Sampling issues in the administration of justice

Significance

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 24-27

  Aitken, Colin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949808223     PISSN: 17409705     EISSN: 17409713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2005.00080.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Aitken, C. G. G., Bring, J., Leonard, X and Papasouliotis, O. (1997) Estimation of quantities of drugs handled and the burden of proof. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 160, 333-350.DOI: 10.1111/1467-985X.00066
2. Izenman, A. J. (2000) Statistical issues in the application of the Federal sentencing guidelines in drug, pornography and fraud cases. In Statistical Science in the Courtroom (ed. J. L. Gastwirth ), pp. 25-50. New York: Springer.
3. Izenman, A. J. (2000) Introduction to two views on the Shonubi case. In Statistical Science in the Courtroom (ed. J. L. Gastwirth ), pp. 393-403. New York: Springer.
4. Izenman, A. J. (2000) Assessing the statistical evidence in the Shonubi case. In Statistical Science in the Courtroom (ed. J. L. Gastwirth ), pp. 415-433. New York: Springer.
5. Gastwirth, J. L., (ed.) (2000) Statistical Science in the Courtroom. New York: Springer.
6. Aitken, C. G. G. (1999) Sampling-how big a sample Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44, 750-760.
7. Tzidony, D. and Ravreboy, M. (1992) A statistical approach to drug sampling: a case study. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 37, 1541-1549.
8. Aitken, C. G. G. and Lucy, D. (2002) Estimation of the quantity of a drug in a consignment from measurements on a sample. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 47, 968-975.