Equal prior probabilities: Can one do any better?

Forensic Science International

Volumn 172, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 85-93

  Biedermann, A ^a   Taroni, F ^a   Garbolino, P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY IUAV OF VENICE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bayes' theorem; Evidence evaluation; Prior and posterior probabilities

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CRIME; EVALUATION; FORENSIC SCIENCE; GUILT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SCIENTIST;

EID: 34548387412     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ENFSI Expert Working Group Marks Conclusion Scale Committee. Conclusion scale for shoeprint and toolmarks examinations. J. Forensic Identification 56 (2006) 255-280
2. Evett I.W. Expert evidence and forensic misconceptions of the nature of exact science. Sci. Justice 36 (1996) 118-122
3. Finkelstein M.O., and Fairley W.B. A Bayesian approach to identification evidence. Harvard Law Rev. 83 (1970) 489-517
4. Kahneman D., Slovic P., and Tversky A. Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Robertson B., and Vignaux G.A. Interpreting Evidence. Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (1995), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
6. Jackson G., Jones S., Booth G., Champod C., and Evett I.W. The nature of forensic science opinion-a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings. Sci. Justice 46 (2006) 33-44
7. Redmayne M. Expert Evidence and Criminal Justice (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford
8. Essen-Möller E. Die Beweiskraft der Ähnlichkeit im Vaterschaftsnachweis. Theoretische Grundlagen. Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft (Wien) 68 (1938) 9-53
9. Good P.I. Applying Statistics in the Courtroom (2001), Chapman & Hall/CRC, London
10. Berry D.A. Probability of paternity. In: Aitken C.G.G., and Stoney D.A. (Eds). The Use of Statistics in Forensic Science (1991), Ellis Horwood, New York 150-156
11. Robertson B., and Vignaux G.A. Unhelpful evidence in paternity cases. N. Z. Law J. 9 (1992) 315-317
12. Morling N., et al. Paternity Testing Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics recommendations on genetic investigations in paternity cases. Int. J. Leg. Med. 117 (2003) 56-61
13. Buckleton J.S., Triggs C.M., and Walsh S.J. Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation (2004), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
14. Fitelson B. The plurality of Bayesian measures of confirmation and the problem of measure sensitivity. Philos. Sci. 66 (1999) 362-378
15. Eells E., and Fitelson B. Symmetries and asymmetries in evidential support. Philos. Stud. 107 (2002) 129-142
16. Taroni F., and Biedermann A. Inadequacies of posterior probabilities for the assessment of scientific evidence. Law Probability Risk 4 (2005) 89-114
17. Tentori K., Crupi V., Bonini N., and Osherson D. Comparison of confirmation measures. Cognition 103 (2007) 107-119
18. Cook R., Evett I.W., Jackson J., Jones P.J., and Lambert J.A. A hierarchy of propositions: Deciding which level to address in casework. Sci. Justice 38 (1998) 231-240
19. Keynes J.M. A Treatise on Probability (1921), McMillan, London
20. Jaynes E.T. Where do we stand on Maximum Entropy?. In: Rosenkrantz R.D. (Ed). Papers on Probability, Statistics and Statistical Physics (1983), Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht 211-314
21. Jaynes E.T. Probability Theory: The Logic of Science (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
22. Jaynes E.T. Information theory and statistical mechanics, pt. I. Phys. Rev. 106 (1957) 620-630
23. Jaynes E.T. Information theory and statistical mechanics, pt. II. Phys. Rev. 108 (1957) 171-191
24. Jaynes E.T. Prior probabilities. In: Rosenkrantz R.D. (Ed). Papers on Probability, Statistics and Statistical Physics (1983), Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht 116-130
25. Howson C. Bayesianism in statistics. In: Swinburne R. (Ed). Bayes's Theorem, Proceedings of the British Academy (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford 39-69
26. Evett I.W. Establishing the evidential value of a small quantity of material found at a crime scene. J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 33 (1993) 83-86
27. Stoney D.A. Relaxation of the assumption of relevance and an application to one-trace and two-trace problems. J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 34 (1994) 17-21
28. Taroni F., Aitken C.G.G., Garbolino G., and Biedermann A. Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science (2006), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
29. Garbolino P., and Taroni F. Evaluation of scientific evidence using Bayesian networks. Forensic Sci. Int. 125 (2002) 149-155
30. Williamson J. Bayesian Nets and Causality: Philosophical and Computational Foundations (2004), Clarendon Press, Oxford
31. Evett I.W., Lambert J.A., and Buckleton J.S. A Bayesian approach to interpreting footwear marks in forensic casework. Sci. Justice 38 (1998) 241-247
32. Balding D.J. Weight-of-Evidence for Forensic DNA Profiles (2005), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
33. Joyce H. Bayesian thoughts. Communication with Dennis Lindley. Significance 1 (2004) 73-75
34. Lindley D.V. Probability and the law. The Statistician 26 (1977) 203-220