Fast pseudolikelihood maximization for direct-coupling analysis of protein structure from many homologous amino-acid sequences

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 276, Issue , 2014, Pages 341-356

  Ekeberg, Magnus ^a,b   Hartonen, Tuomo ^c,d   Aurell, Erik ^b,c  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b ALBANOVA UNIVERSITY CENTER   (Sweden)

^c AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Contact map; Direct coupling analysis; Inference; Potts model; Protein structure prediction; Pseudolikelihood

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; PROTEINS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CONTACTS MAP; COUPLING ANALYSIS; DIRECT COUPLING; DIRECT-COUPLING ANALYSE; INFERENCE; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE PREDICTION; PROTEINS STRUCTURES; PSEUDO-LIKELIHOOD;

POTTS MODEL;

EID: 84905637666     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.07.024     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Moult J., Pedersen J.T., Judson R., Fidelis K. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins, Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 1995, 23(3):R2-R4. 10.1002/prot.340230303.
2. Clarke N.D. Covariation of residues in the homeodomain sequence family. Protein Sci. 1995, 4(11):2269-2278.
3. Göbel U., Sander C., Schneider R., Valencia A. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins, Struct. Funct. Genet. 1994, 18(4):309. 10.1002/prot.340180402.
4. Neher E. How frequent are correlated changes in families of protein sequences?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91(1):98-102. 10.1073/pnas.91.1.98.
5. Marks D.S., Hopf T.A., Sander C. Protein structure prediction from sequence variation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30(11):1072-1080. 10.1038/nbt.2419.
6. Ekeberg M., Lövkvist C., Lan Y., Weigt M., Aurell E. Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Phys. Rev. E 2013, 87(1):012707. http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.012707, 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.012707.
7. Protein families-database, accessed: 2013-10-24. http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/.
8. Punta M., Coggill P.C., Eberhardt R.Y., Mistry J., Tate J.G., Boursnell C., Pang N., Forslund K., Ceric G., Clements J., Heger A., Holm L., Sonnhammer E.L.L., Eddy S.R., Bateman A., Finn R.D. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40(D1):D290. 10.1093/nar/gkr1065.
9. Wainwright M.J., Jordan M.I. Graphical models, exponential families, and variational inference. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2008, 1(1-2):1-305. 10.1561/2200000001.
10. Pitman E., Wishart J. Sufficient statistics and intrinsic accuracy. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1936, 32:567-579. 10.1017/S0305004100019307.
11. Darmois G. Sur les lois de probabilités à estimation exhaustive. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 1935, 200:1265-1266. (in French).
12. Koopman B. On distribution admitting a sufficient statistic. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1936, 39(3):399-409. 10.2307/1989758.
13. Morcos F., Pagnani A., Lunt B., Bertolino A., Marks D.S., Sander C., Zecchina R., Onuchic J.N., Hwa T., Weigt M. Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108(49):E1293. 10.1073/pnas.1111471108.
14. Weigt M., White R.A., Szurmant H., Hoch J.A., Hwa T. Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106(1):67. arxiv:0901.1248v1, 10.1073/pnas.0805923106.
15. Sessak V., Monasson R. Small-correlation expansions for the inverse Ising problem. J. Phys. A, Math. Theor. 2009, 42(5):055001. 10.1088/1751-8113/42/5/055001.
16. Cocco S., Monasson R. Adaptive cluster expansion for inferring Boltzmann machines with noisy data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106(9):090601. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.090601.
17. Cocco S., Monasson R. Adaptive cluster expansion for the inverse Ising problem: convergence, algorithm and tests. J. Stat. Phys. 2012, 147(2):252-314. 10.1007/s10955-012-0463-4.
18. Ricci-Tersenghi F. The Bethe approximation for solving the inverse Ising problem: a comparison with other inference methods. J. Stat. Mech. 2012, 2012:P08015. 10.1088/1742-5468/2012/08/P08015.
19. Lapedes A.S., Giraud B.G., Liu L., Stormo G.D. Correlated mutations in models of protein sequences: phylogenetic and structural effects. Lect. Notes Monogr. Ser. 1999, vol. 33:236-256.
20. Russ W.P., Lowery D.M., Mishra P., Yaffe M.B., Ranganathan R. Natural-like function in artificial WW domains. Nature 2005, 437(7058):579-583. 10.1038/nature03990.
21. Burger L., van Nimwegen E. Disentangling direct from indirect co-evolution of residues in protein alignments. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6(1):E1000633. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000633.
22. Balakrishnan S., Kamisetty H., Carbonell J.G., Lee S.-I., Langmead C.J. Learning generative models for protein fold families. Proteins, Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2011, 79(4):1061. 10.1002/prot.22934.
23. Marks D.S., Colwell L.J., Sheridan T.A., Robert P., Pagnani A., Zecchina R., Sander C. Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(12):e28766. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028766.
24. Hopf T.A., Colwell L.J., Sheridan R., Rost B., Sander C., Marks D.S. Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing. Cell 2012, 149(7):1607-1621. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.012.
25. Jones D.T., Buchan D.W.A., Cozzetto D., Pontil M. PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 2012, 28(2):184. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr638.
26. Cocco S., Monasson R., Weigt M. From principal component to direct coupling analysis of coevolution in proteins: low-eigenvalue modes are needed for structure prediction. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9(8). 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003176.
27. Cocco S., Monasson R., Weigt M. Inference of Hopfield-Potts patterns from covariation in protein families: calculation and statistical error bars. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013, 473(1). 10.1088/1742-6596/473/1/012010.
28. Kamisetty H., Ovchinnikov S., Baker D. Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110(39):15674-15679. 10.1073/pnas.1314045110.
29. Skwark M.J., Abdel-Rehim A., Elofsson A. PconsC: combination of direct information methods and alignments improves contact prediction. Bioinformatics 2013, 29(14):1815-1816. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt259.
30. Hopf T., Schärfe C., Rodrigues J., Green A., Sander C., Bonvin A., Marks D. Sequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of protein complexes bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/004762.
31. Burkoff N.S., Várnai C., Wild D.L. Predicting protein β-sheet contacts using a maximum entropy-based correlated mutation measure. Bioinformatics 2013, 29(5):580-587. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt005.
32. Savojardo C., Fariselli P., Martelli P.L., Casadio R. BCov: a method for predicting β-sheet topology using sparse inverse covariance estimation and integer programming. Bioinformatics 2013, 29(24):3151-3157. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt555.
33. Lui S., Tiana G. The network of stabilizing contacts in proteins studied by coevolutionary data. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139(15):155103. 10.1063/1.4826096.
34. Rivoire O. Elements of coevolution in biological sequences. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110(17):178102. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.178102.
35. Andreatta M., Laplagne S., Li S.C., Smale S. Prediction of residue-residue contacts from protein families using similarity kernels and least squares regularization arxiv:1311.1301.
36. Wang Z., Xu J. Predicting protein contact map using evolutionary and physical constraints by integer programming. Bioinformatics 2013, 29(13):i266-i273. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt211.
37. Miyazawa S. Prediction of contact residue pairs based on co-substitution between sites in protein structures. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(1):e54252. 10.1371/journal.pone.0054252.
38. Ma J., Wang S., Xu J. Protein contact prediction by joint evolutionary coupling analysis across multiple families arxiv:1312.2988.
39. Feizi S., Marbach D., Medard M., Kellis M. Network deconvolution as a general method to distinguish direct dependencies in networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31(8):726-733. 10.1038/nbt.2635.
40. Baldassi C., Zamparo M., Feinauer C., Procaccini A., Zecchina R., Weigt M., Pagnani A. Fast and accurate multivariate Gaussian modeling of protein families: predicting residue contacts and protein-interaction partners. PLoS ONE 2014, 9(3):e92721. 10.1371/journal.pone.0092721.
41. Feinauer C., Skwark M.J., Pagnani A., Aurell E. Improving contact prediction along three dimensions arxiv:1403.0379.
42. Besag J. Statistical analysis of non-lattice data. Statistician 1975, 24(3):179-195. 10.2307/2987782.
43. Aurell E., Ekeberg M. Inverse Ising inference using all the data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108(9):090201. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.090201.
44. Dunn S.D., Wahl L.M., Gloor G.B. Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(3):333-340. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm604.
45. Protein data bank, accessed: 2013-10-24. http://www.pdbj.org.
46. Petsko G., Ringe D. Protein Structure and Function. Primers in Biology 2004, New Science Press. http://books.google.fi/books?id=bCI5u_19N_oC.
47. Uniprot-database, accessed: 2013-10-24. http://www.uniprot.org/.
48. Velankar S., McNeil P., Mittard-Runte V., Suarez A., Barrell D., Apweiler R., Henrick K. E-MSD: an integrated data resource for bioinformatics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33(suppl. 1):D262-D265. 10.1093/narl/gki058.
49. Lunt B., Szurmant H., Procaccini A., Hoch J.A., Hwa T., Weigt M. Chapter two: inference of direct residue contacts in two-component signaling. Methods Enzymol. 2010, 471:17-41. 10.1016/S0076-6879(10)71002-8.
50. Murzin A., Brenner S., Hubbard T., Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 247(4):536-540. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80134-2.
51. Pandit S., Bhadra R., Gowri V., Balaji S., Anand B., Srinivasan N. SUPFAM: a database of sequence superfamilies of protein domains. BMC Bioinform. 2004, 5(28). 10.1186/1471-2105-5-28.
52. Gough J., Karplus K., Hughey R., Chothia C. Assignment of homology to genome sequences using a library of hidden Markov models that represent all proteins of known structure. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 313(4):903-919. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5080.