JPEG compression of stereoscopic digital images for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy via teleophthalmology

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 746-754

  Baker, Chad F ^a   Rudnisky, Christopher J ^a   Tennant, Matthew T S ^a,d   Sanghera, Paul ^b   Hinz, Bradley J ^a   De Leon, Alexander R ^c   Greve, Mark D J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^d Alberta Retina Consultants   (Canada)

Author keywords

Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic retinopathy; Fundus photography; Medical imaging; Retina; Telemedicine; Teleophthalmology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL COMPUTER; EARLY TREATMENT DIABETIC RETINOPATHY STUDY STANDARD; EYE FUNDUS; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; JOINT PHOTOGRAPHIC EXPERTS GROUP COMPRESSION; OPHTHALMOLOGY; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PILOT STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; TAGGED IMAGE FILE FORMAT; TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 12244301654     PISSN: 00084182     EISSN: 17153360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-4182(04)80068-1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Preliminary report on effects of photocoagulation therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 1976;94:505-37.
2. MacMillan HL, MacMillan AB, Offord DR, Dingle JL. Aboriginal health. Can Med Assoc J 1996;155(11): 1569-77.
3. Young TK, Shah C. Extent and magnitude of the problem. In: Young TK, editor. Diabetes in the Canadian native population: bicultural perspectives. Toronto: Canadian Diabetes Association; 1987. p. 11-25.
4. Evers S, McCracken E, Antone I, Deagle G. Prevalence of diabetes in Indians and Caucasians living in southwestern Ontario. Can J Public Health 1987;78(4):240-3.
5. Meltzer S, Leiter L, Daneman D, Gerstein HC, Lau D, Ludwig S, et al. 1998 clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetes in Canada. Canadian Diabetes Association. Can Med Assoc J 1998; 159 (Suppl 8):S1-29.
6. McGregor G. Transmitting digital images of the fundus for the West Virginia Diabetic Eye Care Project. J Ophthalmic Photogr 1994;16:87-98.
7. Young S, George LD, Lusty J, Owens DR. A new screening tool for diabetic retinopathy: the Canon CR5 45NM retinal camera with Frost Medical Software RIS-lite digital imaging system. J Audiov Media Med 1997;20(1):11-4.
8. Li HK. Telemedicine and ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol 1999;44(1):61-72.
9. Tennant MTS, Greve MDJ, Rudnisky CJ, Hillson TR, Hinz BJ. Identification of diabetic retinopathy by stereoscopic digital imaging via teleophthalmology: a comparison to slide film. Can J Ophthalmol 2001; 36(4):187-96.
10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs - an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology 1991;98(5 Suppl):786-806.
11. Wong D. Textbook of ophthalmic photography. New York: Inter-Optics Publications; 1982. p. 76.
12. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Ophthalmology 1991;98(5 Suppl):823-33.
13. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley; 1990. p. 365-70.
14. Rudnisky CJ, Hinz BJ, Tennant MTS, De Leon AR, Greve MDJ. High-resolution stereoscopic digital fundus photography versus contact lens biomicroscopy for the detection of clinically significant macular edema. Ophthalmology 2002;109(2):267-74.
15. Scheuten HJ. Estimating kappa from binocular data and comparing marginal probabilities. Stat Med 1993;12(23):2207-17.
16. Fleiss JL. Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. Psychol Bull 1969;72:323-7.
17. Oden NL. Estimating kappa from binocular data. Stat Med 1991;10(8):1303-11.
18. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 4th ed. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth; 1995. p. 423-8.
19. Smith I, Roszkowski A, Slaughter R, Sterling D. Acceptable levels of digital image compression in chest radiology. Australas Radiol 2000;44(1):32-5.
20. Savcenko V, Erickson BJ, Palisson PM, Persons KR, Manduca A, Hartman T, et al. Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression. Radiology 1998;206(3):609-16.
21. Strintzis MG. A review of compression methods for medical images in PACS. Int J Med Inform 1998; 52:159-65.
22. Slone RM, Foos DH, Whiting BR, Muka E, Rubin DA, Pilgram TK, et al. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation. Radiology 2000;215(2):543-53.
23. MacMahon H, Doi K, Sanada S, Montner SM, Giger ML, Metz CE, et al. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology 1991;178(1):175-9.
24. Cosman PC, Davidson HC, Bergin CJ, Tseng CW, Moses LE, Riskin EA, et al. Thoracic CT images: effect of lossy image compression on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 1994;190(2):517-24.
25. Lee MS, Shin DS, Berger JW. Grading, image analysis, and stereopsis of digitally compressed fundus images. Retina 2000;20(3):275-81.
26. Nelson M. The data compression book. New York: M & T Publishing; 1992. p. 347-73.
27. Anagnoste SR, Orlock D, Spaide R, Guyer DR, Slakter GJ, Sorenson J, et al. Digital compression of ophthalmic images: maximum JPEG compression undetectable by retinal specialists [abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:S922.
28. Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA, Morris KG, Harrington RA, Sketch MH, et al. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. Circulation 1997;96(4):1157-64.