Applications and extensions of subpopulation theory: A caseworkers guide

Science and Justice - Journal of the Forensic Science Society

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 249-254

  Harbison, S A ^a   Buckleton, J S ^a  

^a MT ALBERT RESEARCH CENTRE   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

DNA profiling; Forensic science; Genetics; Mixtures; Population genetics; Subpopulation

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CRIME; DNA DETERMINATION; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; FORENSIC SCIENCE; HUMAN; POPULATION GENETICS; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 0031791995     PISSN: 13550306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72119-7     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. National Research Council. The evaluation of forensic DNA evidence. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1996.
2. Balding DJ and Nichols RA. DNA profile match probability calculations: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Science International 1994; 64: 125-140
3. Weir BS Genetic data analysis II. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, 1996
4. Balding DJ, Greenhalgh M and Nichols RA. Population genetics of STR loci in Caucasians. International Journal of Legal Medicine 1996; 108: 300-305
5. Balding DJ and Nichols RA. A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity. Genetica 1995; 96: 3-12.
6. Weir BS, Triggs CM, Starling L, Stowell LI, Walsh KAJ, Buckleton J. Interpreting DNA mixtures. Journal of Forensic Sciences 1997; 42(2): 213-222.
7. Balding DJ and Donnelly P. Inference in forensic identification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 1995; 158 21-53.
8. Evett IW, Buffrey C, Willott G and Stoney D. A guide to interpreting single locus profiles of DNA mixtures in forensic cases. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 1991, 31: 41-47