A multitiered approach for grassland ecosystem services mapping and assessment: The viva grass tool

One Ecosystem

Volumn 3, Issue , 2018, Pages

  Villoslada, Miguel ^a   Vinogradovs, Ivo ^b   Ruskule, Anda ^b,c   Veidemane, Kristina ^b,c   Nikodemus, Olgerts ^b   Kasparinskis, Raimonds ^b   Sepp, Kalev ^a   Gulbinas, Justas ^d  

^a ESTONIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Estonia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA   (Latvia)

^c Baltic Environmental Forum Latvia   (Latvia)

^d Baltic Environmental Forum   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Grasslands; Integrated planning; Tiered approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 85060173154     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23678194     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25380     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning 70: 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002
2. Belton V, Stewart T (2002) An Integrated Approach to MCDA. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_11
3. Boruks A (Ed.) (2001) Zemes izmantošana un kadastrs Latvijā. [Land use and cadaster in Latvia]. State land service of Latvia, Riga, 408 pp. [In Latvian]. [ISBN 9984-9508-1-6]
4. Bullock JM, Jefferson RG, Blackstock TH, Pakeman RJ, Emmett BA, Pywell RJ, Grime JP, Silvertown J (2011) Semi-natural grasslands. UK National Ecosystem Assessment. Understanding nature’s value to society. Technical Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. [In English].
5. Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F (2010) Landscapes’ Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments. Landscape Online 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.200915
6. CICES (2015) CICES (2015) Version 4.3 towards a common classification of ecosystem services. http://cices.eu/. Accessed on: 2018-1-10.
7. Dechazal J, Quetier F, Lavorel S, Vandoorn A (2008) Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems. Global Environmental Change 18 (3): 508-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.04.005
8. Dengler J, Rūsiņa S (2012) Database Dry Grasslands in the Nordic and Baltic Region. Biodiversity & Ecology 4: 319-320. https://doi.org/10.7809/b-e.00114
9. Depellegrin D, Pereira P, Misiunė I, Egarter-Vigl L (2016) Mapping ecosystem services potential in Lithuania. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 23 (5): 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1146176
10. Dick J, Turkelboom F, Woods H, Iniesta-Arandia I, Primmer E, Saarela S, Bezák P, Mederly P, Leone M, Verheyden W, Kelemen E, Hauck J, Andrews C, Antunes P, Aszalós R, Baró F, Barton D, Berry P, Bugter R, Carvalho L, Czúcz B, Dunford R, Blanco GG, Geamănă N, Giucă R, Grizzetti B, Izakovičová Z, Kertész M, Kopperoinen L, Langemeyer J, Lapola DM, Liquete C, Luque S, Pastur GM, Martin-Lopez B, Mukhopadhyay R, Niemela J, Odee D, Peri PL, Pinho P, Patrício-Roberto GB, Preda E, Priess J, Röckmann C, Santos R, Silaghi D, Smith R, Vădineanu A, der Wal JTv, Arany I, Badea O, Bela G, Boros E, Bucur M, Blumentrath S, Calvache M, Carmen E, Clemente P, Fernandes J, Ferraz D, Fongar C, García-Llorente M, Gómez-Baggethun E, Gundersen V, Haavardsholm O, Kalóczkai Á, Khalalwe T, Kiss G, Köhler B, Lazányi O, Lellei-Kovács E, Lichungu R, Lindhjem H, Magare C, Mustajoki J, Ndege C, Nowell M, Girona SN, Ochieng J, Often A, Palomo I, Pataki G, Reinvang R, Rusch G, Saarikoski H, Smith A, Massoni ES, Stange E, Traaholt NV, Vári Á, Verweij P, Vikström S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Zulian G (2017) Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies. Ecosystem Services https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015
11. Dronova I (2017) Environmental heterogeneity as a bridge between ecosystem service and visual quality objectives in management, planning and design. Landscape and Urban Planning 163: 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.005
12. Dube A, Zbytniewski R, Kowalkowski T, Cukrowska E, Buszewski B (2001) Adsorption and migration of heavy metals in soil. Polish journal of environmental studies 10 (1): 1-10.
13. Dunford R, Harrison P, Smith A, Dick J, Barton D, Martin-Lopez B, Kelemen E, Jacobs S, Saarikoski H, Turkelboom F, Verheyden W, Hauck J, Antunes P, Aszalós R, Badea O, Baró F, Berry P, Carvalho L, Conte G, Czúcz B, Blanco GG, Howard D, Giuca R, Gomez-Baggethun E, Grizetti B, Izakovicova Z, Kopperoinen L, Langemeyer J, Luque S, Lapola D, Martinez-Pastur G, Mukhopadhyay R, Roy SB, Niemelä J, Norton L, Ochieng J, Odee D, Palomo I, Pinho P, Priess J, Rusch G, Saarela S, Santos R, der Wal JTv, Vadineanu A, Vári Á, Woods H, Yli-Pelkonen V (2017) Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations. Ecosystem Services https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014
14. Eastwood A, Brooker R, Irvine RJ, Artz RR, Norton LR, Bullock JM, Ross L, Fielding D, Ramsay S, Roberts J, Anderson W, Dugan D, Cooksley S, Pakeman RJ (2016) Does nature conservation enhance ecosystem services delivery? Ecosystem Services 17: 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.001
15. Esmail BA, Geneletti D (2018) Multi-criteria decision analysis for nature conservation: A review of 20 years of applications. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9 (1): 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12899
16. European Commission (2015) The State of Nature in the European Union: Report on the status of and trends for habitat types and species covered by the Birds and Habitats Directives for the 2007-2012 period as required under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive and Article 12 of the Birds Directive. European Commission
17. Frélichová J, Vačkář D, Pártl A, Loučková B, Harmáčková Z, Lorencová E (2014) Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Services 8: 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001
18. Fürst C, Luque S, Geneletti D (2017) Nexus thinking - how ecosystem services can contribute to enhancing the cross-scale and cross-sectoral coherence between land use, spatial planning and policy-making. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 13 (1): 412-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1396257
19. Geneletti D, Ferretti V (2015) Multicriteria analysis for sustainability assessment: concepts and case studies. Handbook of Sustainability Assessment 235-264. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471379.00019
20. Gosal A, Newton A, Gillingham P (2018) Comparison of methods for a landscape-scale assessment of the cultural ecosystem services associated with different habitats. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 14 (1): 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2018.1447016
21. Greiner L, Keller A, Grêt-Regamey A, Papritz A (2017) Soil function assessment: review of methods for quantifying the contributions of soils to ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 69: 224-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.025
22. Grêt-Regamey A, Weibel B, Kienast F, Rabe S, Zulian G (2015) A tiered approach for mapping ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 13: 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008
23. Grêt-Regamey A, Sirén E, Brunner SH, Weibel B (2017) Review of decision support tools to operationalize the ecosystem services concept. Ecosystem Services 26: 306-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.012
24. Grigulis K, Lavorel S, Krainer U, Legay N, Baxendale C, Dumont M, Kastl E, Arnoldi C, Bardgett R, Poly F, Pommier T, Schloter M, Tappeiner U, Bahn M, Clément J (2012) Relative contributions of plant traits and soil microbial properties to mountain grassland ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology 101 (1): 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12014
25. Halada Ľ, David S, Hreško J, Klimantová A, Bača A, Rusňák T, Buraľ M, Vadel Ľ (2017) Changes in grassland management and plant diversity in a marginal region of the Carpathian Mt. in 1999-2015. Science of The Total Environment 609: 896-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.066
26. Hermes J, Berkel DV, Burkhard B, Plieninger T, Fagerholm N, Haaren Cv, Albert C (2018) Assessment and valuation of recreational ecosystem services of landscapes. Ecosystem Services 31: 289-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.011
27. Ingram JC, Redford K, Watson JM (2012) Applying Ecosystem Services Approaches for Biodiversity Conservation: Benefits and Challenges. S.A.P.I.EN.S 5 (1): . [In English].
28. Jacobs S, Burkhard B, Daele TV, Staes J, Schneiders A (2015) ‘The Matrix Reloaded’: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling 295: 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024
29. Jakeman A, Sawah SE, Guillaume JA, Pierce S (2011) Making Progress in Integrated Modelling and Environmental Decision Support. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22285-6_2
30. Järv H, Kliimask J, Ward R, Sepp K (2016) Socioeconomic Impacts of Protection Status on Residents of National Parks. European Countryside 8 (2): . https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2016-0006
31. Keesstra S, Geissen V, Mosse K, Piiranen S, Scudiero E, Leistra M, Schaik Lv (2012) Soil as a filter for groundwater quality. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4 (5): 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.007
32. Klein TM, Celio E, Grêt-Regamey A (2015) Ecosystem services visualization and communication: A demand analysis approach for designing information and conceptualizing decision support systems. Ecosystem Services 13: 173-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.006
33. Kliimask J, Parts PK, Järv H, Sepp K, Ward R (2015) Endangered settlements and protected areas in Estonia: the challenge of maintaining cultural landscapes. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 11: 346. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijarge.2015.074094
34. Kohler M, Devaux C, Grigulis K, Leitinger G, Lavorel S, Tappeiner U (2017) Plant functional assemblages as indicators of the resilience of grassland ecosystem service provision. Ecological Indicators 73: 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.024
35. Koschke L, Fürst C, Frank S, Makeschin F (2012) A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators 21: 54-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010
36. Lamarque P, Tappeiner U, Turner C, Steinbacher M, Bardgett R, Szukics U, Schermer M, Lavorel S (2011) Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Regional Environmental Change 11 (4): 791-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-011-0214-0
37. Larondelle N, Haase D (2013) Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural-urban gradient: A cross-analysis of European cities. Ecological Indicators 29: 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.022
38. Lavorel S, Grigulis K, Lamarque P, Colace M, Garden D, Girel J, Pellet G, Douzet R (2010) Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology 99 (1): 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01753.x
39. Lüker-Jans N, Simmering D, Otte A (2016) Analysing Data of the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) to Detect Patterns of Agricultural Land-Use Change at Municipality Level. Landscape Online 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3097/lo.201648
40. Maes J, Paracchini ML, Zulian G (2011) A European assessment of the provision of ecosystem services. Towards an atlas of ecosystem services. JRC-IES
41. Malinga R, Gordon L, Jewitt G, Lindborg R (2015) Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents - A review. Ecosystem Services 13: 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.006
42. Mavrommati G, Borsuk M, Howarth R (2017) A novel deliberative multicriteria evaluation approach to ecosystem service valuation. Ecology and Society 22 (2): . https://doi.org/10.5751/es-09105-220239
43. McKenzie E, Posner S, Tillmann P, Bernhardt JR, Howard K, Rosenthal A (2014) Understanding the Use of Ecosystem Service Knowledge in Decision Making: Lessons from International Experiences of Spatial Planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32 (2): 320-340. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12292j
44. Mouchet M, Lamarque P, Martín-López B, Crouzat E, Gos P, Byczek C, Lavorel S (2014) An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 28: 298-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012
45. Nikodemus O, Bell S, Grīne I, Liepiņš I (2005) The impact of economic, social and political factors on the landscape structure of the Vidzeme Uplands in Latvia. Landscape and Urban Planning 70: 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.005
46. Nikodemus O, Bell S, Penēze Z, Krūze I (2010) The influence of European Union single area payments and less favoured area payments on the Latvian landscape. European Countryside 2 (1): . https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-010-0003-7
47. Nikolaidou C, Votsi N, Sgardelis S, Halley J, Pantis J, Tsiafouli M (2017) Ecosystem Service capacity is higher in areas of multiple designation types. One Ecosystem 2: e13718. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e13718
48. Öckinger E, Smith H (2006) Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology 44 (1): 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01250.x
49. Palomo I, Willemen L, Drakou E, Burkhard B, Crossman N, Bellamy C, Burkhard K, Campagne CS, Dangol A, Franke J, Kulczyk S, Clec’h SL, Malak DA, Muñoz L, Narusevicius V, Ottoy S, Roelens J, Sing L, Thomas A, Meerbeek KV, Verweij P (2018) Practical solutions for bottlenecks in ecosystem services mapping. One Ecosystem 3: e20713. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e20713
50. Proctor W, Drechsler M (2006) Deliberative Multicriteria Evaluation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24 (2): 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1068/c22s
51. FF The German exemplar. Ecological Indicators 70: 357-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.043
52. Rabot E, Wiesmeier M, Schlüter S, Vogel H- (2018) Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review. Geoderma 314: 122-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.009
53. Raet J, Sepp K, Kaasik A, Kuusemets V, Külvik M (2010) Distribution of the Green Network of Estonia. Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused 53 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10132-011-0090-x
54. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (11): 5242-5247. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907284107
55. Rosenthal A, Verutes G, McKenzie E, Arkema K, Bhagabati N, Bremer L, Olwero N, Vogl A (2014) Process matters: a framework for conducting decision-relevant assessments of ecosystem services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 11 (3): 190-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.966149
56. Rūsiņa S (2017) Semi-natural grasslands in Latvia. In: Rūsiņa S (Ed.) Outstanding semi-natural grassland sites in Latvia: biodiversity, managment, restoration. University of Latvia, Riga.
57. Ruskule A, Nikodemus O, Kasparinskis R, Bell S, Urtane I (2013) The perception of abandoned farmland by local people and experts: Landscape value and perspectives on future land use. Landscape and Urban Planning 115: 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.03.012
58. Ruskule A, Indriksone D, Gulbinas J, Morkvėnas Ž, Kuris M, Remmelgas L (2015) Analysis of the policies and regulatory framework influencing maintenance of grassland ecosystems in the Baltic States: Synthesis Report. LIFE Viva Grass. Baltic Environmental Forum. http://vivagrass.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/7-2-5_policyassessment_syntesis-report_october2016_final.pdf. Accessed on: 2018-2-21.
59. Santos-Martin F, Viinikka A, Mononen L, Brander L, Vihervaara P, Liekens I, Potschin-Young M (2018) Creating an operational database for Ecosystems Services Mapping and Assessment Methods. One Ecosystem 3: e26719. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e26719
60. Sarukhan J, Whyte A, Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N, Carpenter ST, Pingali PL, Bennett EM, Zurek MB, Chopra K, Leemans R, Kimar P, Simons H, Capistrano D, Samper CK, Lee MJ, Raudsepp-Hearne C (Eds) (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
61. Schägner JP, Brander L, Maes J, Hartje V (2013) Mapping ecosystem services’ values: Current practice and future prospects. Ecosystem Services 4: 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003
62. Shaheen SM, Tsadilas CD, Rinklebe J (2013) A review of the distribution coefficients of trace elements in soils: influence of sorption system, element characteristics, and soil colloidal properties. Advances in colloid and interface science 201-202: 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2013.10.005
63. Smith AC, Harrison PA, Soba MP, Archaux F, Blicharska M, Egoh BN, Erős T, Domenech NF, György ÁI, Haines-Young R, Li S, Lommelen E, Meiresonne L, Ayala LM, Mononen L, Simpson G, Stange E, Turkelboom F, Uiterwijk M, Veerkamp CJ, de Echeverria VW (2017) How natural capital delivers ecosystem services: A typology derived from a systematic review. Ecosystem Services 26: 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006
64. Soukup T, Feranec J, Hazeu G, Jaffrain G, Jindrova M, Kopecky M, Orlitova E (2016) Chapter 11 CORINE Land Cover 2000 (CLC2000): Analysis and Assessment. European Landscape Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315372860-12
65. Spake R, Lasseur R, Crouzat E, Bullock J, Lavorel S, Parks K, Schaafsma M, Bennett E, Maes J, Mulligan M, Mouchet M, Peterson G, Schulp CE, Thuiller W, Turner M, Verburg P, Eigenbrod F (2017) Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: Towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 47: 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004
66. Stålhammar S, Pedersen E (2017) Recreational cultural ecosystem services: How do people describe the value? Ecosystem Services 26: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.010
67. Stirling A (2006) Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis. Land Use Policy 23 (1): 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.010
68. Strijker D (2005) Marginal lands in Europe-causes of decline. Basic and Applied Ecology 6 (2): 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2005.01.001
69. TEEB (2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. TEEB
70. Tscharntke T, Klein A, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity â€" ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters 8 (8): 857-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
71. van Berkel D, Verburg P (2014) Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Indicators 37: 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025
72. Van Orshoven J, Terres J, Tóth T (Eds) (2012) Updated common bio-physical criteria to define natural constraints for agriculture in Europe. Joint Research Centre, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. [In English]. https://doi.org/10.2788/91182
73. Vanwambeke S, Meyfroidt P, Nikodemus O (2012) From USSR to EU: 20 years of rural landscape changes in Vidzeme, Latvia. Landscape and Urban Planning 105 (3): 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.009
74. van Zanten B, Verburg P, Koetse M, van Beukering PH (2014) Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies. Landscape and Urban Planning 132: 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012
75. van Zanten B, Zasada I, Koetse M, Ungaro F, Häfner K, Verburg P (2016) A comparative approach to assess the contribution of landscape features to aesthetic and recreational values in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services 17: 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.011
76. Vinogradovs I, Nikodemus O, Tabors G, Krūze I, Elferts D (2016) Proceedings of the 19th Conference for Junior researchers “Science-Future of Lithuania: Environmental Protection Engineering”. Proceedings of the 19th Conference for Junior Researchers “Science - Future of Lithuania” https://doi.org/10.3846/aainz.2016.31
77. Vinogradovs I, Nikodemus O, Elferts D, Brūmelis G (2018) Assessment of site-specific drivers of farmland abandonment in mosaic-type landscapes: A case study in Vidzeme, Latvia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 253: 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.016
78. Walz U, Syrbe R, Grunewald K (2017) Where to map? In: Burkhard B, Maes J (Eds) Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria, 374 pp. [In English].
79. Wright WC, Eppink F, Greenhalgh S (2017) Are ecosystem service studies presenting the right information for decision making? Ecosystem Services 25: 128-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.002
80. Zariņa A, Vinogradovs I, Šķiņķis P (2017) Towards (dis)continuity of agricultural wetlands: Latvia’s polder landscapes after Soviet productivism. Landscape Research 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1316367
81. Zhang Z, Gao J, Fan X, Lan Y, Zhao M (2017) Response of ecosystem services to socioeconomic development in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators 72: 481-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.035