Gender differences in hierarchically ordered ability dimensions: The impact of missing data

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 37-62

  Rosén, Monica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79851504917     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705519809540088     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allison, P. D. (1987). Estimation of linear models with incomplete data. In C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 71-103). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Allison, P. D., & Hauser, R. M. (1991). Reducing bias in estimates of linear models by remeasurement of a random subsample. Sociological Methods & Research, 19, 466-492.
3. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243-277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos users' guide. Version 3.6. Chicago: SmallWaters.
5. Balke-Aurell, G., & Lindblad, T. (1980). Lär de sig något? Ord och grammatikkunskaper i engelska från årskurs 5 i gmndskolan till 3/3 av gymnasiet [Are they learning anything? Knowledge in English vocabulary and grammar from Grade 5 in compulsory school to the third year in upper secondary school] (Rep. No. 99). Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University, Department of Education.
6. Becker, B. J., & Hedges, L. V. (1984). Meta-analysis of cognitive gender differences: A comment on an analysis by Rosenthal and Rubin. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 583-587.
7. Byrne, B., & Shavelson, R. (1989). Adolescent self-concept: Testing the assumption of equivalent structure across gender. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 365-385.
8. Chipman, S. F., Brush, L. R., & Wilson, D. M. (Eds.). (1985). Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Cleary, T. A. (1992). Gender differences in aptitude and achievement test scores. In J. Pfleiderer (Ed.), Sex equity in educational opportunity, achievement and testing. Proceedings of the 1991 ETS Invitational Conference (pp. 51-90). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
10. Einarsson, J., & Hultman, T. (1984). Godmorgon pojkar och flicker. Om språk och kön i skolan [Good morning boys and girls. Focusing communication and gender in school]. Stockholm: Liber förlag.
11. Feingold, A. (1992a). The greater male variability controversy: Science versus politics. Review of Educational Research, 62, 89-90.
12. Feingold, A. (1992b). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62, 61-84.
13. Feingold, A. (1993). Joint effects of gender differences in central tendency and gender differences in variability. Review of Educational Research, 63, 106-109.
14. Fennema, E. (1980). Sex differences in mathematics achievement: Where and why. In L. H. Fox & D. Tobin (Eds.), Women and the mathematical mystique (pp. 76-93). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
15. Fennema, E., & Leder, G. C. (1990). Mathematics and gender. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Gustafsson, J-E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179-203.
17. Gustafsson, J-E., Lindström, B., & Björck-Akesson, E. (1981). A general model for the organization of cognitive abilities (Rep. No. 1981:6). Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University.
18. Gustafsson, J-E., & Stahl, P-A. (1996). STREAM'S users guide. Version 1.7 for Windows. Mölndal, Sweden: Multivariate Ware.
19. Hedges, L. V., & Friedman, L. (1993a). Computing gender difference effects in tails of distributions: The consequences of differences in tail size, effect size, and variance ratio. Review of Educational Research, 63, 110-112
20. Hedges, L. V., & Friedman, L. (1993b). Gender differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A reanalysis of Feingold's results. Review of Educational Research, 63, 94-105
21. Hirdman, Y. (1987). Makt och kön [Power and gender]. In O. Peterson (Ed.), Maktbegreppet (pp. 188-206). Stockholm: Carlssons förlag.
22. Hyde, J. S. (1981). How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using w2 and d. American Psychologist, 36, 892-901
23. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7. A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS.
24. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modelling with the S1MPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
25. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. R. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
26. Madow, W. G., Nisselson, H., & Olkin, I. (1983). Incomplete data in sample surveys. Volume 1. Report and case studies. New York: Academic.
27. Madow, W. G., & Olkin, I. (1983). Incomplete data in sample surveys. Volume 3. Proceedings of the symposium. New York: Academic.
28. Madow, W. G., Olkin, I., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). Incomplete data in sample surveys. Volume 2. Theory and bibliographies. New York. Academic.
29. Mäkitalo, Å., & Reuterberg, S-E. (1996). Who takes the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test? A study of differential selection to the SweSAT in relation to gender and ability (Rep. No. 1996:03). Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University, Department of Education and Educational Research.
30. Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modelling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 431-462.
31. Muthén, B., Khoo, S-T., & Nelson Goff, G. (1994, April). Multidimensional description of subgroup differences in mathematics achievement data from the 1992 national assessment of educational progress. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
32. Neale, M. C. (1995). Mx. Statistical modeling (3rd ed.). Richmond, VA: Department of Psychology, Medical College of Virginia.
33. Noddings, N. (1992). Variability: A pernicious hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 62, 85-88.
34. Reuterberg, S-E., Westerlund, A., & Gustafsson, J-E. (1992). Beror gruppskillnaderna på tidigare selektion i utbildningssystemet [Are group-differences affected by earlier selection in the education system]? Betyg och högskoleprov för man och kvinnor. Rapport från ett seminarium. UHä -RAPPORT1992: 3 [Grades and SAT for males and females. Report from a seminar; Rep. No. 1992:3]. Stockholm: National Swedish Board for Universities and Colleges.
35. Rosén, M. (1995). Gender differences in structure, means and variances of hierarchically ordered ability dimensions. Learning and Instruction, 5, 37-62.
36. Rovine, M. J. (1994). Latent variable models and missing data analysis. In A. von Eye & C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis. Applications for developmental research (pp. 181-255). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Rubin, R. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.
38. Wemersson, I. (1977). Köndsdifferentieringen i grundskolan [Gender differentiation in compulsory school; Göteborg studies in educational sciences 22]. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothenburghensis.
39. Wemersson, I. (1989). Olika kön samma skola? En kunskapsöversikt om hur elevemas könstillhörighet påverkar deras skolsituation. [Different sex same school? A research review of how student gender affects the school situation] Skolöverstyrelsen, Vad säger forskningen F 89:1 [National Board of Education. What does the Research tell us?; Rep. No. F 89:1].
40. Wernersson, I. (1991). Könsskillnader i gymnasieskolan. En kunskapsöversikt. [Gender differences in upper secondary school. A research review] Skolöverstyrelsen, Vad säger forskningen F 91:2 [National Board of Education. What does the Research tell us?; Rep. No. F 91:2].
41. Wilkinson, L. C., & Marrett, C. B. (1985). Gender influences in classroom interaction. New York: Academic.
42. Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the Embedded Figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
43. Öhrn, E. (1990). Könsmönster i klassrumsinteraktion. En observations- och intervjustudie av högstadieelvers lärarkontakter [Gender pattern in classroom interaction, Göteborg studies in educational sciences 77]. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburghensis.
44. Öhm, E. (1993). Gender, influence and resistance in school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14, 147-158.