A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions

Psychometrika

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 241-261

  Eid, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Classical test theory; Construct validity; Multitrait multimethod models; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034345716     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02294377     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Arbuckle, J.L. (1995). Amos for Windows. Analysis of moment structures (Version 3.5). Chicago, IL: Smallwaters.
2. Bagozzi, R.P. (1993). Assessing construct validity in personality research: Applications to measures of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 49-87.
3. Bentler, P. (1992). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
4. Brannick, M.T., & Spector, P.E. (1990). Estimation problems in the block-diagonal model of the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 325-339.
5. Browne, MW. (1984). The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 1-21.
6. Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
7. Cudeck, R. (1988). Multiplicative models and MTMM matrices. Journal of Educational Statistics, 13, 131-147.
8. Eid, M. (1996). Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis for polytomous item responses: Model definition and model selection on the basis of stochastic measurement theory. Methods of Psychological Research - Online, 1, 65-85.
9. Eid, M. (1997). Sonnenschutzverhalten: Ein typologischer Ansatz [Sun-protection behavior: A typological approach]. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 5, 73-90.
10. Eid, M., Klusemann, J., & Schwenkmezger, P. (1996). Motivation zum Sonnenschutz: Ein Experiment zu den Auswirkungen von Aufklrungsbotschaften auf die Intention zum Sonnenschutz und das Sonnenschutzverhalten [Sun-protection motivation: An experiment on the effects of messages on sun-protection intentions and behavior]. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 4, 270-289.
11. Eid, M., Schneider, C., & Schwenkmezger, P. (1995). Do you feel better or worse? On the validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits. European Journal of Personality 13, 283-306.
12. Grayson, D., & Marsh, H W. (1994). Identification with deficient rank loading matrices in confirmatory factor analysis: Multitrait-multimethod models. Psychometrika, 59, 121-134.
13. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
14. Kenny, D.A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.
15. Kenny, D.A., & Kashy, D.A. (1992). The analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165-172.
16. Lord, F.M., & Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17. Marsh, H.W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 335-361.
18. Marsh, H.W., Byrne, B.M., & Craven, R. (1992). Overcoming problems in confirmatory factor analyses of MTMM data: The correlated uniqueness model and factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 489-507.
19. Marsh, H.W., & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 177-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Marsh, H.W., & Hocevar, D. (1988). A new, more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 107-117.
21. Millsap, R.E. (1995). The statistical analysis of method effects in multitrait-multimethod data: A review. In P.E. Shrout & S.T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory. A festschrift honoring D.W. Fiske (pp. 93-109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Mount, M.K. (1984). Psychometric properties of subordinate ratings of managerial performance. Personnel Psychology, 37, 687-702.
23. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
24. Saris, W.E., & Andrews, F.M. (1991). Evaluation of measurement instruments using a structural modeling approach. In P.P. Biemer, R.M. Groves, L.E. Lyberg, N.A. Mathiowetz, & S. Sudman (Eds.), Measurement errors in surveys (pp. 575-597). New York. Wiley.
25. Saris, W.E., & van Meurs, A. (1991). Evaluation of measurement instruments by meta-analysis of multitrait-multimethod studies. Amsterdam: North Holland.
26. Schmitt, N., & Stults, D.M. (1986). Methodological review: Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 1-22.
27. Shrout, P.E., & Fiske, S.T. (Eds.) (1995). Personality research, methods, and theory. A festschrift honoring D.W. Fiske (pp. 93-109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Steyer, R. (1988). Conditional expectations: An introduction to the concept and its applications in empirical sciences. Methodika, 2, 53-78.
29. Steyer, R. (1989). Models of classical psychometric test theory as stochastic measurement models: Representation, uniqueness, meaningfulness, identifiability, and testability. Methodika, 3, 25-60.
30. West, S.G., Finch, J.F., & Curran, P.J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
31. Widaman, K.F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-26.
32. Wothke, W. (1996). Models for multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis. In G.A. Marcoulides & R E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling. Issues and techniques (pp. 7-56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Zimmerman, D.W. (1975). Probability spaces, Hilbert spaces, and the axioms of test theory. Psychometrika, 40, 395-412.
34. Zimmerman, D.W. (1976). Test theory with minimal assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 85-96.