Practical solutions for bottlenecks in ecosystem services mapping

One Ecosystem

Volumn 3, Issue , 2018, Pages

  Palomo, Ignacio ^a,b   Willemen, Louise ^c   Drakou, Evangelia ^c   Burkhard, Benjamin ^d,e   Crossman, Neville ^f   Bellamy, Chloe ^g   Burkhard, Kremena ^d   Sylvie Campagne, C ^h   Dangol, Anuja ⁱ   Franke, Jonas ^j   Kulczyk, Sylwia ^k   Le Clec’h, Solen ^l,m   Abdul Malak, Dania ⁿ   Muñoz, Lorena ^o   Narusevicius, Vytautas ^p   Ottoy, Sam ^q   Roelens, Jennifer ^r   Sing, Louise ^g   Thomas, Amy ^s   Van Meerbeek, Koenraad ^r,t   Verweij, Peter ^u   more..

^a BASQUE CENTRE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE BC3   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^d LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^e LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH ZALF   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^g FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^h CEMAGREF   (France)

ⁱ Irstea ^*  (Belgium)

^j REMOTE SENSING SOLUTIONS GMBH   (Germany)

^k UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^l ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^m UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^o UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^p VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^q PXL   (Belgium)

^r UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^s CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^t AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^u WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Mapping; Solutions; Spatial analysis; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 85051383339     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23678194     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3897/oneeco.3.e20713     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adem Esmail B, Geneletti D (2017) Design and impact assessment of watershed investments: An approach based on ecosystem services and boundary work. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 62: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.eiar.2016.08.001
2. Albert C, Galler C, Hermes J, Neuendorf F, Haaren Cv, Lovett A (2016) Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: the ES-in- Planning framework. Ecological Indicators 61: 100-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecolind.2015.03.029
3. Asner GP, Martin RE, Knapp DE, Tupayachi R, Anderson CB, Sinca F, Vaughn NR, Llactayo W (2017) Airborne laser-guided imaging spectroscopy to map forest trait diversity and guide conservation. Science 355 (6323): 385-389. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aaj1987
4. Bagstad K, Semmens D, Ancona Z, Sherrouse B (2016) Evaluating alternative methods for biophysical and cultural ecosystem services hotspot mapping in natural resource planning. Landscape Ecology 32 (1): 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0430-6
5. Baró F, Palomo I, Zulian G, Vizcaino P, Haase D, Gómez-Baggethun E (2016) Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: A case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy 57: 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006
6. Bellamy C, der Jagt ANv, Barbour S, Smith M, Moseley D (2017) A spatial framework for targeting urban planning for pollinators and people with local stakeholders: A route to healthy, blossoming communities? Environmental Research 158: 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.023
7. Burkhard B, Maes J (Eds) (2017) Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia
8. Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators 21: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecolind.2011.06.019
9. Campagne CS, Roche P, Gosselin F, Tschanz L, Tatoni T (2017) Expert-based ecosystem services capacity matrices: Dealing with scoring variability. Ecological Indicators 79: 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.043
10. Clec’h SL, Oszwald J, Decaens T, Desjardins T, Dufour S, Grimaldi M, Jegou N, Lavelle P (2016) Mapping multiple ecosystem services indicators: Toward an objective-oriented approach. Ecological Indicators 69: 508-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecolind.2016.05.021
11. Crossman N, Burkhard B, Nedkov S, Willemen L, Petz K, Palomo I, Drakou E, Martín-Lopez B, McPhearson T, Boyanova K, Alkemade R, Egoh B, Dunbar M, Maes J (2013) A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 4: 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001
12. Department for Environment faRA, Affairs faR, (DEFRA) (2013) Open Data Strategy draft. version 9: 1-32.
13. Drakou E, Pendleton L, Effron M, Ingram JC, Teneva L (2017) When ecosystems and their services are not co-located: oceans and coasts. ICES Journal of Marine Science https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx026
14. Drakou EG, Crossman ND, Willemen L, Burkhard B, Palomo I, Maes J, Peedell S (2015) A visualization and data-sharing tool for ecosystem service maps: Lessons learnt, challenges and the way forward. Ecosystem Services 13: 134-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.002
15. Edsall R, Barbour L, Hoffman J (2015) Complementary Methods for Citizen Mapping of Ecosystem Services: Comparing Digital and Analog Representations. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17738-0_20
16. Fagerholm N, Oteros-Rozas E, Raymond C, Torralba M, Moreno G, Plieninger T (2016) Assessing linkages between ecosystem services, land-use and well-being in an agroforestry landscape using public participation GIS. Applied Geography 74: 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.06.007
17. Franke J, Keuck V, Siegert F (2012) Assessment of grassland use intensity by remote sensing to support conservation schemes. Journal for Nature Conservation 20 (3): 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.02.001
18. García-Nieto A, Quintas-Soriano C, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Montes C, Martín- López B (2015) Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: The role of stakeholders ' profiles. Ecosystem Services 13: 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.006
19. Gotz D, Zhou M (2009) Characterizing Users’ Visual Analytic Activity for Insight Provenance. Information Visualization 8 (1): 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1057/ivs.2008.31
20. Grêt-Regamey A, Weibel B, Kienast F, Rabe S, Zulian G (2015) A tiered approach for mapping ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 13: 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecoser.2014.10.008
21. Groot RSd, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7 (3): 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecocom.2009.10.006
22. Haines-Young, Potschin (2012) Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES, Version 4.1). European Environment Agenc, 33 pp.
23. Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2014) Typology/Classification of Ecosystem Services. In: Potschin M, Jax K (Eds) OpenNESS Ecosystem Services Reference Book. URL: http://www.openness-project.eu/library/reference-book
24. Hauck J, Görg C, Varjopuro R, Ratamäki O, Maes J, Wittmer H, Jax K (2013) “Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making. Ecosystem Services 4: 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.11.003
25. Klein TM, Celio E, Grêt-Regamey A (2015) Ecosystem services visualization and communication: A demand analysis approach for designing information and conceptualizing decision support systems. Ecosystem Services 13: 173-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.006
26. Klein TM, Drobnik T, Grêt-Regamey A (2016) Shedding light on the usability of ecosystem services-based decision support systems: An eye-tracking study linked to the cognitive probing approach. Ecosystem Services 19: 65-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecoser.2016.04.002
27. Kulczyk S,, Wozniak E,, Kowalczyk M,, Derek M (2014) Ecosystem services in tourism and recreation. Revisiting the classification problem. Ekonomia i Środowisko 4 (51): 84-92.
28. Lamarque P, Tappeiner U, Turner C, Steinbacher M, Bardgett R, Szukics U, Schermer M, Lavorel S (2011) Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Regional Environmental Change 11 (4): 791-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-011-0214-0
29. Liu J, Opdam P (2014) Valuing ecosystem services in community-based landscape planning: introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Landscape Ecology 29 (8): 1347-1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0045-8
30. Maes J, Liquete C, Teller A, Erhard M, Paracchini ML, Barredo J, Grizzetti B, Cardoso A, Somma F, Petersen J, Meiner A, Gelabert ER, Zal N, Kristensen P, Bastrup-Birk A, Biala K, Piroddi C, Egoh B, Degeorges P, Fiorina C, Santos-Martín F, Naruševičius V, Verboven J, Pereira H, Bengtsson J, Gocheva K, Marta-Pedroso C, Snäll T, Estreguil C, San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Pérez-Soba M, Grêt-Regamey A, Lillebø A, Malak DA, Condé S, Moen J, Czúcz B, Drakou E, Zulian G, Lavalle C (2016) An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Ecosystem Services 17: 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
31. Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, García-Llorente M, Montes C (2014) Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecological Indicators 37: 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003
32. Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Del Amo DG, Gómez-Baggethun E, Oteros-Rozas E, Palacios-Agundez I, Willaarts B, González J, Santos-Martín F, Onaindia M, López-Santiago C, Montes C (2012) Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences. PLoS ONE 7 (6): e38970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
33. Meerbeek KV, Ottoy S, Andrés García Md, Muys B, Hermy M (2016) The bioenergy potential of Natura 2000 - a synergy between climate change mitigation and biodiversity protection. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14 (9): 473-478. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1425
34. Nahuelhual L, Ochoa FB, Rojas F, Díaz GI, Carmona A (2016) Mapping social values of ecosystem services: What is behind the map? Ecology and Society 21 (3): . https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08676-210324
35. Ottoy S, Meerbeek KV, Sindayihebura A, Hermy M, Orshoven JV (2017) Assessing topand subsoil organic carbon stocks of Low-Input High-Diversity systems using soil and vegetation characteristics. Science of The Total Environment 589: 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.116
36. Palomo I, Felipe-Lucia M, Bennett E, Martín-López B, Pascual U (2016) Disentangling the Pathways and Effects of Ecosystem Service Co-Production. Advances in Ecological Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.003
37. Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M, Haines-Young R, Montes C (2013) National parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services 4: 104-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001
38. Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, Pataki G, Roth E, Stenseke M, Watson RT, Dessane EB, Islar M, Kelemen E, Maris V, Quaas M, Subramanian SM, Wittmer H, Adlan A, Ahn S, Al-Hafedh YS, Amankwah E, Asah ST, Berry P, Bilgin A, Breslow SJ, Bullock C, Cáceres D, Daly-Hassen H, Figueroa E, Golden CD, Gómez-Baggethun E, González-Jiménez D, Houdet J, Keune H, Kumar R, Ma K, May PH, Mead A, O’Farrell P, Pandit R, Pengue W, Pichis-Madruga R, Popa F, Preston S, Pacheco-Balanza D, Saarikoski H, Strassburg BB, den Belt Mv, Verma M, Wickson F, Yagi N (2017) Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
39. Pastur GM, Peri P, Lencinas M, García-Llorente M, Martín-López B (2015) Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia. Landscape Ecology 31 (2): 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0254-9
40. Quintas-Soriano C, Castro A, García-Llorente M, Cabello J, Castro H (2014) From supply to social demand: a landscape-scale analysis of the water regulation service. Landscape Ecology 29 (6): 1069-1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0032-0
41. Ricaurte LF, Olaya-Rodríguez MH, Cepeda-Valencia J, Lara D, Arroyave-Suárez J, Finlayson CM, Palomo I (2017) Future impacts of drivers of change on wetland ecosystem services in Colombia. Global Environmental Change 44: 158-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.04.001
42. Rodela R, Bregt A, Ligtenberg A, Pérez-Soba M, Verweij P (2017) The social side of spatial decision support systems: Investigating knowledge integration and learning. Environmental Science & Policy 76: 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envsci.2017.06.015
43. Roelens J, Dondeyne S, Orshoven JV, Diels J (2016) Extracting cross sections and water levels of vegetated ditches from LiDAR point clouds. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 53: 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jag.2016.08.003
44. Root-Bernstein M, Jaksic F (2017) Making research relevant? Ecological methods and the ecosystem services framework. Earth’s Future 5 (7): 664-678. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ef000501
45. Ruckelshaus M, McKenzie E, Tallis H, Guerry A, Daily G, Kareiva P, Polasky S, Ricketts T, Bhagabati N, Wood S, Bernhardt J (2015) Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecological Economics 115: 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009
46. Schröter M, Remme R, Sumarga E, Barton D, Hein L (2015) Lessons learned for spatial modelling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting. Ecosystem Services 13: 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.003
47. Sharps K, Masante D, Thomas A, Jackson B, Redhead J, May L, Prosser H, Cosby B, Emmett B, Jones L (2017) Comparing strengths and weaknesses of three ecosystem services modelling tools in a diverse UK river catchment. Science of The Total Environment 584-585: 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.160
48. Stępniewska M, Łowick i, Lupa P (2017) Possibilities of using the concept of ecosystem services at the regional level in experts’ opinions. Ekologia I Środowisko 1 (60): 81-91.
49. Syrbe R, Walz U (2012) Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators 21: 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013
50. van Zanten B, Van Berkel D, Meentemeyer R, Smith J, Tieskens K, Verburg P (2016) Continental-scale quantification of landscape values using social media data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (46): 12974-12979. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614158113
51. Verhagen W, Kukkala A, Moilanen A, van Teeffelen AA, Verburg P (2016) Use of demand and spatial flow in prioritizing areas for ecosystem services. Conservation Biology https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12872
52. Verweij P, Janssen S, Braat L, Eupen Mv, Soba MP, Winograd M, Winter Wd, Cormont A (2016) QUICKScan as a quick and participatory methodology for problem identification and scoping in policy processes. Environmental Science & Policy 66: 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.010
53. Villa F, Bagstad KJ, Voigt B, Johnson GW, Portela R, Honzák M, Batker D (2014) A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PloS one 9 (3): e91001. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091001
54. Vorstius A, Spray C (2015) A comparison of ecosystem services mapping tools for their potential to support planning and decision-making on a local scale. Ecosystem Services 15: 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.07.007
55. Werf B Van Der, Adamescu M, Ayromlou M, Bertrand N, Boussard H, Cazacu C, Daele T Van, Datcu S, Frenzel M, V H (2009) SERONTO: A Socio-Ecological Research and Observation Ontology: the core ontology: A Long-Term Biodiversity, Ecosystem and Awareness Research Network. FAO
56. Willcock S, Hooftman D, Sitas N, O’Farrell P, Hudson M, Reyers B, Eigenbrod F, Bullock J (2016) Do ecosystem service maps and models meet stakeholders’ needs? A preliminary survey across sub-Saharan Africa. Ecosystem Services 18: 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.038
57. Willemen L, Cottam A, Drakou E, Burgess N (2015a) Using social media to measure the contribution of red list species to the nature-based tourism potential of African protected areas. PLOS ONE 10 (6): e0129785. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129785
58. Willemen L, Burkhard B, Crossman N, Drakou E, Palomo I (2015b) Editorial: Best practices for mapping ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 13: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.008
59. Willemen L, Crossman N, Quatrini S, Egoh B, Kalaba F, Mbilinyi B, Groot Rd (2017) Identifying ecosystem service hotspots for targeting land degradation neutrality investments in south-eastern Africa. Journal of Arid Environments https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.05.009
60. Wright WC, Eppink F, Greenhalgh S (2017) Are ecosystem service studies presenting the right information for decision making? Ecosystem Services 25: 128-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.002