Retrospective questions or a diary method? A two-level multitrait- multimethod analysis

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 311-325

  Hox, Joop J ^a   Kleiboer, Annet M ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STATISTICAL METHODS;

DATA COMPLEXITY; FORMATIVE CONSTRUCTS; LATENT VARIABLE; MULTI METHODS; RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY; TRANSIENT EVENTS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 34247541974     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705510709336748     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305-314.
2. Grilli, L., & Rampichini, C. (2005). Multilevel factor models for ordinal variables. Retrieved March 20, 2006, from http://www.ds.unifi.it/ rampi/multilevel_ordinal_factor.pdf
3. Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Hoyle, R. H., Harris, M. J., & Judd, C. M. (2002). Research methods in social relations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5. Kenny, D. A. (1995). The effect of nonindependence on significance testing in dyadic research. Personal Relationships, 2, 67-75.
6. Little, R., & Rubin, D. (2004). Statistical analysis with missing data (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
7. Lord, R M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Marsh, H., & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait-multirnethod data. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 177-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus ' users guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
10. Newsom, J. T. (2002). A multilevel structural equation model for dyadic data. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 431-447.
11. Raudenbush, S. W., Rowan, B., & Kang, S. J. (1991). A multilevel, multivariate model for studying school climate with estimation via the EM algorithm and application to U.S. high-school data. Journal of Educational Statistics, 16, 295-330.
12. Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. (1999). Ecometrics: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observations of neighborhoods. Sociological Methodology, 29, 1-41.
13. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). On multilevel model reliability estimation from the perspective of structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 130-141.
14. Raykov, T., & Shrout, P. E. (2002). Reliability of scales with general structure: Point and interval estimation using a structural equation modeling approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 195-212.
15. Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93-105.
16. Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
17. van Sonderen, E. (1991). Het Meten van Sociale Steun [The measurement of social support]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Groningen University.
18. Widaman, K. A. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait- multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-21.