Psychophysics of reading in normal and low vision

Psychophysics of Reading in Normal and Low Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-229

  Legge, Gordon E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85077177372     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781482269482     Document Type: Book

References (319)

1. Abdelmour, O., Kalloniatis, M. (2001). Word acuity threshold as a function of contrast and retinal eccentricity. Optometry and Vision Science, 78, 914-919.
2. Abell, A.M. (1894). Rapid reading: Advantages and methods. Educational Review, 8, 283-286.
3. Ahn, S. J., Legge, G. E., Luebker, A. (1995). Printed cards for measuring low-vision reading speed. Vision Research, 35, 1939-1944.
4. Akutsu, H., Bedell, H. E., Patel, S. S. (2000). Recognition thresholds for letters with simulated dioptric blur. Optometry and Vision Science, 77, 524-530.
5. Akutsu, H., Legge, G. E., Showalter, M., Lindstrom, R. L., Zabel, R. W., Kirby, V. M. (1992). Contrast sensitivity and reading through multi focal intraocular lenses. Archives of Ophthalmology, 10, 1076-1080.
6. Alexander, K. R., Fishman, G. A., Derlacki D. J. (1996). Intraocular light scatter in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Vision Research, 36, 3703-3709.
7. Alexander, K. R., Xie, W., Derlacki, D. J. (1994). Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, Vision, I I, 2375-2382.
8. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC.
9. Anstis, S.M. (1974). A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision Research, 14, 589-592.
10. Aquilante, K., Yager, D., Morris, R. A., Khmelnitsky, F. (200 1). Low-vision patients with age-related maculopathy read RSVP faster when word duration varies according to word length. Optometry and Vision Science, 78, 290-296.
11. Arditi, A. (1996). Typography, print legibility, and low vision. In R. Cole, B. Rosenthal (Eds.), Remediation and management of low vision (pp. 237-248). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
12. Arditi, A. (1999). Elicited sequential presentation for low vision reading. Vision Research, 39, 4412-4418.
13. Arditi, A (1999). Making text legible: Designing for people with partial sight. New York: Lighthouse International. Retrieved November 20, 2004, from http://www.lighthouse.org/ print_leg.htrn
14. Arditi, A. (2004). Adjustable typography: An approach to enhancing low vision text accessibility. Ergonomics, 47, 469-482.
15. Arditi, A. (2005). Color contrast: Designing for people with partial sight and color deficiencies. Retrieved June 29, 2005, from http://www.lighthouse.org/colorcontrast.htrn
16. Arditi, A., Cagenello, R., Jacobs, B. (1995). Effects of aspect ratio and spacing on legibility of small letters. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 36(Suppl.), 671.
17. Arditi, A., Cho, J. (2000). Do serifs enhance or diminish text legibility?. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 41(Suppl.), 437.
18. Arditi, A., Cho, J. (2000). Letter case and text legibility. Perception, 29(Suppl. S), 45.
19. Arditi, A., Cho, J. (2005). Serifs and font legibility. Vision Research, 45, 2926-2933.
20. Arditi, A., Knoblauch, K., Grunwald, I. (1990). Reading with fixed and variable pitch. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 7, 2011-2015.
21. Arditi, A., Liu, L., Lynn, W. (1997). Legibility of outline and solid fonts with wide and narrow spacing. In D. Yager (Series Ed.), Trends in optics and photonics (Vol. II, pp. 52-56). Washington, DC: Optical Society of America.
22. Bailey, I. L., Boyd, L. H., Boyd, W. L., Clark, M. (1987). Readability of computer display print enlarged for low vision. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 64, 678-685.
23. Bailey, I. L., Bullirnore, M.A., Greer, R. B., Mattingly, W. B. (1994). Low vision magnifiers- Their optical parameters and methods for prescribing. Optometry and Vision Science, 71, 689-698.
24. Bailey, I. L., Lovie, J. E. (1976). New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 53, 740-745.
25. Baldasare, J., Watson, G. R., Whittaker, S. G., Miller-Shaffer, H. (1986). The development and evaluation of a reading test for low vision individuals with macular loss. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 80, 7859.
26. Bartels, P., Kline, D. W. (2002). Aging effects on the identification of digitally blurred text. scenes and faces: Evidence for optical compensation on everyday tasks in the senescent eye. Aging International, 27, 56-72.
27. Beckmann, P. J., Legge, G. E. (2002). Preneurallimitations on letter identification in central and peripheral vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, Vision, 19, 2349-2362.
28. Beckmann, P. J., Legge, G. E., Luebker, A. (1991). Reading: Letters, words and their spatial-frequency content. Society for Information Display 1991 Digest of Technical Papers, 106-108.
29. Berger, T. D., Martelli, M., Su, M., Aguayo, M., Pelli, D. G. (2003). Reading quickly in the periphery. Vision Sciences Society Abstracts in Journal of Vision, 3, 806a.
30. Blakemore, C., Campbell, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology, 203, 237-260.
31. Boder, E. (1973). Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, 66-87.
32. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178.
33. Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13,767-782.
34. Bouma, H., de Voogd, A. H. (1974). On the control of eye saccades in reading. Vision Research, 14, 273-284.
35. Bowers, A. R. (2000). Eye movements and reading with plus-lens magnifiers. Optometry and Vision Science, 77, 25-31.
36. Bowers, A. R., Meek, C., Stewart, N. (2001). Illumination and reading performance in age-related macular degeneration. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 84, 139-147.
37. Bowers, A. R., Woods, R. L., Peli, E. (2004). Preferred retinal locus and reading rate with four dynamic text presentation formats. Optometry and Vision Science, 81, 205-213.
38. Bowers, J. S., Vigliocco, G., Haan, R. (1998). Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception, Performance, 24, 1705-1719.
39. Breitmeyer, B. (1980). Unmasking visual masking: A look at the "why" behind the veil of the "how." Psychological Review, 87, 52-69.
40. Brindley, G. S. (1970). Physiology of the retina and visual pathway (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams, Wilkins.
41. Brindley, G. S., Lewin, W. S. (1968). The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 196, 479-493.
42. Bringhurst, R. (2004). The elements of typographic style (3rd ed.). Vancouver, Canada: Hartley, Marks.
43. Buchel, C., Price, C., Frackowiak, R. S., Friston K. (1998). Different activation patterns in the visual cortex of late and congenitally blind subjects. Brain, 12, 409-419.
44. Buettner, M., Krischer, C., Meissen, R. (1985). Characterization of gliding text as a reading stimulus. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 479-482.
45. Bullimore, M. A., Bailey, I. (1995). Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy. Optometry and Vision Science, 72, 125-138.
46. Buonomano, D. (1998). Cortical plasticity: From synapses to maps. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 21, 149-186.
47. Burr, D. C., Morrone, M. C., Ross, J. (1994). Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature, 371, 511-513.
48. Campbell, F. W. (1957). The depth of field of the human eye. Optica Acta, 4, 157-164.
49. Campbell, F. W., Green, D. G. (1965). Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. Journal of Physiology, 181, 576-593.
50. Campbell, F. W., Robson, J. G. (1968). Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. Journal of Physiology, 197, 551-566.
51. Carpenter, R. H. S. (1988). Movements of the eyes (2nd ed.). London: Pion.
52. Carver, R. P. (1976). Word length, prose difficulty and reading rate. Journal of Reading Behavior. 8, 193-204.
53. Carver, R. P. (1982). Optimal rate of reading prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 56-88.
54. Carver, R. P. (1989). What does maximum oral reading rate measure?. Yearbook of the national Reading Conference, 38, 421-425.
55. Carver, R. P. (1990). Reading rate: A review of research and theory. San Diego, CA: Academic.
56. Carver, R. P. (2000). Technical manual for the rate level test (FormA, Form B. and Form C). Kansas City, MO: Revrac.
57. Casco, C., Campana, G., Grieco, A., Musetti, S., Perrone, S. (2003). Hyper-vision in a patient with central and paracentral vision loss reflects cortical reorganization. Visual Neuroscience, 20, 501-510.
58. Castelhano, M.S., Muter, P. (2001). Optimizing the reading of electronic text using rapid serial visual presentation, Behaviour and Information Technology, 20, 237-247.
59. Castles, A., Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia, Cognition, 47, 149-180.
60. Castles, A., Datta, H., Gay an, J., Olson, R. K. (1999). Varieties of developmental reading disorder: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 73-94.
61. Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind, 11. 22-242, 377-392,524-538.
62. Cattell, J. M. (1947). On the time required for recognizing and naming letters and words, pictures and colors (R. S. Woodworth, Trans.). Man of Science, 1, 13-25. (Original work published 1885)
63. Charness, N., Dijkstra, K. (1999). Age, luminance, and print legibility in homes, offices, and public places. Human Factors, 41, 173-193.
64. Chase, C., Ashourzadeh, A., Kelly, C., Monfette, S., Kinsey, K. (2003). Can the magnocellular pathway read?. Evidence from studies of color. Vision Research, 43, 1211-1222.
65. Cheung, S.-H., Legge, G. E. (2005). Functional and cortical adaptations to central vision loss. Visual Neuroscience, 22, 187-201.
66. Chung, S. T. L. (2005, March).Wo approaches to reduce crowding do not lead to improved reading speed in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Paper presented at Vision 2005 International Low Vision Conference, London, England.
67. Chung, S. T. L. (2002). The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision.1nvestigative Ophthalmalogy and Visual Science, 43, 127-1276.
68. Chung, S. T. L., Legge, G. E. (1997). Is reading with a central scotoma like reading with normal peripheral vision?. Optometry and Vision Science, 74(Suppl.), 153.
69. Chung, S. T. L., Legge, G. E., Cheung, S.-H. (2004). Letter recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning. Vision Research. 44, 695-109.
70. Chung, S. T. L., Legge, G. E., Tjan, B.S. (2002). Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 42, 2137-2152.
71. Chung, S. T. L., Levi, D. M., Legge, G. E. (2001). Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding. Vision Research. 41, 1833-1850.
72. Chung, S. T. L., Mansfield, J. S. (1999). Does reading mixed-polarity text improve reading speed in peripheral vision?. Vision 'Intemational Low Vision Conference Abstracts, 249.
73. Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehericy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Henaff, M., et al. (2000). The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123, 291-307.
74. Cohen, L., Lehericy, S., Chochon, F., Lerner, C., Rivaud, S., Dehaene, S. (2002). Language- specific tuning of visual cortex?. Functional properties of the visual word form area. Brain, 125, 1054-1069.
75. Cohen, J. M., Waiss, B. (199la). Reading speed in normal observers through different forms of equivalent power low vision devices. Optometry and VISion Science, 68, 127-131.
76. Cohen, J. M., Waiss, B. (1991 b). Reading speed through different equivalent power low vision devices with identical field of view. Optometry and Vision Science, 68, 195-191.
77. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., Halter, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-8.
78. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., Ziegler, J. (200 I). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
79. Cornelissen, P. L., Hansen, P. C., Gilchrist, 1., Cormack, F., Essex, J., Frankish, C. (1998). Coherent motion detection and letter position encoding. Vision Research, 38, 2181-2191.
80. Cornelissen, P. L., Hansen, P. C., Hutton, J. L., Evangelinou, V., Stein, J. F. (1998). Magnacellular visual function and children's single word reading. Vision Research, 38, 471-482.
81. Culham, L. E., Chabra, A., Rubin, G. S. (2004). Clinical performance of electronic, head-mounted, low-vision devices. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 24, 281-290.
82. Curcio C. A., Owsley, C., Jackson, G. R. (2000). Spare the rods save the cones in aging and age-related maculopathy. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 41, 2015-2018.
83. Daly, S. (200 I). Analysis of subtriad addressing algorithms by visual system models. Society for Information Display 2001 Digest of Technical Papers, 1200-1203.
84. Dehaene, S., Le Clec, H., G., Poline, J. B., Bihan, D. L., Cohen, L. (2002). The visual word form area: A prelexica1 representation of visual words in the left fusiform gyrus. Neuroreport, 13, 321-325.
85. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Bihan, D. L., Mangin, J. F., Poline, J. B., et al. (2001). Cerebral mechannisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 752-758.
86. DeMarco, L., Masso f. R. (1997). Distributions of print sizes in U.S. newspapers. Journal of Visualmpairment and Blindness, 97, 9-13.
87. Demb, J., Boynton, G., Heeger, D. (1998). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 6939-6951.
88. Demb, J., Boynton, G., Best, M., Heeger, D. (1998). Psychophysical evidence for a magnocellular pathway deficit in dyslexia. Vision Research, 38, 1555-1559.
89. Dowdeswell, H. J., Slater, A.M., Broomhall, J., Tripp, J. (1995). Visual deficits in children born at less than 32 weeks' gestation with and without major ocular pathology and cerebral damage. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 79, 447-452.
90. Eden, G. F., VanMeter, J. W., Rumsey, J. M., Maisog, J. M., Woods, R. P., Zeffiro, T. A. (1996). Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging. Nature, 382, 66-69.
91. Ehrlich, D. (1987). A comparative study in the use of closed-circuit television reading machines and optical aids by patients with retinitis pigmentosa and maculopathy Ophthalmic and Physiologi-al Optics, 7, 293-302.
92. Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Wienbruch, C., Rockstroh, B., Tau b. E. (1995). Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science, 270, 305-307.
93. Eldred, K. B. (1992). Optimal illumination for reading in patients with age-related maculopathy.Optometry and Vision Science, 69, 46-50.
94. Elliott, D. B., Trukolo-Ilic, M., Strong, J. G., Pace, R., Plotkin, A., Bevers, P. (1997). Demographic characteristics of the vision disabled elderly. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38, 2566-2575.
95. Engbert, R., Longtin, A., Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42, 621-636.
96. Estes, W. (1978). Perceptual processing in letter recognition and reading. In E. Carterette, M. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook ofperception,JX (pp.l63-220). New York: Academic.
97. Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. (2004). Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Archives of Ophthalmology, 122, 477-485.
98. Farmer, M., Klein, R. (1995). The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin, Review, 2, 460-493.
99. Farrell, G. (1956). The story of blindness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100. Faye, E. E. (1976). Clinicallow-vision. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
101. Ferris, F. L., Kassoff, A., Bresnick, G. H., Bailey, I. L. (1982). New visual acuity charts for clinical research. American Journal of Ophtholmology, 94, 91-96.
102. Fine, E. M. (200 I). Does meaning matter?. The impact of word knowledge on lateral masking. Optometry and Vision Science, 78, 831-838.
103. Fine, E. M., Hazel, C. A., Petre, K. L., Rubin, G. S. (1999). Are the benefits of sentence context different in central and peripheral vision?. Optometry and Vision Science, 76, 764-769.
104. Fine, E. M., Kirschen, M. P., Peli, E. (1996). The necessary field of view to read with an optimal stand magnifier. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 67, 382-389.
105. Fine, E. M., Peli, E. (1996). The role of context in reading with central field loss. Optometry and Vision Science, 73, 533-539.
106. Fine, E. M., Peli, E., Reeves, A. (1997). Simulated cataract does not reduce the benefit of RSVP. Vision Research, 37, 2639-2647.
107. Fine, E. M., Rubin, G. (1999). Reading with simulated scotomas: Attending to the right is better than attending to the left. Vision Research, 39, 1039-1048.
108. Fine, L., Jacobs, R. A. (2002). Comparing perceptual learning across tasks: A review. Journal of Vision, 2, 190-203.
109. Fletcher, D. C., Schuchard, R. A., Livingstone, C. L., Crane, W. G., Hu, S. Y. (1994). Scanning laser ophthalmoscope macular perimetry and applications for low vision rehabilitation clinicians. Low Vision and Vision Rehabilitation, 7, 257-265.
110. Fletcher, D. C., Schuchard, R. A., Watson, G. (1999). Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: Effect on low vision reading. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 36, 356-364.
111. Forbes, T. W., Holmes, R. S. (1939). Legibility distances of highway destination signs in relation to letter height, width, and retlectorization. Proceedings of the Highway Research Board U.S.A., 19, 321-335.
112. Forbes, T. W., Moskowitz, K., Morgan, G. (1950). A Comparison of! ower-case and capital letters for highway signs. Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the Highway Research Board (pp. 355-373). Washington, DC: Highway Research Board.
113. Forster, K. I. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 215-221.
114. Foulke, E. (1982). Reading braille. In W. Shiff, E. Foulke (Eds.), Tactual perception: A source book (pp. 168-208). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
115. Garvey, P., Pietrucha, M., Meeker, D. (1998). Clearer road signs ahead. Ergonomics in Design, 6, 7-11.
116. Geisler, W. S. (1989). Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations. Psychological Review, 96, 267-314.
117. Gelb, I. J. (1963). A study of writing (2nd ed.). Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
118. Gibson, E. J., Levin, H. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
119. Gilchrist, I., Brown, V., Findlay, J. (1997). Saccades without eye movements. Nature, 390, 130-131.
120. Gill, J. M., Perera, S. (2003, July). The tiresiasfamily of fonts. Retrieved November 20, 2004, from http://www.tiresias.org/reports/marburg.htm
121. Ginsburg, A. P. (1978). Visual information processing based on spatial filters constrained by biological data. Vols. I and ll. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Cambridge University, England.
122. Gould, J., Alfaro, L., Finn, R., Haupt, B., Minuto, A. (1987). Reading from CRT displays can be as fast as reading from paper. Human Factors, 29, 497-517.
123. Habib, M. (2000). The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: An overview and working hypothesis. Brain, 123, 2373-2399.
124. Harmon, L. D., Julesz. B. (1973). Masking in visual recognition: Effects oftwo-dimensional filtered noise. Science, I 89, 1194-1197.
125. Hartley, J. T., Stojack, C. C., Mushaney, T. T., Kiku Annon, T. A., Lee, D. W. (1994). Reading speed and prose memory in older and younger adults. Psychology, Aging, 9, 216-23.
126. Hayes, J. S., Yin, V. T., Piyathaisere, D. Weiland, J. D., Humayun, M. S., Dagnelie, G. (2003). Visually guided performance of simple tasks using simulated prosthetic vision. Artificial Organs, 27, 1016-28.
127. Heinen, S. J., Skavenski, A. A. (1991). Recovery of visual responses in foveal VI neurons following bilateral foveal lesions in adult monkey. Experimental Brain Research. 83, 670-674.
128. Hensil, J., Whittaker, S. G. (2000). Visual reading vs. auditory reading?. Sighted persons and persons with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 94, 762-770.
129. Hering, E. (1879). Ober muskelgerausche das auges. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Abt. I I 179, 137-154.
130. Herse, P., Bedell, H. (1989). Contrast sensitivity for letter and grating targets under various stimulus conditions. Optometry and Vision Science, 66, 774-781.
131. Huey, E. B. (1968). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1908)
132. Humayun, M.S., de Juan, E. (1998). Anificial vision. Eye, 12,605-607.
133. Humayun, M.S., de Juan, E., Weiland, J.D., Dagnelie, G., Katona, S., Greenberg, R., et al. (2003). Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Research, 43, 2573-2581.
134. IESNA. Illuminating Engineering Society of Nonh America. (2000). Lighting handbook: Reference, application (9th ed.). New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of Nonh America.
135. Irlen, H. (1991). Reading by the colours: Overcoming dyslexia and other reading disabilities through the lrlen method. New York: Avery.
136. Jackson, M., McClelland, J. (1975). Sensory and cognitive determinants of reading speed. Journal ofVerballLaming and Verbal Behavior 14, 565-574.
137. Jackson, M., McClelland, J. (1979). Process determinants of reading speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 151-181.
138. Jarvis, S. H., Chung, S. T. L. (2004). Effect of optical blur on reading speed. Optometry and Vision Science, 81(Suppl.), 138.
139. Javal, L. E, (1879). Essai sur Ia physiologic de Ia lecture. Annales d'Oculistique, 82, 242-253.
140. Jorna, G. C., Snyder, H. L. (1991).Image quality determines differences in reading performance and perceived image quality with CRT and hard-copy displays. Human Factors, 33, 45-9.
141. Juola, J. F., Tiritoglu, A., Pleunis, J. (1995). Reading text presented on a small display. Applied Ergonomics, 26, 227-229.
142. Juola, J. F., Ward, N.J., McNamara, T. (1982). Visual search and reading of rapid serial presentations of letter strings, words, and text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, JJJ, 208-227.
143. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
144. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston, MA: Allyn, Bacon.
145. Kallie, C. S., Cheung, S. H., Legge, G. E., Owsley, C., McGwin, G. (2005). Nonlinear mixed effects modeling as an estimation procedure for sparse MNREAD data. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 46, 4589.
146. Kauffman, T., Theoret, H., Pascual-Leone, A. (2002). Braille character discrimination in blindfolded human subjects. Neuroreport, 13, 571-574.
147. Kilgarriff, A. (1997). Putting frequencies in the dictionary. International Journal of Lexicography, 11, 135-155.
148. Kitchel, J. E. (2004, March). Large print: Guidelines for optimal readability and APHontTM a font for low vision. Louisville, KY: The American Printing House for the Blind, Inc. Retrieved November 20, 2004, from http://www.aph.rg/edresearch/ lpguide.htm
149. Kline, D. W., Buck, K., Sell, Y., Bolan, T. L., Dewar, R. E. (1999). Older observers' tolerance of optical blur: Age differences in the identification of defocused text signs. Human Factors, 41, 356-364.
150. Klitz, T. S., Mansfield, J. S., Legge, G. E. (1995). Reading speed is affected by font transitions. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 36(Suppl. S), 670.
151. Knoblauch, K., Arditi, A., Szlyk, J. (1991). Effects of chromatic and luminance contrast on reading. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 8, 428-439.
152. Knuth, D. E. (1986). The METAFONT book. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
153. Kooi, F. L., Toet, A., Tripathy, S. P., Levi, D. M. (1994). The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spatial Vision, 8, 255-279.
154. Kowler, E., Anton, S. (1987). Reading twisted text: Implications for the role of saccades. Vision Research. 27, 45-60.
155. Kucera, H., Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present tkly American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
156. Kujala, T., Alho, K., Naatanen, R. (2000). Cross-modal reorganization of human cortical functions. Trends in Neuroscience, 23, 115-120.
157. LaGrow, S. J. (1986). Assessing optimal illumination for visual response accuracy in visually impaired adults. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 83, 888-895.
158. Lamare, M. (1892). Des mouvements des yeux dans Ia lecture. Bulletin et Memoire de Ia Societe Frangaise d'Ophthalmologie, 10, 354-364.
159. Latham, K., Whitaker, D. (1996). A comparison of word recognition and reading performance in foveal and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 36, 2665-2674.
160. Lawson, A. S., Agner D. (I 990). Printing types: An introduction. Boston, MA: Beacon.
161. Leat S. J., Legge, G. E., Bullimore, M. (1999). What is low vision?. A re-evaluation of definitions. Optometry and Vision Science, 76, 198-211.
162. Lee, H.-W., Gefroh, J., Legge, G. E., K won, M. Y. (2003, November). Training improves reading speed in peripheral vision: Is it due to attention?. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
163. Legge, G. E. (1976). Adaptation to a spatial impulse: Implications for Fourier transform models of visual processing. Vision Research, 16, 1407-1418.
164. Legge, G. E. (1978). Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties. Vision Research, 18, 69-81.
165. Legge, G. E., Foley, J. M. (1980). Contrast masking in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 70, 1458-1471.
166. Legge, G. E., Hooven, T. A., Klitz, T. S., Mansfield, J. S., Tjan, B. S. (2002). Mr. Chips 2002: New insights from an ideal-observer model of reading. Vision Research, 42, 2219-2234.
167. Legge, G. E., Klitz, T. S., Tjan, B.S. (1997). Mr. Chips: An ideal-observer model of reading. Psychological Review, 104, 524-553.
168. Legge, G. E., Lee, H.-W., Owens, D., Cheung, S.-H., Chung, S. T. L. (2002). Visual span: A sensory bottleneck on reading speed [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2, 279a.
169. Legge, G. E., Madison, C., Mansfield, J. S. (1999). Measuring braille reading speed with the MNREAD test. Visual Impairment Research, 1, 131-145.
170. Legge, G. E., Mullen, K. T., Woo, G. C., Campbell, F. W. (1987). Tolerance to visual defocus. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 4, 851-863.
171. Legge, G. E., Rubin, G. S., Schleske, M. M. (1986). Contrast-polarity effects in low-vision reading. In G. C. Woo (Ed.), Low vision: Principles and applications (pp. 288-307). New York: Springer-Verlag.
172. Lei, H., Schuchard, R. A. (1997). Using two preferred retinal loci for different lighting conditions in patients with central scotomas. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38, 1812-1818.
173. Levi, D. M., Klein, S. A., Aitsebaomo, A. P. (1985). Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vision Research, 25, 963-77.
174. Li, L., Nugent, A. K., Peli, E. (2000). Recognition of jagged (pixelated) letters in the periphery. Visual Impairment Research, 2, 143-154.
175. Livingstone, M.S., Rosen, G. D., Drislane, F. W., Galaburda, A.M. (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 88, 7943-7947.
176. Loomis, J. (1981). On the tangibility of letters and Braille. Perception, Psychophysics, 29,37-46.
177. Lott, L.A., Schneck, M. E., Haegerstrom-Portnoy, G., Brabyn, J. A., Gildengorin, G. L., West, C. G. (200 I). Reading performance in older adults with good acuity. Optometry and Vision Science, 78, 31-324.
178. Lovegrove, W. J., Bowling, A., Badcock, D., Blackwood, M. (1980). Specific reading disability: Differences in contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency, Science, 210, 439-440.
179. Lovie-Kitchin, J. E., Bailey, I. L. (1981). Task complexity and visual acuity in senile macular degeneration. Australian Journal of Optometry, 64, 235-242.
180. Lovie-Kitchin, J. E., Bowers, A., Woods, R. (2000). Oral and silent reading performance with macular degeqeration. Ophthalmology and Physiological Optics, 20, 360-370.
181. Lovie-Kitchin, J. E., Woo, G. C. (1988). Effect of magnification and field of view on reading speed using a CCTV. In G. C. Woo (Ed.), Low vision: Principles and applications (pp. 308-322). New York: Springer-Verlag.
182. Lowe, J. B., Drasdo, N. (1990). Efficiency in reading with closed-circuit television for low vision. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 10, 225-233.
183. Ludvigh, E. (1941). Extrafoveal visual acuity as measured with Snellen test-letters. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 24, 303-310.
184. Lund, R., Watson, G. (1997). The ccrv book. Fro land, Norway: Synsforum.
185. Majaj, N.J., Liang, Y. X., Martelli, M., Berger, T. D., Pelli, D. G. (2003). Channel for reading. Vision Sciences Society Abstracts in Journal of Vision, 3, 813a.
186. Majaj, N. J., Pelli, D. G., Kurshan, P., Palomares, M. (2002). The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Research, 42, 1165-1184.
187. Mancil, G. L., Nowakowski, R. (1986). Evaluation of reading speed with four low vision aids. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 63, 708-713.
188. Mansfield, J. S., Ahn, S. J., Legge, G. E., Luebker, A. (1993). A new reading-acuity chart for normal and low vision. Ophthalmic and Visual Optics/Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System Technical Digest, 3, 232-235.
189. McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Pzychological Review, 88, 375-407.
190. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M.D., Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28, 1107-1118.
191. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M.D., Zola, D., Jacobs, A.M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception, Pzychophysics, 46, 245-253.
192. McConkie, G. W, Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception, Pzychophysics, 17, 578-586.
193. Mellor, C. M. (2006). Louis Braille: A touch of genius. Boston, MA: National Braille Press.
194. Merabet, L. B., Rizzo, J. F., Amedi, A., Somers, D. C., Pascual-Leone, A. (2005). What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprostheses. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 71-77.
195. Merzenich, M. M., Nelson, R. J., Stryker, M.P., Cynader, M. S., Schoppmann, A., Zook, J. M. (1984). Somatosensory conical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 224, 591-605.
196. Mewhon, D. J. K., Campbell, A.J., Marchetti, F. M., Campbeli,J. I. D. (1981).1dentification, localization, and iconic memory: An evaluation of the bar-probe task. Memory, Cognition, 9, 50-67.
197. Morris, R. A., Aquilante, K., Yager, D., Bigelow, C. (2002). Serifs slow RSVP reading at very small sizes but don't matter at larger sizes. Society for Information Display Digest of Technical Papers, 244-247.
198. Morris, R. A., Hersch, R. D., Coimbra, A. (1998, March 30-April 3). Legibility of condensed perceptually-tuned grayscale fonts. Paper presented at the Electronic Publishing, Anistic Imaging and Digital Typography, Proc. EP '98 and RIOT '98 Conferences, LNCS 1375, St. Malo: England.
199. The National Library Service. (2000). Braille into the next millennium. Washington, DC: The Library of Congress.
200. National Research Council. (1980). Recommended standards for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Advances in Ophthalmology, 41, 103-148.
201. National Research Council. (2002). Visual impairments: Determining eligibility for social security benefits. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
202. Nazir, T. A., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A.M. (1991). On words and their letters. Bulletin of the Pzychonomic Society, 29, 171-174.
203. Nilsson, U., Frennesson, C., Nilsson, S. (1998). Location and stability of a newly established eccentric retinal locus suitable for reading, achieved through training of patients with a dense central scotoma. Optometry and Vision Science, 75, 873-878.
204. Nolan, C., Kederis, C. (1969). Perceptual factors in braille word recognition (Research Series No. 20). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
205. Normann, R. A, Maynard, E. M., Rousche, P. J., Warren, D. J. (1999). A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis. Vision Research, 39, 2577-2587.
206. O'Brien, B. A., Mansfield, J. S., Legge, G. E. (2000). The effect of contrast on reading speed in dyslexia. Vision Research, 40, 1921-1935.
207. O'Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395-453). New York: Elsevier Science.
208. O'Regan, J. K. (1991). Understanding visual search and reading using the concept of stimulus "grain." LPO Annual Progress Report, 26, 96-108.
209. O'Regan, J. K., Bismuth, N., Hersch, R. D., Pappas, A. (1996). Legibility of perceptually- tuned grayscale fonts. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing,ICIP '96 (P. Delogne, Ed.), Vol. I, 537-540.
210. O'Regan, J. K., Levy-Schoen, A., Jacobs, A. M. (1983). The effect of visibility on eye-movement parameters in reading. Perception, Psychophysics, 34, 457-464.
211. Ortiz, A. (2002). Perceptual properties of letter reading in central and peripheral vision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
212. Ortiz, A., Chung, S. T. L., Legge, G. E., Jobling, J. T. (1999). Reading with a headmounted video magnifier. Optometry and Vision Science, 76, 755-763.
213. Owsley, C., McGwin, G. (1999). Vision impairment and driving. Survey of Ophthalmology, 43, 535-550.
214. Pammer, K., Hansen, P. C., Kringelbach, M. L., Holliday, 1., Barnes, G., Hillebrand, A., et al. (2004). Visual word recognition: The first half second. Neuroimage, 22, 1819-1825.
215. Parish, D. H., Sperling, G. (1991). Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, and the efficiency of letter discrimination. Vision Research, 31, 1399-1415.
216. Pascuai-Leone, A., Hamilton, R. (200 I). The metamodal organization of the brain. Progress in Brain Research, 134, 427-45.
217. Pascuai-Leone, A., Torres, F. (1993). Plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex representation of the reading finger in Braille readers. Brain, 116, 39-52.
218. Pastoor, S. (1990). Legibility and subjective preference for color combinations in text. Human Factors, 32, 157-171.
219. Paulesu, E., McCrory, E., Fazio, F., Menoncello, L., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S. F., et al. (2000). A cultural effect on brain function. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 91-96.
220. Peli, E. (1986). Control of eye movement with peripheral vision: Implications for training of eccentric viewing. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 63, 113-118.
221. Peli, E., Siegmund, W. P. (1995). Fiber-optic reading magnifiers for the visually impaired. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A, 12, 2274-2286.
222. Pelli, D. G., Burns, C., Farell, B., Moore-Page, D. C. (in press). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research.
223. Pelli, D. G., Farell, B., Moore, D. C. (2003). The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition. Nature, 423, 752-756.
224. Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M., Majaj, N. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4, 1136-1169.
225. Perera, S. (2001). LPfont: An investigation into the legibility of large print typefaces. Retrieved November 20, 2004, from http://www.tiresias.org/fontsllpfontlreport/ index.htm
226. Pokorny, J., Graham, C. H., Lanson, R.N. (1968). Effect of wavelength on foveal grating acuity. Journal of the Optical Society of Merica A, 58, 1410-1414.
227. Price, C., Devlin, C., (2003). The myth of the visual word form area. Neuroimage, 19, 463-481.
228. Rahman, T., Muter, P., (1999). Designing an interface to optimize reading with small display windows. Human Factors, 41, 106-117.
229. Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 4 I, 211-236.
230. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
231. Rayner, K., Bertera, J. H. (1979). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206, 468-469.
232. Rayner, K., Fischer, M. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception, Psychophysics, 58, 734-747.
233. Rayner, K., McConkie, G. (1976). What guides a reader's eye movements?. Vision Research, 16, 829-837.
234. Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., Zola, D. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206-226.
235. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of -ading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
236. Rayner, K, Sereno, S., Raney, G. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188-1200.
237. Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A. (1980). Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Perception, Psychophysics, 27, 537-544.
238. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of the meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275-280.
239. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, JO-t 125-157.
240. Robinson, G. L., Foreman, P. J. (1999). Scotopic sensitivityllrlen syndrome and the use of coloured filters: A long-term placebo controlled and masked study of reading achievement and perception of ability. Perception and Motor Skills, 89, 83-113.
241. Roufs, J., Boschmann, M. C. (1997). Text quality metrics for visual display units: I. Methodological aspects. Display, 18, 37-43.
242. Rubin, G. S., Turano, K. (1992). Reading without saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 32, 895-902.
243. Rubin, G. S., Turano, K. (1994). Low vision reading with sequential word presentation. Vision Research, 34, 1723-1733.
244. Rumney, N.J., Leat, S. J. (1994). Why do low vision patients still read slowly with a low vision aid?. In A. C. Kooijman, P. L. Looijestijn, J. A. Welling, G. J. van der Wildt (Eds.), Low vision-Research and new developments to -habilitation (pp. 269-274). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: lOS Press.
245. Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone A., Grafman, J., Ibanez, V., Deiber, M. P., Dold, G., et al. (1996). Activation of the primary visual cortex by braille reading in blind subjects. Natural. 380, 52-528.
246. Sass, S.M., Legge, G. E., Lee, H.-W. (2006). Low-vision reading speed: Influences of linguistic inference and aging. Optometry and Vision Science, 83, l6-167.
247. Sathian, K. (1998). Perceptual learning. Cur-nt Science, 75, 451-457.
248. Schade, O. H. (1956). Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 46, 721-739.
249. Schaeffel, F., Weiss, S., Seidel, J. (1999). How good is the match between the plane of the text and the plane offocus during reading?. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 19, 180-192.
250. Scharff, L. F., Hill, A. L., Ahumada, A. J., Jr. (2000). Discriminability measures for predicting readability of text on textured backgrounds. Optics Express, 6, 81-91.
251. Schuchard, R. A., Naseer, S., de Castro, K. (1999). Characteristics of AMD patients with low vision receiving visual rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 36, 294-302.
252. Shapley, R., Enroth-Cugell, C. (1984). Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls. InN. Osborne, G. Chader (Eds.), Progress in retinal research (Vol. 3, pp. 263-346). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
253. Shaywitz, S. E. (1998). Current concepts: Dyslexia. New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 308-312.
254. Shaywitz, S. E., Escobar, M. D., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., Makuch, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 192-193.
255. Sheedy, J. E., Hayes, J., Engle, J. (2003). Is all asthenopia the same?. Optometry and Vision Science, 80, 732-739.
256. Sheedy, J. E., McCarthy. M. (1994). Reading performance and visual comfort with scale to gray compared with black-and-white scanned print. Displays, 15, 27-30.
257. Skottun, B. C. (2000). On the conflicting support for the magnocellular-deficit theory of dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 211-212.
258. Skottun, B. C. (2000). The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: The evidence from contrast sensitivity. Vision Research, 40, 111-127.
259. Sloan, L. L. (1977). Reading aids for the partially sighted: A systematic classification and procedure for prescribing. Baltimore, MD: Williams, Wilkins.
260. Smith, E. L. (1998). Spectacle lenses and emmetropization: The role of optical defocus in regulating ocular development. Optometry and Vision Science, 75, 388-398.
261. Smith, E. L., Kee, C. S., Ramamirtham, R., Qiao-Grider, Y., Hung, L. F. (2005). Peripheral vision can influence eye growth and refractive development in infant monkeys. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 46, 3965-3972.
262. Smith, F. (1969). Familiarity of configuration vs. discriminability offeatures in the visual identification of words. Psychonomic Science, 14, 261-263.
263. Solomon, A. (2004 July 10). The closing of the American book. New York 1imes, p. 17.
264. Solomon, J. A., Pelli, D. G. (1994). The visual filter mediating letter identification. Nature, 369, 395-397.
265. Sommerhalder, J., Queghlani, E., Bagnoud, M., Leonards, U., Safran, A. B., Pelizzone, M. (2003). Simulation of artificial vision: Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptuallearning. Vision Research, 43, 269-283.
266. Sommerhalder, J., Rappaz, B., de Haller, R. (2004). Simulation of artificial vision: II. Eccentric reading of full-page text and the learning of this task. Vision Research, 44, 1693-1706.
267. Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
268. Stanovich, K. (1999). The sociopsychometrics oflearning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350-361.
269. Stanovich, K. (2000). Progress in understanding reading. New York: Guilford.
270. Stanovich, K. E., West, R. E. (1983). On priming by a sentence context, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1-36.
271. Starr, M.S., Rayner, K. (2001). Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 156-163.
272. Stein, J., Talcott, J., Walsh, V. (2000). Controversy about the visual magnocellulardeficit in developmental dyslexics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 209-211.
273. Stein, J., Walsh, V. (1997). To see but not to read: The magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neuroscience, 20, 147-152.
274. Sunness, J. S., Applegate, C. A., Haselwood, D., Rubin, G. S. (1996). Fixation patterns and reading rates in eyes with central scotomas from advanced atrophic age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt disease. Ophthalmology, 103, 1458-1466.
275. Sunness, J. S., Gonzalez-Baron,).,Applegate, C. A., Bressler, N. M., Tian, Y., Hawkins, B., et al. (1999). Enlargement of atrophy and visual acuity loss in the geographic atrophy form of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology, 106, 1768-1779.
276. Talcott, J. B., Witton, C., Hebb, G., Stoodley, C., Westwood, E., France, S., et al. (2002). On the relationship between dynamic visual and auditory processing and literacy skills: Results from a large primary-school study. Dyslexill, 8, 204-225.
277. Tallal, P. (1984). Temporal or phonetic processing deficit in dyslexia?. That is the question. Applied psycholinguistics, 5, 167-169.
278. Tallal, P., Curtiss, S. (1990). Neurological basis of developmental language disorders. In A. Rothenberger (Ed.), Brain and behavior in child psychiatry (pp. 205-216). New York: Springer-Verlag.
279. Tamaki, C., Kallie, C. S., Legge, G. E., Salomiio, S. R., Cudeck, R., Mansfield, J. S. (2004). Validation of the MNREAD-Portuguese Continuous-Text Reading-Acuity Chart. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 45, 4358.
280. Tatler, B., Wade, N. (2003). On nystagmus, saccades and fixations. Perception, 32, 167-184.
281. Taylor, S. E. (1965). Eye movements in reading: Facts and fallacies. American Educational Research Journal, 2, 187-202.
282. Thompson, R. W., Jr., Barnett, G. D., Humayun, M.S., Dagnelie, G. (2003). Facial vision using simulated prosthetic pixelized vision. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 34, 5035-5042.
283. Thorn, F., Schwartz, F. (1990). Effects of dioptric blur on Snellen and grating acuity. Optometry and Vision Science, 67, 3-7.
284. Tinker, M.A. (1963). Legibility of print. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
285. Tjan, B. S., Braje, W. L., Legge, G. E., Kersten, D. (1995). Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise. Vision Research, 35, 3053-3069.
286. Trauzettel-Klosinski, S., Teschner, C., Tornow, R.-P., Zrenner, E. (1994). Reading strategies in normal subjects and in patients with macular scotoma assessed by two new methods of registration. Neuro-ophthalmology, 14, 15-30.
287. Travis, D. S., Bowles, S., Seton, J., Peppe, R. (1990). Reading from color displays: A psychophysical model. Human Factors, 32, 147-156.
288. Troilo, D., Gottlieb, M. D., Wallman, J. (1987). Visual deprivation causes myopia in chicks with optic nerve section. Current Eye Research, 6, 993-999.
289. Tyrrell, R. A., Pasquale, T. 8., Aten, T., Francis, E. L. (2001). Empirical evaluation of user responses to reading text rendered using ClearType technologies. Society for Information Display 200 I Digest of Technical Papers, 1205-1207.
290. Vtrgili, G., Cordaro, C., Bigoni, A., Crovato,S., Cecchini, P., Menchini, U. (2004). Reading acuity in children: Evaluation and reliability using MNREAD charts. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 45, 3349-3354.
291. Virsu, V., Rovamo, J. (1979). Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research, 37, 475-494.
292. Vitu, F., O'Regan, J. K., lnhoff, A., Topolski, R. (1995). Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts. Perception, Psychophysics, 57, 352-364.
293. Wade, N., Tatler, B., Heller, D. (2003). Dodge-ing the issue: Dodge,Javal, Hering and the measurement of saccades in eye-movement research. Perception. 32, 793-804.
294. Walker, P. (1987). Word shape as a cue to the identity of a word: Analysis of the Kucera and Francis (1967) word list. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 39, 675-700.
295. Wallman, J., Gottlieb, M. D., Rajaram, V., Fugate-Wentzek, L.A. (1987). Local retinal regions control local eye growth and myopia. Science, 237, 73-77.
296. Wallman, J., Winawer, J. (2004). Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia. Neuron, 43, 447-468.
297. Wandell, B. A. (1995). Foundations of vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
298. Warde, B. (1955). The crystal goblet or printing should be invisible. In H. Jacob (Ed.), The crystal goblet: Sixteen essays on typography (pp. 11-17). London: Sylvan.
299. Warrington, E. K., Shallice, T. (1980). Word-form dyslexia. Brain, 103, 99-112.
300. Watson, G. R., Wright, V., Long, S., De I' Aune, W. (1996). A low vision reading comprehension test. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 90, 486-494.
301. Weale, R. A. (1963). The aging eye. London: Lewis.
302. Webster, M. A., Georgeson, M. A., Webster, S. M. (2002). Neural adjustments to image blur. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 839-840.
303. Westheimer, G. (2003). Visual acuity with reversed-contrast charts. I. Theoretical and psychophysical investigations. Optometry and Vision Science, 80, 745-748.
304. Westheimer, G., Chu, P., Huang, W., Tran, T., Dister, R. (2003). Visual acuity with reversed- contrast charts. II. Clinical investigation. Optometry and Vision Science, 80, 749-752.
305. Weymouth, F. W. (1958). Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 46, 102-113.
306. Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, I, 59-85.
307. White, J. M., Bedell, H. E. (1990). The oculomotor reference in humans with bilateral macular disease. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 31, 1149-1161.
308. Whittaker, S. G., Cummings, R. W., Swieson, L. R. (1991). Saccade control without a fovea. Vision Research, 3 I, 2209-2218.
309. Whittaker, S. G., Lovie-Kitchin, J. (1993). Visual requirements for reading. Optometry and Vision Science, 70, 54-65.
310. Wilkins, A. J. (2002). Coloured overlays and their effects on reading speed: A review. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 22, 448-454.
311. Wilkins, A. J. (1995). Visual stress. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
312. Wilkins, A. J. (1994). Overlays for classroom and optometric use. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 14, 97-99.
313. Wilkins, A. J., Lewis, E., Smith, F., Rowland, E., Tweedie, W. (200 I). Coloured overlays and their benefit for reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 24, 41-64.
314. Williams, M. C., May,J. G., Solman, R., Zhou, H. (1995). The effects of spatial filtering and contrast reduction on visual search times in good and poor readers. Vision Research, 35, 285-291.
315. Wilson, H. R., Levi, D. M., Maffei, L., Rovamo, J., Devalois, R. (1990). The perception of form: Retina to striate cortex. In L. Spill mann, J. S. Werner (Eds.), Visual perception: The neurophysiological foundations (pp. 231-272). San Diego, CA: Academic.
316. Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
317. World Health Organization. (2004). Fact sheet: Vision 2020: The right to sight, the global initiative for the elimination of avoidable blindness. Retrieved April 3, 2005, from http://www. v2020.orglnews/documents/Factsheet8lindness-1 0 1204.pdf
318. Wyszecki, G., Stiles, W. S. (1982). Color science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formula (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
319. Zrenner, E. (2002). Will retinal implants restore vision?. Science, 295, 1022-1025.