Integrating genetics as practices of primary care

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 223-233

  Robins, Rosemary ^a   Metcalfe, Sylvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; General practitioners; Genetics education; Primary care

Indexed keywords

PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

AMBIVALENCE; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETICS; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE NEED; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL EXPERT; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SKILL;

FAMILY PRACTICE; FOCUS GROUPS; GENETIC SERVICES; GENETICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; VICTORIA;

EID: 2042434544     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.025     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Berg M. Rationalizing medical work. Decision support techniques and medical practices:1997;The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
2. Berg M., Mol A. Differences in medicine. Unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies:1998;Duke University Press, Durham
3. Elwyn G., Iredale R., Gray J. Reactions of GPs to a triage-controlled referral system for cancer genetics. Family Practice. 19(1):2002;65-71
4. Emery J., Hayflick S. The challenge of integrating genetic medicine into primary care. British Medical Journal. 322:2001;1027-1030
5. Emery J., Watson E., Rose P., Andermann A. A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services. Family Practice. 16(4):1999;426-445
6. Ettorre E. Experts as 'storytellers' in reproductive genetics. Exploring key issues Sociology of Health & Illness. 21(5):1999;539-559
7. Fetters M.D., Doukas D.J., Phan K.L.D. Family physicians' perspectives on genetics and the human genome project. Clinical Genetics. 56:1999;28-34
8. Friedman L., Plon S., Cooper P., Weinberg A. Cancer genetics survey of primary care physicians' attitudes and practices. Journal of Cancer Education. 12:1997;199-203
9. Hallowell N., Green J.M., Statham H., Murton F., Richards M.P.M. Recall of numerical risk estimates and counsellees' perceptions of the importance of risk information following genetic counselling for breast and ovarian cancer. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2(2):1997;149-159
10. Hallowell N., Statham H., Murton F. Women's understanding of their risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer before and after genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 7:1998;345-364
11. Haraway D. Situated knowledges. The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective Haraway D. Simians, Cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. 1991;183-201 Free Association Books, London
12. Hayflick S., Eiff P., Carpenter L., Steinberger J. Primary care physicians' utilization and perceptions of genetic services. Genetics in Medicine. 1:1998;13-21
13. Hurworth, R., Robins, R., Metcalfe, S. (2000). Genetics Education for GPs in Victoria: A Needs Assessment. Report for the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP), Victoria, Australia: RACGP.
14. Irwin A. Citizen science. a study of people expertise and sustainable development:1995;Routledge, London
15. Kerr A., Cunningham-Burley S., Amos A. The new genetics. Professionals' discursive boundaries The Sociological Review. 45(2):1997;279-303
16. Krueger R. Focus groups. 1994;Sage, Thousand Oaks CA
17. Krueger R., Morgan D. The focus group kit. 1998;Sage, Thousand Oaks CA
18. Kumar S. Resisting revolution. Generalism and the new genetics Lancet. 354:1999;1992-1993
19. Kumar S., Gantley M. Tensions between policy makers and general practitioners in implementing new genetics. Grounded theory interview study British Medical Journal. 319:1999;1410-1413
20. Kumar S., Gantley M., Elwyn G., Iredale R. Integrating genetics into primary care practice. British Medical Journal. 323(7325):2001;1367
21. Latour B. We have never been modern. 1993;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
22. Latour B. Pandora's hope. essays on the reality of science studies:1999;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
23. Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts:1979;Sage, Beverley Hills, CA
24. Law J. Organising modernity. 1994;Blackwell, Oxford
25. Law J., Hassard J. Actor network theory and after. 1999;Blackwell, Oxford
26. Macintyre S. The public understanding of science or the scientific understanding of the public? A review of the social context of the 'new genetics'. Public Understanding of Science. 4:1995;223-323
27. Marteau T., Richards M. The troubled helix. Social and psychological implications of the new human genetics:1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
28. Metcalfe S., Hurworth R., Newstead J., Robins R. A needs assessment study of genetics education for General practitioners in Australia. Genetics in Medicine. 4(2):2002;71-77
29. Miles M., Huberman A.M. Qualitative data analysis. 1994;Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
30. Mol A. Missing links, making links; The performance of some atheroscleroses. Berg M., Mol A. Differences in medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies. 1998;144-165 Duke University Press, Durham
31. Mol A. Ontological politics. A word and some questions. Law J., Hassard J. Actor network theory and after. 1999;74-89 Blackwell, Oxford
32. Parsons E., Atkinson P. Lay constructions of genetic risk. Sociology of Health & Illness. 14(4):1992;437-455
33. Patton M.Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 1990;Sage, Newbury Park
34. Richards M. Lay and professional knowledge of genetics and inheritance. Public Understanding of Science. 5:1996;217-230
35. Richards M. Lay understanding of genetics. A test of a hypothesis Journal of Medical Genetics. 33:1996;1032-1036
36. Richards M. Annotation. Genetic research, family life, and clinical practice Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 39:1998;291-305
37. Richards M. Lay understanding of mendelian genetics. Endeavour. 22(3):1998;93-94
38. Richards M.P.M. The new genetics. Some issues for social scientists Sociology of Health & Illness. 15:1993;567-586
39. Richards, M.P.M. (1995). Genetics and health: A family affair. MRC News autumn, 10-13.
40. Rose P.W., Watson E., Yudkin P., Emery J., Murphy M., Fuller A., Lucassen A. Referral of patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer - GPs' knowledge and expectations. Family Practice. 18(5):2001;487-490
41. Shapin S. Here and everywhere. Sociology of scientific knowledge Annual Review of Sociology. 21:1995;289-321
42. Verran H. Science and an African logic. 2001;University of Chicago Press, Chicago
43. Watson E., Austoker J., Lucassen A. A study of GP referrals to a family cancer clinic for breast/ovarian cancer. Family Practice. 18(2):2001;131-134
44. Watson E.K., Shickle D., Qureshi N., Emery J., Austoker J. The 'new genetics' and primary care. GPs' views on their role and their educational needs Family Practice. 16(4):1999;420-425
45. Wynne B. Knowledges in context. Science, Technology and Human Values. 16(1):1991;111-121
46. Wynne B. Public understanding of science. Jasanoff S., Markle G.E., Peterson J.C., Pinch T. Handbook of science and technology studies. 1995;361-388 Sage, Thousand Oaks
47. Wynne B. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. Lash S., Szerszynski B., Wynne B. Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology. 1996;44-83 Sage, London