Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) comparison of taste profiles for different sweeteners in black tea, chocolate milk, and natural yogurt

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2020, Pages 486-492

  Tan, Vicki Wei Kee ^a   Wee, May Sui Mei ^a   Tomic, Oliver ^b   Forde, Ciarán G ^a,c  

^a AGENCY FOR SCIENCE   (Singapore)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Rate All That Apply; side taste; sugar reduction; sweeteners

Indexed keywords

ASPARTAME; GLUCOSIDE; KAURANE DERIVATIVE; STEVIOSIDE; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENT; TRICHLOROSUCROSE; YOGHURT;

ANIMAL; BOVINE; CAMELLIA SINENSIS; CHEMISTRY; CHOCOLATE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MILK; STEVIA; TASTE; TEA;

ANIMALS; ASPARTAME; CAMELLIA SINENSIS; CATTLE; CHOCOLATE; DITERPENES, KAURANE; GLUCOSIDES; HUMANS; MILK; STEVIA; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE; TEA; YOGURT;

EID: 85078776669     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: 17503841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.15007     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alasalvar, C., Topal, B., Serpen, A., Bahar, B., Pelvan, E., & Gökmen, V. (2012). Flavor characteristics of seven grades of black tea produced in Turkey. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60(25), 6323–6332.
2. Allen, A. L., McGeary, J. E., & Hayes, J. E. (2013). Rebaudioside A and rebaudioside D bitterness do not covary with acesulfame-K bitterness or polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31. Chemosensory Perception, 6(3), 109–117.
3. Ares, G., Bruzzone, F., Vidal, L., Cadena, R. S., Giménez, A., Pineau, B., … Jaeger, S. R. (2014). Evaluation of a rating-based variant of check-all-that-apply questions: Rate-all-that-apply (RATA). Food Quality and Preference, 36, 87–95.
4. Ayya, N., & Lawless, H. T. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of high-intensity sweeteners and sweetener mixtures. Chemical Senses, 17(3), 245–259.
5. Baines, Z. V., & Morris, E. R. (1987). Flavour/taste perception in thickened systems: The effect of guar gum above and below c. Food Hydrocolloids, 1(3), 197–205.
6. Bennett, S. M., & Hayes, J. E. (2012). Differences in the chemesthetic subqualities of capsaicin, ibuprofen, and olive oil. Chemical Senses, 37(5), 471–478.
7. Bobowski, N., Reed, D. R., & Mennella, J. A. (2016). Variation in the TAS2R31 bitter taste receptor gene relates to liking for the nonnutritive sweetener Acesulfame-K among children and adults. Scientific Reports, 6, 39135.
8. Calviño, A. M., García-Medina, M. R., Cometto-Muniz, J. E., & Rodríguez, M. B. (1993). Perception of sweetness and bitterness in different vehicles. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(6), 751–758.
9. Chung, M.-Y., Oh, D.-K., & Lee, K. W. (2012). Hypoglycemic health benefits of d-psicose. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60(4), 863–869.
10. Coggins, P. C., Schilling, M. W., Kumari, S., & Gerrard, P. D. (2008). Development of a sensory lexicon for conventional milk yogurt in the United States. Journal of Sensory Studies, 23(5), 671–687. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2008.00179.x
11. de Cock, P. (1999). Erythritol: A novel noncaloric sweetener ingredient low-calories sweeteners—Present and Future (Vol. 85, pp. 110–116). Basel, Switzerland: Karger Publishers.
12. de Melo, L. L. M. M., Bolini, H. M. A., & Efraim, P. (2009). Sensory profile, acceptability, and their relationship for diabetic/reduced calorie chocolates. Food Quality and Preference, 20(2), 138–143.
13. Fujimaru, T., Park, J. H., & Lim, J. (2012). Sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose and other sweeteners. Journal of Food Science, 77(9), S323–S328.
14. George, V., Arora, S., Wadhwa, B. K., Singh, A. K., & Sharma, G. S. (2010). Optimisation of sweetener blends for the preparation of lassi. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 63(2), 256–261.
15. Giacalone, D., & Hedelund, P. I. (2016). Rate-all-that-apply (RATA) with semi-trained assessors: An investigation of the method reproducibility at assessor-, attribute-and panel-level. Food Quality and Preference, 51, 65–71.
16. Green, B. G., Lim, J., Osterhoff, F., Blacher, K., & Nachtigal, D. (2010). Taste mixture interactions: Suppression, additivity, and the predominance of sweetness. Physiology & Behavior, 101(5), 731–737.
17. Hanger, L., Lotz, A., & Lepeniotis, S. (1996). Descriptive profiles of selected high intensity sweeteners (HIS), HIS blends, and sucrose. Journal of Food Science, 61(2), 456–459.
18. Higgins, K. A., & Mattes, R. D. (2019). A randomized controlled trial contrasting the effects of four low-calorie sweeteners and sucrose on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 109(5), 1288–1301.
19. Holub, I., Gostner, A., Theis, S., Nosek, L., Kudlich, T., Melcher, R., & Scheppach, W. (2010). Novel findings on the metabolic effects of the low glycaemic carbohydrate isomaltulose (Palatinose™). British Journal of Nutrition, 103(12), 1730–1737.
20. Hutchings, S. C., Low, J. Y., & Keast, R. S. (2019). Sugar reduction without compromising sensory perception. An impossible dream? Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 59(14), 2287–2307.
21. ISO. (1988). Sensory analysis: General guidance for the design of test rooms. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
22. Kamen, J. M., Pilgrim, F. J., Gutman, N. J., & Kroll, B. J. (1961). Interactions of suprathereshold taste stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(4), 348–356.
23. Keast, R. S., & Breslin, P. A. (2003). An overview of binary taste–taste interactions. Food Quality and Preference, 14(2), 111–124.
24. Ketelsen, S., Keay, C., & Wiet, S. (1993). Time-intensity parameters of selected carbohydrate and high potency sweeteners. Journal of Food Science, 58(6), 1418–1421.
25. Kokini, J. (1985). Fluid and semi-solid food texture and texture-taste interactions. Food technology (USA).
26. Lawless, H. T. (1979). Evidence for neural inhibition in bittersweet taste mixtures. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 93(3), 538–547.
27. Li, X., Lopetcharat, K., & Drake, M. (2015). Parents’ and children's acceptance of skim chocolate milks sweetened by monk fruit and stevia leaf extracts. Journal of Food Science, 80(5), S1083–S1092.
28. Livesey, G. (2003). Health potential of polyols as sugar replacers, with emphasis on low glycaemic properties. Nutrition Research Reviews, 16(2), 163–191.
29. Majchrzak, D., Ipsen, A., & Koenig, J. (2015). Sucrose-replacement by rebaudioside a in a model beverage. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(9), 6031–6036.
30. McGorrin, R. J., & Leland, J. V. (1996). Flavor-food interactions.Washington, D.C.: ACS Publications.
31. Moskowitz, H. R., & Arabie, P. (1970). Taste intensity as a function of stimulus concentration and solvent viscosity. Journal of Texture Studies, 1(4), 502–510.
32. O'Brien-Nabors, L. (2016). Alternative sweeteners. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
33. 1. Journal of Texture Studies, 9(4), 415–436.
34. Pangborn, R. M., Trabue, I. M., & Szczesniak, A. S. (1973). Effect of hydrocolloids on oral viscosity and basic taste intensities. Journal of Texture Studies, 4(2), 224–241.
35. Reis, R. C., Minim, V. P., Bolini, H. M., Dias, B. R., Minim, L. A., & Ceresino, E. B. (2011). Sweetness equivalence of different sweeteners in strawberry-flavored yogurt. Journal of Food Quality, 34(3), 163–170.
36. Reyes, M. M., Castura, J. C., & Hayes, J. E. (2017). Characterizing dynamic sensory properties of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners with temporal check-all-that-apply. Journal of Sensory Studies, 32(3), e12270.
37. Rocha, I. F. d. O., & Bolini, H. M. A. (2015). Passion fruit juice with different sweeteners: Sensory profile by descriptive analysis and acceptance. Food Science & Nutrition, 3(2), 129–139.
38. Shankar, P., Ahuja, S., & Sriram, K. (2013). Non-nutritive sweeteners: Review and update. Nutrition, 29(11–12), 1293–1299. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2013.03.024
39. Tan, V. W. K., Wee, M. S. M., Tomic, O., & Forde, C. G. (2019). Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA). Food Research International, 121, 39–47.
40. Tenney, K., Hayes, J., Euston, S., Elias, R., & Coupland, J. (2017). Binding of caffeine and quinine by whey protein and the effect on bitterness. Journal of Food Science, 82(2), 509–516.
41. Taylor, A. (1999). Flavour matrix interactions. Current topics in flavours and fragrances (pp. 123–138). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
42. Thompson, J. L., Drake, M. A., Lopetcharat, K., & Yates, M. D. (2004). Preference mapping of commercial chocolate milks. Journal of Food Science, 69(9), S406–S413. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb09958.x
43. van der Klaauw, N. J., & Frank, R. A. (1996). Scaling component intensities of complex stimuli: The influence of response alternatives. Environment international, 22(1), 21–31.
44. Ventura, E. E., Davis, J. N., & Goran, M. I. (2011). Sugar content of popular sweetened beverages based on objective laboratory analysis: Focus on fructose content. Obesity, 19(4), 868–874.
45. Wee, M., Tan, V., & Forde, C. (2018). A comparison of psychophysical dose-response behaviour across 16 sweeteners. Nutrients, 10(11), 1632.
46. Zhao, L., & Tepper, B. J. (2007). Perception and acceptance of selected high-intensity sweeteners and blends in model soft drinks by propylthiouracil (PROP) non-tasters and super-tasters. Food Quality and Preference, 18(3), 531–540.
47. Zorn, S., Alcaire, F., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., & Ares, G. (2014). Application of multiple-sip temporal dominance of sensations to the evaluation of sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference, 36, 135–143.