360-Degree Feedback at the Workplace: A Transformative Learning Perspective

The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 313-332

  Athota, Vidya S ^a   Malik, Ashish ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85121531412     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/9781316832134.016     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. Al Ansari, A., Donnon, T., Al Khalifa, K., Darwish, A., and Violato, C. (2014). The construct and criterion validity of the multi-source feedback process to assess physician performance: A meta-analysis. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 5, 39.
2. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., and Berg, P. Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. New York: ILR Press.
3. Athota, V. S. (2016). Foundations and future of well-being: How personality influences happiness and well-being. In Impact of organizational trauma on workplace behavior and performance (pp. 279-293). Business Science Reference Press.
4. Athota, V. S., and Roberts, R. D. (2015). How extraversion + leads to problem-solving ability. Psychological Studies, 60, 332-338.
5. Atwater, L. E., and Brett, J. F. (2006). 360-degree feedback to leaders: Does it relate to changes in employee attitudes? Group and Organization Management, 31(5), 578-600.
6. Atwater, L., Waldman, D., Ostroff, C., Robie, C., and Johnson, K. M. (2005). Self-other agreement: Comparing its relationship with performance in the U.S. and Europe. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 25-40.
7. Baker, N. (2010). Employee feedback technologies in the human performance system. Human Resource Development International, 13(4), 477-485.
8. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
9. Bell, S. T., and Arthur, W. A. (2008). Feedback acceptance in developmental assessment canters: The role of feedback message, participant personality, and affective response to the feedback session. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 681-703.
10. Blumberg, M., and Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560-569.
11. Bommer, W. H., Rubin, R. S., and Bartels, L. K. (2005). Assessing the “unassessable”: Interpersonal and managerial skills. In K. Martell and T. Calderon (Eds.), Assessment of student learning in business schools: Best practices each step of the way (pp. 103-130). Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research and AACSB International.
12. Bono, J., and Colbert, A. (2005). Understanding responses to multi-source feedback: The role of core self-evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 58, 171-203.
13. Boxall, P., and Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and human resource management (4th edn.). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Bracken, D. W., and Rose, D. S. (2011). When does 360-degree feedback create behaviour change? And how would we know it when it does? Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 183-192.
15. Bracken, D. W., Rose, D. S., and Church, A. H. (2016). The evolution and devolution of 360 degree feedback. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9(4), 761-794.
16. Brett, J., and Atwater, L. (2001). 360-degree feedback: Accuracy, reactions and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 930-942.
17. Brown, A., Inceoglu, I., and Lin, Y. (2017). Preventing rater biases in 360-degree feedback by forcing choice. Organizational Research Methods, 20(1), 121-148.
18. Bunker, K. A., Kram, K. E., and Ting, S. (2002). The young and the clueless. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 80-87.
19. Campbell, D. J., and Lee, C. (1988). Self-appraisal in performance evaluation: Development versus evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 302-314.
20. Campion, M. C., Campion, E. D., and Campion, M. A. (2015). Improvements in performance management through the use of 360 feedack. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8(1), 85-93.
21. Carver, C. S., and Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111-135.
22. Church, A. H. (2016). Is engagement overrated? Five questions to consider before doing your next engagement survey. Talent Quarterly, 9, 1-7.
23. Conger, J.A. (2002, November 29). The danger of delusion. Financial Times, pp. 1-4.
24. Dalton, M. A. (1998). Best practices: Five rationales for using 360-degree feedback in organizations. In W. W. Tornow andM. London (Eds.), Maximizing the value of 360-degree feedback: A process for successful individual and organizational development (pp. 59-77). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25. Decotiis, T., and Petit, A. (1978). The performance appraisal process: A model and some testable propositions. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 635.
26. Delahaye, B. L. (2004). Human resource development: Adult learning and knowledge management. Milton, Australia: John Wiley and Sons.
27. Delahaye, B. L., Limerick, D. C., and Hearn, G. (1994). The relationship between andragogical and pedagogical orientations and the implications for adult learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 187-200.
28. DeNisi, A. S., and Kluger, A. N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? The Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 129-139.
29. DeNisi, A., and Pritchard, R. (2006). Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2(2), 253-277.
30. DeNisi, A. S., and Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421-433.
31. de Silva, P. (2014). Tackling psychopathy: A necessary competency in leadership development? Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry, 5, 4-6.
32. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
33. Farh, J. L., Werbel, J. D., and Bedeian, A. G. (1988). An empirical assessment of selfappraisal based performance evaluation. Personnel Psychology, 41, 141-156.
34. Festinger, L. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
35. Fleenor, J., Taylor, S., and Chappelow, C. (2008). Leveraging the impact of 360-degree feedback. New York: Wiley.
36. Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 473-487.
37. Franceschini, F., and Turina, E. (2013). Quality improvement and redesign of performance measurement systems an application to the academic field. Quality and Quantity, 47, 465-483.
38. Fredrickson, B. L., and Losada, M. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60, 678-686.
39. Gorman, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Roch, S. G., Ray, J. L., and Gamble, J. S. (2017). An exploratory study of current performance management practices: Human resource executives’ perspectives. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(2), 193-202.
40. Gruman, J. A., and Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 123-136.
41. Hageman, M. G. J. S., Ring, D. C., Gregory, P. J., Rubash, H. E., and Harmon, L. (2015). Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 473(5), 1590-1597.
42. Hazucha, J. F., Hezlett, S. A., and Schneider, R. J. (1993). The impact of 360-degree feedback on management skills development. Human Resource Management, 32(2-3), 325-351.
43. Hermel-Stanescu, M. (2015). The role of performance appraisal in the context of performance management systems. SEA-Practical Application of Science, 3(1), 275-278.
44. Hofstede, G., and McRae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 52-88.
45. Hogan, J., Hogan, R., and Kaiser, R. B. (2011). Management derailment: Personality assessment and mitigation. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), American Psychological Association handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 555-575). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46. Kossek, E. E., Huang, J. L., Piszczek, M. M., Fleenor, J. W., and Ruderman, M. (2017). Rating expatriate leader effectiveness in multisource feedback systems: Cultural distance and hierarchical effects. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 151-172.
47. Laleman, F., Pereira, V., and Malik, A. (2015). Understanding cultural singularities of “Indianness” in an intercultural business setting. Culture and Organization, 21(5), 427-447.
48. Lehman, B. J., and Conley, K. M. (2010). Momentary reports of social-evaluative threat predict ambulatory blood pressure. Psychological Science and Personality Science, 1, 51-56.
49. Losada, M., and Heaphy, E. (2004). The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams: A nonlinear dynamics model. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 740-765.
50. Luffarelli, J., Goncalves, D., and Stanatoginannakis, A. (2016). When feedback interventions backfire: Why higher performance feedback may result in lower self-percieved competence and satisfaction with performance. Human Resource Management, 55, 591-614.
51. Malik, A. (2013). Post-GFC people management challenges: A study of India’s information technology sector. Asia Pacific Business Review, 19(2), 230-246.
52. Malik, A., andPereira, V. (2015).Culture research in India: Critical issues and future research opportunities. In Vijay Pereira and Ashish Malik (Eds.), Investigating cultural aspects in Indian organizations (pp. 185-197). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
53. Malik, A., and Pereira, V. (2016a). Indian culture and work organisations in transition. New Delhi: Routledge.
54. Malik, A., and Pereira, V. (2016b). India: A culture in transition. In A. Malik and V. Pereira (Eds), Indian culture and work organisations in transition (pp. 1-13). New Delhi: Routledge.
55. Mayer, R. C., and Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for mnagement: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123-136.
56. McKenna, S., Richardson, J., and Manroop, L. (2011). Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 148-157.
57. Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education Quarterly, 32(1), 3-24.
58. Mezirow, J. (1992). Transformation theory: Critique and confusion. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(4), 250-252.
59. Mezirow, J. (1994a). Understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 222-232.
60. Mezirow, J. (1994b). Response to Mark Tennant and Michael Newman. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 243-244.
61. Mohapatra, M. (2015). 360 degree feedback: A review of literature. Research Scholar of Management KIIT University Bhubaneswar Orissa, 2(1), 112-116.
62. Moscoso, S., and Salgado, J. (2004). “Dark side” personality styles as predictors of task, contextual, and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 356-362.
63. Newman, M. (1994). Response to understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 236-242.
64. Nowack, K. (1999). 360 degree feedback. In D. G. Langdon, K. S. Whiteside, and M. M. McKenna (Eds.), Intervention: 50 performance technology tools (pp. 34-46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
65. Nowack, K., Hartley, J., and Bradley, W. (1999). Evaluating results of your 360-degree feedback intervention. Training and Development, 53, 48-53.
66. Nowack, M. K., and Mashihi, S. (2012). Evidence-based answers to 15 questions about leveraging 360-degree feedback. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 64(3), 157-182.
67. Obisi, C. (2011, December). Employee performance appraisal and its implication for individual and organizational growth. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(9), 92-97.
68. O’Connor, P. J., and Athota, V. S. (2013). The intervening role of agreeableness in the relationship between trait emotional intelligence and Machiavellianism: Reassessing the potential dark side of EI. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 750-754.
69. Paulhus, D. L., and Williams, K. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-568.
70. Pereira, V., and Malik, A. (2013). East is East? Understanding aspects of Indian culture(s) within organisations. Culture and Organization, 19(5), 453-456.
71. Pereira, V., and Malik, A. (2015a). Human capital in the Indian IT/BPO industry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
72. Pereira, V., and Malik, A. (2015b). Investigating cultural aspects in Indian organizations: Empirical evidence. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
73. Pereira, V., and Malik, A. (2015c). Culture in Indian organisations: Evidence-based research and practice. In V. Pereira and A. Malik (Eds.), Investigating cultural aspects in Indian organizations: Empirical evidence (pp. 1-10). Cham: Springer.
74. Pereira, V., and Malik, A. (2015d). Making sense and identifying aspects of Indian culture(s) in organisations: Demystifying through empirical evidence. Culture and Organization, 21(5), 355-365.
75. Pereira, V., and Malik, A. (2016a). Conclusion and future research directions. In Indian culture and work organisations in transition (pp. 220-232). Abingdon, UK: Routledge and Taylor and Francis.
76. Pereira, V., Malik, A., and Froese, F. (2017). Mapping the impact of Asian business systems on HRM and organisational behaviour: Multi-level comparative perspectives. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 11(3), 253-261.
77. Pichler, S. (2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management, 51(5), 709-732.
78. Rai, H., and Singh, M. (2013). A study of mediating variables of the relationship between 360 feedback and employee performance. Human Resource Development International, 66(1), 56-73.
79. Rusu, G., Avasilcai, S., and Hutu, C.-A. (2016). Employee performance appraisal: A conceptual framework. Annals of the University of Oradea, 53-58.
80. Smith, A., Oczkowski, E., and Sellby-Smith, C. (2011). To have and to hold: Modelling the drivers of employee turnover and skill retention in Australian organisations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(2), 395-416.
81. Smither, J. W., London, M., and Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 33-66.
82. Swing, S. R. (2007). The ACGME outcome project: Retrospective and prospective. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 648-654.
83. Tennant, M. (1994). Response to understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 233-235.
84. Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., and Schmidt, F. L. (2016). Comparing rater groups: How to disentangle rating reliability from construct-level disagreements. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(4), 800-806.
85. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley
86. Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., and Antonioni, D. (1998). Has 360 degree feedback gone amok? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 86-94.
87. Ward, P. (1997). 360 Feedback. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
88. Wright, P., Dunford, B., and Snell, S. (2001). Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 6, 701-721.
89. Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Chang, Q., and Sun, B. (2013). Psychometric characteristics of the 360 feedback scales in professionalism and interpersonal and communication skills assessment of surgery residents in China. Journal of Surgical Education, 70, 628-635.