Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 37, Issue PART A, 2014, Pages 163-174

  Van Berkel, Derek B ^a   Verburg, Peter H ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Participatory Mapping; Photo realistic montages; Rural development; Stated and Revealed monetary valuation

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ABANDONMENTS; AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIONS; MONETARY VALUATIONS; PHOTO-REALISTIC; RURAL DEVELOPMENT; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; VALUATION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES;

AGRICULTURE; ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEMS; REGIONAL PLANNING; SURVEYS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RURAL DEVELOPMENT; VALUATION;

GELDERLAND; NETHERLANDS; WINTERSWIJK;

EID: 84890053185     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. L. Alessa, A. Kliskey, and G. Brown Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space Landscape Urban Plan. 85 2008 27 39 (Pubitemid 351305430)
2. E. Birol, P. Koundouri, and Y. Kountouris Integrating wetland management into sustainable water resources allocation: the case of Akrotiri wetland in Cyprus J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 51 2008 37 53 (Pubitemid 350263504)
3. R. Brouwer, and L.H.G. Slangen Contingent valuation of the public benefits of agricultural wildlife management: the case of Dutch peat meadow land Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 25 1998 53 72
4. G. Brown Mapping landscape values and development preferences: a method for tourism and residential development planning Int. J. Tourism Res. 8 2006 101 113
5. G. Brown, and C. Raymond The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment Appl. Geogr. 27 2007 89 111 (Pubitemid 46238328)
6. B. Bryan, A.S. Grandgirard, and J. Ward Quantifying and exploring strategic regional priorities for managing natural capital and ecosystem services given multiple stakeholder perspectives Ecosystems 13 2010 539 555
7. A. Buijs, B. Pedroli, and Y. Luginbühl From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: changing social perceptions of the European landscape Landscape Ecol. 21 2006 375 389
8. D. Campbell Willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements: combining mixed logit and random-effects models J. Agric. Econ. 58 2007 467 483 (Pubitemid 47316810)
9. J. Cavailhès, T. Brossard, J.-C. Foltête, M. Hilal, D. Joly, and F.P. Tourneux GIS-based hedonic pricing of landscape Environ. Resour. Econ. 44 2009 571 590
10. S. Colombo, J. Calatrava-Requena, and N. Hanley Analysing the social benefits of soil conservation measures using stated preference methods Ecol. Econ. 58 2006 850 861 (Pubitemid 43816274)
11. G.C. Daily, S. Polasky, J. Goldstein, P.M. Kareiva, H.A. Mooney, and L. Pejchar Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver Front. Ecol. Environ. 7 2009 21 28
12. W.T. De Groot, and R.J.G. van den Born Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: an exploration in The Netherlands Landscape Urban Plan. 63 2003 127 138 (Pubitemid 36521715)
13. T. Dockerty, A. Lovett, G. Nnenberg, K. Appleton, and M. Parry Visualising the potential impacts of climate change on rural landscapes Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 29 2005 297 320 (Pubitemid 40280720)
14. W.E. Dramstad, M.S. Tveit, W.J. Fjellstad, and G.L.A. Fry Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure Landscape Urban Plan. 78 2006 465 474 (Pubitemid 44692350)
15. B. Egoh, B. Reyers, M. Rouget, D.M. Richardson, D.C. Le Maitre, and A.S. van Jaarsveld Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 127 2008 135 140
16. N. Fagerholm, and N. Käyhkö Participatory mapping and geographical patterns of the social landscape values of rural communities in Zanzibar, Tanzania Fennia 187 2009 46 60
17. J. Geoghegan, L.A. Wainger, and N.E. Bockstael Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS Ecol. Econ. 23 1997 251 264 (Pubitemid 28005677)
18. N. Hanley, S. Mourato, and R.E. Wright Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation? J. Econ. Surv. 15 2001 435 462 (Pubitemid 32808619)
19. L. Hein Economic benefits generated by protected areas: the case of the Hoge Veluwe Forest, The Netherlands Ecol. Soc. 16 2011 (2):13
20. P. Howley, C.O. Donoghue, and S. Hynes Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapes Landscape Urban Plan. 104 2012 66 74
21. IEEP (Institute for European Environmental Policy) Final Report on the Study of HNV Indicators for Evaluation 2007 European Commission, DG Agriculture Brussels
22. A.P. Kinzig, C. Perrings, F.S. Chapin, S. Polasky, V.K. Smith, and D. Tilman Paying for ecosystem services? Promise and peril Science 334 2011 603 604
23. K. Knickel, H. Renting, and J.D. Van der Ploeg Multifunctionality in European agriculture F. Brouwer, Sustaining Agriculture and the Rural Environment, Governance, Policy and Multifunctionality 2004 Edward Elgar Publishing Cheltenham, UK 81 103
24. S. Lautenbach, C. Kugel, A. Lausch, and R. Seppelt Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data Ecol. Indic. 11 2011 676 687
25. A.A. Lovett, S.C. Ribeiro, D.B. Van Berkel, P.H. Verburg, and A. Firmino Representing and communicating rural futures through 3D landscape visualizations: experiences from the RUFUS project M. Pietsch, E. Kretzler, Peer Reviewed Proceedings of Digital Landscape Architecture 2010 2010 Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Wichmann Verlag Heidelberg 261 268
26. MA Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment 2003 Island Press Washington
27. S. Ma, and S.M. Swinton Valuation of ecosystem services from rural landscapes using agricultural land prices Ecol. Econ. 70 2011 1649 1659
28. T. Mari Sundli Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups J. Environ. Manage. 90 2009 2882 2888
29. T. Marsden Rural futures: the consumption countryside and its regulation Sociol. Ruralis 39 1999 501 526
30. T. Marsden, and R. Sonnino Rural development and the regional state: denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK J. Rural Stud. 24 2008 422 431
31. B. Martín-López, E. Gómez-Baggethun, P.L. Lomas, and C. Montes Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation J. Environ. Manage. 90 2009 1050 1059
32. R. Naidoo, and T.H. Ricketts Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation PLoS Biol. 4 2006
33. S. Nedkov, and B. Burkhard Flood regulating ecosystem services - mapping supply and demand, in the metropole municipality, Bulgaria Ecol. Indic. 21 2011 67 79
34. E. Nelson, G. Mendoza, J. Regetz, S. Polasky, H. Tallis, and D.R. Cameron Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales Front. Ecol. Environ. 7 2009 4 11
35. P.J. O'Farrell, and P.M. Anderson Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: a review to implementation Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 2 2010 59 65
36. Å. Ode, G. Fry, M.S. Tveit, P. Messager, and D. Miller Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference J. Environ. Manage. 90 2009 375 383
37. D. Philip Factors influencing landscape preferences: an empirical investigation Landscape Plan. 11 1984 293 306
38. T. Pinto-Correia, R. Gustavsson, and J. Pirnat Bridging the gap between centrally defined policies and local decisions - towards more sensitive and creative rural landscape management Landscape Ecol. 21 2006 333 346
39. Provincie Gelderland Geografische gegeven (Geographical data) 2010 Povincie Gelderland Arnhem
40. C.M. Raymond, B.A. Bryan, D.H. MacDonald, A. Cast, S. Strathearn, and A. Grandgirard Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services Ecol. Econ. 68 2009 1301 1315
41. R.C. Ready, M.C. Berger, and G.C. Blomquist Measuring amenity benefits from farmland: hedonic pricing vs. contingent valuation Growth Change 28 1997 438 458
42. H. Renting, W.A.H. Rossing, J.C.J. Groot, J.D. Van der Ploeg, C. Laurent, and D. Perraud Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework J. Environ. Manage. 90 2009 S112 S123
43. R.L. Ryan The social landscape of planning: integrating social and perceptual research with spatial planning information Landscape Urban Plan. 100 2011 361 363
44. Y. Santana-Jimènez, R. Suárez-Vega, and J.M. Hernàndez Spatial and environmental characteristics of rural tourism lodging units Anatolia 22 2011 89 101
45. B.C. Sherrouse, J.M. Clement, and D.J. Semmens A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services Appl. Geogr. 31 2011 748 760
46. K. Soini, H. Vaarala, and E. Pouta Residents' sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural-urban interface Landscape Urban Plan. 104 2012 124 134
47. R. Soliva, J. Bolliger, and M. Hunziker Differences in preferences towards potential future landscapes in the Swiss Alps Landscape Res. 35 2010 671 696
48. R. Soliva, K. Rønningen, I. Bella, P. Bezak, T. Cooper, and B.E. Flø Envisioning upland futures: stakeholder responses to scenarios for Europe's mountain landscapes J. Rural Stud. 24 2008 56 71 (Pubitemid 350149026)
49. K. Solymosi Indicators for the identification of cultural landscape hotspots in Europe Landscape Res. 36 2011 3 18
50. M. Stenseke Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: lessons from Sweden Land Use Policy 26 2009 214 223
51. S.M. Swinton, F. Lupi, G.P. Robertson, and S.K. Hamilton Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits Ecol. Econ. 64 2007 245 252 (Pubitemid 350181378)
52. B. Tress, and G. Tress Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning - a study from Denmark Landscape Urban Plan. 64 2003 161 178 (Pubitemid 36725929)
53. D.B. Van Berkel, S. Carvalho-Ribeiro, P.H. Verburg, and A. Lovett Identifying assets and constraints for rural development with qualitative scenarios: a case study of Castro Laboreiro, Portugal Landscape Urban Plan. 102 2011 127 141
54. D.B. Van Berkel, and P.H. Verburg Sensitising rural policy: assessing spatial variation in rural development options for Europe Land Use Policy 28 2011 447 459
55. A.E. Van den Berg, and S.L. Koole New wilderness in the Netherlands: an investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes Landscape Urban Plan. 78 2006 362 372 (Pubitemid 44692342)
56. G. Wildenbeest Recent farmers' protest in a Dutch municipality: the legacy of the past J. Boissevain, J. Verrips, Dutch Dilemmas: Anthropologists look at the Netherlands 1989 Van Gorcum Assen 70 88
57. L. Willemen, L. Hein, and P.H. Verburg Evaluating the impact of regional development policies on future landscape services Ecol. Econ. 69 2010 2244 2254
58. L. Willemen, P.H. Verburg, L. Hein, and M.E.F. van Mensvoort Spatial characterization of landscape functions Landscape Urban Plan. 88 2008 34 43
59. G. Wilson Multifunctional 'quality' and rural community resilience Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 35 2010 364 381
60. R.C. Zimmermann Recording rural landscapes and their cultural associations: some initial results and impressions Environ. Sci. Policy 9 2006 360 369 (Pubitemid 43731318)