The injustices of others: Social reports and the integration of others' experiences in organizational justice judgments

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 906-924

  Kray, Laura J ^a   Allan Lind, E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036742003     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00035-3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1) (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. Brockner, J., & Greenberg, J. (1990). The impact of layoffs on survivors: an organizational justice perspective. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings (pp. 45-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Brockner, J., Grover, S., Reed, T., DeWitt, R., & O'Malley, M. (1987). Survivors' reactions to layoffs: we get by with a little help for our friends. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 526-541.
4. Brockner, J., Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C., & Bies, R. J. (1994). Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 397-409.
5. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6. Goldman, B. (2001). Toward an understanding of employment discrimination-claiming: an integration of organizational justice and social information processing theories. Personnel Psychology, 54, 361-386.
7. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9-22.
8. Jones, C., & Aronson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415-419.
9. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15) (pp. 192-241). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
10. LaTour, S. (1978). Determinants of participant and observer satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1531-1545.
11. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York: Plenum.
12. Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030-1051.
13. Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observers' reactions to the "innocent victim": compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203-210.
14. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-54). New York: Plenum.
15. Lind, E. A. (1994). Procedural justice and culture: evidence for ubiquitous process concerns. Zeitschift für Rechtssoziologie, 15, 24-36.
16. Lind, E. A. (1995a). Justice and authority in organizations. In R. Cropanzano, & K. M. Kacmar (Eds.), Politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of work organizations (pp. 83-96). Westport, CT: Quorum.
17. Lind, E. A. (1995b). Social conflict and social justice: Some lessons from the social psychology of justice. Leiden, the Netherlands: Leiden University Press.
18. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Lind, E. A., Kray, L., & Thompson, L. (2001). Primacy effects in justice judgments: testing predictions from fairness heuristic theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 189-210.
20. Lind, E. A., Kray, L., & Thompson, L. (1998). The social construction of injustice: fairness judgments in response to own and others' unfair treatment by authorities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 1-22.
21. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
22. Skarlicki, D. P., Ellard, J. H., & Kelln, B. R. C. (1998). Third-party perceptions of a layoff: procedural, derogation, and retributive aspects of justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 119-127.
23. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2001). The psychology of own versus others' treatment: self-oriented and other-oriented effects on perceptions of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1324-1333.
25. Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., & Wilke, H. (2001). The psychology of procedural justice and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Volume II-From theory to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Vermunt, R., Wit, A., Van den Bos, K., & Lind, A. (1996). The effect of inaccurate procedure on protest: the mediating role of perceived unfairness and situational self-esteem. Social Justice Research, 109-120.
27. Walker, L., LaTour, S., Lind, E. A., & Thibaut, J. (1974). Reactions of participants and observers to modes of adjudication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 295-310.
28. Walker, L., Lind, E. A., & Thibaut, J. (1979). The relation between procedural and distributive justice. Virginia Law Review, 65, 1401-1420.
29. Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73-79.
30. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.