Generation and Distribution of Technological Knowledge: Incentives, Norms, and Institutions

Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 64-85

  Foray, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85137519224     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203357620-10     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Allen, R. C. (1983) Collective invention. Journal of Economic Behavior and Economic Organization, 4, 1-24.
2. Arrow, K. (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources to invention. In R. R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton: NBER.
3. Arrow, K. (1994) Methodological individualism and social knowledge. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, May.
4. Besen, S. and Raskind, L. (1991) An introduction to the law and economics of intellectual property. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), 3-27.
5. Callon, M. (1994) Is science a public good? Fifth Mullins Lecture. Science, Technology and Human Value, 19 (4).
6. Cassier, M. (1995) Les règles de bonne conduite du projet Bridge sur les lipases. Journée du Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation de l’Ecole des Mines de Paris.
7. Cohen, W., Florida, R. and Goe, R. (1994) University-industry research centers in the United States. CEPR/AAAS Conference, University Goals, Institutional Mechanisms and the ‘Industrial Transferability’ of Research. Stanford University.
8. Dasgupta, P. and David, P. A. (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23 (5).
9. David, P. A. (1991) Reputation and agency in the historical emergence of the institutions of ‘open science’. CEPR Discussion Paper, no. 261, Stanford University [Reissued in revised version as MERIT Memorandum (2) 94-006, January (1994).]
10. David, P. A. (1993) Intellectual property institutions and the panda’s thumb. In M. Waller-stein, M. Mogee and R. Schoen (eds), Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. National Research Council, National Academy Press.
11. David, P. A. (1994) Why are institutions the ‘carriers’ of history? Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions. Structural Change and Economics, 5 (2).
12. David, P. A. and Foray, D. (1993) Markov random fields, percolation structure and the economics of diffusion of document standard. In G. Pogorel (ed.), Global Telecommunications Strategies and Technological Changes. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. David, P. A. and Foray, D. (1994) Dynamics of technology diffusion through local network structures. In L. Leydersdorff and P. van den Besselaar (eds), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Developments in Technology Studies. London: Pinter.
14. David, P. A. and Foray, D. (1995) Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. S77 Review, 16.
15. David, P. A. and Foray, D. (1996) Information distribution and the growth of economically valuable knowledge: a rationale for technological infrastructure policies. In M. Teubal, D. Foray, M. Justman and E. Zuscovitch (eds), Technological Infrastructure Policies: an International Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
16. David, P. A., Foray, D. and Dalle, J. M. (1996) Marshallian externalities and the emergence and spatial stability of technological enclaves. To be published in a special issue of Economics of Innovation and New Technology, forthcoming.
17. David, P. A., Mowery, D. and Steinmueller, E. (1992) Analyzing the economics pay off of basic research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
18. David, P. A., Mowery, D. and Steinmueller, E. (1994) University-industry research collaborations: managing missions in conflict. CEPR/AAAS Conference, University Goals, Institutional Mechanisms and the ‘Industrial Transferability’ of Research. Stanford University.
19. Eamon, W. (1985) From the secret of nature to public knowledge: the origins of the concept of openness in science. Minerva, 23 (3), 321-47.
20. Farrell, J. (1989) Standardization and intellectual property. Jurimetrics, 30 (1), 35-50.
21. Foray, D. (1991) The secrets of the industry are in the air: industrial cooperation and the organizational dynamics of the innovative firms. Research Policy, 20 (5).
22. Foray, D. (1994) Production and distribution of knowledge in the new systems of innovation: the role of intellectual property rights. STI Review, 14.
23. Foray, D. (1995a) The economics of intellectual property rights and the systems of innovation: the inevitable diversity. In J. Hagedorn (ed.), Technical Change and the World Economy. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
24. Foray, D. (1995b) Coalitions and committees: how users get involved in information technology standardization. In R. Hawkins, R. Mansell and J. Skea (eds), Standards, Innovation and Competitiveness. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
25. Foray, D. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (1996) Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-based Economy. Paris: OECD.
26. Frank, R. (1991) Positional externalities. In R. Zeckhauser (ed.), Strategy and Choice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Garfinkel, S., Stallman, R. and Kapor, M. (1991) Why patents are bad for software. Issues in Science and Technology, Fall.
28. Grindley, P., Mowery, D. and Silvermann, B. (1994) The Design of High-technology Consortia: Lessons from SEMA TECH. Center for Research in Management, University of Berkeley.
29. Hatchuel, A. and Weil, B. (1995) Experts in Organizations. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
30. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. and Tratjenberg, M. (1994) Numbers up, quality down? Trends in university patenting 1965-1992. CEPR/AAAS Conference, University Goals, Institutional Mechanisms and the ‘Industrial Transferability’ of Research. Stanford University.
31. Hilgartner, S. and Brandt-Rauf, S. (1994) Controlling data and resources: access strategies in molecular genetics. CEPR/AAAS Conference, University Goals, Institutional Mechanisms and the ‘Industrial Transferability’ of Research. Stanford University.
32. von Hippel, E. (1988) Trading trade secrets. Technology Review, February-March, 58-64.
33. Hirshleifer, J. (1971) The private and social value of information and the reward to inventive activity. American Economic Review, 61.
34. Joly, P. B. and Hermitte, M. A. (1993) Plant biotechnology and patents in Europe: an economic analysis of alternative models of intellectual property rights. Biotechnology Review, 1, November.
35. Kahin, B. (1990) The software patent crisis. Technology Review, April.
36. Kitch, E. (1977) The nature and function of the patent system. Journal of Law and Economics, 20.
37. Klein, B. (1988) Luck, necessity and dynamic flexibility. In H. Hanusch (ed.), Evolutionary Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Long, P. (1991) The openness of knowledge: an ideal and its context in 16th century writings on mining and metallurgy. Technology and Culture.
40. Lundvall, B.-A. (1995) The social dimension of the learning economy. Inaugural Lecture, Aalborg University.
41. Lundvall, B.-A. and Johnson, B. (1994) The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1 (2).
42. Machlup, F. (1983) What do we mean by the optimum utilization of knowledge. In K. Boulding and L. Senesh (eds), The Optimum Utilization of Knowledge. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
43. Machlup, F. and Penrose, E. (1950) The patent controversy in the nineteenth century. Journal of Economic History, 10 (1).
44. MacLeod, C. (1991) The paradoxes of patenting: invention and its diffusion in 18th- and 19th- century Britain, France, and North America. Technology and Culture.
45. Margolis, H. (1991) Free-riding versus cooperation. In R. Zeckhauser (ed.), Strategy and Choice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Merges, R. and Nelson, R. (1994) On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: the effect of patent scope decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations, 25.
47. Merton, R. K. (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: N. W. Storer.
48. Nelson, R. (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67.
49. Ordover, J. (1991) A patent system for both diffusion and exclusion. Journal of Economic Perspective, 5 (1).
50. Romer, P. (1993) The economics of new ideas and new goods. Published as a supplement to Suimmers and Shah (eds), World Bank Economic Review. Washington, DC: IBRD/World Bank.
51. Rosenberg, N. and Birdzell, L. E. (1986) How the West Grew Rich? New York: Basic Books.
52. Sabel, C. (1992) Studied trust: building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. In D. Foray and C. Freeman (eds). Technology and the Wealth of Nations. London: Pinter.
53. Schelling, T. (1978) Micromotives and macrobehaviors. New York: W. W. Norton.
54. Scotchmer, S. (1991) On the shoulders of giants: cumulative research and the patent law. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), 24-41.
55. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1992) Finding a Balance: Computer Software, Intellectual Property, and the Challenge of Technological Change. Washington, DC: USGPO, OTA-TCT-527.