ResPRE: High-accuracy protein contact prediction by coupling precision matrix with deep residual neural networks

Bioinformatics

Volumn 35, Issue 22, 2019, Pages 4647-4655

  Li, Yang ^a,b   Hu, Jun ^a,b   Zhang, Chengxin ^b   Yu, Dong Jun ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COEVOLUTION; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK; COVARIANCE; DATA ANALYSIS; LEARNING; NOISE; PREDICTION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; BIOLOGY; PROTEIN DATABASE;

PROTEIN;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; NEURAL NETWORKS, COMPUTER; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 85070761841     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz291     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adhikari, B. et al. (2018) DNCON2: improved protein contact prediction using two-level deep convolutional neural networks. Bioinformatics, 34, 1466-1472.
2. Bell, E. W. et al. (2018) ResTriplet/TripletRes: learning contact-maps from a triplet of coevolutionary matrices. In: Invited Talk Given in 13th Community Wide Experiment on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction. Iberostar Paraiso, Riviera Maya, Mexico.
3. Buchan, D. W. and Jones, D. T. (2017) Improved protein contact predictions with the MetaPSICOV2 server in CASP12. Proteins, 86, 78-83.
4. Burger, L. and Van Nimwegen, E. (2010) Disentangling direct from indirect co-evolution of residues in protein alignments. PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000633.
5. Ekeberg, M. et al. (2014) Fast pseudolikelihood maximization for direct-coupling analysis of protein structure from many homologous amino-acid sequences. J. Comput. Phys., 276, 341-356.
6. Ekeberg, M. et al. (2013) Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Phys. Rev. E, 87, 012707.
7. Fan, J. et al. (2016) An overview of the estimation of large covariance and precision matrices. Econom. J., 19, C1-C32.
8. Feizi, S. et al. (2013) Network deconvolution as a general method to distinguish direct dependencies in networks. Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 726.
9. Fox, N. K. et al. (2014) SCOPe: structural Classification of Proteins-extended, integrating SCOP and ASTRAL data and classification of new structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D304-D309.
10. Friedman, J. et al. (2008) Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics, 9, 432-441.
11. Göbel, U. et al. (1994) Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins, 18, 309-317.
12. Golkov, V. et al. (2016) Protein contact prediction from amino acid co-evolution using convolutional networks for graph-valued images. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. pp. 4222-4230.
13. He, B. et al. (2017) NeBcon: protein contact map prediction using neural network training coupled with naive Bayes classifiers. Bioinformatics, 33, 2296-2306.
14. He, K. et al. (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 770-778.
15. Jones, D. T. et al. (2012) PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics, 28, 184-190.
16. Jones, D. T. and Kandathil, S. M. (2018) High precision in protein contact prediction using fully convolutional neural networks and minimal sequence features. Bioinformatics, 34, 3308-3315.
17. Jones, D. T. et al. (2015) MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins. Bioinformatics, 31, 999-1006.
18. Kajan, L. et al. (2014) FreeContact: fast and free software for protein contact prediction from residue co-evolution. BMC Bioinformatics, 15, 85.
19. Kamisetty, H. et al. (2013) Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence-and structure-rich era. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 110, 15674-15679.
20. Kandathil, S. M. et al. (2018) DeepMetaPSICOV (DMP) in CASP13. In: Invited Talk Given in 13th Community Wide Experiment on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction. Iberostar Paraiso, Riviera Maya, Mexico.
21. Kass, I. and Horovitz, A. (2002) Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in GroEL by analysis of correlated mutations. Proteins, 48, 611-617.
22. Kass, I. and Horovitz, A. (2002) Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in GroEL by analysis of correlated mutations. Proteins, 48, 611-617.
23. Kinch, L. N. et al. (2016) Evaluation of free modeling targets in CASP11 and ROLL. Proteins, 84 (Suppl. 1), 51-66.
24. Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J. (2014) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1412. 6980.
25. Knapp, S. K. (1990) Accelerate FPGA macros with one-hot approach. Electron. Des., 38, 71-78.
26. Krizhevsky, A. et al. (2017) ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM, 60, 84-90.
27. Kuismin, M. et al. (2017) Precision matrix estimation with ROPE. J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 26, 682-694.
28. Liu, Y. et al. (2018) Enhancing evolutionary couplings with deep convolutional neural networks. Cell Syst., 6, 65-74. e3.
29. Long, J. et al. (2015) Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 3431-3440.
30. Ma, J. et al. (2015) Protein contact prediction by integrating joint evolutionary coupling analysis and supervised learning. Bioinformatics, 31, 3506-3513.
31. Martin, L. et al. (2005) Using information theory to search for co-evolving residues in proteins. Bioinformatics, 21, 4116-4124.
32. Morcos, F. et al. (2011) Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 108, E1293-E1301.
33. Paszke, A. et al. (2017) Automatic differentiation in PyTorch. In: 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017) Workshop Autodiff. Paper 8.
34. Ravikumar, P. et al. (2010) High-dimensional Ising model selection using '1-regularized logistic regression. Ann. Stat., 38, 1287-1319.
35. Remmert, M. et al. (2012) HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMMalignment. Nat. Methods, 9, 173.
36. Schaarschmidt, J. et al. (2018) Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: co-evolution and deep learning coming of age. Proteins, 86 (Suppl. 1), 51-66.
37. Seemayer, S. et al. (2014) CCMpred-fast and precise prediction of protein residue-residue contacts from correlated mutations. Bioinformatics, 30, 3128-3130.
38. Sun, H. P. et al. (2015) Improving accuracy of protein contact prediction using balanced network deconvolution. Proteins, 83, 485-496.
39. Towns, J. et al. (2014) XSEDE: accelerating scientific discovery. Comput. Sci. Eng., 16, 62-74.
40. van Wieringen, W. N. and Peeters, C. F. (2016) Ridge estimation of inverse covariance matrices from high-dimensional data. Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 103, 284-303.
41. Wang, S. et al. (2017) Accurate De Novo prediction of protein contact map by ultra-deep learning model. PLoS Comput. Biol., 13, e1005324.
42. Weigt, M. et al. (2009) Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 106, 67-72.
43. Zhang, C. et al. (2018) Template-based and free modeling of I-TASSER and QUARK pipelines using predicted contact maps in CASP12. Proteins, 86, 136-151.
44. Zhang, Y. (2008) Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 18, 342-348.