Frequency-Based accounts of second language acquisition

The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 193-210

  Ellis, Nick C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064360972     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203808184     Document Type: Chapter

References (132)

1. Achard, M. (2008). Cognitive pedagogical grammar. In P. Robinson and N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisitionLondon: Routledge.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89(4), 369—406.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1989). A rational analysis of human memory. In H. L. I. Roediger and F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 195—210). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Anderson, J. R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and its implications (Seventh Edition). New York: Worth Publishers.
5. Anderson, J. R. and Schooler, L. J. (2000). The adaptive nature of memory. In E. Tulving and F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 557—570). London: Oxford University Press.
6. Baddeley, A. D. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice Revised Edition. Hove: Psychology Press.
7. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and useOxford: Blackwell.
8. Barlow, M., and Kemmer, S. (Eds.). (2000). Usage based models of languageStanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
9. Bartlett, F. C. ([1932] 1967). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychologyCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157—193). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and useNew York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., and Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
13. Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology,18, 355—387.
14. Bod, R., Hay, J., and Jannedy, S. (Eds.) (2003). Probabilistic linguisticsCambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Boyd, J. K. and Goldberg, A. E. (2009). Input effects within a constructionist framework. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 418—429.
16. Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson and N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
17. Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. Eds (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structureAmsterdam: Benjamins.
18. Bybee, J. and Thompson, S. (2000). Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 23, 65—85.
19. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntaxBoston, MA: MIT Press.
20. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
21. Christiansen, M. H. and Chater, N. (Eds.). (2001). Connectionist psycholinguistics. Westport, CO: Ablex.
22. Clark, E. V. (1978). Discoveringwhat words can do. In D. Farkas, W. M.Jacobsen, and K. W. Todrys (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on the lexicon, Chicago Linguistics Society April 14-15, 1978 (pp. 34—57). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Frequency-based accounts of second language acquisition
23. Collins, L. and Ellis, N. C. (2009). Input and second language construction learning: Frequency, form, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), Whole issue.
24. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213—238.
25. Craik, F. I. M. and Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,11, 671—684.
26. Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Croft, W. and Cruise, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Dietrich, R., Klein, W., and Noyau, C. (Eds.) (1995). The acquisition of temporality in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Doughty, C. and Williams, J. (Eds.) (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisitionNew York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. R. C. E. B. (1913), Trans.). New York: Teachers College, Columbia.
31. Elio, R. and Anderson, J. R. (1981). The effects of category generalizations and instance similarity on schema abstraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7(6), 397—417.
32. Elio, R. and Anderson, J. R. (1984). The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction. Memory and Cognition, 12(1), 20—30.
33. Ellis, N. C. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48(4), 631—664.
34. Ellis, N. C. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143—188.
35. Ellis, N. C. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 297—339.
36. Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty and M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.
37. Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305—352.
38. Ellis, N. C. (2006a). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 1—24.
39. Ellis, N. C. (2006b). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 1—31.
40. Ellis, N. C. (2007). Blocking and learned attention in language acquisition. CogSci 2007, Proceedings of the twenty ninth cognitive science conference. Nashville, Tennesse, August 1—4.
41. Ellis, N. C. (2008a). The dynamics of language use, language change, and first and second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 41(3), 232—249.
42. Ellis, N. C. (2008b). The psycholinguistics of the interaction hypothesis. In A. Mackey and C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction in SLA: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 11—40). New York: Routledge.
43. Ellis, N. C. (2008c). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson and N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
44. Ellis, N. C. and Cadierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(Special section), 111—290.
45. Ellis, N. C. and Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009a). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 370—386.
46. Ellis, N. C. and Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009b). Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 188—221.
47. Ellis, N. C. and Laporte, N. (1997). Contexts of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on second language acquisition. In A. M. DeGroot and J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 53—83). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Ellis, N. C. and Larsen Freeman, D. (2006a). Language emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), whole issue.
49. Ellis, N. C. and Larsen Freeman, D. (2006b). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics (introduction to the special issue). Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 558—589.
50. Ellis, N. C. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009a). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59 (Supplement 1)
51. Ellis, N. C. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009b). Language as a complex adaptive system [Special issue]. Language Learning, 59 (Supplement 1).
52. Ellis, N. C. and Sagarra, N. (2010). The bounds of adult language acquisition: Blocking and learned attention. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(4), 553—580.
53. Ellis, N. C. and Schmidt, R. (1998). Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(2and3), 307-336.
54. Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R., and Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 375-396.
55. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., and Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Fries, C. C. (1952). The structure of English. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
57. Fries, C. C. and Lado, R. and the Staff of the Michigan English Language Institute (1958). English pattern practices: Establishing the patterns as habits. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
58. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structureChicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219-224.
60. Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Goldberg, A. E. (2008). The language of constructions. In P. Robinson and N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
62. Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., and Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics,15, 289-316.
63. Goldschneider, J. M. and DeKeyser, R. (2001). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1-50.
64. Gries, S. T. (2007). Corpus-based methods in analyses of SLA data. In P. Robinson and N. C. Ellis (Eds.), A handbook of cognitive linguistics and SLAMahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Gries, S. T. (2008). Phraseology and linguistic theory: A brief survey. In S. Granger and F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
66. Gries, S. T. and Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on “alternations”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 97-129.
67. Gries, S. T. and Wulff, S. (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182-200.
68. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammarLondon: E. Arnold.
69. Harnad, S. (Ed.). (1987). Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognitionNew York: Cambridge University Press.
70. Harris, Z. (1955). From phoneme to morpheme. Language, 31, 190-222.
71. Harris, Z. (1968). Mathematical structures of languageNew York: Wiley and Sons.
72. Harris, Z. (1982). A grammar of English on mathematical principlesNew York: John Wiley and Sons.
73. Harris, Z. (1991). A theory of language and information: A mathematical approachOxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behaviourNew York: John Wiley and Sons.
75. Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 24-44.
76. Hulstijn, J. and DeKeyser, R. (Eds.) (1997). Testing SLA theory in the research laboratory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 2 [Special issue].
77. Hunston, S. and Francis, G. (1996). Pattern grammar: A corpus driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
78. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Holt.
79. Jurafsky, D. and Martin, J. H. (2000). Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, speech recognition, and computational linguisticsEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
80. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mindChicago: University of Chicago Press.
81. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisitesStanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
82. Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow and S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1-63). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
83. Larsen-Freeman, D. and Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguisticsOxford: Oxford University Press.
84. Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (2008). Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson and N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisitionNewYork and London: Routledge.
85. Lightbown, P. M., Spada, N., and White, L. (1993). The role of instruction in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15 [Special issue].
86. Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17,359—382.
87. MacWhinney, B. (1987a). Applying the Competition Model to bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8(4), 315-327.
88. MacWhinney, B. (1987b). The Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249-308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. MacWhinney, B. (1997). Second language acquisition and the Competition Model. In A. M. B. De Groot and J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 113-142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
90. MacWhinney, B. (Ed.) (1999). The emergence of languageHillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69-90). New York: Cambridge University Press.
92. McDonough, K. (2006). Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 179-207.
93. McDonough, K. and Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693-720.
94. McDonough, K. and Trofimovich, P. (2008). Using priming methods in second language research. London: Routledge.
95. Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
97. Ninio, A. (1999). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26, 619-653.
98. Ninio, A. (2006). Language and the learning curve: A new theory of syntactic developmentOxford: Oxford University Press.
99. Norris, J. and Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
100. Ooi, V. B. Y. (1998). Computer corpus lexicographyEdinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
101. Perdue, C. (Ed.) (1993). Adult language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectivesCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
102. Pickering, M. J. (2006). The dance of dialogue. The Psychologist, 19, 734-737.
103. Pickering, M. J. and Garrod, S. C. (2006). Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language and Computation, 4, 203-228.
104. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
105. Posner, M. I. and Keele, S. W. (1970). Retention of abstract ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 304-308.
106. Rescorla, R. A. (1968). Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66, 1-5.
107. Rescorla, R. A. and Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black and W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64-99). NewYork: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
108. Roberts, P. (1956). Patterns of English. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
109. Robinson, P. and Ellis, N. C. (2008a). Conclusion: Cognitive linguistics, Second language acquisition and L2 instruction—issues for research. In P. Robinson and N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
110. Robinson, P. and Ellis, N. C. (Eds.) (2008b). A handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
111. Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. B. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-233.
112. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., and Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
113. Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. (Eds.) (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2, Psychological and biological models) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
114. Saussure, F. D. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale (Roy Harris, Trans.). London: Duckworth.
115. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teachingNew York: Cambridge University Press.
116. Shanks, D. R. (1995). The psychology of associative learningNew York: Cambridge University Press.
117. Simpson-Vlach, R. and Ellis, N. C. (2010). An Academic Formulas List (AFL). Applied Linguistics, 31, 487—512.
118. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
119. Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70—96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
120. Slobin, D. I. (1997). The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond the individual mind. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 5, pp. 265—323). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
121. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching Research, 30, 73—87.
122. Stefanowitsch, A. and Gries, S. T. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, 209—243.
123. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settingsCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
124. Taylor, J. R. (1998). Syntactic constructions as prototype categories. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 177—202). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
125. Tomasello, M. (Ed.) (1998). The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structureMahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
126. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
127. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review,84, 327—352.
128. Tyler, A. (2008). Cognitive linguistics and second language instruction. In P. Robinson and N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
129. VanPatten, B. (2006). Input processing. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introductionMahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
130. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
131. Wulff, S., Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., and LeBlanc, C. (2009). The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal,93, 354—369.
132. Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philologyCambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.