Bayesian networks for probabilistic inference and decision analysis in forensic science: second edition

Bayesian Networks for Probabilistic Inference and Decision Analysis in Forensic Science

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-438

  Taroni, Franco ^a   Biedermann, Alex ^a   Bozza, Silvia ^b   Garbolino, Paolo ^b   Aitken, Colin ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY IUAV OF VENICE   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85063247598     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118914762     Document Type: Book

References (329)

1. Aitken CGG (1995) Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
2. Aitken CGG (1999) Sampling - how big a sample? Journal of Forensic Sciences 44, 750–760.
3. Aitken CGG (2005) Sampling issues in the administration of justice. Significance 2, 24–27.
4. Aitken CGG, Connolly T, Gammerman A, Zhang G, Bailey D, Gordon R and Oldfield R (1996a) Statistical modelling in specific case analysis. Science & Justice 36, 245–255.
5. Aitken CGG, Gammerman A, Zhang G, Connolly T, Bailey D, Gordon R and Oldfield R (1996b) Bayesian belief networks with an application in specifc case analysis In Computational Learning and Probabilistic Reasoning (ed. Gammerman A) John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester pp. 169–184.
6. Aitken CGG and Gammerman A (1989) Probabilistic reasoning in evidential assessment. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 29, 303–316.
7. Aitken CGG and Gold E (2013) Evidence evaluation for discrete data. Forensic Science International 230, 147–155.
8. Aitken CGG and Taroni F (1997) A contribution to the discussion on ‘Bayesian analysis of the deoxyribonucleic acid profiling data in forensic identification applications’, foreman et al. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 160, 463.
9. Aitken CGG and Taroni F (2004) Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists second edn. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
10. Aitken CGG, Taroni F and Garbolino P (2003) A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles. Theoretical Population Biology 63, 179–190.
11. Anderson T, Schum DA and Twining W (2005) Analysis of Evidence Law in Context second edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Anderson T and Twining W (1998) Analysis of Evidence: How to do Things with Facts Based on Wigmore’s Science of Judicial Proof. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.
13. Andrasko J and Maehly AC (1977) Detection of GSR on hands by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Journal of Forensic Sciences 22, 279–287.
14. Balding DJ (2000) Interpreting DNA evidence: can probability theory help? In Statistical Science in the Courtroom (ed. Gastwirth JL) Statistics for Social Science and Public Policy Springer, New York, pp. 51–70.
15. Balding DJ (2005) Weight-of-Evidence for Forensic DNA Profiles. JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
16. Balding DJ and Donnelly P (1995) Inference in forensic identification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 158, 21–53.
17. Balding DJ and Donnelly P (1996) Evaluating DNA profile evidence when the suspect is identified through a database search. Journal of Forensic Sciences 41, 603–607.
18. Balding DJ, Donnelly P and Nichols RA (1994) Some causes for concern aboutDNAprofiles - comment. Statistical Science 9, 248–251.
19. Balding DJ and Nichols RA (1994) DNA profile match probability calculation: How to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Science International 64, 125–140.
20. Balding DJ and Nichols RA (1997) Significant genetic correlations among Caucasians at forensic DNA loci. Hereditiy 78, 583–589.
21. Bangso O and Wuillemin PH (2000) Object Oriented Bayesian networks: A framework for top-down specification of large Bayesian networks with repetitive structures. Technical report, Hewlett-Packard Laboratory for Normative Systems, Aalborg University, Aalborg.
22. Bayes T (1763) An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances In Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability (1970) (ed. Pearson ES and Kendall MG) vol. 1 Griffin, London pp. 134–153.
23. Berger JO (1985) Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis second edn. Springer, New York.
24. Berger JO (1988) Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis second edn. Springer, New York.
25. Berk RE, Rochowicz SA, Wong M and Kopina MA (2007) Gunshot residue in Chicago police vehicles and facilities: An empirical study. Journal of Forensic Sciences 52, 838–841.
26. Bernardo JM and Smith AFM (1994) Bayesian Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
27. Bernardo JM and Smith AFM (2000) Bayesian Theory second edn. JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
28. Berry DA (1994) [DNA fingerprinting: A review of the controversy]: Comment. Statistical Science 9, 252–255.
29. Berzuini C, Dawid, P and Bernardinelli L (2012) Causality: Statistical Perspectives and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
30. Biasotti AA (1959) Astatistical study of the individual characteristics of fired bullets. Journal of Forensic Sciences 4, 34–50.
31. Biasotti AA and Murdock J (1997) Firearms and toolmark identification: The scientific basis of firearms and toolmark identification In Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert Testimony (ed. Faigman L, Kaye DH, Saks MJ and Sanders J) West Publishing, St.Paul, MN pp. 144–150.
32. Biedermann A, Bozza S and Taroni F (2008a) Decision theoretic properties of forensic identification: Underlying logic and argumentative implications. Forensic Science International 177, 120–132.
33. Biedermann A, Taroni F, Bozza S and Aitken CGG (2008b) Analysis of sampling issues using Bayesian networks. Law, Probability and Risk 7, 35–60.
34. Biedermann A, Bozza S and Taroni F (2009) Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks (Part I): A guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data. Forensic Science International 193, 63–71.
35. Biedermann A, Bozza S, Garbolino P and Taroni F (2012a) Decision-theoretic analysis of forensic sampling criteria using Bayesian decision networks. Forensic Science International 223, 217–227.
36. Biedermann A, Bozza S, Konis K and Taroni F (2012b) Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method. Forensic Science International: Genetics 6, 689–696.
37. Biedermann A, Taroni F and Champod C (2012c) How to assign a likelihood ratio in a footwear mark case: An analysis and discussion in the light of R v T. Law, Probability and Risk 11, 259–277.
38. Biedermann A, Voisard R and Taroni F (2012d) Learning about Bayesian networks for forensic interpretation: An example based on the ‘the problem of multiple propositions’. Science & Justice 52, 191–198.
39. Biedermann A, Vuille J and Taroni F (2012e) A Bayesian network approach to the database search problem in criminal proceedings. Investigative Genetics 3, 1–16.
40. Biedermann A, Garbolino P and Taroni F (2013) The subjectivist interpretation of probability and the problem of individualisation in forensic science. Science & Justice 53, 192–200.
41. Biedermann A, Gittelson S and Taroni F (2011a) Recent misconceptions about the ‘database search problem’: A probabilistic analysis using Bayesian networks. Forensic Science International 212, 51–60.
42. Biedermann A, Taroni F and Thompson WC (2011b) Using graphical probability analysis (Bayes nets) to evaluate a conditional DNA inclusion. Law, Probability and Risk 10, 89–121.
43. Biedermann A and Taroni F (2004) Bayesian networks and the assessment of scientific evidence: the use of qualitative probabilistic networks and sensitivity analyses Proceedings of the 14th Interpol Forensic Science Symposium, Lyon, France.
44. Biedermann A and Taroni F (2006) A probabilistic approach to the joint evaluation of firearm evidence and gunshot residues. Forensic Science International 163, 18–33.
45. Biedermann A and Taroni F (2011) Evidential relevance in scene to offender transfer cases: Development and analysis of a likelihood ratio for offence level propositions. Law, Probability and Risk 10, 277–301.
46. Biedermann A, Taroni F, Delemont O, Semadeni C and Davison AC (2005a) The evaluation of evidence in the forensic investigation of fire incidents (Part I): An approach using Bayesian networks. Forensic Science International 147, 49–57.
47. Biedermann A, Taroni F, Delemont O, Semadeni C and Davison AC (2005b) The evaluation of evidence in the forensic investigation of fire incidents (Part II): Practical examples of the use of Bayesian networks. Forensic Science International 147, 56–69.
48. Biedermann A, Taroni F and Garbolino P (2007) Equal prior probabilities: Can one do any better? Forensic Science International 172, 85–93.
49. Booth G, Johnston F and Jackson G (2002) Case assessment and interpretation - application to a drugs supply case. Science & Justice 42, 123–125.
50. Bovens L, Fitelson B, Hartmann S and Snyder J (2002) Too odd (not) to be true? A reply to Olsson. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53, 539–563.
51. Bovens L and Hartmann S (2003) Bayesian Epistemology. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
52. Box GEP and Draper NR (1987) Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces. JohnWiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
53. Brier GW (1950) Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review 78, 1–3.
54. Bruijning-van Dongen CJ, Slooten K, Burgers W and Wiegerinck W (2009) Bayesian networks for victim identification on the basis of DNA profiles. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2, 466–468. Progress in Forensic Genetics 13 - Proceedings of the 23rd International ISFG Congress.
55. Buckleton JS, Evett IW and Weir BS (1998) Setting bounds for the likelihood ratio when multiple hypotheses are postulated. Science & Justice 38, 23–26.
56. Buckleton JS and Triggs CM (2005) Relatedness and DNA: Are we taking it seriously enough? Forensic Science International 152, 115–119.
57. Buckleton JS, Triggs CM and Champod C (2006) An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidence. Science & Justice 46, 69–78.
58. Buckleton JS, Triggs CM andWalsh SJ (2005) Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
59. Bunch SG (2000) Consecutive matching striation criteria: A general critique. Journal of Forensic Sciences 45, 955–962.
60. Butler JM, Schoske R, Vallone PM, Redman JW and Kline MC (2003) Allele frequencies of 15 autosomal STR loci on U.S. Caucasian, African American and Hispanic populations. Journal of Forensic Sciences 48, 908–911.
61. Cardinetti B, Ciampini C, Abate S, Marchetti C, Ferrari F, Di Tullio D, D’Onofrio C, Orlando G, Gravina L, Torresi L and Saporita G (2006) A proposal for statistical evaluation of the detection of gunshot residues on a suspect. Scanning 28, 142–147.
62. Castillo E, Gutierrez JM and Hadi S (1997) Expert Systems and Probabilistic Network Models. Springer, New York.
63. Cavallini D and Corradi F (2006) Forensic identification of relatives of individuals included in a database of DNA profiles. Biometrika 93, 525–536.
64. Cereda G, Biedermann A, Hall D and Taroni F (2014) Object-oriented Bayesian networks for evaluating DIP-STR profiling results from unbalanced DNA mixtures. Forensic Science International: Genetics 8, 118–133.
65. Champod C (2010) The use of probabilistic networks in the area of fingerprints Impression and Pattern Evidence Symposium, Clearwater, FL.
66. Champod C and Evett IW (2001) A probabilistic approach to fingerprint evidence. Journal of Forensic Identification 51, 101–122.
67. Champod C and Jackson G (2000) European fibres group workshop: Case assessment and Bayesian interpretation of fibres evidence Proceedings of the 8th Meeting of European Fibres Group, pp. 33–45, Krakow.
68. Champod C, Lennard C, Margot P and Stoilovic M (2004) Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
69. Champod C and Taroni F (1999) The Bayesian approach In Forensic Examination of Fibres (ed. Robertson J and Grieve M) Taylor and Francis, London pp. 379–398.
70. Charniak E (1991) Bayesian networks without tears. AI Magazine 12, 50–63.
71. Cohen JL (1977) The Probable and the Provable. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
72. Cohen JL (1988) The difficulty about conjunction in forensic proof. Statistician 37, 415–416.
73. Conan Doyle SA (1953) The Complete Sherlock Holmes. Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden City.
74. Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ and Lambert JA (1998a) A hierarchy of propositions: Deciding which level to address in casework. Science & Justice 38, 231–239.
75. Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ and Lambert JA (1998b) A model for case assessment and interpretation. Science & Justice 38, 151–156.
76. Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ and Lambert JA (1999) Case pre-assessment and review in a two-way transfer case. Science & Justice 39, 103–111.
77. Cooper GF (1999) An overview of the representation and discovery of causal relationships using Bayesian networks In Computation, Causation, and Discovery (ed. Glymour C and Cooper GF) The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA pp. 3–62.
78. Corradi F, Lago G and Stefanini FM (2003) The evaluation of DNA evidence in pedigrees requiring population inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 166, 425–440.
79. Corradi F and Ricciardi F (2013) Evaluation of kinship identification systems based on short tandem repeat DNA profiles. Applied Statistics 62, 649–668.
80. Coupe V M H and Van der Gaag LC (1998) Practicable sensitivity analysis of Bayesian belief networks In Prague Stochastics ‘98 - Proceedings of the Joint Session of the 6th Prague Symposium of Asymptotic Statistics and the 13th Prague Conference on Information Theory, Statistical Decision Functions and Random Processes (ed. Huškova M, Lachout P and Vi˘sek JA) Union of Czech Mathematicians and Physicists, Prague, pp. 81–86.
81. Cowell RG (2003) FINEX: A probabilistic expert system for forensic identification. Forensic Science International 134, 196–206.
82. Cowell RG, Dawid AP, Lauritzen SL and Spiegelhalter DJ (1999) Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems. Springer, New York.
83. Cowell RG, Lauritzen SL and Mortera J (2007a) A Gamma model for DNA mixture analyses. Bayesian Analysis 2, 333–348.
84. Cowell RG, Lauritzen SL and Mortera J (2007b) Identification and separation of DNA mixtures using peak area information. Forensic Science International 166, 28–34.
85. Cowell RG, Lauritzen SL and Mortera J (2008) Probabilistic modelling for DNA mixture analysis. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 1, 640–642. Progress in Forensic Genetics 12 - Proceedings of the 22nd International ISFG Congress.
86. Cowell RG, Lauritzen SL and Mortera J (2011) Probabilistic expert systems for handling artifacts in complex DNA mixtures. Forensic Science International: Genetics 5, 202–209.
87. Curran JM, Hicks TN and Buckleton JS (2000) Forensic Interpretation of Glass Evidence. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
88. Curran JM, Triggs CM, Buckleton J, Walsh KAJ and Hicks T (1998) Assessing transfer probabilities in a Bayesian interpretation of forensic glass evidence. Science & Justice 38, 15–21.
89. D’Agostini GD (2003) Bayesian Reasoning in Data Analysis: A Critical Introduction. World Scientific, New York.
90. Darboux JG, Appell PE and Poincare JH (1908) Examen critique des divers systèmes ou études graphologiques auxquels a donné lieu le bordereau. In L’affaire Dreyfus - La revision du proces de Rennes - Enquete de la chambre criminelle de la Cour de Cassation Ligue francaise des droits de l’homme et du citoyen Paris.
91. Daston L (1988) Classical Probability in the Enlightment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
92. Dawid AP (1987) The difficulty about conjunction. Statistician 36, 91–97.
93. Dawid AP (2000) Causal inference without counterfactuals (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association 95, 407–448.
94. Dawid AP (2001) Comment on Stockmarr’s ‘Likelihood ratios for evaluating DNA evidence, when the suspect is found through a database search’. Biometrics 57, 976–978.
95. Dawid AP (2002) Influence diagrams for causal modelling and inference. International Statistical Review 70, 161–189.
96. Dawid AP (2003a) An object-oriented Bayesian network for estimating mutation rates. Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Key West, Florida (FL).
97. Dawid AP (2003b) An object-oriented Bayesian network for estimating mutation rates. Technical Report 226, Department of Statistical Science, University College London.
98. Dawid AP, van Boxel DW, Mortera J and Pascali VL (1999) Inference about disputed paternity from an incomplete pedigree using a probabilistic expert system. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute 58 (Book 1), 241–242.
99. Dawid AP and Evett IW (1997) Using a graphical method to assist the evaluation of complicated patterns of evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences 42, 226–231.
100. Dawid AP and Mortera J (1996) Coherent analysis of forensic identification evidence. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 58, 425–443.
101. Dawid AP, Mortera J, Pascali VL and van Boxel D (2002) Probabilistic expert systems for forensic inference from genetic markers. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 29, 577–595.
102. Dawid AP, Mortera J andVicard P (2005) Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensicDNA profiling problems. Technical Report 256, Departement of Statistical Science, University College London.
103. Dawid AP, Mortera J and Vicard P (2007) Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems. Forensic Science International 169, 195–205.
104. Dawid AP and Vovk V (1999) Prequential probability: Principles and properties. Bernoulli 5, 125–162.
105. De Groot M H (1970) Optimal Statistical Decisions Wiley Classics Library Edition Published 2004. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
106. DeGroot MH and Fienberg SE (1982) The comparison and evaluation of forecasters. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician) 32, 12–22.
107. Diaconis P and Freedman D (1981) The persistence of cognitive illusions. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 4, 333–334.
108. Diaconis P and Zabell S (1982) Updating subjective probability. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77, 882–830.
109. Dillon JH (1990) The Modified Griess Test: A chemically specific chromophoric test for nitrite compounds in gunshot residues. AFTE Journal 22, 243–250.
110. Domotor Z, Zanotti M and Graves H (1980) Probability kinematics. Synthese 44, 421–442.
111. Donkin WF (1851) On certain questions relating to the theory of probability. The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Series 4 1, 353–368.
112. Donnelly P and Friedman RD (1999) DNA database searches and the legal consumption of scientific evidence. Michigan Law Review 97, 931–984.
113. Druzdzel MJ (1996) Explanation in probabilistic systems: Is it feasible? Will it work? Proceedings of the Workshop Intelligent Information Systems V, pp. 1–13, Deblin, Poland.
114. Druzdzel MJ (1997) Five useful properties of probabilistic knowledge representations from the point of view of intelligent systems. Fundamenta Informaticae 30, 241–254. Special Issue on Knowledge Representation and Machine Learning.
115. Druzdzel MJ and Henrion M (1993a) Belief propagation in qualitative probabilistic networks In Qualitative Reasoning and Decision Technologies (ed. Carrete NP and Singh MG) CIMNE, Barcelona pp. 451–460.
116. Druzdzel MJ and Henrion M (1993b) Efficient reasoning in qualitative probabilistic networks Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-93), pp. 548–553, Washington, DC.
117. Druzdzel MJ and Henrion M (1993c) Intercausal reasoning with uninstantiated ancestor nodes Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-93), pp. 317–325, Washington, DC.
118. Earman J (1992) Bayes or Bust? The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
119. Edwards W (1954) The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin 51, 380–417.
120. Edwards AWF (1987) Pascal’s Arithmetical Triangle. Griffin & Oxford University Press, London, New York.
121. Edwards W (1991) Influence diagrams, Bayesian imperialism, and the Collins case: An appeal to reason. Cardozo Law Review 13, 1025–1074.
122. ENFSI Drugs Working Group (2004) Guidelines on representative drug sampling Den Haag.
123. Evett IW (1984) A quantitative theory for interpreting transfer evidence in criminal cases. Applied Statistics 33, 25–32.
124. Evett IW (1987) On meaningful questions: A two-trace transfer problem. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 27, 375–381.
125. Evett IW (1992) Evaluating DNA profiles in a case where the defence is ‘It was my brother’. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 32, 5–14.
126. Evett IW (1993) Establishing the evidential value of a small quantity of material found at a crime scene. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 33, 83–86.
127. Evett IW, Foreman LA and Weir BS (2000a) Letter to the editor. Biometrics 56, 1274–1277.
128. Evett IW, Jackson G and Lambert JA (2000b) More on the hierarchy of propositions: Exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions. Science & Justice 40, 3–10.
129. Evett IW, Jackson G, Lambert JA and McCrossan S (2000c) The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation and the structure and content of statements. Science & Justice 40, 233–239.
130. Evett IW, Gill PD, Jackson G, Whitaker J and Champod C (2002) Interpreting small quantities of DNA: The hierarchy of propositions and the use of Bayesian networks. Journal of Forensic Sciences 47, 520–530.
131. Evett IW, Gill P and Lambert JA (1998a) Taking accout of peak areas when interpreting mixed DNA profiles. Journal of Forensic Sciences 43, 62–69.
132. Evett IW, Lambert JA and Buckleton JS (1995) Further observations on glass evidence interpretation. Science & Justice 35, 283–289.
133. Evett IW, Lambert JA and Buckleton JS (1998b) A Bayesian approach to interpreting footwear marks in forensic casework. Science & Justice 38, 241–247.
134. Evett IW and Weir BS (1998) Interpreting DNA Evidence. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland.
135. Fenton N, Berger D, Lagnado D, Neil M and Hsu A (2013) When ‘neutral’ evidence still has probative value (with implications from the Barry George Case). Science & Justice, in press.
136. Fenton N and Neil M (2011) Avoiding legal fallacies in practice using Bayesian networks. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36, 114–151.
137. Fenton N and Neil M (2013) Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
138. de Finetti B (1930a) Fondamenti logici del ragionamento probabilistico. Bollettino della Unione matematica Italiana 9, 258–261.
139. de Finetti B (1930b) Funzione caratteristica di un fenomeno aleatorio. Memorie della Regia Accademia dei Lincei 4, 86–133.
140. de Finetti B (1937) La prevision: Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré 7, 1–68 (english translation) In Studies in Subjective Probability (1980) (ed. Kyburg HE and Smokler HE) second edn. Dover, New York pp. 93–158.
141. de Finetti B (1962) Does it make sense to speak of ‘Good Probability Appraisers’? In The Scientist Speculates: An Anthology of Partly-Baked Ideas (ed. Good IJ) Basic Books, New York pp. 357–364.
142. de Finetti B (1968) Probability: The subjective approach In La Philosophie Contemporaine (ed. Klibansky R) La Nuova Firenze, Firenze pp. 45–53.
143. de Finetti B (1972) Probability, Induction and Statistics, The Art of Guessing. JohnWiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
144. de Finetti B (1975) Theory of Probability, A Critical Introductory Treatment. vol. 2. JohnWiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
145. de Finetti B (1982) The proper approach to probability In Exchangeability in Probability and Statistics (ed. Koch G and Spizzichino K) North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam pp. 1–6.
146. de Finetti B (1989) La probabilita: Guardarsi dalle contraffazioni! In La logica dell’incerto (ed. Mondadori M) Il Saggiatore, Milano pp. 149–188.
147. Finkelstein MO and Fairley WB (1970) A Bayesian approach to identification evidence. Harvard Law Review 83, 489–517.
148. van Fraassen BC (1986) A demonstration of Jeffrey conditionalization rule. Erkenntnis 24, 17–24.
149. van Fraassen BC (1989) Laws and Symmetry. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
150. Friedman RD (1986a) A close look at probative value. Boston University Law Review 66, 733–759.
151. Friedman RD (1986b) A diagrammatic approach to evidence. Boston University Law Review 66, 571–622.
152. Friedman RD (1996) Assessing evidence. Michigan Law Review 94, 1810–1838.
153. Friedman N and Goldszmidt M (1996) Learning Bayesian networks with local structure In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference (ed. Horvitz E and Jensen FV) Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA pp. 252–262.
154. Galavotti MC (2005) Philosophical Introduction to Probability. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
155. Garbolino P (2001) Explaining relevance. Cardozo Law Review 22, 1503–1521.
156. Garbolino P and Taroni F (2002) Evaluation of scientific evidence using Bayesian networks. Forensic Science International 125, 149–155.
157. Gardenfors P, Hansson B and Sahlin NE (1983) Evidentiary Value: Philosophical, Judicial and Psychological Aspects of a Theory: Essays Dedicated to Sören Halldén on His Sixtieth Birthday. Gleerups, Lund.
158. Geiger D and Heckerman D (1991) Advances in probabilistic reasoning In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference (ed. Bonissone P, D’Ambrosio B and Smets P) Morgan Kaufmann, Los Angeles, pp. 118–126.
159. Gill P, Puch-Solis R and Curran J (2009) The low-template-DNA (stochastic) threshold - its determination relative to risk analysis for national DNA databases. Forensic Science International: Genetics 3, 104–111.
160. Gittelson S, Biedermann A, Bozza S and Taroni F (2012) The database search problem: A question of rational decision making. Forensic Science International 222, 186–199.
161. Gittelson S, Biedermann A, Bozza S and Taroni F (2013a) Modeling the forensic two-trace problem with Bayesian networks. Artificial Intelligence and Law 21, 221–252.
162. Gittelson S, Bozza S, Biedermann A and Taroni F (2013b) Decision-theoretic reflections on processing a fingermark. Forensic Science International 226, e42–e47.
163. Gittelson S, Biedermann A, Bozza S and Taroni F (2014) Decision analysis for the genotype designation in low-template-DNA profiles. Forensic Science International: Genetics 9, 118–133.
164. Good IJ (1950) Probability and the Weighing of Evidence. Griffin, London.
165. Good IJ (1952) Rational decisions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 14, 107–114.
166. Good IJ (1985) Weight of evidence: a brief survey (with discussion) In Bayesian Statistics 2 (ed. Bernardo JM, DeGroot MH, Lindley DV and Smith AFM) Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North Holland pp. 249–270.
167. Green PJ and Mortera J (2009) Sensitivity of inferences in forensic genetics to assumptions about funding genes. Annals of Applied Statistics 3, 731–763.
168. Haag LC (2006) Shooting Incident Reconstruction. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
169. Hacking I (1975) The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
170. Halliwell J, Keppens J and Shen Q (2003) Linguistic Bayesian networks for reasoning with subjective probabilities in forensic statistics 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2003), pp. 42–50, Edinburgh.
171. Harbison SA and Buckleton JS (1998) Applications and extensions of subpopulation theory: A caseworkers guide. Science & Justice 38, 249–254.
172. Harman G (1965) The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review 77, 88–95.
173. Hatsch D, Keyser C, Hienne R and Bertrand L (2007) Resolving paternity relationships using X-chromosome STRs and Bayesian networks. Journal of Forensic Sciences 52, 895–897.
174. Hempel CG (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press, New York.
175. Henrion M (1986) Uncertainty in artificial intelligence: is probability epistemically and heuristically adequate? In Expert Judgement and Expert Systems (NATO ASI Series F) (ed. Mumpower J, Phillips LD, Renn O and Uppuluri VRR) vol. 35 Springer Berlin pp. 105–130.
176. HenrionMand Druzdzel MJ (1991) Qualitative propagation and scenario-based schemes for explaining probabilistic reasoning In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 6 (ed. Bonissone PP, Henrion M, Kanal LN and Lemmer JF) Elsevier, North Holland pp. 17–32.
177. Hepler A, Dawid AP and Leucari V (2007) Object-oriented graphical representations of complex patterns of evidence. Law Probability and Risk 6, 275–293.
178. Hepler A andWeir BS (2007) Object-oriented Bayesian networks for paternity cases with allelic dependencies. Technical Report 281, Departement of Statistical Science, University College London, London.
179. Hepler A andWeir BS (2008) Object-oriented Bayesian networks for paternity cases with allelic dependencies. Forensic Science International: Genetics 2, 166–175.
180. Hitchcock C (2012) Probabilistic causation In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta EN) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-probabilistic/ (last accessed May 2014).
181. Hojsgaard S, Edwards D and Lauritzen S (2012) Graphical Models with R. Springer, Boston, MA.
182. Horwich P (1982) Probability and Evidence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
183. Howard R and Matheson J (1984) Influence diagrams In Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis (ed. Howard RA and Matheson JE) Vol. 2 Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA pp. 719–762.
184. Howson C and Urbach P (1996) Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach second edn. Open Court, La Salle.
185. Hummel K (1971) Biostatistical opinion of parentage based upon the results of blood group tests In Biostatistische Abstammungsbegutachtung mit Blutgruppenbefunden (ed. Schmidt P) Gustav Fisher, Stuttgart.
186. Hummel K (1983) Selection of gene frequency tables In Inclusion Probabilities in Parentage Testing (ed. Walker R) American Association of Blook Banks, Arlington, TX.
187. Jackson G (2000) The scientist and the scales of justice. Science & Justice 40, 81–85.
188. Jalanti T, Henchoz P, Gallusser A and Bonfanti MS (1999) The persistence of gunshot residue on shooters’ hands. Science & Justice 39, 48–52.
189. Jaynes ET (1983) Where do we stand on Maximum Entropy? In Papers on Probability, Statistics and Statistical Physics (ed. Rosenkrantz RD) Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht pp. 211–314.
190. Jaynes ET (2003) Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
191. Jeffrey RC (1983) The Logic of Decision second edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
192. Jeffrey RC (1992) Probability and the Art of Judgment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
193. Jeffrey RC (2004) Subjective Probability, The Real Thing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
194. Jensen FV (1996) An Introduction to Bayesian Networks. University College London Press, London.
195. Jensen FV (2001) Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Springer, New York.
196. Jensen FV, Lauritzen SL and Olesen KG (1990) Bayesian updating in causal probabilistic networks by local computation. Computational Statistics Quarterly 4, 269–282.
197. Jensen FV and Nielsen TD (2007) Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs second edn. Springer, New York.
198. Juchli P, Biedermann A and Taroni F (2012) Graphical probabilistic analysis of the combination of items of evidence. Law, Probability and Risk 11, 51–84.
199. Kadane JB and Schum DA (1996) A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
200. Katterwe H (2003) True or false. Information Bulletin for Shoeprint/Toolmark Examiners 9, 18–25.
201. Kaye DH (1987) The validity of tests: Caveant omnes. Jurimetrics Journal 27, 349–361.
202. Kaye DH (1988) What is Bayesianism? In Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence, The Uses and Limits of Bayesianism (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science) (ed. Tillers P and Green ED) Springer, Dordrecht pp. 1–19.
203. Kaye DH (2009) Rounding up the usual suspects: A logical and legal analysis of DNA trawling cases. North Carolina Law Review 87, 425–503.
204. Kilty JW (1975) Activity after shooting and its effect on the retention of primer GSR. Journal of Forensic Sciences 20, 219–230.
205. Kim JH and Pearl J (1983) A computational model for causal and diagnostic reasoning in inference systems Proceedings of IJCAI-83, Karlsruhe, West Germany, pp. 190–193. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA.
206. Kim Y and Valtorta M (1995) On the detection of conflicts in diagnostic Bayesian networks using abstraction Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 362–367.
207. Kind SS (1994) Crime investigation and the criminal trial: A three chapter paradigm of evidence. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 35, 155–164.
208. Kirk PL and Kingston CR (1964) Evidence evaluation and problems in general criminalistics 16th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Chicago.
209. Kjarulff UB and Madsen AL (2008) Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams, A Guide to Construction and Analysis. Springer, New York.
210. Knechtle P and Gallusser A (1996) La persistance des residus de tir sur les mains selon l’activite du tireur. Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique 49, 228–246.
211. Koller N, Nissen K, RiessMand Sadorf E (2004) Probability Conclusions in Expert Opinions on Handwriting. Substantiation and Standardization of Probability Statements in Expert Opinions. Luchterhand, Munchen.
212. Koller D and Pfeffer A (1997) Object-Oriented Bayesian networks Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-97), pp. 302–313.
213. Korb KB and Nicholson AE (2011) Bayesian Artificial Intelligence second edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
214. Kullback S (1959) Information Theory and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
215. Laskey KB and Mahoney SM (1997) Network fragments: Representing knowledge for constructing probabilistic models Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-97), pp. 334–341.
216. Lauritzen SL and Mortera J (2002) Bounding the number of contributors to mixed DNA stains. Forensic Science International 130, 125–126.
217. Lauritzen SL and Nilsson D (2001) Representing and solving decision problems with limited information. Management Science 47, 1238–1251.
218. Lauritzen SL and Spiegelhalter DJ (1988) Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 50, 157–224.
219. Lee PM (2004) Bayesian Statistics, An Introduction third edn. Arnold, London.
220. Leibniz GW (1930) Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe vol. 6. Otto Reichl, Darmstadt.
221. Lemmer JF and Barth SW (1982) Efficient minimum information updating for Bayesian inferencing in expert systems Proceedings of the 2nd American National Conference on AI, pp. 424–427, Pittsburgh.
222. Lempert RO (1977) Modeling relevance. Michigan Law Review 75, 1021–1057.
223. Levitt TS and Blackmond Laskey K (2001) Computational inference for evidential reasoning in support of judicial proof. Cardozo Law Review 22, 1691–1731.
224. Lichtenberg W (1990) Methods for the determination of shooting distance. Forensic Science Review 2, 37–62.
225. Lindley D (1965) Introduction to Probability and Statistics from a Bayesian Viewpoint. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
226. Lindley DV 1975 Probabilities and the Law. In: Utility, Probability and Human Decision Making Wendt/Vlek pp 223–232. D.Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.
227. Lindley D (1985) Making Decisions second edn. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
228. Lindley DV (1990) The 1988 Wald Memorial Lectures: The present position in Bayesian statistics. Statistical Science 5, 44–89.
229. Lindley DV (1991) Probability In The Use of Statistics in Forensic Science (ed. Aitken CGG and Stoney DA) Ellis Horwood, New York pp. 27–50.
230. Lindley DV (2000) The philosophy of statistics. Statistician 49, 293–337.
231. Lindley DV (2004) Foreword In Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists second edn (ed. Aitken CGG and Taroni F) John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
232. Lindley DV (2006) Understanding Uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
233. Luce RD and Raiffa H (1958) Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
234. Mackie JL (1974) The Cement of the Universe. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
235. Madsen AL and Jensen FV (1999) Lazy propagation: A junction tree inference algorithm based on lazy evaluation. Artificial Intelligence 113, 203–245.
236. Mahoney SM and Laskey KB (1999) Representing and combining partially specified CPTs In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference (ed. Laskey KB and Prade H) Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA pp. 391–400.
237. Marschak J (1950) Rational behavior, uncertain prospects, and measurable utility. Econometrica 18, 111–141.
238. Mazumder A (2010) Planning in Forensic DNA Identification Using Probabilistic Expert Systems PhD thesis University of Oxford, Department of Statistics Oxford.
239. Morgan MG and Henrion M (1990) Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policiy Analysis. Cambridge Unviersity Press, Cambridge.
240. Mortera J (2003) Analysis of DNA mixtures using probabilistic expert systems In Highly Structured Stochastic Systems (ed. Green PL, Hjort NL and Richardson S) Oxford University Press Oxford, Oxford.
241. Mortera J, Dawid AP and Lauritzen SL (2003) Probabilistic expert systems for DNA mixture profiling. Theoretical Population Biology 63, 191–205.
242. Mueller C and Kirkpatrick L (1988) Federal Rules of Evidence. Little, Brown, Boston, MA.
243. Nagarajan R, ScutariMand Lebre S (2013) Bayesian Networks in R with Applications in Systems Biology Use R! Series. Springer, New York.
244. National Research Council (1992) NRC I - National Research Council Committee on DNA Technology in Forensic Science. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
245. Neil M, Fenton N and Nielsen L (2000) Building large-scale Bayesian networks. Knowledge Engineering Review 15, 257–284.
246. Nesbitt RS, Wessel JE and Jones PF (1976) Detection of GSR by use of the Scanning Electron Microscope. Journal of Forensic Sciences 21, 595–610.
247. von Neumann J and Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior third edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
248. Nichols RG (1997) Firearms and toolmark identification criteria: A review of the literature. Journal of Forensic Sciences 42, 466–474.
249. Nichols RG (2003) Firearms and toolmark identification criteria: A review of the literature, Part II. Journal of Forensic Sciences 48, 318–327.
250. O’Hagan A (1988) Probability: Methods and Measurements. Chapman and Hall, London.
251. O’Hagan A (1994) Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2B, Bayesian Inference. Edward Arnold, London.
252. Olsson EJ (2002) Corroborating testimony, probability and surprise. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53, 273–288.
253. Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, CA.
254. Pearl J (1999) Graphs, structural models, and causality In Computation, Causation, and Discovery (ed. Glymour C and Cooper GF) The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA pp. 95–138.
255. Pearl J (2000) Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
256. Pearl J (2009) Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference second edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
257. Pearl J and Verma T (1987) The logic of representing dependencies by directed graphs Proceedings of the National Conference on AI (AAAI-87). AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA pp. 374–379.
258. Pourret O, Naim P and Marcot B (2008) Bayesian Networks: A Practical Guide to Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
259. Press SJ (1982) Applied Multivariate Analysis: Using Bayesian and Frequentist Methods of Inference second edn. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar.
260. Press SJ (1989) Bayesian Statistics: Principles, Models, and Applications. JohnWiley&Sons, Ltd, New York.
261. Press SJ (2003) Subjective and Objective Bayesian Statistics: Principles, Models, and Applications second edn. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ.
262. R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria.
263. Raiffa H (1968) Decision Analysis, Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
264. Ramsey FP (1931) Truth and probability In The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays (ed. Braithwaite RB) Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, London pp. 156–198. Reprinted in Kyburg HE and Smokler HE (eds) (1980) Studies in Subjective Probability second edn. Dover, New York pp. 61–92.
265. Ribaux O and Margot P (2003) Case based reasoning in criminal intelligence using forensic case data. Science & Justice 43, 135–143.
266. Robert CP (2007) The Bayesian Choice, A Decision-Theoretic Motivation second edn. Springer-Verlag, New York.
267. Robertson B and Vignaux GA (1993) Taking fact analysis seriously. Michigan Law Review 91, 1442–1464.
268. Robertson B and Vignaux GA (1995) Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
269. Romolo FS, Christopher ME, Donghi M, Ripani L, Jeynes C, Webb RP, Ward NI, Kirkby KJ and Bailey MJ (2013) Integrated Ion Beam Analysis (IBA) in gunshot residue (GSR) characterisation. Forensic Science International 231, 219–228.
270. Romolo FS and Margot P (2001) Identification of gunshot residue: A critical review. Forensic Science International 119, 195–211.
271. Rowe WF (2000a) Range In Encyclopedia of Forensic Science (ed. Siegel JH, Saukko PJ and Knupfer GC) vol. 2 Academic Press, San Diego, CA pp. 949–953.
272. Rowe WF (2000b) Residues In Encyclopedia of Forensic Science (ed. Siegel JH, Saukko PJ and Knupfer GC) vol. 2 Academic Press, San Diego, CA pp. 953–961.
273. Saks MJ and Koehler JJ (2005) The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science 309, 892–895.
274. Salmon WC (1990) Rationality and objectivity in science or Tom Kuhn meets Tom Bayes In Scientific Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. Savage CW) vol. 14 University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN pp. 175–204.
275. Salmon WC (1998) Causality and Explanation. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.
276. Salmon WC (1999) Scientific explanation In Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (ed. Salmon MH, Earman J, Glymour C, Lennox JG, Machamer P, McGuire JE, Norton JD, Salmon WC and Schaffner KF) second edn. Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis, IN pp. 7–41.
277. Salmon W, Jeffrey RC and Greeno JG (1971) Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
278. Savage LJ (1951) Theory of statistical decision. Journal of the American Statistical Association 46, 55–67.
279. Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
280. Savage LJ (1972) The Foundations of Statistics second edn. Dover, New York.
281. Scheines R (1997) An introduction to causal inference In Causality in Crisis? (ed. McKim VR and Turner S) University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame pp. 185–199.
282. Schervish MJ (1995) Theory of Statistics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York.
283. Schum DA (1994) Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
284. Shachter RD (1986) Evaluating influence diagrams. Operations Research 34, 871–882.
285. Shafer G and Vovk V (2001) Probability and Finance. It’s Only a Game!. JohnWiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
286. Shenoy PP and Shafer G (1990) Axioms for probability and belief-function propagation In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of the Fifth Conference (ed. Shachter RD, Levitt TS, Kanal LN and Lemmer JF) North Holland, Amsterdam pp. 169–198.
287. Sjerps M and Kloosterman AD (1999) On the consequences of DNA profile mismatches for close relatives of an excluded suspect. International Journal of Legal Medicine 112, 176–180.
288. Smith JQ (1988) Decision Analysis: A Bayesian Approach. Chapman and Hall, London.
289. Spirtes P, Glymour C and Scheines R (2001) Causation, Prediction and Search second edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
290. Stockton A and Day S (2001) Bayes, handwriting and science Proceedings of the 59th Annual ASQDE Meeting - Handwriting & Technology: At the Crossroads, pp. 1–10, Des Moines, IA.
291. Stoney DA (1991) Transfer evidence In The Use of Statistics in Forensic Science (ed. Aitken CGG and Stoney DA) Ellis Horwood, New York pp. 107–138.
292. Stoney DA (1994) Relaxation of the assumption of relevance and an application to one-trace and two-trace problems. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 34, 17–21.
293. Swinburne R (2002) Bayes’s Theorem. Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press, Oxford.
294. Taroni F and Aitken CGG (1998) Probabilites et preuve par ADN dans les affaires civiles et criminelles. Questions de la cour et reponses fallacieuses des experts. Revue Pénale Suisse 116, 291–313.
295. Taroni F, Aitken CGG and Garbolino P (2001) De Finetti’s subjectivism, the assessment of probabilities and the evaluation of evidence: a commentary for forensic scientists. Science & Justice 41, 145–150.
296. Taroni F, Aitken CGG, Garbolino G and Biedermann A (2006a) Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
297. Taroni F, Bozza S and Biedermann A (2006b) Two items of evidence, no putative source: an inference problem in forensic intelligence. Journal of Forensic Sciences 51, 1350–1361.
298. Taroni F and Biedermann A (2005) Inadequacies of posterior probabilities for the assessment of scientific evidence. Law, Probability and Risk 4, 89–114.
299. Taroni F, Biedermann A, Bozza S, Comte J and Garbolino P (2012) Uncertainty about the true source - a note on the likelihood ratio at the activity level. Forensic Science International 220, 173–179.
300. Taroni F, Biedermann A, Garbolino P and Aitken CGG (2004) A general approach to Bayesian networks for the interpretation of evidence. Forensic Science International 139, 5–16.
301. Taroni F, Biedermann A, Vuille J and Morling N (2013) Whose DNA is this? How relevant a question? (a note for forensic scientists). Forensic Science International: Genetics 7, 467–470.
302. Taroni F, Bozza S and Aitken CGG (2005) Decision analysis in forensic science. Journal of Forensic Sciences 50, 894–905.
303. Taroni F, Bozza S, BernardMand Champod C (2007) Value DNA tests: A decision perspective. Journal of Forensic Sciences 52, 31–39.
304. Taroni F, Bozza S, Biedermann A, Garbolino G and Aitken CGG (2010) Data Analysis in Forensic Science: A Bayesian Decision Perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
305. Taroni F, Champod C and Margot P (1998) Forerunners of Bayesianism in early forensic science. Jurimetrics Journal 38, 183–200.
306. Thagart P (1988) Computational Philosophy of Science. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
307. Thagart P (2003) Why wasn’t O.J. convicted? Emotional coherence and legal inference. Cognition and Emotion 17, 361–383.
308. Thompson WC (1995) Subjective interpretation, laboratory error and the value of DNA evidence: three case studies. Genetica 96, 153–168.
309. Thompson WC and Ford S (1991) The meaning of a match: Sources of ambiguity in the interpretation of DNA prints In Forensic DNA Technology (ed. Farley M and Harrington J) CRC Press, Inc., New York pp. 93–152.
310. Thompson WC, Taroni F and Aitken CGG (2003) How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences 48, 47–54.
311. Tikochinsky Y, Tishby NZ and Levine RD (1984) Consistent inference of probabilities for reproducible experiments. Physical Review Letters 52, 1357–1360.
312. Tillman WL (1987) Automated GSR particle search and characterization. Journal of Forensic Sciences 32, 62–71.
313. Twining W (1994) Rethinking Evidence. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.
314. Unites Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2009) Guidelines on Representative Drug Sampling. UNO, New York.
315. Vanderweele TJ and Staudt N (2011) Causal diagrams for empirical legal research: A methodology for identifying causation, avoiding bias and interpreting results. Law, Probability and Risk 10, 329–354.
316. Vicard P, Dawid AP, Mortera J and Lauritzen SL (2008) Estimating mutation rates from paternity casework. Forensic Science International: Genetics 2, 9–18.
317. Vuille J, Biedermann A and Taroni F (2013) The importance of having a logical framework for expert conclusions in forensic DNA profiling: Illustrations from the Amanda Knox case In Wrongful Convictions and Miscarriages of Justice: Causes and Remedies in North American and European Criminal Justice Systems (ed. Huff RC and Killias M) Routledge Chapman & Hall, New York pp. 137–159.
318. Watson SR and Buede DM (1987) Decision Synthesis: The Principles and Practice of Decision Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
319. Weir BS (1996) Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
320. Weir BS (2000) Statistical analysis In Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences (ed. Siegel JA, Saukko PJ and Knupfer GC) Academic Press, San Diego, CA pp. 545–550.
321. Wellman MP (1990a) Fundamental concepts of qualitative probabilistic networks. Artificial Intelligence 44, 257–303.
322. Wellman MP (1990b) Qualitative probabilistic networks for planning under uncertainty In Readings in Uncertain Reasoning (ed. Shafer G and Pearl J) Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA pp. 711–722.
323. Wellman MP and Henrion M (1993) Explaining ‘explaining away’. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 15, 287–292.
324. Whittaker J (1990) Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
325. Wigmore JH (1913) The problem of proof. Illinois Law Review 8, 77–103.
326. Wigmore JH (1937) The Science of Judicial Proof: As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial Trials third edn. Little, Brown, Boston, MA.
327. Williams PM (1980) Bayesian conditionalisation and the principle of Minimum information. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31, 131–144.
328. Williamson J (2004) Bayesian Nets and Causality: Philosophical and Computational Foundations. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
329. Zeichner A and Levin N (1995) Casework experience of GSR detection in Israel on samples from hands, hair and clothing using an Autosearch SEM/EDX System. Journal of Forensic Sciences 40, 1082–1085.