Using Principal Components as Auxiliary Variables in Missing Data Estimation

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 285-299

  Howard, Waylon J ^a   Rhemtulla, Mijke ^b   Little, Todd D ^c  

^a SEATTLE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL BIAS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMMUNICATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; INFANT; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 84931569171     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2014.999267     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. T.Asparouhov,, & B.Muthén, (2010). Multiple imputation with Mplus: Technical report.www.statmodel.com
2. E.R.Buhi,, P.Goodson,, & T.B.Neilands, (2008). Out of sight, not out of mind: Strategies for handling missing data. American Journal of Health Behavior, 32(1), 83–92.
3. L.M.Collins,, J.L.Schafer,, & C.M.Kam, (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 330–351.
4. C.K.Enders, (2001). The performance of the full information maximum likelihood estimator in multiple regression models with missing data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(5), 713–740.
5. C.K.Enders, (2002). Applying the Bollen-Stine bootstrap for goodness-of-fit measures to structural equation models with missing data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 359–377.
6. C.K.Enders, (2003). Using the expectation maximization algorithm to estimate coefficient alpha for scales with item-level missing data. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 322–337.
7. C.K.Enders, (2008). A note on the use of missing auxiliary variables in full information maximum likelihood-based structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15(3), 434–448.
8. C.K.Enders, (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
9. C.K.Enders,, & D.L.Bandalos, (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430–457.
10. C.K.Enders,, & A.C.Gottschall, (2011). Multiple imputation strategies for multiple group structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 18(1), 35–54.
11. C.K.Enders,, & J.L.Peugh, (2004). Using an EM covariance matrix to estimate structural equation models with missing data: Choosing an adjusted sample size to improve the accuracy of inferences. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(1), 1–19.
12. L.S.Fuchs, (2004). The past, present, and future of curriculum-based measurement research. School Psychology Review, 33(2), 188–192.
13. J.W.Graham, (2003). Adding missing-data-relevant variables to FIML-based structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(1), 80–100.
14. J.W.Graham, (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.
15. J.W.Graham,, P.E.Cumsille,, & A.E.Shevock, (2013). Methods for handling missing data. In J.A.Schinka & W.F.Velicer (Eds.), Research Methods in Psychology (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Wiley.
16. J.W.Graham,, A.E.Olchowski,, & T.D.Gilreath, (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8(3), 206–213.
17. C.R.Greenwood,, D.Walker,, J.Buzhardt,, W.J.Howard,, L.McCune,, & R.A.Anderson,, (2013). Evidence of a continuum in foundational expressive communication skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 540–554.
18. J.Hardt,, M.Herke,, & R.Leonhart, (2012). Auxiliary variables in multiple imputation in regression with missing X: A warning against including too many in small sample research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 184–197.
19. R.J.A.Little,, & D.B.Rubin,, (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
20. T.D.Little,, W.J.Howard, E.K.McConnell,, & K.N.Stump, (2011). Missing data in large data projects: Two methods of missing data imputation when working with large data projects. Retrieved June 15, 2012, from http://www.quant.ku.edu/resources/guides.html
21. L.K.Muthén,, & B.O.Muthén, (2011). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
22. J.L.Peugh,, & C.K.Enders, (2004). Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74, 525–556.
23. SAS Institute. (2012). SAS/STAT 9.3 user's guide: SAS Institute.
24. J.L.Schafer,, & J.W.Graham, (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177.
25. T.Von Hippel,. 2009. How to impute interactions, squares, and other transformed variables. Sociological Methodology, 39(1), 265–291.
26. K.F.Widaman, (2007). Common factors versus components: Principals and principles, errors and misconceptions. In R.Cudeck & R.C.MacCallum (Eds.), Factor analysis at 100 (pp. 177–203). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. J.E.Yoo, (2009). The effect of auxiliary variables and multiple imputation on parameter estimation in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 929–947.