National ecosystem services mapping at multiple scales - The German exemplar

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 70, Issue , 2016, Pages 357-372

  Rabe, Sven Erik ^a   Koellner, Thomas ^b   Marzelli, Stefan ^c   Schumacher, Paul ^b   Grêt Regamey, Adrienne ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

^c Ifuplan Institut für Umweltplanung und Raumentwicklung   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Hotspots; Indicators; MAES; Mapping; Scales; TEEB

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INDICATORS (INSTRUMENTS); MAPPING;

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; HOTSPOTS; MAES; SCALES; TEEB;

ECOSYSTEMS;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EUROPEAN UNION; MAPPING METHOD; NATIONAL POLITICS; NATURE CONSERVATION; SCALE EFFECT;

GERMANY;

EID: 84976407177     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.043     Document Type: Article

References (126)

1. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, 2014. Ecosystems and biodiversity for human wellbeing. Spanish National Ecosystem Assessment. Synthesis of key findings, Madrid.
2. C. Albert, J. Hauck, N. Buhr, and C.v. Haaren What ecosystem services information do users want? Investigating interests and requirements among landscape and regional planners in Germany Landsc. Ecol. 29 8 2014 1301 1313 10.1007/s10980-014-9990-5
3. C. Albert, A. Bonn, B. Burkhard, S. Daube, K. Dietrich, B. Engels, J. Frommer, M. Götzl, A. Grêt-Regamey, B. Job-Hoben, T. Koellner, S. Marzelli, C. Moning, F. Müller, S.-E. Rabe, I. Ring, E. Schwaiger, B. Schweppe-Kraft, and H. Wüstemann Towards a national set of ecosystem service indicators. Insights from Germany Ecol. Indic. 2015 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.050
4. C. Albert, C. Galler, J. Hermes, F. Neuendorf, C.v. Haaren, and A. Lovett Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: the ES-in-Planning framework Ecol. Indic. 2015 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.029
5. C. Albert, C.v. Haaren, F. Othengrafen, S. Krätzig, and W. Saathoff Scaling policy conflicts in ecosystem services governance. A framework for spatial analysis J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2015 1 19 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1075194
6. L. Alessa, A. Kliskey, and G. Brown Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space Landsc. Urban Plan. 85 1 2008 27 39 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007
7. Alterra, 2015. Mapping of Ecosystems and their Services in the EU and its Member States (MESEU). Final Technical Report 2013-2014. ENV.B.2/SER/2012/0016, Wageningen.
8. Alterra, 2015. Mapping of Ecosystems and their Services in the EU and its Member States (MESEU). Interim Report MESEU-3. ENV.B.2/SER/2012/0016, Wageningen.
9. C. Anton, J. Young, P. Harrison, M. Musche, G. Bela, C. Feld, R. Harrington, J. Haslett, G. Pataki, M.A. Rounsevell, M. Skourtos, J.P. Sousa, M. Sykes, R. Tinch, M. Vandewalle, A. Watt, and J. Settele Research needs for incorporating the ecosystem service approach into EU biodiversity conservation policy Biodivers. Conserv. 19 10 2010 2979 2994
10. BGR Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften Und Rohstoffe 2011 Nutzungsdifferenzierte Bodenübersichtskarte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 1:1.000.000 (BÜK1000N) http://www.bgr.de/app/FISBoBGR-Produktauswahl/Produktkatalog/metadata.php?fcni=bk1000n-v23-gk3-polygon&lang=de (accessed 21.08.12)
11. BGR Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften Und Rohstoffe 2012 BGR - Projekte - HAD - Hydrogeologische Karten für den Hydrologischen Atlas von Deutschland http://www.bgr.bund.de/DE/Themen/Wasser/Projekte/laufend/Beratung/Had/had-projektbeschr.html (accessed 20.08.12)
12. BKG, 2013. Verwaltungsgebiete, Kreise und kreisfreie Städte. vg2500-krs-BKG. GeoBasis-DE/BKG 2013.
13. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, 2008a. Grundwasser in Deutschland. Umweltpolitik, Berlin.
14. Bundesministerium für Umwelt Hydrologischer Atlas Von Deutschland 2008 http://www.hydrology.uni-freiburg.de/forsch/had/had-aufbau.htm#stand-them-taf (accessed 06.03.13)
15. K.J. Bagstad, F. Villa, D. Batker, J. Harrison-Cox, B. Voigt, and G.W. Johnson From theoretical to actual ecosystem services. Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments E&S 19 2 2014 10.5751/ES-06523-190264
16. K.J. Bagstad, J.M. Reed, D.J. Semmens, B.C. Sherrouse, and A. Troy Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystem service assessments: a case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains Reg. Environ. Change 2015 10.1007/s10113-015-0756-7
17. Y. Bai, C. Zhuang, Z. Ouyang, H. Zheng, and B. Jiang Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed Ecol. Complex. 8 2 2011 177 183 10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.01.007
18. P. Balvanera, G.C. Daily, P.R. Ehrlich, T.H. Ricketts, S.-A. Bailey, S. Kark, C. Kremen, and H. Pereira Editorial: conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services Science 291 5511 2001 2047 10.2307/3082577
19. P. Balvanera, A.B. Pfisterer, N. Buchmann, J.-S. He, T. Nakashizuka, D. Raffaelli, and B. Schmid Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services Ecol. Lett. 9 10 2006 1146 1156 10.1111/j. 1461-0248.2006.00963.x
20. A.D. Barnosky, E.A. Hadly, J. Bascompte, E.L. Berlow, J.H. Brown, M. Fortelius, W.M. Getz, J. Harte, A. Hastings, P.A. Marquet, N.D. Martinez, A. Mooers, P. Roopnarine, G. Vermeij, J.W. Williams, R. Gillespie, J. Kitzes, C. Marshall, N. Matzke, D.P. Mindell, E. Revilla, and A.B. Smith Approaching a state shift in Earth's biosphere Nature 486 7401 2012 52 58 10.1038/nature11018
21. Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, 2010. Bayerischer Agrarbericht. Kurzfassung.
22. Becerra-Jurado, G., Philipsen, C., Kleeschulte, S., 2015. Mapping and assessing ecosystems and their services in Luxembourg. Implementation report, Luxembourg.
23. Bellamy, C., Winn, J., Fisher, T., 2014. EcoServ-GIS Version 2 (England only): A Wildlife Trust toolkit for mapping multiple ecosystem services. User Guide. Document Version 2.1.
24. F. Bello, S. Lavorel, S. Díaz, R. Harrington, J.C. Cornelissen, R. Bardgett, M. Berg, P. Cipriotti, C. Feld, D. Hering, P. Martins da Silva, S. Potts, L. Sandin, J. Sousa, J. Storkey, D. Wardle, and P. Harrison Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits Biodivers. Conserv. 19 10 2010 2873 2893 10.1007/s10531-010-9850-9
25. Bundesministerium für Ernährung Statistik und Berichte 2011 www.bmelv-statistik.de
26. L.C. Braat, and R. de Groot The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy Ecosyst. Serv. 1 1 2012 4 15 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011
27. M. Bruse Particle filtering capacity of urban vegetation: a microscale numerical approach Berliner Geographische Arbeiten (109) 109 2007 61 70
28. B. Burkhard, F. Kroll, F. Müller, and W. Windhorst Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services - a concept for land-cover based assessments Landsc. Online 15 1 2009 22
29. B. Burkhard, F. Kroll, S. Nedkov, and F. Müller Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets Ecol. Indic. 21 0 2012 17 29
30. B. Burkhard, M. Kandziora, Y. Hou, and F. Müller Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands - concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification LO 2014 1 32 10.3097/LO. 201434
31. S.R. Carpenter, H.A. Mooney, J. Agard, D. Capistrano, R.S. DeFries, S. Díaz, T. Dietz, A.K. Duraiappah, A. Oteng-Yeboah, H.M. Pereira, C. Perrings, W.V. Reid, J. Sarukhan, R.J. Scholes, and A. Whyte Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 5 2009 1305 1312 10.1073/pnas.0808772106
32. K.M.A. Chan, M.R. Shaw, D.R. Cameron, E.C. Underwood, and G.C. Daily Conservation planning for ecosystem services PLoS Biol. 4 11 2006 e379 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379
33. J. de Chazal, F. Quétier, S. Lavorel, and A. van Doorn Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems Glob. Environ. Change 18 3 2008 508 520 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.04.005
34. Convention on Biological Diversity Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, Including Aichi Biodiversity Targets 2015 (accessed 13.11.15) http://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/#GoalD
35. S. Díaz, J. Fargione, F.S. Chapin, and D. Tilman Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being PLoS Biol. 4 8 2006 e277 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277
36. G.C. Daily, and P.A. Matson Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 28 2008 9455 9456 10.1073/pnas.0804960105
37. Dales, N., Brown, N., Lusardi, J., 2014. Assessing the potential for mapping ecosystem services in England based on existing habitats. Natural England Research Reports 056.
38. R Development Core Team, 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
39. EEA, 2015. The European environment - state and outlook 2015. Synthesis report. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 1 online resource.
40. B. Egoh, B. Reyers, M. Rouget, D.M. Richardson, C. David Le Maitre, and Albert S. van Jaarsveld Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 127 1-2 2008 135 140 10.1016/j.agee.2008.03.013
41. F. Eigenbrod, P.R. Armsworth, B.J. Anderson, A. Heinemeyer, S. Gillings, D.B. Roy, C.D. Thomas, and K.J. Gaston The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services J. Appl. Ecol. 47 2 2010 377 385 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x
42. K.-H. Erb, F. Krausmann, W. Lucht, and H. Haberl Embodied HANPP. Mapping the spatial disconnect between global biomass production and consumption Ecol. Econ. 69 2 2009 328 334 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.025
43. D. Ervin, D. Brown, H. Chang, V. Dujon, E. Granek, V. Shandas, and A. Yeakley Growing cities depend on ecosystem services Solutions 2 6 2012 74 86
44. Europäische Gemeinschaften, 2008. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Ein Zwischenbericht.
45. European Commission; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; United Nations; World Bank, 2013. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012. Experimental Ecosystem Accounting.
46. European Commission, 2011a. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM (2011) 244.
47. European Commission, 2011b. Mapping Guide for a European Urban Atlas.
48. European Commission, 2015. Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity. produced for the European Commission. In-depth Report 11, Bristol. 10.2779/162593.
49. European Environment Agency, 2012. Urban adaptation to climate change in Europe. Challenges and opportunities for cities together with supportive national and European policies, Copenhagen, 143 sider.
50. European Environment Agency CORINE Land Cover 2000 (CLC2000) Seamless Vector Database 2012 (accessed 07.03.13) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/corine-land-cover-2000-clc2000-seamless-vector-database-1
51. J.A. Foley, R. Defries, G.P. Asner, C. Barford, G. Bonan, S.R. Carpenter, F.S. Chapin, M.T. Coe, G.C. Daily, H.K. Gibbs, J.H. Helkowski, T. Holloway, E.A. Howard, C.J. Kucharik, C. Monfreda, J.A. Patz, I.C. Prentice, N. Ramankutty, and P.K. Snyder Global consequences of land use Science 309 5734 2005 570 574 10.1126/science.1111772
52. S. Frank, C. Fürst, A. Witt, L. Koschke, and F. Makeschin Making use of the ecosystem services concept in regional planning - trade-offs from reducing water erosion Landsc. Ecol. 29 8 2014 1377 1391 10.1007/s10980-014-9992-3
53. A.P. García-Nieto, M. García-Llorente, I. Iniesta-Arandia, and B. Martín-López Mapping forest ecosystem services: from providing units to beneficiaries Ecosyst. Serv. 4 2013 126 138 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.03.003
54. A. Getis, and J.K. Ord The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics Geogr. Anal. 24 3 1992 189 206 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
55. A. Gimona, and D. van der Horst Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland Landsc. Ecol. 22 8 2007 1255 1264 10.1007/s10980-007-9105-7
56. A. Grêt-Regamey, B. Weibel, K.J. Bagstad, M. Ferrari, D. Geneletti, H. Klug, U. Schirpke, and U. Tappeiner On the effects of scale for ecosystem services mapping PLoS One 9 12 2014 e112601 10.1371/journal.pone.0112601
57. A. Grêt-Regamey, B. Weibel, F. Kienast, S.-E. Rabe, and Z. Grazia A tiered approach for mapping ecosystem services Ecosyst. Serv. 2014 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008
58. R.S. de Groot, R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making Ecol. Complex. 7 3 2010 260 272 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
59. R. Haines-Young, and M. Potschin The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being D.G. Raffaelli, C. Frid, Ecosystem Ecology. A New Synthesis 2010 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, New York
60. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003, London.
61. P.A. Harrison, P.M. Berry, G. Simpson, J.R. Haslett, M. Blicharska, M. Bucur, R. Dunford, B. Egoh, M. Garcia-Llorente, N. GeamǍnǍ, W. Geertsema, E. Lommelen, L. Meiresonne, and F. Turkelboom Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: a systematic review Ecosyst. Serv. 9 2014 191 203 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006
62. J. Hauck, B. Schweppe-Kraft, C. Albert, C. Görg, K. Jax, R. Jensen, C. Fürst, J. Maes, I. Ring, I. Hönigová, B. Burkhard, M. Mehring, M. Tiefenbach, K. Grunewald, M. Schwarzer, J. Meurer, M. Sommerhäuser, J. Priess, J. Schmidt, and A. Grêt-Regamey The promise of the ecosystem services concept for planning and decision-Making GAIA 22 4 2013 232 236
63. X. Hu, W. Hong, R. Qiu, T. Hong, C. Chen, and C. Wu Geographic variations of ecosystem service intensity in Fuzhou City China Sci. Total Environ. 512-513 2015 215 226 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.035
64. Jäppinen J.-P., Heliölä, J., 2015. Towards A Sustainable and Genuinely Green Economy. The value and social significance of ecosystem services in Finland. (TEEB for Finland). Synthesis and roadmap. The Finnish Environment 1/2015, Helsinki.
65. M. Kandziora, B. Burkhard, and F. Müller Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution Ecosyst. Serv. 4 0 2013 47 59 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001
66. P.M. Kareiva, H. Tallis, T.H. Ricketts, G.C. Daily, and S. Polasky Natural Capital Theory & Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services 2011 Oxford Univ. Press Oxford 365 pp. (eng)
67. K.M. Konarska, P.C. Sutton, and M. Castellon Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets Ecol. Econ. 41 3 2002 491 507 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00096-4
68. C.C. Konijnendijk Urban Forests and Trees 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (New York)
69. L. Kopperoinen, P. Itkonen, and J. Niemelä Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology Landsc. Ecol. 29 8 2014 1361 1375 10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2
70. C. Kremen Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol. Lett. 8 5 2005 468 479 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x
71. D. La Rosa, M. Spyra, and L. Inostroza Indicators of cultural ecosystem services for urban planning. A review Ecol. Indic. 2015 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.028
72. S. Lavorel, and K. Grigulis How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale-up to trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services J. Ecol. 100 1 2012 128 140 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01914.x
73. S. Lavorel, K. Grigulis, P. Lamarque, M.-P. Colace, D. Garden, J. Girel, G. Pellet, and R. Douzet Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services J. Ecol. 99 1 2011 135 147 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01753.x
74. S. Lavorel, J. Storkey, R.D. Bardgett, F. de Bello, M.P. Berg, X. Le Roux, M. Moretti, C. Mulder, R.J. Pakeman, S. Díaz, R. Harrington, and N. Mason A novel framework for linking functional diversity of plants with other trophic levels for the quantification of ecosystem services J. Veg. Sci. 24 5 2013 942 948 10.1111/jvs.12083
75. E.A. Law, B.A. Bryan, E. Meijaard, T. Mallawaarachchi, M. Struebig, and K.A. Wilson Ecosystem services from a degraded peatland of Central Kalimantan: implications for policy, planning, and management Ecol. Appl. 25 1 2015 70 87 10.1890/13-2014.1
76. Liquete, C., Kleeschulte, S., 2014. Mapping and assessing ecosystems and their services in Luxembourg. A methodological guide for the implementation of the EU Biodiversity Strategy, Luxembourg.
77. J. Liu Forest sustainability in China and implications for a telecoupled world Asia Pac. Policy Stud. 1 1 2014 230 250 10.1002/app5.17
78. Maes, J., Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., 2011. A European assessment of the provision of ecosystem services. Towards an atlas of ecosystem services. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
79. J. Maes, B. Egoh, L. Willemen, C. Liquete, P. Vihervaara, J.P. Schägner, B. Grizzetti, E.G. Drakou, A. La Notte, G. Zulian, F. Bouraoui, M. Luisa Paracchini, L. Braat, and G. Bidoglio Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union Ecosyst. Serv. 1 1 2012 31 39 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004
80. J. Maes, M.L. Paracchini, G. Zulian, M.B. Dunbar, and R. Alkemade Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe Biol. Conserv. 155 2012 1 12 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016
81. Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Liquete, C., Braat, L., Berry, P., Egoh, B., Puydarrieux, P., Fiorina, F., Santos, F., Paracchini, M.L., Keune, H., Wittmer, H., Hauck, J., Fiala, I., Verburg, P., Condé, S., Schägner, J.P., San Miguel, J., Estreguil, C., Ostermann, O., Barredo, J.I., Pereira, H.M., Stott, A., Laporte, V., Meiner, A., Olah, B., Royo Gelabert, E., Spyropoulou, R., Petersen, J.E., Maguire, C., Zal, N., Achilleos, E., Rubin, A., Ledoux, L., Brown, C., Raes, C., Jacobs, S., Vandewalle, M., Connor, D., Bidoglio, G., 2013. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020.
82. J. Maes, C. Liquete, A. Teller, M. Erhard, M.L. Paracchini, J.I. Barredo, B. Grizzetti, A. Cardoso, F. Somma, J.-E. Petersen, A. Meiner, E.R. Gelabert, N. Zal, P. Kristensen, A. Bastrup-Birk, K. Biala, C. Piroddi, B. Egoh, P. Degeorges, C. Fiorina, F. Santos-Martín, V. Naruševičius, J. Verboven, H.M. Pereira, J. Bengtsson, K. Gocheva, C. Marta-Pedroso, T. Snäll, C. Estreguil, J. San-Miguel-Ayanz, M. Pérez-Soba, A. Grêt-Regamey, A.I. Lillebø, D.A. Malak, S. Condé, J. Moen, B. Czúcz, E.G. Drakou, G. Zulian, and C. Lavalle An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 Ecosyst. Serv. 17 2016 14 23 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
83. M.J. Martínez-Harms, and P. Balvanera Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 8 1-2 2012 17 25 10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
84. Marzelli, S., Grêt-Regamey, A., Köllner, T., Moning, C., Rabe, S.-E., Daube, S., Poppenborg, P., 2014. TEEB-Deutschland Übersichtsstudie. Teil A: Bilanzierung von Ökosystemleistungen. Forschungsvorhaben 3510 81 0500 im Auftrag des Bundesamtes für Naturschutz - Unpublished Manuscript, Bonn.
85. E.G. McPherson, D. Nowak, G. Heisler, S. Grimmond, C. Souch, R. Grant, and R. Rowntree Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project Urban Ecosyst. 1 1 1997 49 61 10.1023/A:1014350822458
86. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Synthesis 2005 Island Press Washington DC 137 (x)
87. M.A. Mouchet, P. Lamarque, B. Martín-López, E. Crouzat, P. Gos, C. Byczek, and S. Lavorel An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services Global Environ. Change 28 2014 298 308 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012
88. R. Muradian, and L. Rival Between markets and hierarchies: the challenge of governing ecosystem services Ecosyst. Serv. 1 1 2012 93 100 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.009
89. R. Naidoo, A. Balmford, R. Costanza, B. Fisher, R.E. Green, B. Lehner, T.R. Malcolm, and T.H. Ricketts Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105 28 2008 9495 9500 10.1073/pnas.0707823105
90. S. Nedkov, and B. Burkhard Flood regulating ecosystem services - mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria Ecol. Indic. 21 0 2012 67 79 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022
91. L. Norton, S. Greene, P. Scholefield, and M. Dunbar The importance of scale in the development of ecosystem service indicators? Ecol. Indic. 2015 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.051
92. OECD, 2008. Strategic Environmental Assessment and Ecosystem Services. Endorsed by members of the DAC Network on Environment and Development Co-operation (ENVIRONET) at their 8th Meeting on 30 October 2008.
93. J. Qiu, and M.G. Turner Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 29 2013 12149 12154 10.1073/pnas.1310539110
94. C. Queiroz, M. Meacham, K. Richter, A.V. Norström, E. Andersson, J. Norberg, and G. Peterson Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape Ambio 44 Suppl. 1 2015 89 101 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0
95. T. Rötscher Aussagewert Der Bodenschätzung für Den Pflanzenbau 2013 Halle-Wittenberg
96. C. Raudsepp-Hearne, G.D. Peterson, and E.M. Bennett Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 11 2010 5242 5247 10.1073/pnas.0907284107
97. Richter, A., Hennings, V., Müller, L., 2009. Anwendung des Müncheberger Soil Quality Ratings (SQR) auf bodenkundliche Grundlagenkarten. Tagungsbeitrag zu: Jahrestagung der DBG, Kommission VBöden - eine endliche Ressource, Bonn
98. Riecken, U., 2006. Rote Liste der gefährdeten Biotoptypen Deutschlands, 2. fortgeschrittene Fassung 2006. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn-Bad Godesberg, 318 pp.
99. N. Rodríguez, D. Armenteras, and J. Retana National ecosystems services priorities for planning carbon and water resource management in Colombia Land Use Policy 42 2015 609 618 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.013
100. M.D.A. Rounsevell, B. Pedroli, K.-H. Erb, M. Gramberger, A.G. Busck, H. Haberl, S. Kristensen, T. Kuemmerle, S. Lavorel, M. Lindner, H. Lotze-Campen, M.J. Metzger, D. Murray-Rust, A. Popp, M. Pérez-Soba, A. Reenberg, A. Vadineanu, P.H. Verburg, and B. Wolfslehner Challenges for land system science Land Use Policy 29 4 2012 899 910 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.007
101. SCBD Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2014. Global Biodiversity Outlook 4, Montréal.
102. J.P. Schägner, L. Brander, J. Maes, and V. Hartje Mapping ecosystem services' values: current practice and future prospects Ecosyst. Serv. 4 0 2013 33 46 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003
103. M. Schröter, D.N. Barton, R.P. Remme, and L. Hein Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services. A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway Ecol. Indic. 36 2014 539 551 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018
104. M. Schröter, R.P. Remme, E. Sumarga, D.N. Barton, and L. Hein Lessons learned for spatial modelling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting Ecosyst. Serv. 13 0 2015 64 69 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.003
105. C.J.E. Schulp, B. Burkhard, J. Maes, J. van Vliet, and P.H. Verburg Uncertainties in ecosystem service maps: a comparison on the european scale PLoS One 9 10 2014 e109643 10.1371/journal.pone.0109643
106. C. Schuster, M. Förster, and B. Kleinschmit Testing the red edge channel for improving land-use classifications based on high-resolution multi-spectral satellite data Int. J. Remote Sens. 33 17 2012 5583 5599 10.1080/01431161.2012.666812
107. J.A. Sobrino, R. Oltra-Carrió, and G. Sòria Urban heat island effect Earth Observation of Ecosystem Services 2013 CRC Press 417 438
108. Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung. Mit 103 Tabellen Und 31 Listen, 5 Verb. Und Erw H. Sponagel 2005 Aufl. Schweizerbart Stuttgart (438 pp. ger)
109. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder, 2010. Öffentliche Wasserversorgung: Wassergewinnung, Wasserversorgungsunternehmen. regionale Tiefe: Kreise und krfr. Städte. Tabelle: 514-31-4.
110. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder Bodennutzungshaupterhebung. Allgemeine Agrarstrukturerhebung - Landwirtschaftszählung. 115-01-4. Destatis. 2013 (accessed 06.03.13 (en;en) https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/Wirtschaftsbereiche/LandForstwirtschaftFischerei/FeldfruechteGruenland/Methoden/Methodisches-Boden.html
111. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder Regionaldatenbank. Bodenfläche Nach Art Der Tatsächlichen Nutzung. 449-01-5. Destatis 2013 (accessed 06.03.13 (en;en) https://www.regionalstatistik.de/genesis/online/data;jsessionid=790C3A91B1A7977A44F355D802FB19A8?operation=abruftabelleAbrufen&selectionname=449-01-5&levelindex=1&levelid=1359536634801&index=2
112. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder Regionaldatenbank. Hektarerträge Ausgewählter Landwirtschaftlicher Feldfrüchte. 115-46-4. Destatis 2013 (accessed 08.12.11) https://www.regionalstatistik.de/genesis/online
113. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder Flächennutzung. Bodenfläche Nach Nutzungsarten. 115-01-4. Destatis 2015 (accessed 24.11.15) (en;en) https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/Wirtschaftsbereiche/LandForstwirtschaftFischerei/Flaechennutzung/Tabellen/Bodenflaeche.html
114. TEEB, 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Ecological and economic foundations. edited by Pushpam Kumar. Earthscan London, Washington, DC, xxxix, 410.
115. TEEB, 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature. Ansatz, Schlussfolgerungen und Empfehlungen von TEEB - eine Synthese.
116. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 4 - Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.
117. M. Trabucchi, P.J. O'Farrell, E. Notivol, and F.A. Comín Mapping ecological processes and ecosystem services for prioritizing restoration efforts in a semi-arid Mediterranean river basin Environ. Manag. 53 6 2014 1132 1145 10.1007/s00267-014-0264-4
118. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2010. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment. Progress and Steps Towards Delivery, Cambridge.
119. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment. Technical Report, Cambridge.
120. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings.
121. Vermessungsamt München, 2013. Administrative Gliederung (Stadtbezirke, Stadtteile, Stadtviertel).
122. E.F. Viglizzo, J.M. Paruelo, P. Laterra, and E.G. Jobbágy Ecosystem service evaluation to support land-use policy Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 154 2012 78 84 10.1016/j.agee.2011.07.007
123. P. Vihervaara, T. Kumpula, A. Ruokolainen, A. Tanskanen, and B. Burkhard The use of detailed biotope data for linking biodiversity with ecosystem services in Finland Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 8 1-2 2012 169 185 10.1080/21513732.2012.686120
124. D. Vollmer, M.F. Prescott, R. Padawangi, C. Girot, and A. Grêt-Regamey Understanding the value of urban riparian corridors: considerations in planning for cultural services along an Indonesian river Landsc. Urban Plan. 138 2015 144 154 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.011
125. V. Whitford, A.R. Ennos, and J.F. Handley City form and natural process - indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK Landsc. Urban Plan. 57 2 2001 91 103 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00192-X
126. U. Wissen Hayek, M. Teich, T.M. Klein, and A. Grêt-Regamey Bringing ecosystem services indicators into spatial planning practice: lessons from collaborative development of a web-based visualization platform Ecol. Indic. 2015 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.035