Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science

Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-354

  Taroni, Franco ^a   Aitken, Colin ^b   Garbolino, Paolo ^c   Biedermann, Alex ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY IUAV OF VENICE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; DIGITAL FORENSICS; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION; PROBABILITY; STUDENTS;

AMOUNT OF INFORMATION; ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION; FORENSIC SCIENTISTS; PROBABILISTIC INFERENCE; PROBABILITY THEORY; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE; SCIENTIFIC REASONING;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 84947321262     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/0470091754     Document Type: Book

References (225)

1. Aitken CGG 1995 Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
2. Aitken CGG 1999 Sampling - How big a sample? Journal of Forensic Sciences 44(4), 750-760.
3. Aitken CGG, Connolly T, Gammerman A, Zhang G, Bailey D, Gordon R and Oldfield R 1996a Statistical modelling in specific case analysis. Science & Justice 36, 245-255.
4. Aitken CGG and Gammerman A 1989 Probabilistic reasoning in evidential assessment. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 29, 303-316.
5. Aitken CGG, Gammerman A, Zhang G, Connolly T, Bailey D, Gordon R and Oldfield R 1996b Bayesian belief networks with an application in specific case analysis In Computational Learning and Probabilistic Reasoning (ed. Gammerman A), pp. 169-184. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
6. Aitken CGG, Lucy D, Zadora G and Curran JM 2005 Evaluation of trace evidence for three-level multivariate data with the use of graphical models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. In press.
7. Aitken CGG and Taroni F 1997 A contribution to the discussion on "Bayesian analysis of the deoxyribonucleic acid profiling data in forensic identification applications", Foreman et al. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Serie A 160, 463.
8. Aitken CGG and Taroni F 2004 Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
9. Aitken CGG, Taroni F and Garbolino P 2003 A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles. Theoretical Population Biology 63, 179-190.
10. Anderson T and Twining W 1998 Analysis of Evidence: How to do Things with Facts Based on Wigmore's Science of Judicial Proof, 2nd edn. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Ill.
11. Balding DJ 1997 Errors and misunderstandings in the second NRC report. Jurimetrics Journal 37, 469-476.
12. Balding DJ 2000 Interpreting DNA evidence: Can probability theory help? In Statistical Science in the Courtroom (ed. Gastwirth JL), pp. 51-70. Statistics for Social Science and Public Policy Springer.
13. Balding DJ 2003 Likelihood-based inference for genetic correlation coefficients. Theoretical Population Biology 63, 221-230.
14. Balding DJ 2005 Weight-of-Evidence for Forensic DNA Profiles. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
15. Balding DJ and Donnelly P 1996 Evaluating DNA profile evidence when the suspect is identified through a database search. Journal of Forensic Sciences 41(4), 603-607.
16. Balding DJ, Greenhalgh M and Nichols RA 1996 Population genetics of STR loci in Caucasians. International Journal of Legal Medicine 108, 300-305.
17. Balding DJ and Nichols RA 1994 DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Science International 64, 125-140.
18. Balding DJ and Nichols RA 1995 A method for quantifying differentiation between populations and multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity In Human Identification: the Use of DNA Markers (ed. Weir BS), pp. 3-12. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.
19. Balding DJ and Nichols RA 1997 Significant genetic correlations among Caucasians at forensic DNA loci. Heredity 78, 583-589.
20. Bayes T 1763 An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances In Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability (1970) (eds. Pearson ES and Kendall MG), vol. 1, pp. 134-153. Griffin, London.
21. Bernardo JM and Smith AFM 1994 Bayesian Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
22. Biasotti AA 1959 A statistical study of the individual characteristics of fired bullets. Journal of Forensic Sciences 4, 34-50.
23. Biasotti AA and Murdock J 1997 Firearms and toolmark identification: the scientific basis of firearms and toolmark identification In Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert Testimony (eds. Faigman L, Kaye DH, Saks MJ and Sanders J), pp. 144-150. West Publishing, St. Paul, MN.
24. Biedermann A and Taroni F 2004 Bayesian networks and the assessment of scientific evidence: the use of qualitative probabilistic networks and sensitivity analyses. 14th Interpol Forensic Science Symposium Lyon, France.
25. Biedermann A and Taroni F 2005 A probabilistic approach to the joint evaluation of firearms and GSR evidence. Forensic Science International. In press.
26. Biedermann A, Taroni F, Delemont O, Semadeni C and Davison AC 2005a The evaluation of evidence in the forensic investigation of fire incidents (part I): an approach using Bayesian networks. Forensic Science International 147, 49-57.
27. Biedermann A, Taroni F, Delemont O, Semadeni C and Davison AC 2005b The evaluation of evidence in the forensic investigation of fire incidents (part II): practical examples of the use of Bayesian networks. Forensic Science International 147, 56-69.
28. Booth G, Johnston F and Jackson G 2002 Case assessment and interpretation - application to a drugs supply case. Science & Justice 42, 123-125.
29. Buckleton JS, Evett IW and Weir BS 1998 Setting bounds for the likelihood ratio when multiple hypotheses are postulated. Science & Justice 38, 23-26.
30. Buckleton JS and Triggs CM 2005 Relatedness and DNA: are we taking it seriously enough? Forensic Science International 152, 115-119.
31. Buckleton JS, Triggs CM and Walsh SJ 2004 Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
32. Bunch SG 2000 Consecutive matching striation criteria: a general critique. Journal of Forensic Sciences 45(5), 955-962.
33. Castillo E, Gutierrez JM and Hadi S 1997 Expert Systems and Probabilistic Network Models. Springer, New York.
34. Cavallini D, Corradi F and Guagnano G 2004 OOBN for forensic identification via a search in a database of DNA profiles. Technical report 2004-4, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze.
35. Champod C and Evett IW 2001 A probabilistic approach to fingerprint evidence. Journal of Forensic Identification 51, 101-122.
36. Champod C and Jackson G 2000 European fibres group workshop: case assessment and Bayesian interpretation of fibres evidence. Proceedings of the 8th Meeting of European Fibres Group, pp. 33-45, Krakow.
37. Champod C, Lennard C, Margot P and Stoilovic M 2004 Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
38. Champod C and Taroni F 1999 The Bayesian approach In Forensic Examination of Fibres (eds. Robertson J and Grieve M), pp. 379-398. Taylor and Francis, London.
39. Charniak E 1991 Bayesian networks without tears. AI Magazine 12(4), 50-63.
40. Cohen JL 1977 The Probable and the Provable. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
41. Cohen JL 1988 The difficulty about conjunction in forensic proof. The Statistician 37, 415-416.
42. Conan Doyle A 1953 The Complete Sherlock Holmes. Doubleday & Company, Garden City.
43. Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ and Lambert JA 1998a A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework. Science & Justice 38, 231-239.
44. Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ and Lambert JA 1998b A model for case assessment and interpretation. Science & Justice 38, 151-156.
45. Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ and Lambert JA 1999 Case pre-assessment and review in a two-way transfer case. Science & Justice 39(2), 103-111.
46. Cooper GF 1990 The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks. Artificial Intelligence 42, 393-405.
47. Cooper GF 1999 An overview of the representation and discovery of causal relationships using Bayesian networks In Computation, Causation, and Discovery (eds. Glymour C and Cooper GF), pp. 3-62. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
48. Coupé VMH and Van der Gaag LC 1998 Practicable sensitivity analysis of Bayesian belief networks In Prague Stochastics '98 - Proceedings of the Joint Session of the 6th Prague Symposium of Asymptotic Statistics and the 13th Prague Conference on Information Theory, Statistical Decision Functions and Random Processes (eds. Hušková M, Lachout P and Víšek JA), pp. 81-86. Union of Czech Mathematicians and Physicists.
49. Coupé VMH, Van der Gaag LC and Habbema JDF 2000 Sensitivity analysis: an aid for belief-network quantification. The Knowledge Engineering Review 15(3), 215-232.
50. Cowell RG 2003 FINEX: a probabilistic expert system for forensic identification. Forensic Science International 134, 196-206.
51. Cowell RG, Dawid AP, Lauritzen S and Spiegelhalter DJ 1999 Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems. Springer, New York.
52. Cowell RG, Lauritzen SL and Mortera J 2004 Identification and separation of DNA mixtures using peak area information. Technical Report 25, Cass Business School, London.
53. Cox DR and Hinkley DV 1974 Theoretical Statistics. Chapman & Hall, London.
54. Curran JM 2005 An introduction to Bayesian credible intervals for sampling error in DNA profiles. Law, Probability and Risk 4, 115-126.
55. Curran JM, Buckleton JS, Triggs CM and Weir BS 2002 Assessing uncertainty in DNA evidence caused by sampling effects. Science & Justice 42, 29-37.
56. Curran JM, Hicks TN and Buckleton JS 2000 Forensic Interpretation of Glass Evidence. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
57. D'Agostini GD 2003 Bayesian Reasoning in Data Analysis: A Critical Introduction. World Scientific, New York.
58. Darboux JG, Appell PE and Poincaré JH 1908 Examen critique des divers systèmes ou études graphologiques auxquels a donné lieu le bordereau In L'affaire Dreyfus - La révision du Procès de Rennes - Enqûete de la Chambre Criminelle de la Cour de Cassation Ligue Française des Droits de L'homme et du Citoyen Paris.
59. Daston L 1988 Classical Probability in the Enlightment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
60. Dawid AP 1987 The difficulty about conjunction. The Statistician 36, 91-97.
61. Dawid AP 2000 Causal inference without counterfactuals (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association 95, 407-448.
62. Dawid AP 2002 Influence diagrams for causal modelling and inference. International Statistical Review 70, 161-189.
63. Dawid AP 2003 An object-oriented Bayesian network for estimating mutation rates. Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics Key West, Florida, USA.
64. Dawid AP and Evett IW 1997 Using a graphical method to assist the evaluation of complicated patterns of evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences 42, 226-231.
65. Dawid AP and Vovk V 1999 Prequential probability: principles and properties. Bernoulli 5, 125-162.
66. Dawid AP, Mortera J, Pascali VL and van Boxel D 2002 Probabilistic expert systems for forensic inference from genetic markers. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 29, 577-595.
67. de Finetti B 1930a Fondamenti logici del ragionamento probabilistico. Bollettino Della UnioneMatematica Italiana 9, 258-261.
68. de Finetti B 1930b Funzione caratteristica di un fenomeno aleatorio. Memorie Della Regia Accademia dei Lincei 4, 86-133.
69. de Finetti B 1937 La prévision. ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré 7, 1-68. English translation in etc.
70. de Finetti B 1975 Theory of Probability. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
71. de Finetti B 1989 La probabilità: guardarsi dalle contraffazioni! In La logica Dell'incerto (ed. Mondadori M), pp. 149-188, Il Saggiatore, Milan.
72. Diaconis P and Freedman D 1981 The persistence of cognitive illusions. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 4, 333-334.
73. Diaconis P and Zabell S 1982 Updating subjective probability. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77, 882-830.
74. Dillon JH 1990 The Modified Griess Test: a chemically specific chromophoric test for nitrite compounds in gunshot residues. AFTE Journal 22(3), 243-250.
75. Domotor Z, Zanotti M and Graves H 1980 Probability kinematics. Synthese 44, 421-442.
76. Donkin WF 1851 On certain questions relating to the theory of probability. The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Series 4 1, 353-368.
77. Druzdzel MJ 1996 Explanation in probabilistic systems: is it feasible? will it work? Proceedings of the Workshop Intelligent Information Systems V, pp. 1-13, Deblin.
78. Druzdzel MJ 1997 Five useful properties of probabilistic knowledge representations from the point of view of intelligent systems. Fundamenta Informaticae 30, 241-254. Special Issue on Knowledge Representation and Machine Learning.
79. Druzdzel MJ and Henrion M 1993a Belief propagation in qualitative probabilistic networks In Qualitative Reasoning and Decision Technologies (eds. Carrete NP and Singh MG), pp. 451-460. CIMNE, Barcelona.
80. Druzdzel MJ and Henrion M 1993b Efficient reasoning in qualitative probabilistic networks. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-93), pp. 548-553, Washington, DC.
81. Druzdzel MJ and Henrion M 1993c Intercausal reasoning with uninstantiated ancestor nodes. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-93), pp. 317-325, Washington, DC.
82. Earman J 1992 Bayes or Bust? The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
83. Edwards AWF 1987 Pascal's Arithmetical Triangle. Griffin & Oxford University Press, London, New York.
84. Edwards W 1991 Influence diagrams, Bayesian imperialism, and the Collins case: an appeal to reason. Cardozo Law Review 13, 1025-1074.
85. ENFSI (European Network of Forensic Science Institutes) Drugs Working Group 2004 Guidelines on representative drug sampling Den Haag.
86. Evett IW 1984 A quantitative theory for interpreting transfer evidence in criminal cases. Applied Statistics 33, 25-32.
87. Evett IW 1987 On meaningful questions: a two-trace transfer problem. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 27, 375-381.
88. Evett IW 1992 Evaluating DNA profiles in a case where the defence is "It was my brother". Journal of the Forensic Science Society 32(1), 5-14.
89. Evett IW 1993 Establishing the evidential value of a small quantity of material found at a crime scene. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 33, 83-86.
90. Evett IW, Gill P and Lambert JA 1998a Taking accout of peak areas when interpreting mixed DNA profiles. Journal of Forensic Sciences 43, 62-69.
91. Evett IW, Lambert JA and Buckleton JS 1998b A Bayesian approach to interpreting footwear marks in forensic casework. Science & Justice 38(4), 241-247.
92. Evett IW, Jackson G and Lambert JA 2000 More in the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions. Science & Justice 40, 3-10.
93. Evett IW, Gill PD, Jackson G, Whitaker J and Champod C 2002a Interpreting small quantities of DNA: the hierarchy of propositions and the use of Bayesian networks. Journal of Forensic Sciences 47, 520-530.
94. Evett IW, Jackson G, Lambert JA and McCrossan S 2002b The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation and the structure and content of statements. Science & Justice 40, 233-239.
95. Evett IW and Weir BS 1998 Interpreting DNA Evidence. Sinauer Associates Incorporated, Sunderland.
96. Fenton N and Neil M 2000 The 'jury observation fallacy' and the use of Bayesian networks to present probabilistic legal arguments. Mathematics Today - Bulletin of the IMA 36, 180-187.
97. Finkelstein MO and Fairley WB 1970 A Bayesian approach to identification evidence. Harvard Law Review 83, 489-517.
98. Foreman LA, Lambert JA and Evett IW 1998 Regional genetic variation in Caucasians. Forensic Science International 95, 27-37.
99. Foreman LA, Smith AFM and Evett IW 1997 A Bayesian approach to validating STR multiplex databases for use in forensic casework. International Journal of Legal Medicine 110, 244-250.
100. Friedman RD 1986a A close look at probative value. Boston University Law Review 66, 733-759.
101. Friedman RD 1986b A diagrammatic approach to evidence. Boston University Law Review 66, 571-622.
102. Friedman RD 1996 Assessing evidence. Michigan Law Review 94, 1810-1838.
103. Friedman N and Goldszmidt M 1996 Learning Bayesian networks with local structure In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference (eds. Horvitz E and Jensen FV), pp. 252-262. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.
104. Galavotti MC 2005 Philosophical Introduction to Probability. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
105. Garbolino P 2001 Explaining relevance. Cardozo Law Review 22, 1503-1521.
106. Garbolino P and Taroni F 2002 Evaluation of scientific evidence using Bayesian networks. Forensic Science International 125, 149-155.
107. Geiger D and Heckerman D 1991 Advances in probabilistic reasoning In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference (eds. Bonissone P, D'Ambrosio B and Smets P), pp. 118-126. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.
108. Good IJ 1985 Weight of evidence: a brief survey (with discussion) In Bayesian Statistics 2 (eds. Bernardo JM, DeGroot MH, Lindley DV and Smith AFM), pp. 249-270. North Holland, Amsterdam.
109. Graham J, Curran J and Weir BS 2000 Conditional genotypic probabilities for microsatellite loci. Genetics 155, 1973-1980.
110. Hacking I 1975 The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
111. Halliwell J, Keppens J and Shen Q 2003 Linguistic Bayesian networks for reasoning with subjective probabilities in forensic statistics. 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2003), pp. 42-50, Edinburgh, Scotland.
112. Harbison SA and Buckleton JS 1998 Applications and extensions of subpopulation theory: a caseworkers guide. Science & Justice 38, 249-254.
113. Harman G 1965 The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review 77, 88-95.
114. Helsper EM and van der Gaag LC 2003 Ontologies for probabilistic networks. Technical Report UUCS-2003-042, Institute of Information and Computing Science, Utrecht University, Netherlands.
115. Hempel CG 1965 Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press, New York.
116. Henrion M 1986 Uncertainty in artificial intelligence: is probability epistemically and heuristically adequate? In Expert Judgement and Expert Systems (NATO ISI Series F) (eds. Mumpower J, Phillips LD, Renn O and Uppuluri VRR), pp. 105-130, vol. 35. Springer, Berlin .
117. Henrion M and Druzdzel MJ 1991 Qualitative propagation and scenario-based approaches to explanation of probabilistic reasoning In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 6 (eds. Bonissone PP, Henrion M, Kanal LN and Lemmer JF), pp. 17-32. Elsevier, North Holland.
118. Hitchcock C 2002 Probabilistic causation In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta EN) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2002/entries/causation-probabilistic/ (last accessed April 2005).
119. Horwich P 1982 Probability and Evidence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
120. Howson C and Urbach P 1993 Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, 2nd edn. Open Court, La Salle.
121. Hummel K 1971 Biostatistical opinion of parentage based upon the results of blood group tests In Biostatistische Abstammungsbegutachtung mit Blutgruppenbefunden (ed. Schmidt P). Gustav Fisher, Stuttgart.
122. Hummel K 1983 Selection of gene frequency tables In Inclusion Probabilities in Parentage Testing (ed. Walker R). American Association of Blook Banks, Arlington, VA.
123. Jackson G 2000 The scientist and the scales of justice. Science & Justice 40, 81-85.
124. Jaynes ET 1983 Where do we stand on maximum entropy? In Papers on Probability, Statistics and Statistical Physics (ed. Rosenkrantz RD), pp. 211-314. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht.
125. Jaynes ET 2003 Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
126. Jeffrey RC 1983 The Logic of Decision, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.
127. Jeffrey RC 1992 Probability and the Art of Judgment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
128. Jeffrey RC 2004 Subjective Probability (The Real Thing). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
129. Jensen FV 2001 Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Springer, New York.
130. Jensen FV, Lauritzen SL and Olesen KG 1990 Bayesian updating in causal probabilistic networks by local computation. Computational Statistical Quarterly 4, 269-282.
131. Jowett C 2001a Lies, damned lies, and DNA statistics: DNA match testing, Bayes' theorem, and the criminal courts. Medicine, Science & Law 41, 194-205.
132. Jowett C 2001b Sittin' in the dock with the Bayes. New Law Journal Expert Witness Supplement 151, 201-212.
133. Kadane JB and Schum DA 1996 A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
134. Katterwe H 2003 True or false. Information Bulletin for Shoeprint/Toolmark Examiners 9(2), 18-25.
135. Kim JH and Pearl J 1983 A computational model for combined causal and diagnostic reasoning in inference systems. Proceedings of IJCAI-83, pp. 190-193, Karlsruhe.
136. Kind SS 1994 Crime investigation and the criminal trial: a three chapter paradigm of evidence. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 35, 155-164.
137. Kirk PL and Kingston CR 1964 Evidence evaluation and problems in general criminalistics. 16th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Chicago, Ill.
138. Kjærulff U and Van der Gaag LC 2000 Making sensitivity analysis computationally efficient In Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (eds. Boutilier C and Goldszmidt M), pp. 362-367. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, Quebec.
139. Köller N, Niessen K, Riess M and Sadorf E 2004 Probability Conclusions in Expert Opinions on Handwriting. Substantiation and Standardization of Probability Statements in Expert Opinions. Luchterhand, München.
140. Koller D and Pfeffer A 1997 Object-Oriented Bayesian networks. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-97), pp. 302-313, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
141. Kullback S 1959 Information Theory and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
142. Lauritzen SL and Mortera J 2002 Bounding the number of contributors to mixed DNA stains. Forensic Science International 130, 125-126.
143. Lauritzen SL and Spiegelhalter DJ 1988 Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 50(2), 157-224.
144. Lee PM 2004 Bayesian Statistics, an Introduction, 3rd edn. Arnold, London.
145. Lee JW, Lee HS and Hwang JJ 2002 Statistical analysis for estimating heterogenity of korean population in dna typing using STR loci. International Journal of Legal Medicine 116, 153-160.
146. Leibniz GW 1930 Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, vol. 6. Otto Reichl, Darmstadt.
147. Lemmer JF and Barth SW 1982 Efficient minimum information updating for Bayesian inferencing in expert systems. Proceedings of the 2nd American National Conference on AI, pp. 424-427, Pittsburgh, PA.
148. Lempert RO 1977 Modeling relevance. Michigan Law Review 75, 1021-1057.
149. Levitt TS and Blackmond Laskey K 2001 Computational inference for evidential reasoning in support of judicial proof. Cardozo Law Review 22, 1691-1731.
150. Lichtenberg W 1990 Methods for the determination of shooting distance. Forensic Science Review 2, 37-62.
151. Lindley DV 1965 Introduction to Probability and Statistics from a Bayesian Viewpoint. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
152. Lindley DV 1985 Making Decisions, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
153. Lindley DV 1991 Probability In The Use of Statistics in Forensic Science (eds. Aitken CGG and Stoney DA), pp. 27-50. Ellis Horwood, New York.
154. Lindley DV 2004 Foreword In Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, 2nd edn, (eds. Aitken CGG and Taroni F). John Wiley & Sons, New York.
155. Lindley DV and Eggleston R 1983 The problem of missing evidence. The Law Quarterly Review 99, 86-99.
156. Luce RD and Raiffa H 1957 Games and Decisions. Introduction and Critical Survey. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
157. Mackie JL 1974 The Cement of the Universe. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
158. Madsen AL and Jensen FV 1999 Lazy propagation: a junction tree inference algorithm based on lazy evaluation. Artificial Intelligence 113, 203-245.
159. Mahoney SM and Laskey KB 1999 Representing and combining partially specified CPTs In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference (eds. Laskey KB and Prade H), pp. 391-400. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
160. Morgan MG and Henrion M 1990 Uncertainty. A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge Unviersity Press.
161. Mortera J 2003 Analysis of DNA mixtures using probabilistic expert systems In Highly Structured Stochastic Systems (eds. Green PL, Hjort NL and Richardson S). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
162. Mortera J, Dawid AP and Lauritzen SL 2003 Probabilistic expert systems for DNA mixture profiling. Theoretical Population Biology 63, 191-205.
163. Mueller C and Kirkpatrick L 1988 Federal Rules of Evidence. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MA.
164. National Research Council 1992 DNA Technology in Forensic Science. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
165. Neil M, Fenton N and Nielsen L 2000 Building large-scale Bayesian networks. The Knowledge Engineering Review 15, 257-284.
166. Nichols RG 1997 Firearms and toolmark identification criteria: a review of the literature. Journal of Forensic Sciences 42(3), 466-474.
167. Nichols RG 2003 Firearms and toolmark identification criteria: a review of the literature, Part II. Journal of Forensic Sciences 48(2), 318-327.
168. O'Hagan A 1988 Probability: Methods and Measurements. Chapman & Hall, London.
169. Pearl J 1988 Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.
170. Pearl J 1999 Graphs, structural models, and causality In Computation, Causation, and Discovery (eds. Glymour C and Cooper GF), pp. 95-138. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
171. Pearl J 2000 Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
172. Pearl J and Verma T 1987 The logic of representing dependencies by directed graphs Proceedings of the National Conference on AI (AAAI-87), pp. 374-379. AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA.
173. R Development Core Team 2003 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, ISBN 3-900051-00-3.
174. Raiffa H 1968 Decision Analysis. Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
175. Ramsey FP 1931 Truth and probability In The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays (ed. Braithwaite RB), pp. 156-198. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. Reprinted in Studies in Subjective Probability (1980) 2nd edn, (eds. Kyburg HE and Smokler HE), pp. 61-92. Dover Publications, New York .
176. Ribaux O and Margot P 2003 Case based reasoning in criminal intelligence using forensic case data. Science & Justice 43(3), 135-143.
177. Robertson B and Vignaux GA 1993 Taking fact analysis seriously. Michigan Law Review 91, 1442-1464.
178. Robertson B and Vignaux GA 1995 Interpreting Evidence. Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
179. Rowe WF 2000 Range In Encyclopedia of Forensic Science (eds. Siegel JH, Saukko PJ and Knupfer GC), vol. 2 pp. 949-953. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
180. Salmon WC 1990 Rationality and objectivity in science or Tom Kuhn meets Tom Bayes In Scientific Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. Savage CW), vol. 14, pp. 175-204. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
181. Salmon WC 1998 Causality and Explanation. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.
182. Salmon WC 1999 Scientific explanation In Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (eds. Salmon MH, Earman J, Glymour C, Lennox JG, Machamer P, McGuire JE, Norton JD, Salmon WC and Schaffner KF), 2nd edn, pp. 7-41. Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
183. Salmon W, Jeffrey RC and Greeno JG 1971 Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
184. Savage LJ 1951 Theory of statistical decision. Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 46, pp. 55-67.
185. Savage LJ 1972 The Foundations of Statistics, 2nd edn. Dover Publications, New York.
186. Scheines R 1997 An introduction to causal inference In Causality in Crisis? (eds. McKim VR and Turner S), pp. 185-199. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
187. Schervish MJ 1995 Theory of Statistics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York.
188. Schum DA 1994 Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
189. Shafer G and Vovk V 2001 Probability and Finance. It's Only a Game! John Wiley & Sons, New York.
190. Shenoy PP and Shafer G 1990 Axioms for probability and belief-function propagation In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of the Fifth Conference (eds. Shachter RD, Levitt TS, Kanal LN and Lemmer JF), pp. 169-198. North Holland, Amsterdam.
191. Sinha SK 2003 Y-chromosome: genetics, analysis, and application in forensic science. Forensic Science Review 15(2), 77-201.
192. Sjerps M and Kloosterman AD 1999 On the consequences of DNA profile mismatches for close relatives of an excluded suspect. International Journal of Legal Medicine 112, 176-180.
193. Smith JQ 1988 Decision Analysis, a Bayesian Approach. Chapman & Hall, London.
194. Spirtes P, Glymour C and Scheines R 2001 Causation, Prediction and Search, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
195. Stockton A and Day S 2001 Bayes, handwriting and science. Proceedings of the 59th Annual ASQDE Meeting - Handwriting & Technology: At the Crossroads, pp. 1-10, Des Moines, IA.
196. Stoney DA 1991 Transfer evidence In The Use of Statistics in Forensic Science (eds. Aitken CGG and Stoney DA), pp. 107-138. Ellis Horwood, New York.
197. Stoney DA 1994 Relaxation of the assumption of relevance and an application to one-trace and two-trace problems. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 34(1), 17-21.
198. Taroni F and Aitken CGG 1998 Probabilités et preuve par ADN dans les affaires civiles et criminelles. Questions de la cour et réponses fallacieuses des experts. Revue Pénale Suisse 116, 291-313.
199. Taroni F, Aitken CGG and Garbolino P 2001 De Finetti's subjectivism, the assessment of probabilities and the evaluation of evidence: a commentary for forensic scientists. Science & Justice 41, 145-150.
200. Taroni F and Biedermann A 2005 Inadequacies of posterior probabilities for the assessment of scientific evidence. Law, Probability and Risk 4, 89-114.
201. Taroni F, Bozza S and Aitken CGG 2005a Decision analysis in forensic science. Journal of Forensic Sciences 50, 894-905.
202. Taroni F, Bozza S, Bernard M and Champod C 2005c Value of information for DNA tests: a decision perspective. Journal of Forensic Sciences. Accepted for publication.
203. Taroni F, Bozza S and Biedermann A 2005b Two items of evidence, no putative source: an inference problem in forensic intelligence. Journal of Forensic Sciences. Accepted for publication.
204. Taroni F, Champod C and Margot P 1998 Forerunners of Bayesianism in early forensic science. Jurimetrics Journal 38, 183-200.
205. Thagart P 1988 Computational Philosophy of Science. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
206. Thagart P 2003 Why wasn't O.J. convicted? emotional coherence and legal inference. Cognition and Emotion 17, 361-383.
207. Thompson WC 1995 Subjective interpretation, laboratory error and the value of DNA evidence: three case studies. Genetica 96, 153-168.
208. Thompson WC and Ford S 1991 The meaning of a match: sources of ambiguity in the interpretation of DNA prints In Forensic DNA Technology (eds. Farley M and Harrington J), pp. 93-152. CRC Press, New York.
209. Thompson WC, Taroni F and Aitken CGG 2003 How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences 48, 47-54.
210. Tikochinsky Y, Tishby NZ and Levine RD 1984 Consistent inference of probabilities for reproducible experiments. Physical Review Letters 52, 1357-1360.
211. van Fraassen BC 1986 A demonstration of Jeffrey conditionalization rule. Erkenntnis 24, 17-24.
212. van Fraassen BC 1989 Laws and Symmetry. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
213. Vicard P and Dawid AP 2003 Estimating mutation rates from paternity data Atti del Convegno Modelli Complessi e Metodi Computazionali Intensivi per la Stima e la Previsione, pp. 415-418. Università Cà Foscari, Venezia.
214. Weir BS 1996 Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
215. Weir BS 2000 Statistical analysis In Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences (eds. Siegel JA, Saukko PJ and Knupfer GC), pp. 86-97. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
216. Weir BS 2001 Forensics In Handbook of Statistical Genetics (eds. Balding DJ, BishopM and Cannings C), pp. 721-739. John Wiley &Sons, Chichester.
217. Wellman MP 1990a Fundamental concepts of qualitative probabilistic networks. Artificial Intelligence 44(3), 257-303.
218. Wellman MP 1990b Qualitative probabilistic networks for planning under uncertainty In Readings in Uncertain Reasoning (eds. Shafer G and Pearl J), pp. 711-722. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Meteo, CA.
219. Wellman MP and Henrion M 1993 Explaining "explaining away". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 15(3), 287-292.
220. Whittaker J 1990 Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
221. Wigmore JH 1913 The problem of proof. Illinois Law Review 8(2), 77-103.
222. Wigmore JH 1937 The Science of Judicial Proof: As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial Trials, 3rd edn. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MA.
223. Williams PM 1980 Bayesian conditionalisation and the principle of Minimum information. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31, 131-144.
224. Williamson J 2004 Bayesian Nets and Causality: Philosophical and Computational Foundations. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
225. Wright S 1922 Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. American Naturalist 56, 330-338.