. (1990). Missing data estimation in developmental research. In A. Von Eye (Ed.), Statistical methods in longitudinal research: Vol. I. Principles and structuring change (pp. 35-79). New York, NY: Academic Press.
298. Rozeboom, W.W. (1960). The fallacy of the null hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416-428.
299. Rubin, D.B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581-592.
300. Saris, W.E. and Aalberts, C. (2003). Different explanations for correlated disturbance terms in MTMM studies. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 193-213.
301. Saris, W. and Stronkhorst, H. (1984). Causal modeling: nonexperimental research: An introduction to the LISREL approach. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.
302. Saris, W.E., Satorra, A., and Sörbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models. In C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1987 (pp. 105-130). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
303. Satorra, A. and Bentler, P.M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. American Statistical Association 1988 proceedings of the business and economics section (pp. 308-313). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
304. Satorra, A. and Bentler, P.M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye and C.C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
305. Satorra, A. and Saris, W.E. (1985). Power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika, 50, 83-90.
306. Savalei, V. (2010). Expected versus observed information in SEM with incomplete normal and nonnormal data. Psychological Methods, 15, 352-367.
307. Savalei, V. and Bentler, P.M. (2005). A statistically justified pairwise ML method for incomplete nonnormal data: A comparison with direct ML and pairwise ADF. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 183-214.
308. Savalei, V. and Bentler, P.M. (2009). A two-stage approach to missing data: Theory and application to auxiliary variables. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 477-497.
309. Schafer, J.L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman and Hall.
310. Schafer, J.L. and Graham, J.W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
311. Schafer, J.L. and Olsen, M.K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 545-571.
312. Schmidt, F.L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
313. Schmitt, N., and Stults, D.M. (1986). Methodology review: Analysis of multitraitmultimethod matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 1-22.
314. Schumacker, R.E. and Lomax, R.G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
315. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
316. Sechrest, L., Davis, M.F., Stickle, T.R., and McKnight, P.E. (2000). Understanding “method” variance. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Research design: Donald Campbell’s legacy (pp. 63-87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
317. Selig, J. P., Card, N. A., and Little, T. D. (2008). Latent variable structural equation modeling in cross-cultural research: Multigroup and multilevel approaches. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, D. A. van Hemert, and Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 93-119). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
318. Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.J., and Stanton, G.C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
319. Shin T., Davison, M.L., and Long, J.D. (2009). Effects of missing data methods in structural equation modeling with nonnormal longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 70-98.
320. Singer, J.D. and Willett, J.D. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford.
321. Sinharay, S., Stern, H.S., and Russell, D. (2001). The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data. Psychological Methods, 6, 317-329.
322. Soares, A.T. and Soares, L.M. (1979). The Affective Perception Inventory: Advanced Level. Trumbell, CT: ALSO.
323. Sobel, M.F. and Bohrnstedt, G.W. (1985). Use of null models in evaluating the fit of covariance structure models. in N.B. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1985 (pp. 152-178). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
324. Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structures between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229-239.
325. Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
326. Steiger, J.H. (1998). A note on multiple sample extensions of the RMSEA fit index. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 411-419.
327. Steiger, J.H. and Lind, J.C. (1980, June). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometric Society Annual Meeting, Iowa City, IA.
328. Sterba, S.K., and MacCallum, R.C. (2010). Variability in parameter estimates and model fit across repeated allocations of items to parcels. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 322-358.
329. Stine, R.A. (1990). An introduction to bootstrap methods: Examples and ideas. Sociological Methods and Research, 8, 243-291.
330. Stoel, R.D., Garre, F.G., Dolan, C., and van den Wittenboer, W.W. (2006). On the Likelihood Ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints. Psychological Methods, 11, 439-455.
331. Sugawara, H.M. and MacCallum, R.C. (1993). Effect of estimation method on incremental fit indexes for covariance structure models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 365-377.
332. Tanaka, J.S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In J.A. Bollen and J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
333. Tanaka, J.S. and Huba, G.J. (1984). Confirmatory hierarchical factor analyses of psychological distress measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 621-635.
334. Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25, 26-30.
335. Tomarken, A.J. and Waller, N.G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 2.1-2.35.
336. Tomás, J.M., Hontangas, P.M., and Oliver, A. (2000). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 469-499.
337. Tucker, L.R. and Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10
338. van de Schoot, R., Kaplan, D., Denisson, J., Asendorpf, J.B., Neyer, F.J., and van Aken, M.A.G. (2014). A gentle introduction to Bayesian analysis: Applications to development research. Child Development, 85, 842-860.
339. Vogt, W.P. (1993). Dictionary of statistics and methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
340. Wang, S., Wang, N., and Hoadley, D. (2007). Construct equivalence of a national certification examination that uses dual languages and audio assistance. International Journal of Testing, 7, 255-268.
341. Weng, L-J., and Cheng, C-P. (1997) Why might relative fit indices differ between estimators? Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 121-128.
342. West, S.G., Finch, J.F., and Curran, P.J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
343. Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 118-154.
344. Wheaton, B., Muthén, B., Alwin, D.F., and Summers, G.F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D.R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1977 (pp. 84-136). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
345. Whittaker, T.A., and Stapleton, L.M. (2006). The performance of cross-validation indices used to select among competing covariance structure models under multivariate nonnormality conditions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 295-335.
346. Widaman, K.F. (1985). Hierarchically tested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-26.
347. Widaman, K.F. and Reise, S.P. (1997). Exploring the measurement equivalence of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K.J. Bryant, M. Windle, and S.G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention (pp. 281-324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
348. Willett, J.B. (1988). Questions and answers in the measurement of change. In E.Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 15, pp. 345-422). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
349. Willett, J.B. (1989). Some results on reliability for the longitudinal measurement of change: Implications for the design of studies of individual growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 587-602.
350. Willett, J.B. and Keiley, M.K. (2000). Using covariance structure analysis to model change over time. In H.E.A. Tinsley and S.D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 665-694). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
351. Willett, J.B. and Sayer, A.G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 363-381.
352. Willett, J.B. and Sayer, A.G. (1996). Cross-domain analyses of change over time: Combining growth modeling and covariance structure analysis. In G.A. Marcoulides and R.E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 125-157). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
353. Williams, L.J. and Holahan, P.J. (1994) Parsimony-based fit indices for multipleindicator models: Do they work? Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 161-189.
354. Wood, J.M., Tataryn, D.J., and Gorsuch, R.L. (1996). Effects of under- and overextraction on principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotation. Psychological Methods, 1, 354-365.
355. Wothke, W. (1993). Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In K.A. Bollen and J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 256-293). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
356. Wothke, W. (1996). Models for multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis. In G.A. Marcoulides and R.E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling:Issues and techniques (pp. 7-56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
357. Yuan, K.-H. and Bentler, P.M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology (pp. 165-200). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
358. Yuan, K.-H., Lambert, P.L., and Fouladi, R.T. (2004). Mardia’s multivariate kurtosis with missing data. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 39, 413-437.
359. Yung, Y-F. and Bentler, P.M. (1994). Bootstrap-corrected ADF test statistics in covariance structure analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 63-84.
360. Yung, Y-F. and Bentler, P.M. (1996). Bootstrapping techniques in analysis of mean and covariance structures. In G.A. Marcoulides and R.E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 195-226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
361. Zhang, L., Jin, R., Leite, W.L., and Algina, J. (2014). Additive models for multitraitmultimethod data with a multiplicative trait-method relationship: A simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 68-80.
362. Zhu, W. (1997). Making bootstrap statistical inferences: A tutorial. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 44-55.