Simulated cataract does not reduce the benefit of RSVP

Vision Research

Volumn 37, Issue 18, 1997, Pages 2639-2647

  Fine, Elisabeth M ^a   Peli, Eli ^b   Reeves, Adam ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Low vision; Rapid serial visual presentation; Reading; Simulated cataract

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CATARACT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; READING; VISION, LOW; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0030931590     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00051-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Akutsu, H., Legge, G. E., Ross, J. A. & Schuebel, K. J. (1991). Psychophysics of reading - X. Effects of age-related changes in vision. Journal of Gerontology, 46, P325-331.
2. Allen, P. A., Madden, D. J., Weber, T. A. & Groth, K. E. (1993). Influence of age and processing stage on visual word recognition. Psychology and Aging, 8, 274-282.
3. Baldesare, J. & Watson, G. (1986). Observations from the psychology of reading relevant to low vision research. In Woo, G. C. (Ed.), Low vision principles and applications (pp. 272-286). New York: Springer.
4. Chen, H.-C. (1986). Effects of reading span and textual coherence on rapid-sequential reading. Memory & Cognition, 14, 202-208.
5. Fine, E. M. (1995). Reading dynamically displayed text with visual impairments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
6. Fine, E. M. & Peli, E. (1995a) Enhancement of text for the visually impaired. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 12, 1439-1447.
7. Fine, E. M. & Peli, E. (1995b) Scrolled and rapid serial visual presentation text are read at a similar rate by the visually impaired. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 12, 2286-2292.
8. Fine, E. M. & Peli, E. (1996). The role of context in reading with central field loss. Optometry and Vision Science, 73, 533-539.
9. Forster, K. I. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 215-221.
10. Francis, W. N. & Kučera, H. (1982) Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
11. Legge, G. E., Pelli, D. G., Rubin, G. S. & Schleske, M. M. (1985). Psychophysics of reading I. Normal vision. Vision Research, 25, 239-252.
12. Legge, G. E., Ross, J. A. & Luebker, A. (1989). Psychophysics of reading VIII. The Minnesota low-vision reading test. Optometry and Vision Science, 66, 843-851.
13. Madden, D. J. (1992). Four to ten milliseconds per year: age-related slowing of visual word identification. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, 59-68.
14. Masson, M. E. J. (1983). Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading. Memory & Cognition, 11, 262-274.
15. Patberg, J. P., Dewitz, P. & Samuels, S. J. (1981). The effect of context on the size of the perceptual unit used in word recognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 33-48.
16. Potter, M. C. (1984) Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). A method for studying language processing. In Kieras, D. E. & Just, M. A. (Eds), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 91-118). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Potter, M. C., Kroll, J. F. & Harris, C. (1980) Comprehension and memory in rapid sequential reading. In Nickerson, R. (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 395-418). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Rubin, G. S. & Turano, K. (1994). Low vision reading with sequential word presentation. Vision Research, 34, 1723-1733.
19. Rubin, G. S. & Turano, K. (1992). Reading without saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 32, 895-902.
20. Sinclair, G. P., Healy, A. F. & Bourne, L. E. Jr. (1989). Facilitating text memory with additional processing opportunities in rapid sequential reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 153, 418-431.
21. Whittaker, S. G. & Lovie-Kitchin, J. (1993). Visual requirements for reading. Optometry and Vision Science, 70, 54-65