Evaluation of a Distance Education Course Using the 4C-ID Model for Continuing Endodontics Education

Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2020, Pages 62-71

  Kolcu, Mukadder Iṅci Basȩr ^a   Öztürkçü, Özlem Sürel Karabilgin ^b   Kaki, Gülter Devrim ^c  

^a SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^b EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c USAK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

continuing dental education; continuing education; continuing professional development; distance education; endodontics; psychomotor skills

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTISTRY; E-LEARNING; EDUCATION; ENDODONTIC PROCEDURE; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRETEST POSTTEST CONTROL GROUP DESIGN; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SATISFACTION; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

EID: 85088579983     PISSN: 00220337     EISSN: 19307837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21815/JDE.019.138     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Yoldaş O, Işçi̇ S, Topuz A, et al. [Retreatment: evaluation of treatment results.] Cumhur Dent J 2003;6:102-9. [in Turkish]
2. Eleazer PD, Gilbert GH, Funkhouser E, et al. Techniques and materials used by general dentists during endodontic treatment procedures: findings from the national dental practice-based research network. J Am Dent Assoc 2016;147(1):19-27.
3. Mathew ST, Nafea MA. An evaluation of the current endodontic trends among the general dental practitioners and specialists in Riyadh, KSA. Int J Innov Educ Res 2015;3(9).
4. Galler KM, Krastl G, Simon S, et al. European Society of Endodontology position statement: revitalization procedures. Int Endod J 2016;49(8):717-23.
5. Lee JY, Kersten DD, Mines P, Beltran TAB. Regenerative endodontic procedures among endodontists: a web-based survey. J Endod 2018;44(2):250-5.
6. Cowpe J, Plasschaert A, Harzer W, et al. Profile and competences for the graduating European dentist: update 2009. Eur J Dent Educ 2010;14:193-202.
7. Dahlström L, Lindwall O, Rystedt H, Reit C. “Working in the dark”: Swedish general dental practitioners on the complexity of root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2017;50(7):636-45.
8. Schönwetter DJ, Reynolds PA, Eaton KA, Vries JD. Online learning in dentistry: an overview of the future direction for dental education. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37(12):927-40.
9. Perkins DN, Salomon G. Knowledge to go: a motivational and dispositional view of transfer. Educ Psychol 2012;47(3):248-58.
10. Khalil MK, Elkhider IA. Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Adv Physiol Educ 2016;40(2):147-56.
11. Van Laer S, Elen J. In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments. Educ Inf Technol 2017;22(4):1395-454.
12. Crawford C. Non-linear instructional design model: eternal, synergistic design and development. Br J Educ Technol 2004;35(4):413-20.
13. Göksu I, Özcan K, Çakir R. Content analysis of research trends in instructional design models. J Learn Design 2017;10(2):85-109.
14. Melo M, Miranda G. Applying the 4C-ID model to the design of a digital educational resource for teaching electric circuits: effects on student achievement. Presentation at 2014 Workshop on Interaction Design in Educational Environments, 2014.
15. Vandewaetere M, Manhaeve D, Aertgeerts B, et al. 4CID in medical education: how to design an educational program based on whole-task learning. AMEE guide no. 93. Med Teach 2015;37(1):4-20.
16. Van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ 2010;44(1):85-93.
17. Van Merriënboer JJG, Kirschner PA. Ten stepsto complex learning. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2013.
18. Postma TC, White JG. Developing clinical reasoning in the classroom: analysis of the 4C-ID model. Eur J Dent Educ 2015;19(2):74-80.
19. Pittenger AL, Becky OK, Olson-Kellogg B. Leveraging learning technologies for collaborative writing in an online pharmacotherapy course. Distance Educ 2012;33(1): 61-80.
20. Susilo AP, van Merriënboer J, van Dalen J, et al. From lecture to learning tasks: use of the 4C/ID model in a communication skills course in a continuing professional education context.JContin Educ Nurs 2013;44(6):278-84.
21. Kearney RC, Premaraj S, Smith BM, et al. Massive open online coursesin dental education: two viewpoints.J Dent Educ 2016;80(2):121-8.
22. Nayak P, Prasad K, Jyothi C. Preferences and barriers for continuing professional development among dental practitioners in the twin cities of Hubli-Dharwad, India. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent 2015;13(4):429-33.
23. Nazir M, Al-Ansari A, Alabdulaziz M, et al. Reasons for and barriers to attending continuing education activities and prioritiesfor different dentalspecialties. Maced J Med Sci 2018;6(9):1716-21.
24. Ghasemi N, Falsafi P, Aminabadi NA, et al. E-learning in medicalsciences education: a comprehensive literature review. Periapex Ind J Res 2016;5(1):107-9.
25. Fraenkel JR, Allen NE, Hyun HH. Quantitative research methodologies. In: How to design and evaluate research in education. 6th ed. NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 2011:264-301.
26. Slavin RE. Mastery learning reconsidered. Rev Educ Res 1987;57(2):175-213.
27. Gülbahar Y. Study of developing scalesfor assessment of the levels of readiness and satisfaction of participants in e-learning environments.J FacEduc Sci 2012;45(2):119-37.
28. Fisher C, Sadera WA. Comparing student learning and satisfaction between learning environmentsin continuing medical education. Int J Instr Technol Distance Learn 2011;8(5):29-42.
29. Botelho MG, Gao X,Jagannathan N.Aqualitative analysis of students’ perceptions of videos to support learning in a psychomotorskills course. EurJ Dent Educ 2018;22:1-8.
30. Nagendrababu V, Pulikkotil SJ, Sultan OS, et al. Effectiveness of technology-enhanced learning in endodontic education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J 2018;1-12.
31. Maresca C, Barrero C, Duggan D, et al. Utilization of blended learning to teach preclinical endodontics. J Dent Educ 2014;78(8):1194-204.
32. Yang M, Shao Z, Liu Q, Liu C. Understanding the quality factorsthat influence the continuance intention ofstudents toward participation in MOOCs. Educ Technol Res Dev 2017;65(5):1195-214.
33. Knowles M. The modern practice of adult education. Cambridge: Prentice Hall, 1980:57-8.
34. Dziuban C, Moskal P, Thompson J, Learning LKO. Studentsatisfaction with online learning: isit a psychological contract? Online Learn 2015;19(2):122-3.
35. Chan WC, Ng CH, Yiu BK, et al. A survey on the preference for continuing professional dental education amongst general dental practitioners who attended the 26th Asia Pacific Dental Congress. EurJ Dent Educ 2006;10(4):210-6.
36. Czerkawski BC, Lyman EW. An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. Tech Trends 2016;60(6):532-9.
37. Van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and complex learning: recent developments and future directions. Educ Psychol Rev 2005;17(2):147-77.
38. Van Merriënboer JJG, Kester L.Whole-task modelsin education. Handb Res Educ Commun Technol 2008;441-56.
39. Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn Instr 1994;4(4):295-312.
40. Scott JD, Aragon SR. An instructionalstrategy framework for online learning environments. New Dir Adult Contin Educ 2003;100(Winter):31-43.
41. Larmuseau C, Elen J, Depaepe F. The influence of students’ cognitive and motivational characteristics on students’ use of a 4C/ID-based online learning environment and their learning gain. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on LearningAnalytics and Knowledge, March 7-9, 2018, Sydney, NSW,Australia.At: dl.acm.org/ citation.cfm?id=3170363. Accessed 13 Sept. 2018.
42. Ok O, Vatansever K, Araz E, et al. Trauma advanced life support training program for prehospital health professionals. Tip Egitimi Dungasi 17(51):60-71.
43. Larmuseau C, Desmet P, Depaepe F. Perceptions ofinstructional quality: impact on acceptance and use of an online learning environment. Interact Learn Environ 2018;1-12.
44. Gao X, Wong LM, Chow DYS, et al. Learning clinical proceduresthrough Internet visual resources: a qualitative study amongst undergraduate students. Eur J Dent Educ 2015;19(1):38-43.
45. Raza A, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. Best evidence continuous medical education.Arch Gynecol Obs 2009;683-7.
46. Lee BC, Yoon JO, Lee I. Learners’ acceptance of elearning in South Korea: theories and results. Comput Educ 2009;53(4):1320-9