Evidence evaluation for discrete data

Forensic Science International

Volumn 230, Issue 1-3, 2013, Pages 147-155

  Aitken, Colin ^a   Gold, Erica ^b  

^a MAXWELL INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discrete data; Evidence evaluation; Forensic phonetics; Likelihood ratio

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISCRETE DATA; FORENSIC PHONETICS; FORENSIC SCIENCE; LEGAL EVIDENCE; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SPEECH ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 84879604635     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: 18726283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.02.042     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Aitken C.G.G., Taroni F. Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists 2004, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester. 2nd ed.
2. Aitken C.G.G., Lucy D., Zadora G., Curran J.M. Evaluation of trace evidence for three-level multivariate data with the use of graphical models. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2006, 50:2571-2588. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2005.04.005.
3. Ebejer K.A., Winn J., Carter J.F., Sleeman R., Parker J., Körber F. The difference between drug money and a "lifetime's savings". Forensic Sci. Int. 2007, 167(2-3):94-101.
4. Ladefoged P. A Course in Phonetics 2006, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Boston. 5th ed.
5. Laver J. Principles of Phonetics 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Nolan F., McDougall K., de Jong G., Hudson T. The DyViS database: style controlled recordings of 100 homogeneous speakers for forensic phonetic research. Int. J. Speech Lang. Law 2009, 16(1):31-57.
7. Li C.-S., Lu J.-C., Park J., Kim K., Brinkley P.A., Peterson J.P. Multivariate zero-inflated Poisson models and their applications. Technometrics 1999, 41:29-38.