Preneural limitations on letter identification in central and peripheral vision

Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 2349-2362

  Beckmann, Paul J ^a   Legge, Gordon E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATHODE RAY TUBES; IMAGE QUALITY; LIGHT ABSORPTION; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER;

PERIPHERAL VISION;

VISION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; READING; RETINA; VALIDATION STUDY; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; READING; RETINA; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISION, OCULAR;

EID: 0036884129     PISSN: 10847529     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.19.002349     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. P. Arial, I. Iglesias, N. López-Gil, and D. G. Green, "Double-pass measurements of the retinal-image quality with unequal entrance and exit pupil sizes and the reversibility of the eye's optical system," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 2358-2366 (1995).
2. F. W. Campbell and R. W. Gubisch, "Optical quality of the human eye," J. Physiol. (London) 186, 558-578 (1966).
3. A. Guirao and P. Artal, "Off-axis monochromatic aberrations estimated from double pass measurements in the human eye," Vision Res. 39, 207-217 (1999).
4. R. Navarro, P. Artal, and D. R. Williams, "Modulation transfer function of the human eye as a function of retinal eccentricity," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 201-212 (1993).
5. L. N. Thibos, A. Bradley, D. L. Still, X. Zhang, and P. A. Howarth, "Theory and measurement of ocular chromatic aberration," Vision Res. 30, 33-49 (1990).
6. C. A. Curcio, K. R. Sloan, R. E. Kalina, and A. E. Hendrickson, "Human photoreceptor topography," J. Comp. Neurol. 292, 497-523 (1990).
7. C. A. Curcio, K. R. Sloan, and D. Meyers, "Computer methods for sampling, reconstruction, display and analysis of retinal whole mounts," Vision Res. 29, 529-540 (1989).
8. B. Chen, W. Makous, and D. R. Williams, "Serial spatial filters in vision," Vision Res. 33, 413-427 (1993).
9. C. A. Curcio, K. A. Allen, K. R. Sloan, C. L. Lerea, J. B. Hurley, I. B. Klock, and A. H. Milam, "Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with antiblue opsin," J. Comp. Neurol. 312, 610-624 (1991).
10. D. H. Brainard, A. Roorda, Y. Yamauchi, J. B. Calderone, A. Metha, M. Neitz, J. Neitz, D. R. Williams, and G. H. Jacobs, "Function consequences of the relative numbers of L and M cones," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 607-614 (2000).
11. H. Wässle, "Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate," Vision Res. 30, 1897-1911 (1990).
12. S. T. L. Chung, J. S. Mansfield, and G. E. Legge, "Psychophysics of reading XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision," Vision Res. 38, 2949-2962 (1998).
13. G. E. Legge, J. S. Mansfield, and S. T. L. Chung, "Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision," Vision Res. 41, 725-743 (2001).
14. S. M. Anstis, "A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position," Vision Res. 14, 589-592 (1974).
15. E. Ludvigh, "Extrafoveal visual acuity as measured with Snellen test-letters," Am. J. Ophthalmol. 24, 303-310 (1941).
16. A. M. Jacobs, T. A. Nazir, and O. Heller, "Perception of low-ercase letters in peripheral vision: a discrimination matrix based on saccade latencies," Percept. Psychophys. 46, 95-102 (1989).
17. M. Millodot, C. A. Johnson, A. Lament, and H. W. Leibowitz, "Effect of dioptrics on peripheral visual acuity," Vision Res. 15, 1357-1362 (1975).
18. J. M. White and D. S. Loshin, "Grating acuity overestimates Snellen acuity in patients with age-related maculopathy," Optom. Vision Sci. 66, 751-755 (1989).
19. H. Bouma, "Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters," Vision Res. 11, 459-474 (1971).
20. B. E. Roethlein, "The relative legibility of different faces of printing types," Am. J. Psychol. 23, 1-36 (1912).
21. E. C. Sanford, "The relative legibility of the small letters," Am. J. Psychol. 1, 402-435 (1888).
22. K. R. Alexander, W. Xie, and D. J. Derlacki, "Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for individual Sloan letters," Vision Res. 37, 813-819 (1997).
23. R. S. Anderson and L. N. Thibos, "Relationship between acuity for gratings and for tumbling-E letters in peripheral vision," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 2321-2333 (1999).
24. W. S. Geisler, "Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations," Psychol. Rev. 96, 267-314 (1989).
25. W. S. Geisler, "Physical limits of acuity and hyperacuity," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 775-782 (1984).
26. W. S. Geisler and K. D. Davila, "Ideal discriminators in spatial vision: two-point stimuli," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1483-1497 (1985).
27. W. S. Geisler and D. B. Hamilton, "Sampling-theory analysis of spatial vision," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 62-70 (1986).
28. M. S. Banks, A. B. Sekuler, and S. J. Anderson, "Peripheral spatial vision: limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 1775-1787 (1991).
29. G. E. Legge, S. J. Ahn, T. S. Klitz, and A. Luebker, "Psychophysics of reading XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision," Vision Res. 37, 1999-2010 (1997).
30. H. E. Blanchard, A. Pollatsek, and K. Rayner, "The acquisition of parafoveal word information in reading," Percept. Psychophys. 46, 85-94 (1989).
31. G. E. Legge, G. S. Rubin, D. G. Pelli, and M. M. Schleske, "Psychophysics of reading II. Low vision," Vision Res. 25, 253-266 (1985).
32. K. Rayner and J. H. Bertera, "Reading without a fovea," Science 206, 468-469 (1979).
33. The photoreceptors were positioned on a regular, triangular close-packed grid. Photons were captured by the photoreceptor if they fell anywhere in their physiologic aperture, which was taken to be a circle with a diameter equal to the cone spacing. The retinal image was sampled by this mosaic by multiplying it by the Fourier transform of a single cone, inverse transforming the result, and sampling the image at the known receptor sites.
34. Geisler derived a closed-form expression for the likelihood computed from the mean absorption counts for both of the alternatives.
35. Their study controlled the optical image quality of the eye across the visual field by using an external 1.5-mm pupil. They used such a pupil in the human experiments and represented the imaging in the model as diffraction limited.
36. G. Westheimer, "The eye as an optical instrument," in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. Vol. I. Sensory Processes and Perception, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1986), pp. 4-1-4-20.
37. 6 and the aperture of the photoreceptor was taken as either the diameter of the inner segment or the outer segment of the receptor, with a photon taken as captured if it fell anywhere within the aperture. The isomerization rate was taken as eccentricity dependent.
38. The location of each cone is known exactly by the decision stage.
39. D. G. Pelli, "The quantum efficiency of vision," in Vision: Coding and Efficiency, C. Blakemore, ed. (Cambridge U. Press, 1990), pp. 3-24.
40. J. A. Solomon and D. G. Pelli, "The visual filter mediating letter identification," Nature 369, 395-397 (1994).
41. Two parameters that affect the rendering of the letter on the display will be considered here: pixel pitch defined as the physical separation between adjacent pixels, and pixel width defined as the standard deviation of the Gaussian pixel profile. The pixels are arranged on a rectangular grid.
42. W. Cowan, "Displays for vision research," in Handbook of Optics. Vol. I: Fundamentals, Techniques, and Design, M. Bass, ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995), pp. 27.1-27.44.
43. J. Santamaría, P. Artal, and J. Bescos, "Determination of the point-spread function of human eyes using a hybrid optical-digital method," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1109-1114 (1987).
44. 3 is that the circle of least confusion remains unchanged at least out to 20°. This compromise condition of focus is the one included here.
45. A. M. McKendrick and N. A. Brennan, "Distribution of astigmatism in the adult population," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 206-214 (1996).
46. W. Lotmar and T. Lotmar, "Peripheral astigmatism in the human eye: experimental data and theoretical model predictions," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 510-513 (1974).
47. D. R. Williams, P. Artal, R. Navarro, M. J. McMahon, and D. H. Brainard, "Off-axis optical quality and retinal sampling in the human eye," Vision Res. 36, 1103-1114 (1996).
48. 50
49. N. Drasdo and C. W. Fowler, "Non-linear projection of the retinal image in a wide-angle schematic eye," Br. J. Ophthamol. 58, 709-714 (1974).
50. C. A. Curcio and K. R. Sloan, "Packing geometry of human cone photoreceptors: variation with eccentricity and evidence for local anisotropy," Visual Neurosci. 9, 169-180 (1992).
51. W. N. Charman, "Optics of the human eye," in Vision and Visual Dysfunction, Vol. 1, Visual Optics and Instrumentation, W. N. Charman, ed. (Macmillan, London, 1991), pp. 1-26.
52. L. N. Thibos, "Calculation of the influence of lateral chromatic aberration on image quality across the visual field," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1673-1680 (1987).
53. P. A. Howarth and A. Bradley, "The longitudinal chromatic aberration of the human eye, and its correction," Vision Res. 26, 361-366 (1986).
54. C. A. Curcio, University of Alabama at Birmingham; 700 South 18th Street, Room H20; Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0009 (personal communication, October 6, 1993).
55. S. Marcos, R. Navarro, and P. Artal, "Coherent imaging of the cone mosaic in the living human eye," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 897-905 (1996).
56. C. M. Cicerone and J. L. Nerger, "The relative numbers of long-wavelength-sensitive to middle-wavelength-sensitive cones in the human fovea centralis," Vision Res. 29, 115-128 (1989).
57. P. D. Gowdy, S. Otake, and C. M. Cicerone, "The spatial arrangement of L and M cones in the living human eye," Vision Res. Suppl. 37, S448 (1996).
58. J. L. Nerger and C. M. Cicerone, "The ratio of L cones to M cones in the human parafoveal retina," Vision Res. 32, 879-888 (1992).
59. C. M. Cicerone and S. Otake, "Color-opponent sites: individual variability and changes with retinal eccentricity," Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 38, S454 (1997).
60. A. Roorda and D. R. Williams, "The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye," Nature 397, 520-522 (1999).
61. S. Otake, P. D. Gowdy, and C. M. Cicerone, "The spatial arrangement of L and M cones in the peripheral human retina," Vision Res. 40, 677-693 (2000).
62. 63 exists. This difference, however, is not incorporated into the model. Instead, a peak absorption probability of 50% is assumed in the calculations.
63. M. W. Levine, R. P. Zimmerman, and V. Carrion-Carire, "Variability in responses of retinal ganglion cells," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 593-597 (1988).
64. G. Wyszecki and W. S. Stiles, Color Science, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1982).
65. 66 have shown that quantum noise follows Poisson statistics in the dark-adapted human eye.
66. K. Donner, "Noise and the absolute thresholds of cone and rod vision," Vision Res. 32, 853-866 (1992).
67. J. T. Tou and R. C. Gonzalez, Pattern Recognition Principles (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1974).
68. M. S. Banks, W. S. Geisler, and P. J. Bennett, "The physical limits of grating visibility," Vision Res. 27, 1915-1924 (1987).
69. The Gabor patch was rendered as a 101×101 pixel bitmap representing a cosinusoidal horizontal grating modulated by a 2D circular half-cosine envelope. The half-cosine spanned 7.5 periods of the underlying grating. Each period of the grating was rendered across 12.5 pixels. The spatial frequency of the grating was changed by changing the viewing distance and keeping the rendering of the grating the same. The amplitude of the grating modulation of the background was changed for each distance until the model performed at threshold level.
70. The cutoff due to diffraction is 110 cpd for a 4-mm pupil. It is reasonable to expect the 4-mm pupil diameter represented in the current model to exhibit a cutoff higher than that of the 1.5-mm pupil used by Banks but lower than the theoretical diffraction limit due to aberrations.
71. L. L. Sloan, "The photopic acuity-luminance function with special reference to parafoveal vision," Vision Res. 8, 901-911 (1968).
72. F. L. van Nes and J. C. Jacobs, "The effect of contrast on letter and word recognition," IPO Ann. Prog. Rep. 16, 72-80 (1981).
73. K. R. Alexander, D. J. Derlacki, G. A. Fishman, and J. P. Szlyk, "Temporal properties of letter identification in retinitis pigmentosa," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 1631-1636 (1993).
74. W. Seiple, K. Holopigian, Y. Shnayder, and J. P. Szlyk, "Duration thresholds for target detection and identification in the peripheral visual field," Optom. Vision Sci. 78, 169-176 (2001).
75. Postscript™ assigns an origin within its definition for each letter. Within each x-height size, the origin of the letters was in the same location, trial to trial. Alternative rules for aligning stimulus letters on the screen could influence performance of the ideal observer; for instance, in an extreme case in which the 26 letters were presented at distinct, nonoverlapping regions of the screen, the ideal-observer's performance would be significantly improved. The method used here, however, resulted in substantial overlap between the letter images.
76. K. R. Aggarwala, S. Nowbotsing, and P. B. Kruger, "Accommodation to monochromatic and white-light targets," Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 36, 2695-2705 (1995).
77. P. B. Kruger and J. Pola, "Stimuli for accommodation: blur, chromatic aberration and size," Vision Res. 26, 957-971 (1986).
78. D. H. Foster and W. F. Bischof, "Thresholds from psychometric functions: Superiority of bootstrap to incremental and probit variance estimators," Psychol. Bull. 109, 152-159 (1991).
79. L. T. Maloney, "Confidence intervals for the parameters of psychometric functions," Percept. Psychophys. 47, 127-184 (1990).
80. W. H. Press, B. P. Lannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge U. Press, New York, 1988).
81. This presentation time was chosen because it was the shortest reliable presentation time possible with the software and hardware used in the experiment.
82. R. M. Steinman, G. M. Haddad, A. A. Skavenski, and D. Wyman, "Miniature eye movements," Science 181, 810-819 (1973).
83. B. S. Tjan, "Ideal observer analysis of object recognition," Ph.D. dissertation (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn., 1996).
84. B. S. Tjan, W. L. Braje, G. E. Legge, and D. Kersten, "Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise," Vision Res. 35, 3053-3069 (1995).
85. 0.5 increase in letter size at fixed contrast and the same threshold level of performance. We used this method to calculate our estimates.
86. G. E. Legge and J. M. Foley, "Contrast masking in human vision," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 1458-1471 (1980).
87. C. A. Curcio and K. A. Allen, "Topography of ganglion cells in human retina," J. Comp. Neurol. 300, 5-25 (1990).
88. P. J. Beckmann, "Preneural limitations to identification performance in central and peripheral vision," Ph.D. dissertation (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn., 1998).