Employee feedback technologies in the human performance system

Human Resource Development International

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 477-485

  Baker, Nathan ^a  

^a INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Employee feedback; Feedback technology; Human capital; Human performance system; Performance evaluation; Performance review

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870364835     PISSN: 13678868     EISSN: 14698374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2010.501994     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Borgham, Lex, Bas ter Weel and Weinberg, Bruce A., 2006. Interpersonal styles and labour market outcomes. The Journal of Human Resources, 18 (4):43
2. Carden, Lila L., and Callahan, Jamie L., 2007. Creating leaders or loyalists? Conflicting identities in a leadership development programme. Human Resources Development International, 10 (2):17
3. Carmeli, Abraham, and Weisberg, Jacob. 2006. Exploring turnover intentions among three professional groups of employees. Human Resources Development International, 9 (2):15
4. Chang, Wei-Wen. 2007. The negative can be positive for cultural competence. Human Resources Development International, 10 (2):6
5. Chiaburu, Dan S., and Lindsay, Douglas R., 2008. Can do or will do? The importance of self-efficacy and instrumentality for training transfer. Human Resources Development International, 11 (2):7
6. Conrad, Sean, and Matuson, Roberta. 2009. Feedback loop. Mechanical Engineering, 131 (8):2
7. Eryes, Patricia. 2005. Avoiding successful lawsuits by non-performing employees. Cost Engineering, 47 (2):1
8. Hamlin, Robert G., Ellinger, Andrea D., and Beattie, Rona S., 2008. The emergent ‘coaching industry’:a wake-up call for HRD professionals. Human Resources Development International, 11 (3):8
9. Jawahar, I. M., 2006. An investigation of potential consequences of satisfaction with appraisal feedback. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13 (2):15
10. Kowske, Brenda J., and Anthony, Kshanika. 2007. Towards defining leadership competence around the world:What mid-level managers need to know in twelve countries. Human Resources Development International, 10 (1):10
11. Liker, Jeffrey K., and Meier, David. 2006. The Toyota way, New York:McGraw-Hill.
12. Maylett, Tracy, and Riboldi, Juan. 2007. Using 360 feedback to predict performance. T + D, 61 (9):6
13. McDermott, Anna, and Hasler, J., 2004. 360 feedback:How do perceptions of doctors' attributes compare?. Clinical Governance Bulletin, 5 (4):2
14. Miller, Corey E., and Thornton, Carl L., 2006. How accurate are your performance appraisals?. Public Personnel Management, 35 (2):10
15. Palmer, Jerry K., and Loveland, James M., 2008. The influence of group discussion on performance Jedgemens:Rating accuracy, contrast effects, and halo. The Journal of Psychology, 142 (2):13
16. Ridley, Stanley E., 2007. Selecting job elements to rate in performance appraisals:The human factors approach. Performance Improvement, 46 (5):6
17. Robertson, Christina. 2008. Employee development:Getting the information you need through a 360 feedback report. Chemical Engineering, 115 (4):4
18. Rummler, Geary A., and Brache, Alan P., 1995. Improving performance:How to manage the white space on the organizational chart, 2nd ed, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass. 1995
19. Sordill, Pat. Results-oriented performance management. Paper presented at the BSH Associate Development Program. New Bern, NC.