Whose DNA is this? How relevant a question? (A note for forensic scientists)

Forensic Science International: Genetics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 467-470

  Taroni, Franco ^a   Biedermann, Alex ^a   Vuille, Joëlle ^b   Morling, Niels ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Forensic science research; Hierarchy of propositions; Interpretation of forensic DNA profiling results; Probability

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA FINGERPRINTING; FORENSIC GENETICS; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIST; STAIN; GENETICS; PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY;

DNA; FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY; FORENSIC GENETICS; HUMANS;

EID: 84891724347     PISSN: 18724973     EISSN: 18780326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. R. Cook, I.W. Evett, G. Jackson, P.J. Jones, J.A. Lambert, A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework, Sci. Justice 38 (1998) 231-239. (Pubitemid 28499800)
2. I.W. Evett, G. Jackson, J.A. Lambert, More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions, Sci. Justice 40 (2000) 3-10. (Pubitemid 30195411)