The Problem of health technology: Policy implications for modern health care systems

The Problem of Health Technology: Policy Implications for Modern Health Care Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-266

  Lehoux, Pascale ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082262891     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315810782     Document Type: Book

References (314)

1. Abbott, A. 1988. The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Abelson, J., P.-G. Forest, J. Eyles, P. Smith, E. Martin, and F.-P. Gauvin. 2003. Deliberations about deliberative methods: Issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science and Medicine 57 (2): 239-251.
3. Abraham, J. 2002. Drug safety and the safety of patients: The challenge to medicine and health from permissive expert risk assessments of triazolam (Halcion). Health, Risk and Society 4(1): 19-29.
4. AETMIS (Agence devaluation des Technologies et des Modes d’intervention en Santé). 2002. The efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy: Issues in delivery and organization. Montreal: AETMIS.
5. Akrich, M. 1994. Comment sortir de la dichotomie technique/société: Présentation des diverses sociologies de la technique. In De la préhistoire aux missiles balistiques: De Vintelligence sociale des techniques, ed. B. Latour and P. Lemonnier, 105-131. Paris: La Découverte.
6. Akrich, M. 1995. User representations: Practices, methods and sociology. In Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment, ed. A. Rip, T. J. Misa, and J. Schot, 205-224. London: Pinter.
7. Akrich, M. and B. Latour. 1992. A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and non-human assemblies. In Shaping technology/building society: Studies in socio-technical change, ed. W. E. Bijker and J. Law, 259-264. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Andrews, G. J. 2003. Locating a geography of nursing: Space, place and the progress of geographical thought. Nursing Philosophy A: 231-248.
9. Angell, M. 2000. The pharmaceutical industry: To whom is it accountable? New England Journal of Medicine 342 (25): 1902-1904.
10. Armstrong, D. 1983. Political anatomy of the body: Medical knowledge in Britain in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Auditor General of Quebec. 2001. Report to the National Assembly for 2000-2001, official publication of the Quebec government. Highlights available in English: http://www.vgq.gouv.qc.ca/publications/rapp_2001_l/Highlights/Index.html
12. Australia, Productivity Commission. 2005. The impact of advances in medical technology in Australia. Melbourne: The Commission.
13. Baker C. F., C. J. Rudnisky, M. T. Tennant, P. Sanghera, B. J. Hinz, A. R. De Leon, and M. D. Greve. 2004. JPEG compression of stereoscopic digital images for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy via teleophthalmology. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmolology 39 (7): 746-754.
14. Baker, N. 1990. The mezzanine. New York: Vintage Books.
15. Banta, H. D. and B. R. Luce. 1993. Health care technology and its assessment: An international perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Banta, H. D., W. J. Oortwijn, and W. T. van Beekum. 1995. The organization of health care technology assessment in the Netherlands. The Hague: Rathenau Institute.
17. Banta, H. D., and S. Perry. 1997. A history of ISTAHC: A personal perspective on its first 10 years. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 13 (3): 430-453.
18. Barbot, J. 1998. Science, marché et compassion: L’intervention des associations de lutte contre le sida dans la circulation des nouvelles molécules. Sciences Sociales et Santé 16 (3): 67-93.
19. Barley, S. R., and P. S. Tolbert. 1997. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies 18(1): 93-117.
20. Bartunek, J., J. Trullen, E. Bonet, and A. Sauquet. 2003. Sharing and expanding academic and practitioner knowledge in health care. Health Services Research & Policy 8 (2): 62-68.
21. Bastian, H. 1998. Speaking up for ourselves: The evolution of consumer advocacy in health care. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 14: 3-23.
22. Battista, R. N., H. D. Banta, E. Jonsson, M. Hodge, and Gelbland, H. 1994. Lessons from eight countries. Health Policy 30: 397-421.
23. Battista, R. N„ J.-M. Lance, P. Lehoux, and G. Régnier. 1999. Health technology assessment and the regulation of medical devices and procedures in Quebec: Synergy, collusion or collision? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 15 (3): 593-601.
24. Beck, U. 1992. La société du risque. Sur la voie d'une autre modernité. Paris: Flammarion.
25. Berg, M. 1997. Rationalizing medical work: Décision-support techniques and medical practices. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Berg, M., R. ter Meulen, and M. van den Burg. 2001. Guidelines for appropriate care: The importance of empirical normative analysis. Health Care Analysis 9: 77-99.
27. Berg, M., T. van der Grinten, and N. Klazinga. 2004. Technology assessment, priority setting, and appropriate care in Dutch health care. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 20 (1): 35-43.
28. Bero, L. A., and A. R. Jadad. 1997. How consumers and policymakers can use systematic reviews for decision-making. Annals of Internal Medicine 127: 37-42.
29. Bero, L. A., R. Grilli, J. M. Grimshaw, E. Harvey, A. D. Oxman, and M. A. Thomson. 1998. Closing the gap between research and practice: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. British Medical Journal 317 (7156): 465-468.
30. Besharov, D. J., and J. Dunsay Silver. 1987. Rationing access to advanced medical techniques. Journal of Legal Medicine 8 (4): 507-532.
31. Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of Bakelite: Toward a theory of invention. In The social construction of technological systems, ed. W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, 11-50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Blume, S. S. 1992. Insight and industry: On the dynamics of technological change in medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Blume, S. S. 1997. The rhetoric and counter-rhetoric of a “bionic technology.” Science, Technology and Human Values 22 (1): 31-56.
34. Blumenthal, D., N. Causino, E. Campbell, and K. Seashore Louis. 1996. Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences: an industry survey. New England Journal of Medicine 334: 368-373.
35. Bohman, J. 1996. Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Bos, M., P. Carlsson, S. Kooij, L. Liaropoulos, L. Sampietro-Colom, J. Schilling, and the EUR-ASSESS Project, Technology Assessment and Insurance Coverage SubGroup. 1996. Technology assessment and coverage policy: The case of invasive cardiology therapy in five European countries. Barcelona: Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research (CAHTA).
37. Brown, N., and A. Webster. 2004. New medical technologies and society: Reordering life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
38. Bucciarelli, L. L. 1994. Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Burke, J., and R. Ornstein. 1997. The axemaker's gift: Technology's capture and control of our minds and culture. New York: Penguin Putnam.
40. Buxton, M., and S. Hanney. 1996. How can payback from health services research be assessed? Journal of Health Services Research 1 (1): 35-43.
41. Cabatoff, K. A. 1996. Getting on and off the policy agenda: A dualistic theory of program evaluation utilization. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 11: 35-60.
42. Callahan, D. 1990. What kind of life: The limits of medical progress. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
43. Callon, M. 1986. Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction: La domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins-pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc. L’Année Sociologique 36: 169-208.
44. Callon, M. 1987. Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In The social construction of technological systems, ed. W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, 83-106. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Calnan, M., D. Montaner, and R. Horne. 2005. How acceptable are innovative health-care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales. Social Science and Medicine 60: 1937-1948.
46. Campbell, J. L. 2002. Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 21-38.
47. Casey, S. 1998. Set phasers on stun: And other true tales of design, technology, and human error. Santa Barbara, CA: Aegean.
48. Champagne, F., L. Lemieux-Charles, and W. McGuire. 2004. Introduction: Toward a broader understanding of the use of knowledge and evidence in health care. In Multidisciplinary perspectives on evidence-based decision-making in health care, ed. L. Lemieux-Charles and F. Champagne, 3-17. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
49. Chernew, M. E., R. A. Hirth, S. S. Sonnad, R. Ermann, and A. M. Fendrick. 1998. Managed care, medical technology, and health care cost growth: A review of the evidence. Medical Care Research Review 55 (3): 259-288; discussion 289-297.
50. Chervenak, F. K., and L. B. McCullough. 2001. The moral foundation of medical leadership: The professional virtues of the physician as fiduciary of the patient. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 18 (5): 875-880.
51. Christensen, C. M., R. Bohmer, and J. Kenagy. 2000. Will disruptive innovations cure health care? Harvard Business Review 78 (5): 102-112, 199.
52. Clarke, A. 1998. Disciplining reproduction: Modernity, American life sciences, and “the problem of sex.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Coburn, A. F. 1998. The role of health services research in developing state health policy. Health Affairs 17:139-151.
54. Cockburn, C. 1983. Brothers: Male dominance and technological change. London: Pluto Press.
55. Coddington, D. C., E. A. Fischer, K. D. Moore, and R. L. Clarke, eds. 2000. Beyond managed care: How consumers and technology are changing the future of health care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56. Cohen, A. B„ and R. S. Hanft, with W. E. Encinosa, S. M. Spernak, S. A. Stewart, and C. C. White. 2004. Technology in American health care: Policy directions for effective evaluation and management. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
57. Collins, H., and M. Kush. 1998. The shape of actions: What humans and machines can do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Cooke, B., and U. Kothari, eds. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books.
59. Cookson, R., and A. Maynard. 2000. Health technology assessment in Europe: Improving clarity and performance. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 16 (2): 639-650.
60. Coulter, A. 2004. Perspectives on health technology assessment: Response from the patient’s perspective. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 20 (1): 92-96.
61. Couture, D. 1988. Technologies médicales et statut des corps professionnels dans la division du travail socio-sanitaire. Sociologie et Sociétés 20 (2): 77-88.
62. Cowan, R. S. 1983. More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books.
63. Coyle, D., L. Davies, and M. F. Drummond. 1998. Trials and tribulations: Emerging issues in designing economic evaluations alongside clinical trials. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 14: 135-144.
64. Coyte, P., and W. Young. 1997. Applied home care research. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance Incorporating Leadership in Health Services 10 (1): i-iv.
65. Creditor, M. C., and J. B. Garrett. 1977. The information base for diffusion of technology: Computed tomography scanning. New England Journal of Medicine 297: 49-53.
66. Cross, N. 2004. Editorial. Design Studies 24: 425-426.
67. Cutler, D. M., and M. McClellan. 2001. Is technological change in medicine worth it? Health Affairs 20 (5): 11-29.
68. Daly, J., and E. Willis. 1989. Technological innovation and the labour process in health care. Social Science and Medicine 28 (11): 1149-1157.
69. Daniels, N., and J. E. Sabin. 1997. Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (4): 303-350.
70. Daniels, N., and J. E. Sabin. 1998. Ethics of accountability in managed care reform. Health Affairs 17: 50-64.
71. Danzon, P. M., and M. V. Pauly. 2001. Insurance and new technology: From hospital to drugstore. Health Affairs 20 (5): 86-100.
72. Davies, E., and P. Littlejohns. 2002. Views of directors of public health about NICE Appraisal Guidance: Results of a postal survey. Journal of Public Health Medicine 24: 319-325.
73. Deber, R. 1992. Translating technology assessment into policy. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Cares (1): 131-137.
74. Deber, R. 2003. Health care reforms: Lessons from Canada. American Journal of Public Health 93 (1): 20-24.
75. Denis, J.-L., P. Lehoux, and F. Champagne. 2004. Knowledge utilization in health care: From fine-tuning dissemination to contexualizing knowledge. In Using knowledge and evidence in health care: Multidisiplinary perspectives, ed. L. Lemieux-Charles and F. Champagne, 18-40. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
76. Denis, J.-L., P. Lehoux, M. Hivon, and F. Champagne. 2003. Creating a new articulation between research and practice through policy? The views and experience of researchers and practitioners. Journal of Health Services Research. 8 (Suppl. 2): 44-51.
77. Dixon-Woods, M., S. Agarwal, B. Young, D. Jones, and A. Sutton. 2004. Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence. London: National Health Service (NHS), Health Development Agency.
78. Dodier, N. 1995. Les hommes et les machines: La conscience collective dans les sociétés technicisées. Paris: Éditions Métailié.
79. Domenigehtti, G., R. Grilli, and A. Liberati. 1998. Promoting consumers’ demand for evidence-based medicine. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 14: 97-105.
80. Dyer, S. 2004. Rationalising public participation in the health services: The case of research ethics committees. Health and Place 10: 339-348.
81. Eccles, M. 2004. NICE clinical guidelines: Health economics must engage with complexity of issues. Letter. British Medical Journal 329: 572.
82. Edquist, C., and B. Johnson. 1997. Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations, ed. C. Edquist, 41-63. London: Pinter.
83. Elam, M. 1994. Anti anticonstructivism or laying the fears of a Langdon Winner to rest. Science, Technology & Human Values 19 (1): 101-106.
84. Ellis, D. 2000. Technology and the future of health care: Preparing for the next 30 years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
85. Elzinga, A. 2004. Book review: Making science and technology studies relevant for technology policy—Gains and losses? Social Studies of Science 34(6): 949-956.
86. Evans, R. 1984. Strained mercy: The economics of Canadian health care. Toronto: Butterworths.
87. Evans, R., M. L. Barer, and T. R. Marmor, eds. 1994. Why are some people healthy and others not?: The determinants of health of the populations. New York: A. de Gruyter.
88. Fagerhaugh, S., A. Strauss, B. Suczek, and C. Wiener. 1986. Chronic illness, medical technology, and clinical safety in the hospital. Research in the Sociology of Health Care 4: 237-270.
89. Faulkner, A. 1997. “Strange bedfellows” in the laboratory of the NHS? An analysis of the new science of health technology assessment in the United Kingdom. In The Sociology of Medical Science and Technology, ed. M. A. Elston, 183-207. Oxford: Blackwell.
90. Faulkner, A., I. Geesink, J. Kent, and D. Fitzpatrick. 2003. Human tissue engineered products: drugs or devices? Editorial. British Medical Journal 326: 1159-1160.
91. Finlay, J. F., B. Henderson, and D. Menon. 1994. Medical device regulation in Canada: Direction for change. Health Policy 28:185-195.
92. Foote, S. B. 1986. Coexistence, conflict, and cooperation: Public policies toward medical devices. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 11 (3): 501-523.
93. Foray, D. 1997. Generation and distribution of technological knowledge: Incentives, norms, and institutions. In Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations, ed. C. Edquist, 64-85. London: Pinter.
94. Fox, N. J., K. J. Ward, and A. J. O’Rourke. 2005. The “expert patient”: Empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the Internet. Social Science and Medicine 60: 1299-1309.
95. Freidson, E. 1975. Doctoring together: A study of professional social control. New York: Elsevier.
96. Friedman, L., H. Cooper, J. Webb, A. Weinberg, and S. E. Plon. 2003. Primary care physicians’ attitudes and practices regarding cancer genetics: A comparison of 2001 and 1996 survey results. Journal of Cancer Education 18 (2): 91-94.
97. Fuller, S. 1993. Philosophy of science and its discontents, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
98. Fuller, S. 2000. The governance of science. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
99. Galanti, G.-A. 1999. How to do ethnographic research. Western Journal of Medicine 171: 19-20.
100. Gallo, P. 2004. Integrating ethical enquiry and health technology assessment: Limits and opportunities for efficiency and equity. Poiesis & Praxis 2: 103-117.
101. Garcia-Altes, A., S. Ondategui-Parra, and P. J. Neuman. 2004. Cross-national comparison of technology assessment processes. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 20 (3): 300-310.
102. Garrety, K., and R. Badham. 2004. User-centered design and the normative politics of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values 29 (2): 191-212.
103. Gauthier, P. 1999. Technological intervention and the malady of happiness. Design Issues 15 (2): 40-54.
104. Gelijns, A., and N. Rosenberg. 1994 The dynamics of technological change in medicine. Health Affairs 13 (3): 28-45.
105. Giacomini, M. 1999. The which-hunt: Assembling health technologies for assessment and rationing. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 24: 715-758.
106. Giacomini, M„ F. Miller, and G. Browman. 2003. Confronting the “gray zones” of technology assessment: Evaluating genetic testing services for public insurance coverage in Canada. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 19 (2): 301-316.
107. Giacomini, M„ J. Hurley, I. Gold, P. Smith, and J. Abelson. 2004. The policy analysis of “values talk”: Lessons from Canadian health reform. Health Policy 67: 15-24.
108. Giacomini, M., D. J. Cook, D. L. Streiner, and S. S. Anand. 2000. Using practice guidelines to allocate medical technologies: An ethics framework. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 16 (4): 987-1002.
109. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, P. Scott, S. Schwartzman, and M. Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
110. Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
111. Gillick, M. R. 2004. Medicare coverage for technological innovations: Time for new criteria? New England Journal of Medicine 350 (21): 2199-2203.
112. Goering, P., D. Butterill, N. Jacobson, and D. Sturtevant. 2003. Linkage and exchange at the organizational level: A model of collaboration between research and policy. Health Services Research & Policy 8 (2): 14-19.
113. Goffman, E. 1971. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
114. Golden-Biddle, K., T. Reay, S. Petz, C. Witt, A. Casebeer, A. Pablo, and B. Hinings. 2003. Towards a communicative perspective of collaborating in research: The case of the researcher-decision-maker partnership. Health Services Research & Policy 8 (2): 20-25.
115. Goldstein, D. 2001. Disruptive innovations threaten revenues and profits. Management Care Interface 14 (4): 50-52.
116. Goodman, C. 1992. It’s time to rethink health care technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 8: 335-358.
117. Gortmaker, S. L., and P. H. Wise. 1997. The first injustice: Socioeconomic disparities, health services technology, and infant mortality. Annual Review of Sociology 23: 147-170.
118. Greenhalgh, T., G. Robert, F. MacFarlane, P. Bate, and O. Kyriakidou. 2004. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly 82 (4): 581-629.
119. Greer, A. L. 1987. Rationing medical technology: Hospital decision making in the United States and England. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 3: 199-222.
120. Greer, A. L., J. S. Goodwin, J. L. Freeman, and Z. H. Wu. 2002. Bringing the patient back in: Guidelines, practice variations, and the social context of medical practice. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 18 (4): 747-761.
121. Grin, J. 2004. Health technology assessment between our health care system and our health. Poiesis & Praxis 2: 157-174.
122. Grint, K., and S. Woolgar. 1992. Computers, guns, and roses: What’s social about being shot? Science, Technology, & Human Values 17 (3): 366-380.
123. Grunwald, A. 2004. The normative basis of (health) technology assessment and the role of ethical expertise. Poiesis & Praxis 2: 175-194.
124. Hailey, D. M. 1993. The influence of technology assessments by advisory bodies on health policy and practice. Health Policy, 25(3): 243-254.
125. Hailey, D. M., and B. L. Crowe. 1993. The influence of health technology assessment on the diffusion of MRI in Australia. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 9 (4): 522-529.
126. Halm, E. A., and A. Gelijns. 1991. An introduction to the changing economics of technological innovation in medicine. In The changing economics of medical technology, ed. A. Gelijns and E. A. Halm, 1-20. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
127. Hammersley, M„ and P. Atkinson. 1983. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
128. Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
129. Hasman, A. 2003. Eliciting reasons: Empirical methods in priority setting. Health Care Analysis 11 (1): 41-58.
130. Heitman, E. 1996. The public’s role in the evaluation of health care technology: The conflict over ECT. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 12 (4): 657-672.
131. Heitman, E. 1998. Ethical issues in technology assessment: Conceptual categories and procedural considerations. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 14 (3): 544-566.
132. Hirsch, P. 2005. Personal communication.
133. Hivon, M„ P. Lehoux, J.-L. Denis, and S. Tailliez. 2005. The use of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in decision-making: The co-responsibility of users and producers? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 21 (2): 268-275.
134. Hlatky, M. A. 2004. Evidence-based use of cardiac procedures and devices. New England Journal of Medicine 350 (21): 2126-2128.
135. Hogle, L. F. 2000. Réglementer les innovations utilisant des tissus humains: Hybrides et gouvernance. Sciences Sociales et Santé 18 (4): 53-73.
136. Ihde, D. 1990. Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
137. Illich, I. 1973. Tools for conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.
138. INHATA (International Agency for Health Technology Assessment). 1997. Newsletter. Stockholm: INAHTA.
139. Jacob, R., and M. McGregor. 1997. Assessing the impact of health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 13: 68-80.
140. Jasanoff, S. 1990. The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
141. Joerges, B. 1999. Do politics have artifacts? Social Studies of Science 29 (3): 411-431.
142. Johnson, D. E. 2000. Will disruptive innovations cure health care? Harvard Business Review 78 (6): 197-198.
143. Johri, M., and P. Lehoux. 2003. The great escape? Health technology assessment as a means of cost control. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 19(1): 179-193.
144. Kaiser, L. 2000. Foreword. In Beyond managed care: How consumers and technology are changing the future of health care, ed. D. C. Coddington, E. A. Fischer, K. D. Moore, and R. L. Clarke, ix-xii. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
145. Kaufman S. R. 2003. Hidden places, uncommon persons. Social Science & Medicine 56: 2249-2261.
146. Kaye, L. W., and J. Davitt. 1995. Importation of high technology services into the home. In New developments in home care services for the elderly: Innovations in policy, program, and practice, ed. L. W. Kay, 67-94. New York: Haworth Press.
147. Kearns, R. A. 1993. Place and health: Towards a reformed medical geography. The Professional Geographer 46: 67-72.
148. Kenen, R. G. 1996. The at-risk health status and technology: A diagnostic invitation and the “gift” ofknowing. Social Science and Medicine 42 (11): 1545-1553.
149. Kent, J. 2003. Lay experts and the politics of breast implants. Public Understanding of Science 12: 403-421.
150. Kent, J., and A. Faulkner. 2002. Regulating human implant technologies in Europe: Understanding the new era in medical device regulation. Health, Risk and Society A (2): 189-209.
151. Kling, R. 1991. Computerization and social transformations. Science, Technology, & Human Values 16 (3): 342-367.
152. Kling, R. 1992a. Audiences, narratives, and human values in social studies of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values 17 (3): 349-365.
153. Kling, R. 1992b. When gunfire shatters bone: Reducing sociotechnical systems to social relationships. Science, Technology, & Human Values 17 (3): 381-385.
154. Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
155. Koch, E. B. 1995. Why the development process should be part of medical technology assessment: Examples from the development of medical ultrasound. In Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment, ed. A. Rip, T. J. Misa, and J. Schot, 231-260. London: Pinter.
156. Kuttner, R. 1998. Must good HMOs go bad? The commercialization of prepaid group health care. New England Journal of Medicine 338: 1558-1563.
157. LaCapra, R. 1997. Cultural studies, globalization, and neoliberalism. In The politics of research, ed. E. A. Kaplan and G. Levine, 69-89. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
158. Latour, B. 1988. Mixing humans and nonhumans together: The sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems 35 (3): 298-310.
159. Latour, B. 1989. La science en action. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
160. Latour, B. 1990. Postmodern? No, simply amodern! Steps towards an anthropology of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21 (1): 145-171.
161. Latour, B., and P. Lemonnier, eds.1994. De la préhistoire aux missiles balistiques. De l'intelligence sociale des techniques. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
162. Laupacis, A. 2002. Inclusion of drugs in provincial drug benefit programs: Who is making these decisions, and are they the right ones? Canadian Medical Association Journal 166 (1): 44-47.
163. Laupacis, A., G. Anderson, and B. O’Brien. 2002. Drug policy: Making effective drugs available without bankrupting the healthcare system. Healthcare Papers 3(1): 12-30.
164. Laupacis, A. and Evans, W. 2005. Diagnostic imaging in Canada. Healthcare Papers 6(1): 8-15.
165. Laupacis, A., D. Feeny, A. S. Detsky, and P. X. Tugwell. 1993. Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations revisited. Canadian Medical Association Journal 148 (6): 927-929.
166. Lavis, J. N., S. E. Ross, J. E. Hurley, J. M. Hohenadel, G. L. Stoddart, C. A. Woodward, and J. Abel-son. 2002. Examining the role of health services research in public policy-making. The Milbank Quarterly 80 (1): 125-154.
167. Lawton, J. 2003. Lay experiences of health and illness: Past research and future agendas. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25: 23-40.
168. Lehoux, P. 2000. Cohabitation des perspectives moderne et postmoderne dans la recherche en santé publique: Controverses et propositions. Sciences Sociales et Santé 18 (3): 37-75.
169. Lehoux, P. 2002. Could new regulatory mechanisms be designed after a critical assessment of the value of health innovations? Discussion Paper no. 37, Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada.
170. Lehoux, P. 2004. Patients’ perspectives on high-tech home care: A qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four interventions. BMC Health Services Research 4 (28), http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6963-4-28.pdf.
171. Lehoux, P., and S. Blume. 2000. Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 25 (6): 1083-1120.
172. Lehoux, P., C. Charland, R. Pineault, L. Richard, and J. Saint-Arnaud. 2002. Technologies de pointe et soins à domicile. Où en sont les CLSC? Canadian Medical Association Journal 166 (10): 1277-1278.
173. Lehoux, P., G. Daudelin, R. Pineault, J. St-Arnaud, and C. Sicotte. 2004. Évaluation des unités satellites et mobile d’hémodialyse. Report no. R04-02, GRIS, Université de Montréal.
174. Lehoux, P., J.-L. Denis, M. Hivon, and S. Tailliez. 2003. Dissemination and use of health technology assessment in Canada: The perception of providers, health care administrators, patients and industry. Report no. R03-01, GRIS, Université de Montréal.
175. Lehoux, P., J.-L. Denis, S. Tailliez, and M. Hivon. 2005. Disseminating health technology assessment: Identifying the visions guiding an evolving policy intervention in Canada. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 30 (4): 603-641.
176. Lehoux, P., J. Saint-Arnaud, and L. Richard. 2004. The use of technology at home: What patient manuals say and sell vs. what patients face and fear. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26 (5): 617-644.
177. Lehoux, P., C. Sicotte, and J.-L. Denis. 1999. Assessment of a computerized medical record system: Disclosing its scripts of use. Evaluation and Program Planning 22 (4): 439-453.
178. Lehoux, P., C. Sicotte, J.-L. Denis, M. Berg, and A. Lacroix. 2002. The theory of use behind telemedicine: How compatible with physicians’ clinical routines? Social Science & Medicine, 54: 889-904.
179. Lehoux, P., C. Sicotte, J.-L. Denis, A. Lacroix, and M. Berg. 2000. Trust as a key component in the use of teleconsultation. Annals of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 33 (8): 482-487.
180. Lehoux, P., S. Tailliez, J.-L. Denis, and M. Hivon. 2004. Redefining HTA in Canada: Diversification of products and contextualization of findings. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 20 (3): 325-336.
181. Lehtonen, T.-K. 2003. The domestication of new technologies as a set of trials. Journal of Consumer Culture 3 (3): 363-385.
182. Leslie, J. 1989. Women’s time: A factor in the use of child survival technologies? Health Policy and Planningi (1): 1-16.
183. Levin-Scherz, J. 2001. Will disruptive innovations cure health care? Harvard Business Review 79 (2): 150-151.
184. Lewis, S., P. Baird, R. G. Evans, W. A. Ghali, C. J. Wright, E. Gibson, and F. Baylis. 2001. Dancing with the porcupine: Rules governing the university-industry relationship. Canadian Medical Association Journal 165 (6): 783-785.
185. Leys, M. 2003. Health technology assessment: The contribution of qualitative research. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 19 (2): 319-329.
186. Light, D. W., R. Castellblanch, P. Arredondo, and D. Socolar. 2003. No exit and the organization of voice in biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 28 (2-3): 473-507.
187. Littlejohns, P., G. Leng, T. Culyer, and M. Drummond. 2004. NICE clinical guidelines: Maybe health economists should participate in guideline development. Letter. British Medical Journal 329: 571.
188. Lock, M., A. Young, and A. Cambrosio, eds. 2000. Living and working with new medical technologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
189. Lomas, J. 1990. Finding audiences, changing beliefs: The structure of research use in Canadian health policy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 15 (3): 525-542.
190. Lomas, J. 1993. Making clinical policy explicit. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 9 (I): 11-25.
191. Lomas, J. 2004. Postscript: Understanding evidence-based decision-making or why keyboards are irrational? In Multidisciplinary perspectives on evidence-based decision-making in health care, ed. L. Lemieux-Charles and F. Champagne, 281-290. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
192. Longman dictionary of the English language. 1984. Harlow, U.K.: Longman.
193. Lowton, K., and J. Gabe. 2003. Life on a slippery slope: Perceptions of health in adults with cystic fibrosis. Sociology of Health & Illness 25 (4): 289-319.
194. Luck, R. 2003. Dialogue in participatory design. Design Studies 24: 523-535.
195. Lun, K. C. 1995. New user interfaces. International Journal of Biomedical Computing 39:147-150.
196. MacKenzie, D., and J. Wacjman, eds. 1985. The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum. Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open University Press.
197. Malpani, A., A. Malpani, and D. Modi. 2002. Preimplantation sex selection for family balancing in India. Human Reproduction 17 (1): 11-12.
198. Marmor, T. R., and J. Blustein. 1994. Cutting waste by making rules: Promises, pitfalls and realistic prospects. In Understanding health care reform, ed. T. R. Marmor, 86-106. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
199. Marteau, T. M., and C. Lerman. 2001. Genetic risk and behavioural change. British Medical Journal 322 (7293): 1056-1059.
200. Martin, D. K., M. Giacomini, and P. A. Singer. 2002. Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers. Health Policy 61: 279-290.
201. Martin, M. W. 2002. Personal meaning and ethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 8: 545-560.
202. Mather, C. 2004. The pipeline and the porcupine: Alternate metaphors of the physician-industry relationship. Social Science and Medicine 60: 1323-1334.
203. Mather, C., U. Fleising, and L. Taylor. 2004. Translating knowledge from bench to bedside: The controversial social life of t-PA. Risk Management: An International Journal 6 (2): 49-60.
204. May, C., M. Mort, T. Williams, F. Mair, and L. Gask. 2003. Health technology assessment in its local contexts: Studies of telehealthcare. Social Science and Medicine 57 (4): 697-710.
205. McGregor, M. 1992. Can our health services be saved by technology evaluation? The Quebec experience. Clinical Investigative Medicine 17 (4): 334-342.
206. McKeever, P., and P. Coyte. 1999. Place in health care: Sites, roles, rights and responsibilities. Report prepared under the auspices of an SSHRC/CHSRF Health Institute Design Grant.
207. McKeever, P. 2001. Home care in Canada: Housing matters. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 33 (2): 3-4.
208. McKeever, P., J. Angus, K.-L. Miller, and D. Reid. 2003. “It’s more of a production”: Accomplishing mothering using a mobility device. Disability & Society 18 (2): 179-197.
209. McKinlay, J. 1981. From “promising report” to “standard procedure”: Seven stages in the career of a medical innovation. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly: Health and Society 59 (3): 374-411.
210. Mechanic, D. 2002. Socio-cultural implications of changing organizational technologies in the provision of care. Social Science and Medicine 54 (3): 459-467.
211. Melzer, A. M. 1993. The problem with the “problem of technology.” In Technology in the western political tradition, ed. A. M. Melzer, J. Weinberger, and M. R. Zinman, 287-322. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
212. Menkes, D. B., M. P. Davison, S. A. Costello, and C. Jaye. 2005. Stereotactic radiosurgery: The patient’s experience. Social Science and Medicine 60: 2561-2573.
213. Menon D., and L. A. Topfer. 2000. Health technology assessment in Canada: A decade in review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 16: 896-902.
214. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1969. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
215. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of perception, trans. Colin Smith. New York: The Humanities Press.
216. Mitchell, L. M., and A. Cambrosio. 1997. The invisible topography of power: Electromagnetic fields, bodies and the environment. Social Studies of Science 27 (2): 221-271.
217. Mol, A. 2000. What diagnostic devices do: The case of blood sugar measurement. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21: 9-22.
218. Mol, A.-M. 2002. The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
219. Mol, A.-M., and J. Law. 1994. Regions, networks, and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science 24 (4): 641-671.
220. Molewijk, A. C., A. M. Stiggelbout, W. Otten, H. M. Dupuis, and J. Kievit. 2004. Implicit norma-tivity in evidence-based medicine: A plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Health Care Analysis 11 (1): 69-92.
221. Moran, M., and E. Alexander. 1997. Technology, American democracy and health care. British Journal of Political Sciences 27: 573-594.
222. Moreira, T. 2005. Diversity in guidelines: The role of repertoires of evaluation. Social Science and Medicine 60: 1975-1985.
223. Morgall, J. M. 1993. Technology assessment: A feminist perspective. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
224. Mort, M„ C. May, and T. Williams. 2003. Remote doctors and absent patients: Acting at a distance in telemedicine? Science, Technology and Human Values 28: 274-295.
225. Murphy, E., R. Dingwall, D. Greatbatch, S. Parker, and P. Watson. 1998. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment 2 (16), http://www.ncchta.org/fullmono/mon216.pdf.
226. Murray, S. A., E. Grant, A. Grant, and M. Kendall. 2003. Dying in developed and developing countries: Lessons from two qualitative interview studies of patients and their carers. British Medical Journal 326: 368.
227. Mykhalovskiy, E., and L. Weir. 2004. The problem of evidence-based medicine: Directions for social science. Social Science and Medicine 59 (5): 1059-1069.
228. Nélisse, C. 1996. La trousse médico-légale: Technologie sociale et protocolorisation de l’intervention. Sociologie et Sociétés 28 (2): 157-171.
229. Neves, M. P. 2004. Cultural context and consent: An anthropological view. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7: 93-98.
230. Newhouse, J. P. 1992. Medical care costs: How much welfare loss? Journal of Economic Perspectives 6:3-21.
231. Newhouse, J. P. 1993. An iconoclastic view of health cost containment. Health Affairs 15: 152-171.
232. Neyland, D. 2004. Closed-circuits of interactions? The mobilization of images and accountability through high-street CCTV. Information, Communication and Society 7 (2): 252-271.
233. Neyland, D. 2005. Personal communication.
234. Nieusma, D. 2004. Alternative design scholarship: Working toward appropriate design. Design Issues 20 (3): 13-24.
235. Nord, E. 1999. Cost-value analysis in health care: Making sense out of QALYs. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
236. Norman, D. 1989. The design of everyday things. Toronto: Doubleday.
237. Oliver S., L. Clarke-Jones, R. Rees, R. Milne, P. Buchanan, G. Gyte, A. Oakley, and K. Stein. 2004. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: Developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technology Assessment 8 (15), http://www.ncchta.org/fullmono/mon815.pdf.
238. Oortwijn, W., R. Reuzel, and M. Decker. 2004. Introduction. Poiesis &Praxis, 2: 97-102.
239. Oudshoorn, N., and T. Pinch. 2003. How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
240. Pacey, A. 1999. Meaning in technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
241. Paravic, J., B. Brajenovic-Milic, D. Tislaric, M. Kapovic, A. Botica, V. Jurcan, and S. Milotti. 1999. Maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: A survey of pregnant women’s views. Community Genetics 2 (2-3): 109-112.
242. Parent, K., and M. Anderson. 2000. Developing a home care system by design. Healthcare Papers 11 (4): 46-52.
243. Pasveer, B. 1989. Knowledge of shadows: The introduction of x-ray images in medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness 11 (4): 360-381.
244. Peden, E. A., and M. S. Freeland.1995. A historical analysis of medical spending growth, 1960-1963. Health Affairs 14: 235-247.
245. Pelz, D. C. 1978. Some expanded perspectives on the use of social science in public policy. In Major social issues: A multidisciplinary view, ed. J. M. Yinger and S. J. Cutler, 346-357. New York: Free Press.
246. Peters, B. E. 2000. Hospitals and the forces of change. In Technology and the future of health care: Preparing for the next 30 years, ed. D. Ellis, 193-208. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
247. Petre, M. 2004. How expert engineering teams use disciplines of innovation. Design Studies 25: 477-493.
248. Pierret, J. 2003. The illness experience: State of knowledge and perspective for research. Sociology of Health & Illness 25: 4-22.
249. Pinch, T. J., and W. E. Bijker. 1987. The social construction of facts and artifacts or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit from each other. In The social construction of technological systems, ed. W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, 11-50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
250. Pinch, T. and T. Pinch. 1988. Reservations about reflexivity and new literary forms or why let the devil have all the good tunes? In Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge, ed. S. Woolgar, 178-197. London: Sage.
251. Pippin, K., and G. R. Fernie. 1997. Designing devices that are acceptable to the frail elderly: A new understanding based upon how older people perceive a walker. Technology & Disability 7: 93-102.
252. Pivik, J., E. Rode, and C. Ward. 2004. A consumer involvement model for health technology assessment in Canada. Health Policy 69: 253-268.
253. Poland, B., P. Lehoux, D. Holmes, and G. Andrews. 2005. How place matters: Unpacking technology and power relations in health and social care. Health and Social Care in the Community 13 (2): 170-180.
254. Prasad, P. 1993. Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change: A symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. Academy of Management Journal 36 (6): 1400-1429.
255. Prout, A. 1996. Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology: An illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler. Sociology of Health and Illness 18 (2): 198-219.
256. Reese W. L. 1980. Dictionary of philosophy and religion. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
257. Reiter-Theil, S. 2004. Does empirical research make bioethics more relevant? The “embedded researcher” as a methodological approach. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7: 17-29.
258. Remennick, L. I., and R. A. Shtarkshall. 1997. Technology versus responsibility: Immigrant physicians from the former Soviet Union reflect on Israeli health care. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 38: 191-202.
259. Reuzel, R., W. Oortwijn, M. Decker, C. Clausen, P. Gallo, J. Grin, A. Grunwald, L. Hennen, G. van der Wilt, and Y. Yoshinaka. 2004. Ethics and HTA: Some lessons and challenges for the future. Poiesis & Praxis 2: 247-256.
260. Rip, A., T. J. Misa, and J. Schot, eds. 1995. Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment. London: Pinter.
261. Robins, R., and S. Metcalfe. 2004. Integrating genetics as practices of primary care. Social Science & Medicine 59: 223-233.
262. Rocher, G. 1990. Y a-t-il des normes d’allocation des équipements coûteux en milieu hospitalier? Revue de Droit de l’Université de Sherbrooke 20: 219-229.
263. Ross, S. E., J. N. Lavis, C. Rodriguez, J. M. Woodside, and J.-L. Denis. 2003. Partnership experiences: Involving decision-makers in the research process. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 8 (Suppl. 2): 26-34.
264. Rouse, J. 1991. Philosophy of science and the persistent narratives of modernity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 22 (1): 141-162.
265. Royle, J., and S. Oliver. 2004. Consumer involvement in the health technology assessment program. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 20 (4): 493-497.
266. Sanders, C. A. 1995. Industry’s efforts: Devices and pharmaceuticals. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 60: 1537-1540.
267. Sang, B. 2004. Choice, participation and accountability: Assessing the potential impact of legislation promoting patient and public involvement in health in the UK. Health Expectations 1: 187-190.
268. Savage, J. 2000. Ethnography and health care. British Medical Journal 321: 1400-1402.
269. Savoie, I., A. Kazanjian, and F. Brunger. 1999. Women, the media, and heart disease. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 15 (4): 729-737.
270. Scott, S., L. Prior, F. Wood, and J. Gray. 2005. Repositioning the patient: The implications of being “at risk.” Social Science and Medicine 60: 1869-1879.
271. Serres, M. 1991. Le tiers-instruit. Paris: Gallimard.
272. Serres, M. 2001. Hominescence. Paris: Pommier.
273. Shemer, J., and T. Schersten, eds. 1995. Technology assessment in health care: From theory to practice. Jerusalem: Gefen.
274. Shostak, S. 2003. Locating gene-environment interaction: At the intersections of genetics and public health. Social Science and Medicine 56: 2327-2342.
275. Sicotte, C., J.-L. Denis, P. Lehoux, and F. Champagne. 1998. The computer-based patient record: Challenges towards timeless and spaceless medical practice. Journal of Medical Systems 22 (4): 237-256.
276. Sinding, C. 2003. Disarmed complaints: Unpacking satisfaction with end-of-life care. Social Science & Medicine 57: 1375-1385.
277. Siu, K. W. M. 2003. Users’ creative responses and designers’ roles. Design Issues 19 (2): 64-73.
278. Smith, J. T. 2000. Will disruptive innovations cure health care? Harvard Business Review 78 (6): 198.
279. Smith, K. 1997. Economic infrastructures and innovation systems. In Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations, ed. C. Edquist, 86-105. London: Pinter.
280. Stengers, I. 1993. L’invention des sciences modernes. Paris: Editions La Découverte.
281. Sullivan, M. 2003. The new subjective medicine: Taking the patient’s point of view on health care and health. Social Science & Medicine 56: 1595-1604.
282. Tatum, J. S. 2004. The challenge of responsible design. Design Issues 20 (3): 66-80.
283. Tenery, R. M. 2000. Interactions between physicians and the health care technology industry. Journal of the American Medical Association 283 (3): 391-393.
284. Tenner, E. 1996. Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. New York: Vintage Books.
285. Timmermans, S., and M. Berg. 2003. The practice of medical technology. Sociology of Health and Illness 25: 97-114.
286. Tunis, S. 2004. Why Medicare has not established criteria for coverage decisions. New England Journal of Medicine 350 (21): 2196-2198.
287. Udow, M., and K. L. Seitz. 2000. A payer’s perspective on the future. In Technology and the future of health care: Preparing for the next 30 years, ed. D. Ellis, 209-230. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
288. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1985. Medicare’s prospective payment system: Strategies for evaluating cost, quality, and medical technology. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
289. van der Scheer, L., and G. Widdershoven. 2004a. A response to Levitt and Molewijk. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1: 89-91.
290. van der Scheer, L., and G. Widdershoven. 2004b. Integrated empirical ethics: Loss of normativity? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7: 71-79.
291. van der Wilt, G. J. 2004. Health technology assessment: Trying to bring empirical and ethical inquiry together. Poiesis & Praxis 2: 195-206.
292. Vicente, K. 2003. The human factor: Revolutionizing the way people live with technology. New York: Taylor & Francis.
293. Vos, R., and D. L. Willems. 2000. Technology in medicine: Ontology, epistemology, ethics and social philosophy at the crossroads. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21: 1-7.
294. Wailoo, A., J. Roberts, J. Brazier, and C. McCabe. 2004. Efficiency, equity, and NICE clinical guidelines. British Medical Journal 328: 536-537.
295. Webster, A. 2004a. Health technology assessment: A sociological commentary on reflexive innovation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 20 (1): 61-66.
296. Webster, A. 2004b. Healthy innovation: An international workshop held at the University of Manchester, July 8-10, 2004, http://www.york.ac.uk/res/iht/events/healthyinnov/healthyinnov2004.htm (accessed January 27, 2005).
297. Weisbrod, B. A. 1991. The health care quadrilemma: An essay of technological change, insurance, quality of care, and cost containment. Journal of Economic Literature 29: 523-552.
298. Weiss, C., ed. 1977. Using social research in public policy making. Toronto: Lexington Books.
299. Weiss, C. H. 1991. Policy research: Data, ideas, or arguments? In Social sciences and modern states: National experiences and theoretical crossroads, ed. P. Wagner, C. H. Weiss, B. Wittrock, and H. Wollman, 307-332. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
300. Wensing, M., and G. Elwyn. 2003. Methods for incorporating patients’ views in health care. British Medical Journal 326: 877-879.
301. Wiktorowicz, M., and R. Deber. 1997. Regulating biotechnology: a rational-political model of policy development. Health Policy 40 (3): 115-138.
302. Williams, R., and D. Edge. 1996. The social shaping of technology. Research Policy 25: 865-899.
303. Williams, T., C. May, F. Mair, M. Mort, and L. Gask. 2003. Normative models of health technology assessment and the social production of evidence about telehealth care. Health Policy 64 (1): 39-54.
304. Williams-Jones, B., and J. E. Graham. 2003. Actor-network theory: A tool to support ethical analysis of commercial genetic testing. New Genetics and Society 22 (3): 271-296.
305. Winner, L. 1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109 (1): 121-135.
306. Winner, L. 1994. Reply to Mark Elam. Science, Technology, & Human Values 19 (1): 107-109.
307. Witz, A. 1992. Professions and patriarchy. London: Routledge.
308. Wooffitt, R., and C. MacDermid. 1995. Wizards and social control. In The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces, ed. P. J. Thomas, 126-141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
309. Woolgar, S. 1988. Reflexivity is the ethnographer of the text. In Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge, ed. S. Woolgar, 14-35. London: Sage.
310. Woolgar, S. 1991. Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination, ed. J. Law, 58-97. London: Routledge.
311. Woolgar, S., and M. Ashmore. 1988. The next step: An introduction to the reflexive project. In Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge, ed. S. Woolgar, 1-11. London: Sage.
312. Woolgar, S., and G. Cooper. 1999. Do artefacts have ambivalence? Moses’ bridges, Winner’s bridges and other urban legends in S&TS. Social Studies of Science 29 (3): 433-449.
313. Wyer, M., ed. 2001. Women, science, and technology: A reader in feminist science studies. New York: Routledge.
314. Zimmern, R., and C. Cook. 2000. Genetics and health: Policy issues for genetic science and their implications for health and health services. London: The Nuffield Trust.