How does the medium affect the message? Architecture students’ perceptions of the relative utility of different feedback methods

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2021, Pages 54-67

  Smith, Charlie ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

dialogic feedback; Feedback utility; student perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 85080958180     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1733489     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Askew, S., and C., Lodge. 2000. “Gifts, Ping-Pong and Loops: Linking Feedback and Learning.” In Feedback for Learning, edited by S., Askew, 1–17. Abingdon: Routledge.
2. Austerlitz, N., and I., Aravot. 2006. “The Emotional Structure of the Student-Tutor Relationship in the Design Studio.” In Enhancing Curricula: Contributing to the Future, Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century in the Disciplines of Art, Design and Communication, edited by A., Davies, 91–106. London: Centre for Learning and Teaching in Art and Design.
3. Boud, D., and E., Molloy. 2013a. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
4. Boud, D., and E., Molloy. 2013b. “What is the Problem with Feedback?” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education, edited by D., Boud and E., Molloy, 90–103. Abingdon: Routledge.
5. Braun, V., and V., Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
6. Bryman, A., 2012. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Carless, D., and D., Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
8. Carless, D., D., Salter, M., Yang, and J., Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449.
9. Esterhazy, R., and C., Damşa. 2019. “Unpacking the Feedback Process: An Analysis of Undergraduate Students’ Interactional Meaning-Making in Feedback Comments.” Studies in Higher Education 22 (2): 260–274. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249.
10. Hattie, J., and H., Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
11. Hill, J., and H., West. 2020. “Improving the Student Learning Experience through Dialogic Feed-Forward Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (1): 82–97. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908.
12. Jonsson, A., 2013. “Facilitating Productive Use of Feedback in Higher Education.” Active Learning in Higher Education 14 (1): 63–76. doi:10.1177/1469787412467125.
13. Mewburn, I., 2012. “Lost in Translation: Reconsidering Reflective Practice and Design Studio Pedagogy.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11 (4): 363–379. doi:10.1177/1474022210393912.
14. Nicol, D. J., and D., Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.
15. O’Donovan, B., C., Rust, and M., Price. 2016. “A Scholarly Approach to Solving the Feedback Dilemma in Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (6): 938–949. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1052774.
16. Orr, S., and A., Shreeve. 2018. Art and Design Pedagogy in Higher Education: Knowledge, Values and Ambiguity in the Creative Curriculum. Abingdon: Routledge.
17. Orr, S., M., Yorke, and B., Blair. 2014. “‘The Answer is Brought about from within You’: A Student-Centred Perspective on Pedagogy in Art and Design.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 33 (1): 32–45. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2014.12008.x.
18. Orsmond, P., S., Merry, and K., Reiling. 2005. “Biology Students’ Utilization of Tutors’ Formative Feedback: A Qualitative Interview Study.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (4): 369–386. doi:10.1080/02602930500099177.
19. Palincsar, A. S., 1998. “Social Constructivist Perspectives on Teaching and Learning.” Annual Review of Psychology 49 (1): 345–375. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345.
20. Parker, M., and N. E., Winstone. 2016. “Students’ Perceptions of Interventions for Supporting Their Engagement with Feedback.” Practitioner Research in Higher Education Journal 10 (1): 53–64. http://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/2487/1/Parker_StudentsPerceptionsOfInterventions.pdf.
21. Price, M., K., Handley, and J., Millar. 2011. “Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 879–896. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513.
22. Rust, C., B., O’Donovan, and M., Price. 2005. “A Social Constructivist Assessment Process Model: How the Research Literature Shows Us This Could Be Best Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 231–240. doi:10.1080/02602930500063819.
23. Sadler, D. R., 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
24. Salama, A. M., 2015. Spatial Design Education: New Directions for Pedagogy in Architecture and Beyond. Farnham, Surry: Ashgate.
25. Sendziuk, P., 2010. “Sink or Swim? Improving Student Learning through Feedback and Self-Assessment.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 22 (3): 230–330. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE800.pdf.
26. Smith, C., Forthcoming. “Architecture Students’ Uptake and Use of Formative and Summative Feedback.” In preparation.
27. Steen-Utheim, A., and A. L., Wittek. 2017. “Dialogic Feedback and Potentialities for Student Learning.” Learning.” Culture and Social Interaction 15: 18–30. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002.
28. Sutton, P., 2012. “Conceptualizing Feedback Literacy: Knowing, Being, and Acting.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (1): 31–40. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.647781.
29. Swann, C., 1986. “Nellie is Dead.” Designer 1 (1): 18–20.
30. Weaver, M. R., 2006. “Do Students Value Feedback? Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (3): 379–394. doi:10.1080/02602930500353061.
31. Winstone, N., and D., Carless. 2020. Designing Effective Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Learning-Focused Approach. Abingdon: Routledge.
32. Winstone, N. E., R. A., Nash, M., Parker, and J., Rowntree. 2017. “Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes.” Educational Psychologist 52 (1): 17–37. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538.
33. Winstone, N. E., R. A., Nash, J., Rowntree, and M., Parker. 2017. “It’d Be Useful but I Wouldn’t Use It’: Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (11): 2026–2041. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032.
34. Winstone, N. E., R. A., Nash, J., Rowntree, and R., Menezes. 2016. “What Do Students Want Most from Written Feedback Information? Distinguishing Necessities from Luxuries Using a Budgeting Methodology.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (8): 1237–1253. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1075956.
35. Zimbardi, K., K., Colthorpe, A., Dekker, C., Engstrom, A., Bugarcic, P., Worthy, R., Victor, P., Chunduri, L., Lluka, and P., Long. 2017. “Are They Using My Feedback? the Extent of Students’ Feedback Use Has a Large Impact on Subsequent Academic Performance.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (4): 625–644. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1174187.