NeBcon: Protein contact map prediction using neural network training coupled with naïve Bayes classifiers

Bioinformatics

Volumn 33, Issue 15, 2017, Pages 2296-2306

  He, Baoji ^a,b,c   Mortuza, S M ^c   Wang, Yanting ^a,b   Shen, Hong Bin ^c,d   Zhang, Yang ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGY; MACHINE LEARNING; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MACHINE LEARNING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

EID: 85026374818     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx164     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Altschul, S.F. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389-3402.
2. Burger, L., and van Nimwegen, E. (2010) Disentangling direct from indirect coevolution of residues in protein alignments. PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000633.
3. Cheng, J., and Baldi, P. (2005) Three-stage prediction of protein beta-sheets by neural networks, alignments and graph algorithms. Bioinformatics, 21(Suppl 1), i75-i84.
4. Cheng, J., and Baldi, P. (2007) Improved residue contact prediction using support vector machines and a large feature set. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 113.
5. Ekeberg, M. et al. (2013) Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Phys. Rev. E, 87, 012707.
6. Ezkurdia, I. et al. (2009) Assessment of domain boundary predictions and the prediction of intramolecular contacts in CASP8. Proteins, 77(Suppl 9), 196-209.
7. Gao, X. et al. (2009) Improving consensus contact prediction via server correlation reduction. BMC Struct. Biol., 9, 28.
8. Gobel, U. et al. (1994) Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins, 18, 309-317.
9. Hall, M. et al. (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11, 10-18.
10. Izarzugaza, J.M. et al. (2007) Assessment of intramolecular contact predictions for CASP7. Proteins, 69, 152-158.
11. Jones, D.T. et al. (2012) PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics, 28, 184-190.
12. Jones, D.T. et al. (2015) MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins. Bioinformatics, 31, 999-1006.
13. Kabsch, W., and Sander, C. (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 22, 2577-2637.
14. Kajan, L. et al. (2014) FreeContact: fast and free software for protein contact prediction from residue co-evolution. BMC Bioinformatics, 15, 85.
15. Kamisetty, H. et al. (2013) Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residueresidue contact predictions in a sequence-and structure-rich era. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 110, 15674-15679.
16. Kinch, L.N. et al. (2015) Evaluation of free modeling targets in CASP11 and ROLL. Proteins, 84, 51-66.
17. Konopka, B.M. et al. (2014) Automated procedure for contact-map-based protein structure reconstruction. J. Membr. Biol., 247, 409-420.
18. Marks, D.S. et al. (2011) Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLoS One, 6, e28766.
19. Monastyrskyy, B. et al. (2014) Evaluation of residue-residue contact prediction in CASP10. Proteins, 82(Suppl 2), 138-153.
20. Monastyrskyy, B. et al. (2016) New encouraging developments in contact prediction: assessment of the CASP11 results. Proteins, 84(Suppl 1), 131-144.
21. Monastyrskyy, B. et al. (2011) Evaluation of residue-residue contact predictions in CASP9. Proteins, 79(Suppl 10), 119-125.
22. Morcos, F. et al. (2011) Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 108, E1293-E1301.
23. Needleman, S.B., and Wunsch, C.D. (1970) A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 48, 443-453.
24. Ovchinnikov, S. et al. (2015) Improved de novo structure prediction in CASP11 by incorporating co-evolution information into Rosetta. Proteins, 84, 67-75.
25. Seemayer, S. et al. (2014) CCMpred-fast and precise prediction of protein residue-residue contacts from correlated mutations. Bioinformatics, 30, 3128-3130.
26. Shackelford, G., and Karplus, K. (2007) Contact prediction using mutual information and neural nets. Proteins, 69, 159-164.
27. Shindyalov, I.N. et al. (1994) Can three-dimensional contacts in protein structures be predicted by analysis of correlated mutations? Protein Eng., 7, 349-358.
28. Skolnick, J. et al. (1997) MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J. Mol. Biol., 265, 217-241.
29. Skwark, M.J. et al. (2014) Improved contact predictions using the recognition of protein like contact patterns. PLoS Comput. Biol., 10, e1003889.
30. Vendruscolo, M. et al. (1997) Recovery of protein structure from contact maps. Fold Des., 2, 295-306.
31. Weigt, M. et al. (2009) Identification of direct residue contacts in proteinprotein interaction by message passing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 106, 67-72.
32. Wu, S. et al. (2011) Improving protein structure prediction using multiple sequence-based contact predictions. Structure, 19, 1182-1191.
33. Wu, S., and Zhang, Y. (2007) LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction. Nucliec Acids Res., 35, 3375-3382.
34. Wu, S., and Zhang, Y. (2008a) A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and template-based methods for protein contact prediction. Bioinformatics, 24, 924-931.
35. Wu, S., and Zhang, Y. (2008b) MUSTER: improving protein sequence profile-profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins, 72, 547-556.
36. Xu, D., and Zhang, Y. (2012) Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field. Proteins, 80, 1715-1735.
37. Yan, R. et al. (2013) A comparative assessment and analysis of 20 representative sequence alignment methods for protein structure prediction. Sci. Rep., 3, 2619.
38. Yang, J., and Shen, H.B. (2014) An ensemble predictor by fusing multiple base predictors composed by both coevolution-based and machine learningbased approaches, In: Abstract of CASP11 experiment, p. 209. http://predictioncenter.org/casp11/doc/CASP11-Abstracts.pdf
39. Zhang, Y. et al. (2003) TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction. Biophys. J., 85, 1145-1164.