The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 350-361

  Stanovich, Keith E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APTITUDE TEST; ARTICLE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; LEARNING DISORDER; PATIENT ADVOCACY; POLICY; POLITICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; SOCIAL STATUS; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

APTITUDE TESTS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMANS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MASSACHUSETTS; PATIENT ADVOCACY; POLITICS; PSYCHOMETRICS; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL CONDITIONS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 0033457426     PISSN: 14690047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002221949903200408     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Beech, J., & Harding, L. (1984). Phonemic processing and the poor reader from a developmental lag viewpoint. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 357-366.
2. Birnbaum, R. (1990). IQ and the definition of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 330.
3. Blachman, B. (Ed.). (1997). Foundations of reading acquisition: Implications for early intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Carr, T. H. (1992). Automaticity and cognitive anatomy: Is word recognition "automatic"? American Journal of Psychology, 105, 201-237.
5. Carrier, J. G. (1986). Learning disability: Social class and the construction of inequality in American education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
6. Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149-180.
7. Churchland, P. M. (1989). Folk psychology and the explanation of behavior. In P. M. Churchland (Ed.), A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science (pp. 111-127). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Coles, G. S. (1987). The learning mystique. New York: Pantheon.
9. Fletcher, J. M., Foorman, B. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (in press). Conceptual and methodological issues in dyslexia research: A lesson for developmental disorders. In H. Tager-Flusberg (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of developmental disorders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D., Katz, L., Liberman, I., Stuebing, K., Francis, D. J., Fowler, A., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6-23.
11. Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
13. Frankenberger, W., & Fronzaglio, K. (1991). A review of states' criteria and procedures for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 495-500.
14. Guckenberger v. Boston University, 974 F. Supp. 106 (D. Mass. 1997).
15. Hammill, D. D. (1990). On defining learning disabilities: An emerging consensus. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 74-84.
16. Hazel, J. S., & Schumaker, J. B. (1988). Social skills and learning disabilities: Current issues and recommendations for future research. In J. F. Kavanagh & T. J. Truss (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Proceedings of the national conference (pp. 293-344). Parkton, MD: York Press.
17. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.
18. Hessler, G. L. (1987). Educational issues surrounding severe discrepancy. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 43-49.
19. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
20. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1995). The nature of learning disabilities: Critical elements of diagnosis and classification. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Kelman, M., & Lester, G. (1997). Jumping the queue: An inquiry into the legal treatment of students with learning disabilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Lovett, M. W., Borden, S., DeLuca, T., Lacerenza, L., Benson, N., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 805-822.
23. Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Doi, L. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Peterson, A. (1996). On the bases of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58, 157-195.
24. Mercer, C. D., Jordan, L., Allsopp, D. H., & Mercer, A. H. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 217-232.
25. Metcalf, S. D. (1998, March). Attention deficits. Lingua Franca, 8(2), 60-64.
26. Olson, R. K., Wise, B. W., Johnson, M., & Ring, J. (1997). The etiology and remediation of phonologically based word recognition and spelling disabilities: Are phonological deficits the "hole" story? In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition: Implications for early intervention (pp. 305-326). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Perfetti, C. A., & McCutchen, D. (1987). Schooled language competence: Linguistic abilities in reading and writing. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 105-141). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Posner, M. I., & Carr, T. H. (1992). Lexical access and the brain: Anatomical constraints on cognitive models of word recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 1-26.
29. Reynolds, C. R. (1985). Measuring the aptitude-achievement discrepancy in learning disability diagnosis. Remedial and Special Education, 6(5), 37-55.
30. Scheffler, I. (1985). Of human potential. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31. Schick, F. (1997). Making choices: A recasting of decision theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Shalit, R. (1997, August 25). Defining disability down. The New Republic, 217, 16-22.
33. Share, D. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1-57.
34. Shaywitz, S. E., Escobar, M. D., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Makugh, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. The New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 145-150.
35. Shepard, L. (1980). An evaluation of the regression discrepancy method for identifying children with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 14, 79-91.
36. Siegel, L. S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 201-215.
37. Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469-479.
38. Siegel, L. S. (1993). Alice in IQ land or why IQ is still irrelevant to learning disabilities. In R. M. Joshi & C. K. Leong (Eds.), Reading disabilities: Diagnosis and components processes (pp. 71-84). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
39. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In J. Torgesen & B. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 87-131). New York: Academic Press.
40. Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review, 10, 72-100.
41. Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7-29.
42. Stanovich, K. E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading acquisition. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 307-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Stanovich, K. E. (1993). Dysrationalia: A new specific learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 501-515.
44. Stanovich, K. E. (1994). Does dyslexia exist? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 579-595.
45. Stanovich, K. E. (1996a). Decentered thought and consequentialist decision making (Commentary). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 323-324.
46. Stanovich, K. E. (1996b). Toward a more inclusive definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 2, 154-166.
47. Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 211-229.
49. Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). The phenotypic performance profile of reading-disabled children: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
50. Stanovich, K. E., Siegel, L. S., & Gottardo, A. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 114-127.
51. Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (1997). Prevention and remediation of reading disabilities: A classic glass half empty and half full. Journal of Academic Language Therapy, 1, 48-51.
52. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402-133.
53. Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Harrison, M. (1995). Knowledge growth and maintenance across the life span: The role of print exposure. Developmental Psychology, 31, 811-826.
54. Thornson, M. (1982). Assessing the intelligence of dyslexic children. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 35, 94-96.
55. Torgesen, J. K. (1997). The prevention and remediation of reading disabilities: Evaluating what we know from research. Journal of Academic Language Therapy, 1, 11-47.
56. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1997). Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the end in mind. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 217-234.
57. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
58. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E., Small, S., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.