Patterns of rhetorical organization in Canadian and American language arts textbooks: An exploratory study

English for Specific Purposes

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 180-202

  Shi, Ling ^a   Kubota, Ryuko ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847619345     PISSN: 08894906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bazerman C. The life of genre, the life in the classroom. In: Bishop W., and Ostrom H. (Eds). Genre and writing: issues, arguments, alternatives (1997), Boynton/Cook Publishers, Portsmouth, NH 19-26
2. Bhatia V.K. Integrating products, processes, purposes and in professional writing. In: Candlin C.N., and Hyland K. (Eds). Writing: texts, processes and practices (1999), Longman, London 21-39
3. Candlin C., and Hyland K. Introduction: integrating approaches to the study of writing. In: Candlin C.N., and Hyland K. (Eds). Writing: texts, processes and practices (1999), Longman, London 1-17
4. Casanave C. Controversies in second language writing: dilemmas and decisions in research and instruction (2004), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
5. Chuppa-Cornell K. Rethinking the five-paragraph essay as a tool for teaching the GED writing test. Adult Learning 7 3 (1996) 11-12
6. Coe R.M. The new rhetoric of genre: writing political beliefs. In: Johns A.M. (Ed). Genre in the classroom; multiple perspectives (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 197-207
7. Coe R.M., and Freedman A. Genre theory: Australian and north American approaches. In: Kenney M.L. (Ed). Theorizing composition: A critical sourcebook of theory and scholarship in contemporary composition studies (1998), Greenwood Publishing, Westport, CT 136-147
8. Connor U. Contrastive rhetoric: cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
9. Crowhurst M. The development of persuasive/argumentative writing. In: Beach R., and Hynds S. (Eds). Developing discourse practices in adolescence and adulthood (1990), Ablex, Norwood, NJ 200-223
10. Dean D.M. Muddying boundaries: mixing genres with five paragraphs. English Journal 90 1 (2000) 53-56
11. Devitt A.J. Generalizing about genre: new conceptions of an old concept. College composition and communication 44 4 (1993) 573-586
12. Devitt A.J. Genre as language standard. In: Bishop W., and Ostrom H. (Eds). Genre and writing: issues, arguments, alternatives (1997), Boynton/Cook Publishers, Portsmouth, NH 45-55
13. Dias P., Freedman A., Medway P., and Paré A. Worlds apart: acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts (1999), Lawrence Eribaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ.
14. Emig, J. (1971). The composing process of twelfth graders (NCTE research report No. 13). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
15. Fahnestock J. Genre and rhetorical craft. Research in the Teaching of English 27 3 (1993) 265-271
16. Fairclough N. Orders of discourse. Education Australia Issue 20 (1995) 27-28
17. Freedman A. Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English 27 3 (1993) 222-249
18. Freedman A. Situating genre: a rejoinder. Research in the Teaching of English 27 3 (1993) 272-281
19. Freedman A. 'Do as I say': The relationship between teaching and learning new genres. In: Freedman A., and Medway P. (Eds). Genre and the new rhetoric (1994), Taylor & Francis, London 191-211
20. Freedman A. Beyond the text: towards understanding the teaching and learning of genres. TESOL Quarterly 33 4 (1999) 764-766
21. Freedman A., and Medway P. Introduction: new views of genre and their implications for education. In: Freedman A., and Medway P. (Eds). Learning and teaching genre (1994), Boynton/Cook Publishers, Portsmouth, NH 1-24
22. Giddens A. The constitution of society (1984), University of California Press, Berkley
23. Grabe W., and Kaplan R.B. Writing in a second language: contrastive rhetoric. In: Johnson D.M., and Roen D.H. (Eds). Richness in writing: empowering ESL students (1989), Longman, New York, London 263-283
24. Hillocks G. The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning (2002), Teachers College Press, New York
25. Hinds J. Reader versus writer responsibility: a new typology. In: Connor U., and Kaplan R.B. (Eds). Writing across languages: analysis of L2 text (1987), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA 141-152
26. Hinds J. Inductive, deductive, quasi-inductive: expository writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and Thai. In: Connor U., and Johns A.M. (Eds). Coherence in writing: research and pedagogical perspectives (1990), TESOL, Alexandria, VA 87-109
27. Johns A.M. Introduction: genre in the classroom. In: Johns A.M. (Ed). Genre in the classroom; multiple perspectives (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 3-13
28. Johns A.M. Genre and ESL/EFL composition instruction. In: Kroll B. (Ed). Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 195-217
29. Johnson T.S., Smagorinsky P., Thompson L., and Fry P.G. Learning to teach the five-paragraph theme. Research in the Teaching of English 38 (2003) 136-176
30. Kaplan R.B. Contrastive rhetoric and second language learning: notes towards a theory of contrastive rhetoric. In: Purves A.C. (Ed). Writing across languages and cultures (1988), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA 275-304
31. Kubota R. Japanese identities in written communication: politics and discourses. In: Donahue R.T. (Ed). Exploring Japaneseness: on Japanese enactments of culture and consciousness (2002), Ablex, Westport, CT 293-315
32. Kubota R., and Shi L. Instruction and reading samples for opinion and argumentative writing in L1 junior high school textbooks in China and Japan. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 15 (2005) 97-127
33. Lewis S. Ten years of puzzling about audience awareness. Clearing House 74 4 (2001) 191-197
34. Miller C. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of speech 70 (1984) 151-167
35. Miller C.R. Rhetorical community: the cultural basis of genre. In: Freedman A., and Medway P. (Eds). Genre and the new rhetoric (1994), Taylor & Francis, London 67-78
36. Nunnally T.E. Breaking the five paragraph theme barrier. English Journal 80 1 (1991) 67-71
37. Perrin R. 10:00 and 2:00: A 10-paragraph defense of the five-paragraph theme. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 27 (2000) 312-314
38. Reid J. English as second language composition in higher education: the expectations of the academic audience. In: Johnson D.M., and Roen D.H. (Eds). Richness in writing: empowering ESL students (1989), Longman, New York, London 220-234
39. Reid J. US academic readers, ESL writers, and second sentences. Journal of Second Language Writing 5 (1996) 129-161
40. Rorschach E. The five-paragraph theme redux. The Quarterly 26 1 (2004) 16-25
41. Schryer C.F. The lab vs. the clinic: sites of competing genres. In: Freedman A., and Medway P. (Eds). Genre and the new rhetoric (1994), Taylor & Francis, London 105-124
42. Wesley K. The ill effects of the five paragraph theme. English Journal 90 1 (2000) 57-60
43. Wiley M. The popularity of formulaic writing (and why we need to resist). English Journal 90 1 (2000) 61-67
44. Williams J.M., and Colomb G.G. The case for explicit teaching: why what you do not know would not help you. Research in the Teaching of English 27 3 (1993) 252-264