The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-22

  Lind, E Allan ^a   Kray, Laura ^a   Thompson, Leigh ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002349675     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2785     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adams J. S. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology. 2:1965;Academic Press, New York.
2. Bies R. J., Tyler T. R. The "litigation mentality" in organizations. Organizational Science. 4:1993;352-366.
3. Brockner J., Greenberg J. The impact of layoffs on survivors: An organizational justice perspective. Carroll J. Applied social psychology and organizational settings. 1990;45-75 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
4. Brockner J., Konovsky M., Cooper-Schneider R., Folger R., Martin C., Bies R. J. Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal. 37:1994;397-409.
5. Cartwright D. Risk taking by individuals and groups: An assessment of research employing choice dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 20:1971;361-378.
6. Folger R., Konovsky M. A. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal. 32:1989;115-130.
7. Gigone D., Hastie R. The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 63:1993;959-973.
8. Greenberg J. Group vs. individual equity judgments: Is there a polarization effect? Journal of experimental social psychology. 15:1979;504-512.
9. Greenberg J. A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review. 12:1987;9-22.
10. Greenberg J. Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 54:1993;81-103.
11. Greenberg J. Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79:1994;288-297.
12. Griffin R. W., Bateman T. S., Wayne S. J., Head T. C. Objective and social factors as determinants of task perceptions and responses: An integrated perspective and empirical investigation. Academy of Management Journal. 30:1987;501-523.
13. Huo Y. J., Smith H., Tyler T. R., Lind E. A. Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science. 7:1996;40-45.
14. Isenberg Daniel J. Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 50:1986;1141-1151.
15. Kelley H. Attribution theory in social psychology. Levine D. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. 15:1967;192-241 University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
16. Korsgaard M. A., Schweiger D. M., Sapienza H. J. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal. 38:1995;60-84.
17. Lerner, M. J. 1980, The belief in a just world, New York, Plenum.
18. Lind, E. A. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations, J. GreenbergR. Cropanzano, Advances in organizational behavior, San Francisco, CA, New Lexington Press.
19. Lind, E. A. Greenberg, J. Scott, K. S. Welchans, T. D. 1998, The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination lawsuits, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.
20. Lind E. A., Kanfer R., Earley P. C. Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59:1990;952-959.
21. Lind E. A., Kulik C., Ambrose M., Park M. Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly. 38:1993;224-251.
22. Lind E. A., MacCoun R. J., Ebener P. E., Felstiner W. L. F., Hensler D. R., Resnik J., Tyler T. R. In the eye of the beholder: Tort litigants' evaluations of their experiences in the civil justice system. Law & Society Review. 24:1990;953-996.
23. Lind, E. A. Tyler, T. R. 1988, The social psychology of procedural justice, New York, Plenum Press.
24. McFarlin D. B., Sweeney P. D. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal. 35:1992;626-637.
25. Moorman R. H. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship. Journal of Applied Psychology. 76:1991;845-855.
26. Moorman R. H., Niehoff B. P., Organ D. W. Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 6:1993;209-225.
27. Messick D. M., Sentis K. P. Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 15:1979;418-434.
28. Myers D. G., Lamm H. The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin. 83:1976;602-627.
29. Niehoff B. P., Moorman R. H. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal. 36:1993;527-556.
30. Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly. 23:1978;224-252.
31. Smith H. J., Tyler T. R. Justice and power: When will justice concerns encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law? European Journal of Social Psychology. 26:1996;171-200.
32. Thibaut, J. Walker, L. 1975, Procedural justice: A psychological analysis, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
33. Tyler T. R. Impact of directly and indirectly experienced events: The origin of crime-related judgments and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39:1980;13-28.
34. Tyler T. R. The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 57:1989;333-344.
35. Tyler T. R., Lind E. A. A relational model of authority in groups. Zanna M. Advances in experimental social psychology. 25:1992;115-192 Academic Press, New York.
36. Vermunt R., Wit A., Van den Bos K., Lind A. The effect of inaccurate procedure on protest: The mediating role of perceived unfairness and situational self-esteem. Social Justice Research. 1996;109-120.
37. Walker L., Lind E. A., Thibaut J. The relation between procedural and distributive justice. Virginia Law Review. 65:1979;1401-1420.
38. Walster E., Berscheid E., Walster G. W. New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 25:1973;151-176.