Comparison of methods for a landscape-scale assessment of the cultural ecosystem services associated with different habitats

International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 91-104

  Gosal, Arjan S ^a   Newton, Adrian C ^a   Gillingham, Phillipa K ^a  

^a BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Behaviour; CES; Cultural ecosystem services; PGIS; Recreation; Stated preference; Surveys

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; GIS; GPS; HABITAT; LANDSCAPE; NATIONAL PARK; OUTDOOR RECREATION; SURVEY METHOD;

ENGLAND; HAMPSHIRE; NEW FOREST; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 85054685158     PISSN: 21513732     EISSN: 21513740     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2018.1447016     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Abbot J, Chambers R, Dunn C, Harris T, Merode E, Porter G, Townsend J, Weiner D. 1998. Participatory GIS: opportunity or oxymoron. PLA Notes. 33:27–33.
2. Austin Z, McVittie A, McCracken D, Moxey A, Moran D, White PC. 2016. The co-benefits of biodiversity conservation programmes on wider ecosystem services. Ecosystem Serv. 20:37–43.
3. Barrena J, Nahuelhual L, Báez A, Schiappacasse I, Cerda C. 2014. Valuing cultural ecosystem services: agricultural heritage in Chiloé island, southern Chile. Ecosystem Serv. 7:66–75.
4. Baulcomb C, Fletcher F, Lewis A, Akoglu E, Robinson L, von Almen A, Hussain S, Glenk K. 2015. A pathway to identifying and valuing cultural ecosystem services: an application to marine food webs. Ecosystem Serv. 11:128–139.
5. Beierle TC. 2002. The quality of stakeholder-based decisions. Risk Analysis. 22:739–749.
6. Birkin M, Malleson N. 2012. Investigating the behaviour of twitter users to construct an individual-level model of metropolitan dynamics working paper. UK: Southampton.
7. Blake J. 1999. Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environ. 4:257–278.
8. Brown G, Fagerholm N. 2015. Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation. Ecosystem Serv. 13:119–133.
9. Brown G, Montag JM, Lyon K. 2012. Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Soc Nat Resour. 25:633–651.
10. Brown G, Reed P. 2000. Typology for use in national forest planning. For Sci. 46:240–247.
11. Brown TC. 2003. Introduction to stated preference methods. In: Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC, editors. A primer on nonmarket valuation. New York City (NY, USA): Springer; p. 99–110.
12. Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Díaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 106:1305–1312.
13. Church A, Fish R, Haines-Young R, Mourato S, Tratalos J, Stapleton L, Willis C, Coates P, Gibbons S, Leyshon C, et al. 2014. UK National ecosystem assessment follow-on. Work Package Report 5: Cultural ecosystem services and indicators. LWEC UK.
14. Cordingley JE, Newton AC, Rose RJ, Clarke RT, Bullock JM. 2015. Habitat fragmentation intensifies trade-offs between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a heathland ecosystem in Southern England. PLoS ONE. 10:e0130004.
15. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387:253–260.
16. Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M. 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Serv. 28:1–16.
17. Crossman ND, Burkhard B, Nedkov S, Willemen L, Petz K, Palomo I, Drakou EG, Martín-Lopez B, McPhearson T, Boyanova K. 2013. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Serv. 4:4–14.
18. Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KM, Costanza R, Elmqvist T, Flint CG, Gobster PH. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 109:8812–8819.
19. de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex. 7:260–272.
20. de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Econ. 41:393–408.
21. Deadman P, Gimblett RH. 1994. A role for goal-oriented autonomous agents in modeling people-environment interactions in forest recreation. Math Comput Model. 20:121–133.
22. del Rosario MB, Redmond SJ, Lovell NH. 2015. Tracking the evolution of smartphone sensing for monitoring human movement. Sensors. 15:18901–18933.
23. Duncan S, Stewart TI, Oliver M, Mavoa S, MacRae D, Badland HM, Duncan MJ. 2013. Portable global positioning system receivers: static validity and environmental conditions. Am J Prev Med. 44:e19–e29.
24. Dunn CE. 2007. Participatory GIS – a people’s GIS? Prog Hum Geogr. 31:616–637.
25. Fearnley H 2013. Visitor use of Arne RSPB reserve. Results from an on-site visitor questionnaire and route collection study. Wareham.
26. Feld CK, Martins da Silva P, Paulo Sousa J, De Bello F, Bugter R, Grandin U, Hering D, Lavorel S, Mountford O, Pardo I. 2009. Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: a synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales. Oikos. 118:1862–1871.
27. Fischer F. 2000. Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Durham (N.C., USA): Duke University Press.
28. Fish R, Church A, Winter M. 2016. Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: a novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Serv. 21:208–217.
29. Fraser JA, Diabaté M, Narmah W, Beavogui P, Guilavogui K, De Foresta H, Junqueira AB. 2016. Cultural valuation and biodiversity conservation in the upper Guinea forest, West Africa. Ecol Soc. 21(3):36.
30. Garthe C Understanding ecological impacts of recreation through modeling of spatial visitor behavior. Proceedings of the EASSS 2010; 2010 Aug 23-27.
31. Godin G, Conner M, Sheeran P. 2005. Bridging the intention – behaviour gap: the role of moral norm. Br J Soc Psychol. 44:497–512.
32. Guo Z, Zhang L, Li Y. 2010. Increased dependence of humans on ecosystem services and biodiversity. PLoS One. 5:e13113.
33. Hernández-Morcillo M, Plieninger T, Bieling C. 2013. An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecol Indic. 29:434–444.
34. Hirons M, Comberti C, Dunford R. 2016. Valuingcultural ecosystem services. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 41:545–574.
35. Ingram JC, Redford KH, Watson JE. 2012. Applying ecosystem services approaches for biodiversity conservation: benefits and challenges. SAPI EN. S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society. 5 (1):1–10.
36. James SP. 2015. Cultural Ecosystem Services: a critical assessment. Ethics, Policy & Environ. 18(3):338–350.
37. JNCC. 2011. Natura 2000 data form for the New Forest site as submitted to Europe. Available from http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/protectedsites/sacselection/sac.asp?EUCode=UK0012557
38. Klintman M. 2016. Human sciences and human interests: integrating the social, economic, and evolutionary sciences. Abingdon (UK): Routledge.
39. Lamb RJ, Purcell AT. 1990. Perception of naturalness in landscape and its relationship to vegetation structure. Landsc Urban Plan. 19:333–352.
40. Lau G, McKercher B. 2006. Understanding tourist movement patterns in a destination: a GIS approach. Tour and Hosp Res. 7:39–49.
41. Levine AS, Feinholz CL. 2015. Participatory GIS to inform coral reef ecosystem management: mapping human coastal and ocean uses in Hawaii. Appl Geogr. 59:60–69.
42. McShane TO, Hirsch PD, Trung TC, Songorwa AN, Kinzig A, Monteferri B, Mutekanga D, Van Thang H, Dammert JL, Pulgar-Vidal M. 2011. Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biol Conserv. 144:966–972.
43. Milcu AI, Hanspach J, Abson D, Fischer J. 2013. Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol Soc. 18:44.
44. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington D.C. (USA): Island Press.
45. New Forest Park Authority (NFPA). 2007. Tourism and recreation: facts and Figures. Lyndhurst: NFP Authority.
46. New Forest Park Authority (NFPA). 2008. Landscape in The New Forest National Park. Lymington (UK): New Forest Park Authority.
47. New Forest Park Authority (NFPA). 2010. Management Plan 2010-2015. Lymington (UK): New Forest Park Authority.
48. Newton A. 2010. Biodiversity in the New Forest Newbury. Berkshire: Pisces Publications.
49. Newton AC, Hodder K, Cantarello E, Perrella L, Birch JC, Robins J, Douglas S, Moody C, Cordingley J. 2012. Cost– benefit analysis of ecological networks assessed through spatial analysis of ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol. 49:571–580.
50. Nicholson E, Mace GM, Armsworth PR, Atkinson G, Buckle S, Clements T, Ewers RM, Fa JE, Gardner TA, Gibbons J, et al. 2009. Priority research areas for ecosystem services in a changing world. J Appl Ecol. 46:1139–1144.
51. Niemi GJ, McDonald ME. 2004. Application of ecological indicators. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 35:89–111.
52. O’Connor A, Zerger A, Itami B. 2005. Geo-temporal tracking and analysis of tourist movement. Math Comput Simul. 69:135–150.
53. Orellana D, Bregt AK, Ligtenberg A, Wachowicz M. 2012. Exploring visitor movement patterns in natural recreational areas. Tourism Manag. 33:672–682.
54. Oteros-Rozas E, Martín-López B, Fagerholm N, Bieling C, Plieninger T. 2017. Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites. Ecol Indic. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.009
55. Pettersson R, Zillinger M. 2011. Time and space in event behaviour: tracking visitors by GPS. Tourism Geogr. 13:1–20.
56. Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C. 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy. 33:118–129.
57. Plieninger T, Ferranto S, Huntsinger L, Kelly M, Getz C. 2012. Appreciation, use, and management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in California’s working landscapes. Environ Manage. 50:427–440.
58. Qstarz. 2013. BT-Q1000XT specifications. Available from http://www.qstarz.com/Products/GPS%20Products/BT-Q1000XT-S.htm
59. Reed MS. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv. 141:2417–2431.
60. Rey Benayas JM, Newton AC, Diaz A, Bullock JM. 2009. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science. 325:1121–1124.
61. Riera P, Signorello G, Thiene M, Mahieu P-A, Navrud S, Kaval P, Rulleau B, Mavsar R, Madureira L, Meyerhoff J. 2012. Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: good practice guidelines. J For Econ. 18:259–270.
62. Scholte SS, Van Teeffelen AJ, Verburg PH. 2015. Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: a review of concepts and methods. Ecol Econ. 114:67–78.
63. Schroeder HW, Orland B. 1994. Viewer preference for spatial arrangement of park trees: an application of video-imaging technology. Environ Manage. 18:119–128.
64. Sen A, Darnell A, Crowe A, Bateman I, Munday P, Foden J 2011. Economic assessment of the recreational value of ecosystems in Great Britain. Report to the economics team of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment. East Anglia (UK).
65. Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S. 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J Appl Ecol. 48:630–636.
66. Sharp J, Lowen J, Liley D. 2008. Changing patterns of visitor numbers within the New Forest National Park, with particular reference to the New Forest SPA. Wareham (UK): FTaEC Ltd.
67. Sharp R, Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, Wood SA, Chaplin-Kramer R, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N, et al. 2015. InVEST 3.2.0 User’s Guide. CA (USA): Stanford.
68. Shoval N, Isaacson M. 2007. Sequence alignment as a method for human activity analysis in space and time. Ann Assoc Am Geographers. 97:282–297.
69. Small N, Munday M, Durance I. 2017. The challenge of valuing ecosystem services that have no material benefits. Glob Environ Change. 44:57–67.
70. Stålhammar S, Pedersen E. 2017. Recreational cultural ecosystem services: how do people describe the value? Ecosystem Serv. 26:1–9.
71. Tammi I, Mustajärvi K, Rasinmäki J. 2017. Integrating spatial valuation of ecosystem services into regional planning and development. Ecosystem Serv. 26:329–344.
72. Thomas SJ. 2004. Using web and paper questionnaires for data-based decision making: from design to interpretation of the results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
73. Tyrväinen L, Mäkinen K, Schipperijn J. 2007. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landsc Urban Plan. 79:5–19.
74. University of Edinburgh. 2015. Transformation to OSGB 36 and WGS 84 in ArcGIS. Available from http://digimap.edina.ac.uk/webhelp/digimapgis/projections_and_transformations/transformations_in_arcgis.htm
75. Willcock S, Camp BJ, Peh KS-H. 2017. A comparison of cultural ecosystem service survey methods within South England. Ecosystem Serv. 26:445–450.