Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers

Health Policy

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 279-290

  Martin, Douglas K ^a   Giacomini, Mita ^b   Singer, Peter A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics   (Canada)

Author keywords

Accountability for reasonableness; Decision makers views; Fairness; Priority setting; Resource allocation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MASS MEDIUM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; TECHNOLOGY; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; ORGANIZATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL JUSTICE; STANDARD;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; CANADA; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMAN; INTERVIEWS; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; ONTARIO; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; HUMANS;

EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 0036018479     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00237-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for insurers
2. Allocating health care: Cost-utility analysis, informed democratic decision making, or the veil of ignorance?
3. Allocating livers - Devising a fair system
4. Controlling the costs of health care for the elderly: Fair means and foul
5. The concept of equity in health services research
6. Ethics of allocating intensive care unit resources
7. Ethics of accountability in managed care reform
8. Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: A qualitative case study
9. Priority setting decisions for new cancer drugs: What rationales are used?
10. Goodbye to the simple solutions: The second phase of priority setting in health care
11. Priority setting in health care: Learning from international experience
12. Rationing and the health authority
13. Tragic choices in health care: Lessons from the Child B case
14. Setting Priorities: Is there a role for citizens' juries?
15. Dimensions of rationing: Who should do what?
16. Allocating health care: Cost-utility analysis, informed democratic decision making, or the veil of ignorance?
17. Dilemmas in rationing health care services: The case for implicit rationing
18. The rationing debate: Rationing within the NHS should be explicit: The case for
19. Understanding financial conflicts of interest