Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in english as a foreign language

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 313-338

  Taguchi, Naoko ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447562633     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00061.x     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Ackerman, P. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 117, 288-318.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications (3rd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
3. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a theory of mind?. Cognition, 21, 37-46.
5. Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. Scarcella, D. Andersen, & S. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 55-74). New York: Newbury House.
6. Bialystok, E. (1990). Communication strategies. Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. Bouton, L. (1992). The interpretation of implicature in English by NNS: Does it come automatically without being explicitly taught? Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series, 3, 64-77.
9. Bouton, L. (1994). Can NNS skill in interpreting implicature in American English be improved through explicit instruction?: A pilot study. Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series, 5, 88-108.
10. Bouton, L. (1999). Developing nonnative speaker skills in interpreting conversational implicatures in English. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 47-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Brown, J. D. (1990). The use of multiple t tests in language research. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 770-772.
12. Cameron, R., & Williams, J. (1997). Sentence to ten cents: A case study of relevance and communicative success in nonnative-native speaker interactions in a medical setting. Applied Linguistics, 18, 415-445.
13. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical aspects of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
14. Carber, R. P. (1990). Reading rate: A review of research and theory. New York: Academic Press.
15. Carrell, P. L. (1981). Relative difficulty of request forms in L1/L2 comprehension. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL '81 (pp. 141-152). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
16. Carrell, P. L. (1984). Inferencing in ESL: Presuppositions and implications of factive and implicative predicates. Language Learning, 34, 1-19.
17. Cedrus. (2003). SuperLab 3.0. San Pedro, CA: Author.
18. Cook, M., & Liddicoat, A. J. (2002). The development of comprehension in inter-language pragmatics: The case of request strategies in English. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 19-39.
19. DeKeyser, R. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 124-151). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. ETS. (2003). TOEFL testing program. Princeton, NJ: Author. Available from http://www.ets.org/toefl.
21. ETS. (2005). TOEFL test and score data summary: 2004-2005 test year data (Report No. TOEFL-SUM-0405-DATA). Princeton, NJ: Author. Available from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/TOEFL-SUM-0405-DATA.pdf
22. Freed, B. (2000). Is fluency, like beauty, in the eyes (and ears) of the beholder? In H. Riggenback (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 243-265). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23. Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 277-303.
24. Fukkink, R., Hulstijn, J., & Simis, A. (2005). Does training in second-language word recognition skills affect reading comprehension? An experimental study. Modern Language Journal, 89, 54-75.
25. Garcia, P. (2004). Developmental differences in speech act recognition: A pragmatic awareness study. Language Awareness, 13, 96-115.
26. Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (1988). Creative automatization: Principles for promoting fluency within a communicative framework. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 473-492.
27. Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 325-353.
28. Goffman, E. (1976). Replies and responses. Language in Society, 5, 254-313.
29. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
30. Hala, S., & Carpendale, J. (1997). All in the mind: Children's understanding of mental life. In S. Hara (Ed.), The development of social cognition (pp. 189-240). East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.
31. Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
32. Hirai, A. (1999). The relationship between listening and reading rates of Japanese EFL learners. Modern Language Journal, 83, 367-384.
33. Holtgraves, T. (1999). Comprehending indirect replies: When and how are their conveyed meanings activated? Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 519-540.
34. Hoover, M. L., & Dwivedi, V. D. (1998). Syntactic processing by skilled bilinguals. Language Learning, 48, 1-29.
35. Hymes, H. D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Middlesex, England: Penguin.
36. Jiang, N. (2002). Form-meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 617-637.
37. Juffs, A. (1998). Main verb vs. reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 48, 107-147.
38. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 46, 283-326.
39. Kasper, G. (1984). Pragmatic comprehension in learner-native speaker discourse. Language Learning, 34, 1-20.
40. Kasper, G. (2001). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied Linguistics, 22, 502-530.
41. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2003). Pragmatic development in a second language. Boston: Blackwell.
42. Koike, D. A. (1996). Transfer of pragmatic competence and suggestions in Spanish foreign language learning. In S. M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures (pp. 257-281). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
43. Kotsonis, M. E. (1981). Children's interpretations of conversationally implied meanings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
44. Matsumura, S. (2001). Learning the rules for offering advice: A quantitative approach to second language socialization. Language Learning, 51, 635-679.
45. McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
46. McLaughlin, B., & Heredia, J. (1996). Information-processing approaches to research on second language acquisition and use. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 213-228). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47. Morgan, J. (1978). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 9: Pragmatics (pp. 261-280). New York: Academic Press.
48. Nelson, G. L., Carson, J., Batal, M. A., & Bakary, W. E. (2002). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Strategy use in Egyptian Arabic and American English refusals. Applied Linguistics, 23, 163-189.
49. Neumann, E., McCloskey, M. S., & Felio, A. C. (1999). Cross-language positive priming disappears, negative priming does not: Evidence for two sources of selective inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 27, 1051-1063.
50. Ohta, A. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Robinson, P. (2003). Cognition and second language instruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46-73.
53. Röver, C. (2005). Testing ESL pragmatics: Development and validation of a Web-based assessment battery. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
54. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-385.
56. Schneider, W., & Fisk, A. (1982). Degree of consistent training: Improvements in search performance and automatic process development. Perception of Psychophysics, 31, 160-168.
57. Segalowitz, N. (1997). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In A. de Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 85-112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58. Segalowitz, N. (2000). Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 200-219). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
59. Segalowitz, N. (2001). On the evolving connections between psychology and linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 3-22.
60. Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and second languages. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 382-408). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
61. Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 175-201.
62. Segalowitz, N., & Segalowitz, S. J. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 369-385.
63. Segalowitz, S. J., Segalowitz, N., & Wood, A. (1998). Assessing the development of second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 53-67.
64. Segalowitz, N., Watson, V., & Segalowitz, S. (1995). Vocabulary skill: Single case assessment of automaticity of word recognition in a timed lexical decision task. Second Language Research, 11, 121-136.
65. Skehan, P. (1995). Analyzability, accessibility, and ability for use. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 91-106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67. Smith, F. (1975). Comprehension and learning: A conceptual framework for teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
68. Snellings, P., van Gelderen, A., & Glopper, K (2002). Lexical retrieval: An aspect of fluent second language production that can be enhanced. Language Learning, 52, 723-754.
69. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1991). Loose talk. In S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics: A reader (pp. 540-550). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. SPSS. (1998). SPSS base 8.0 applications guide. Chicago: Author.
72. Summers, D. (Ed.). (1995). Longman dictionary of contemporary English (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
73. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
74. Taguchi, N. (2002). An application of relevance theory to the analysis of L2 interpretation processes: The comprehension of indirect replies. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 151-176.
75. Taguchi, N. (2003). Pragmatic performance in comprehension and production of English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
76. Taguchi, N. (2005). Comprehending implied meaning in English as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 89, 543-562.
77. Takahashi, S., & Roitblat, H. L. (1994). Comprehension process of second language indirect requests. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 475-506.
78. Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.
79. Towell, R. (2002). Relative degrees of fluency: A comparative case study of advanced learners of French. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 117-150.
80. Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold.
81. White, L., & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 233-265.
82. White, L., & Juffs, A. (1998). Constraints on wh-movement in two different contexts of narrative language acquisition: Competence and processing. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono, & W. O'Neil (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 111-129). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
83. Widdowson, H. G. (1989). Knowledge of language and ability for use. Applied Linguistics, 10, 128-137.
84. Wolfson, N., & Manes, J. (1980). The compliment as a social strategy. Papers in Linguistics, 13, 391-410.
85. Wolvin, A. D., & Coakley, A. G. (1985). Listening (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
86. Ying, H. G. (1996). Multiple constraints on processing ambiguous sentences: Evidence from adult L2 learners. Language Learning, 46, 681-711.