The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition

Nature

Volumn 423, Issue 6941, 2003, Pages 752-756

  Pelli, Denis G ^a   Farell, Bart ^b   Moore, Deborah C ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Syracuse Institute for Sensory Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFRACTION GRATINGS; PHOTODETECTORS; PROBABILITY;

WORD RECOGNITION;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

BEHAVIOR;

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DARKNESS; HUMAN; LIGHT; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0012718513     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature01516     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Robson, J. G. & Graham, N. Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field. Vision Res. 21, 409-418 (1981).
2. Diamond, R. & Carey, S. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 115, 107-117 (1986).
3. Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C. & Anderson, A. W. Expertise for can and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neurosci. 3, 191-197 (2000).
4. Treisman, A. & Schmidt, H. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cogn. Psychol. 14, 107-141 (1982).
5. Biederman, I. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol. Rev. 94, 115-147 (1987).
6. Tarr, M. J. & Buelthoff, H. H. Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine. Cognition 67, 1-20 (1998).
7. Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M. & Majaj, N. J. Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature detection and integration. J. Vision [online] 〈http://www.journalofvision.org/〉 (in the press).
8. Cattell, J. M. The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind 11, 220-242 (1886).
9. Huey, E. B. The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading (Macmillan, New York, 1908).
10. Reicher, G. M. Perceptual recognition as a function of the meaningfulness of stimulus material. J. Exp. Psychol. 81, 275-280 (1969).
11. Wheeler, D. D. Processes in word recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 1, 59-85 (1970).
12. Johnston, J. C. & McClelland, J. L. Perception of letters in words: seek not and ye shall find. Science 184, 1192-1194 (1974).
13. Johnston, J. C. & McClelland, J. L. Experimental tests of a hierarchical model of word identification. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 19, 503-524 (1980).
14. McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychol. Rev. 88, 375-407 (1981).
15. Prinzmetal, W. & Silvers, B. The word without the tachistoscope. Percept. Psychophys. 55, 296-312 (1994).
16. Jordan, T. R. & Bevan, K. M. Position-specific masking and the word-letter phenomenon: reexamining the evidence from the Reicher-Wheeler paradigm. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22, 1416-1433 (1996).
17. Peterson, W. W., Birdsall, T. G. & Fox, W. C. Theory of signal detectability. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 4, 171-212 (1954).
18. Pelli, D. G. & Farell, B. Why use noise? J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 647-653 (1999).
19. Tanner, W. P. Jr & Birdsall, T. G. Definitions of d′ and η as psychophysical measures. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 30, 922-928 (1958).
20. Legge, G. E., Pelli, D. G., Rubin, G. S. & Schleske, M. M. Psychophysics of reading - I. Normal vision. Vision Res. 25, 239-252 (1985).
21. Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B. & Moore, D. C. Identifying letters. Vision Res. (in the press).
22. Campbell, F. W. & Robson, J. G. Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 197, 551-566 (1968).
23. Watson, A. B. & Robson, J. G. Discrimination at threshold: labelled detectors in human vision. Vision Res. 21, 1115-1122 (1981).
24. Kucera, H. & Francis, W. N. Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English (Brown Univ. Press, Providence, 1967).
25. Hadley, J. A. & Healy, A. F. When are reading units larger than the letter? Refinement of the Unitization Reading Model. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 17, 1062-1073 (1991).
26. Barlow, H. B. Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 119, 69-88 (1953).
27. Solomon, J. A. & Pelli, D. G. The visual filter mediating letter identification. Nature 369, 395-397 (1994).
28. , Majaj, N. J., Liang, Y. X., Martelli, M., Berger, T. D. & Pelli, D. G. The channel for reading. J. Vision [online] 3 〈http://www.journalofvision.org/〉 (2003).
29. Selfridge, O. Pandemonium: a paradigm for learning. Symposium on the Mechanization of Thought Processes 513-526 (HM Stationery Office, London, 1959).
30. Johnston, J. C. A test of the sophisticated guessing theory of word perception. Cogn. Psychol. 10, 123-153 (1978).