Leveraging learning technologies for collaborative writing in an online pharmacotherapy course

Distance Education

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 61-80

  Pittenger, Amy L ^a   Olson Kellogg, Becky ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

authentic assessment; collaborative digital writing; health professional; whole task

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860753307     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2012.667960     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alverman, D. E., O'Brien, D. G., & Dillon, D. R. (1996). Conversations: On writing qualitative research. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 114-120. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/748242?origin=JSTOR-pdf
2. Amhag, L. and Jakobsson, A. 2009. Collaborative learning as a collective competence when students use the potential of meaning in asynchronous dialogues. Computers & Education, 52: 656-667. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.012
3. Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A. and van der Vleuten, C. P. M. 2007. Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2: 114-129. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.06.001
4. Bean, J. C. 2001. Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. Berninger, V. W. and Winn, W. D. 2006. "Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution". In Handbook of writing research, Edited by: MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S. and Fitzgerald, J. 96-114. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
6. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. and Cocking, R. R., eds. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Cole, M. 2009. Using wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches. Computers & Education, 52: 141-146. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.003
8. Collins, D. 2003. Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12: 229-238. doi:10.1023/A:1023254226592
9. Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Creswell, J. W. 2010. "Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research". In Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavior research, Edited by: Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. B. 45-68. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Dillman, D. A., Tortora, R. D., & Bowker, D. (1998). Principles for constructing web surveys (SESRC Technical Report). Pullman: Washington State University. Retrieved fromhttp://www.websm.org/uploadi/editor/Dillman_1998_Principles_for%20Constructing.pdf
12. Doering, A. and Veletsianos, G. 2008. What lies beyond effectiveness and efficiency? Adventure learning design. Internet and Higher Education, 11: 137-144. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.07.004
13. Duffy, T. M. and Cunningham, D. J. 1996. "Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction". In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, Edited by: Jonassen, D. H. 170-198. New York, NY: Macmillan Library Reference.
14. Fairclough, N. 2004. "Semiotic aspects of social transformation and learning". In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education, Edited by: Rogers, R. 225-235. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Gaddis, S. E. (1998). How to design online surveys. Training and Development, 52(6), 67-71. Retrieved fromhttp://www.astd.org/TD/
16. Gee, J. P. 2003. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy, New York, NY: Palgrave.
17. Gee, J. P. 2005. An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method, 2nd ed., New York, NY: Routledge.
18. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Chicago, IL: Aldine.
19. Hull, D. M. and Saxon, T. F. 2009. Negotiation of meaning and co-construction of knowledge: An experimental analysis of asynchronous online instruction. Computers & Education, 52: 624-639. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.005
20. Jonassen, D. H. 2000. Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking, 2nd ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/30221294?origin=JSTOR-pdf
22. 3-learning. Distance Education, 29: 175-185. doi:10.1080/01587910802154970
23. Kramarae, C. 2007. "Gender matters in online learning". In Handbook of distance education, Edited by: Moore, M. G. 169-180. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Krueger, R. A. and Casey, M. A. 2009. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, 4th ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Landow, G. P. 2006. Hypertext 3.0: Critical theory and new media in an era of globalization, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lewis, C. and Ketter, J. 2004. "Learning as social interaction: Interdiscursivity in a teacher and researcher study group". In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education, Edited by: Rogers, R. 117-146. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Lund, A. 2008. Wikis: A collective approach to language production. ReCALL, 20: 35-54. doi:10.1017/S0958344008000414
29. Merrill, M. D. 2002. First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3): 43-59. doi:10.1007/BF02505024
30. Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Paulus, T. M. 2005. Collaborative and cooperative approaches to online group work: The impact of task type. Distance Education, 26: 111-125. doi:10.1080/01587910500081343
32. Paulus, T. M. 2006. Challenge or connect? Dialogue in online learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 18: 3-29. doi:10.1007/BF03032722
33. Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature. Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 19-48. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/index
34. Sosnoski, J. 1999. "Hyper-readers and their reading engines". In Passions, pedagogies and 21st century technologies, Edited by: Hawisher, G. and Selfe, C. 161-177. Logan: Utah State University Press.
35. Steiner, W. A., Ryser, L., Huber, E., Uebelhart, E., Aeschlimann, A., & Stucki, G. (2002, November). Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Physical Therapy, 82, 1098-1107. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ptjournal.org/
36. Tennyson, R. D., & Breuer, K. (2002). Improving problem solving and creativity through use of complex-dynamic simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 650-668. Retrieved fromhttp://elsevier.com/locate/comphumbeh
37. Trentin, G. 2009. Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25: 43-55. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00276.x
38. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. 2007. "Alternate models of instructional design: Holistic design approaches and complex learning". In Trends and issues in instructional design and technology, Edited by: Reiser, R. A. and Dempsey, J. V. 72-81. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
39. Wang, Q. 2008. A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45: 411-419. doi:10.1080/14703290802377307
40. Weedon, C. 1997. Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory, 2nd ed., Oxford: Blackwell.