An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 298-308

  Mouchet, Maud A ^a,d   Lamarque, Pénélope ^a,b   Martín López, Berta ^c   Crouzat, Emilie ^a   Gos, Pierre ^a   Byczek, Coline ^a   Lavorel, Sandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Bundle; Ecosystem services; Methodological framework; Synergy; Trade off assessment

Indexed keywords

DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY; DEMAND ANALYSIS; GUIDELINE; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; LAND MANAGEMENT; MACHINE LEARNING; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SYNERGISM; TRADE-OFF; VALUATION;

EID: 84918814568     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Anderson B.J., Armsworth P.R., Eigenbrod F., Thomas C.D., Gillings S., Heinemeyer A., Roy D.B., Gaston K.J. Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:888-896.
2. Bai Y., Zhuang C., Ouyang Z., Zheng H., Jiang B. Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed. Ecol. Complex. 2011, 8:177-183.
3. Balmford A., Bond W. Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:1218-1234.
4. Balvanera P., Pfisterer A.B., Buchmann N., He J.S., Nakashizuka T., Raffaelli D., Schmid B. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:1146-1156.
5. Balvanera P., Siddique I., Dee L., Paquette A., Isbell F., Gonzalez A., Byrnes J., O'Connor M.I., Hungate B.A., Griffin J.N. Linking biodiversity and ecosystem services: current uncertainties and the necessary next steps. BioScience 2014, 64:49-57.
6. Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Özdemiroglu E., Pearce D.W., Sugden R., Swanson J. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual 2002, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, USA.
7. Bennett E.M., Peterson G.D., Gordon L.J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:1394-1404.
8. Borcard D., Legendre P., Drapeau P. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 1992, 73:1045-1055.
9. Bryan B.A. Incentives, land use, and ecosystem services: synthesizing complex linkages. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 27:124-134.
10. Bryan B.A., Crossman N.D. Impact of multiple interacting financial incentives on land use a change and the supply of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4:60-72.
11. Bryan B.A., Grandgirard A., Ward J.R. Quantifying and exploring strategic regional priorities for managing natural capital and ecosystem services given multiple stakeholder perspectives. Ecosystems 2010, 13:539-555.
12. Bullock J.M., Aronson J., Newton A.C., Pywell R.F., Rey-Benayas J.M. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:541-549.
13. Burkhard B., Kroll F., Nedkov S., Müller F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets, Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:17-29.
14. Butler J.R.A., Wong G.Y., Metcalfe D.J., Honzák M., Pert P.L., Rao N., van Grieken M.E., Lawson T., Bruce C., Kroon F.J., Brodie J.E. An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 180(1):176-191.
15. Cardinale B.J. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 2012, 486:59.
16. Carpenter S.R., Mooney H.A., Agard J., Capistrano D., DeFries R.S., Díaz S., Dietz T., Duraiappah A.K., Oteng-Yeboah A., Pereira H.M., Perrings C., Reid W.V., Sarukhan J., Scholes R.J., Whyte A. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:1305-1312.
17. Carreno L., Frank F.C., Viglizzo E.F. Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 154:68-77.
18. Casalegno S., Inger R., DeSilvey C., Gaston K.J. Spatial covariance between aesthetic value and other ecosystem services. PLOS ONE 2013, 8(6):e68437.
19. Chan K.M.A., Shaw M.R., Cameron D.R., Underwood E.C., Daily G.C. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:2138-2152.
20. Cimon-Morin J., Darveau M., Poulin M. Fostering Synergies Between Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity in Conservation Planning: A Review Biological Conservation 2013, vol. 166:144-154.
21. de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:260-272.
22. DeFries R.S., Foley J.A., Asner G.P. Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2004, 2:249-257.
23. Díaz S., Fargione J., Chapin F.S., Tilman D. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4(8):e277.
24. Díaz S., Hector A., Wardle D.A. Biodiversity in forest carbon sequestration initiatives: not just a side benefit. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2009, 1:55-60.
25. Dormann C.F., Elith J., Bacher S., Buchmann C., Carl G., Carré G., Garcia Marquez J.R., Gruber B., Lafourcade B., Leitao P.J., Munkemuller T., McCLean C., Osborne P.E., Reineking B., Schroder B., Skidmore A.K., Zurell D., Lautenbach S. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 2013, 36:27-46.
26. Dutilleul P. Modifying the t-test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 1993, 49:305-314.
27. Egoh B., Reyers B., Rouget M., Richardson D.M., Le Maitre D.C., van Jaarsveld A.S. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 127:135-140.
28. Egoh B., Reyers B., Rouget M., Bode M., Richardson D.M. Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:553-562.
29. Eigenbrod F., Armsworth P.R., Anderson B.J., Heinemeyer A., Gillings S., Roy D.B., Thomas C.D., Gaston K. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47:377-385.
30. Fisher B., Edwards D.P., Larsen T.H., Ansell F.A., Hsu W.W., Roberts C.S., Wilcove D.S. Cost-effective conservation: calculating biodiversity and logging trade-offs in Southeast Asia. Conserv. Lett. 2011, 4:443-450.
31. Foley J.A., DeFries R., Asner G.P., Barford C., Bonan G., Carpenter S.R., Chapin F.S., Coe M.T., Daily G.C., Gibbs H.K., Helkowski J.H., Holloway T., Howard E.A., Kucharik C.J., Monfreda C., Patz J.A., Prentice I.C., Ramankutty N., Snyder P.K. Global consequences of land use. Science 2005, 309:570-574.
32. García-Llorente M., Martín-López B., Díaz S., Montes C. Can ecosystem properties be fully translated into service values? An economic valuation of aquatic plants services. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21:3083-3103.
33. García-Nieto A.P., García-Llorente M., Iniesta-Arandia I., Martín-López B. Mapping forest ecosystem services: from providing units to beneficiaries. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4:126-138.
34. Gilbert B., Bennett J.R. Partitioning variation in ecological communities: do the numbers add up?. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47:1071-1082.
35. Gimona A., van der Horst D. Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland. Landsc. Ecol. 2007, 22:1255-1264.
36. Gos P., Lavorel S. Stakeholders' expectations on ecosystem services affect the assessment of ecosystem services hotspots and their congruence with biodiversity, International Journal of Biodiversity Science. Ecosystem Services & Management 2012, 8(1-2):93-106.
37. Grace J.B. Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
38. Guillot G., Rousset F. Dismantling the Mantel tests. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2013, 4:336-344.
39. Haase D., Schwarz N., Strohbach M., Kroll F., Seppelt R. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle region, Germany. Ecol. Soc. 2012, 17(3):22.
40. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. Proposal for a Common International Classification of Ecosystem Goods and Services (CICES) for Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2010, European Environmental Agency, New York, USA.
41. Harrington R., Anton C., Dawson T.P., de Bello F., Feld C.K., Haslett J.R., Kluvánkova-Oravská T., Kontogianni A., Lavorel S., Luck G.W., Rounsevell M.D.A., Samways M.J., Settele J., Skourtos M., Spangenberg J.H., Vandewalle M., Zobel M., Harrison P.A. Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19(10):2773-2790.
42. Hein L., van Koppen K., de Groot R.S., van Ierland E.C. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 57:209-228.
43. Hicks C., Graham N., Cinner J. Synergies and tradeoffs in how managers, scientists, and fishers value coral reef ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 2013, 23(6):1444-1453.
44. Hicks C.C., McClanahan T.R., Cinner J.E., Hills J.M. Trade-offs in values assigned to ecological goods and services associated with different coral reef management strategies. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14(1):10.
45. Kienast F., Bolliger J., Potschin M., de Groot R.S., Verburg P.H., Heller I., Wascher D., Haines-Young R. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environ. Manag. 2009, 44:1099-1120.
46. Koch E.W., Barbier E.B., Silliman B.R., Reed D.J., Perillo G.M.E., Hacker S.D., Granek E.F., Primavera J.H., Muthiga N., Polasky S., Halpern B.S., Kennedy C.J., Kappel C.V., Wolanski E. Non-linearity in ecosystem services: temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:29-37.
47. Kohonen T. The self-organizing map. Proc. IEEE 1990, 78:1464-1480.
48. Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:468-479.
49. Kroll F., Muller F., Haase D., Fohrer N. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:521-535.
50. Lamarque P., Lavorel S., Mouchet M.A., Quétier F. Plant trait-based models identify direct and indirect effects of climate change on bundles of grassland ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, in press.
51. Landuyt D., Broekx S., D'hondt R., Engelen G., Aertsens J., Goethals P.L.M. A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 46:1-11.
52. Lautenbach S., Kugel C., Lausch A., Seppelt R. Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11:676-687.
53. Lautenbach S., Volk M., Strauch M., Whittaker G., Seppelt R. Optimization-based trade-off analysis of biodiesel crop production for managing an agricultural catchment. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 48:98-112.
54. Lavorel S., Grigulis K. How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale-up to trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 2012, 100:128-140.
55. Lavorel S., Grigulis K., Lamarque P., Colace M.P., Garden D., Girel J., Pellet G., Douzet R. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 2011, 99:135-147.
56. Leathwick J.R., Elith J., Francis M.P., Hastie T., Taylor P. Variation in demersal fish species richness in the oceans surrounding New Zealand: an analysis using boosted regression trees. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2006, 321:267-281.
57. Legendre P., Fortin M.J. Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10:831-844.
58. Legendre P., Legendre L. Numerical Ecology 1998, Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam. 2nd English ed.
59. Luck G.W., Daily G.C., Ehrlich P.R. Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18:331-336.
60. Maass J., Balvanera P., Castillo A., Daily G.C., Mooney H.A., Ehrlich P., Quesada M., Miranda A., Jaramillo V.J., García-Oliva F., Martínez-Yrizar A., Cotler H., López-Blanco J., Pérez-Jiménez A., Búrquez A., Tinoco C., Ceballos G., Barraza L., Ayala R., Sarukhán R. Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecol. Soc. 2005, 10(1):17.
61. Mace G.M., Norris K., Fitter A.H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:19-26.
62. Maes J., Paracchini M.L., Zulian G., Dunbar M.B., Alkemade R. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 155:1-12.
63. Maestre Andrés S., Calvet Mir L., van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Ring I., Verburg P.H. Ineffective biodiversity policy due to five rebound effects. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:101-110.
64. Martín-López B., García-Llorente M., Palomo I., Montes C. The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social-ecological system (southwestern Spain). Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70:1481-1491.
65. Martín-López B., Iniesta-Arandia I., Garcia-Llorente M., Palomo I., Casado-Arzuaga I., Del Amo D.G., Gomez-Baggethun E., Oteros-Rozas E., Palacios-Agundez I., Willaarts B., Gonzalez J.A., Santos-Martin F., Onaindia M., Lopez-Santiago C., Montes C. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLOS ONE 2012, 7(6):e38970.
66. MA Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis 2005, Island Press.
67. Naidoo R., Balmford A., Costanza R., Fisher B., Green R.E., Lehner B., Malcolm T.R., Ricketts T.H. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:9495-9500.
68. Nelson E.J., Daily G.C. Modelling ecosystem services in terrestrial systems. Biol. Rep. 2010, 2:53.
69. Nelson E., Mendoza G., Regetz J., Polasky S., Tallis H., Cameron D.R., Chan K.M.A., Daily G.C., Goldstein J., Kareiva P.M., Lonsdorf E., Naidoo R., Ricketts T.H., Shaw M.R. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:4-11.
70. Nicholson E., Mace G.M., Armsworth P.R., Atkinson G., Buckle S., Clements T., Ewers R.M., Fa J.E., Gardner T.A., Gibbons J., Grenyer R., Metcalfe R., Mourato S., Muuls M., Osborn D., Reuman D.C., Watson C., Milner-Gulland E.J. Priority research areas for ecosystem services in a changing world. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:1139-1144.
71. O'Farrell P.J., Reyers B., Le Maitre D.C., Milton S.J., Egoh B., Maherry A., Colvin C., Atkinson D., De Lange W., Blignaut J.N., Cowling R.M. Multi-functional landscapes in semi-arid environments: implications for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 2010, 25:1231-1246.
72. Perrings C., Duraiappah A., Larigauderie A., Mooney H. The biodiversity and ecosystem services science-policy interface. Science 2011, 331:1139-1140.
73. Plieninger T., Dijks S., Oteros-Rozas E., Bieling C. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 2013, 33:118-129.
74. Power A.G. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 365:2959-2971.
75. Raudsepp-Hearne C., Peterson G.D., Bennett E.M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:5242-5247.
76. Rodriguez J.P., Beard T.D., Bennett E.M., Cumming G.S., Cork S.J., Agard J., Dobson A.P., Peterson G.D. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11(1):28.
77. Santos-Martín F., Martín-López B., García-Llorente M., Aguado M., Benayas J., Montes C. Unraveling the relationships between ecosystems and human wellbeing in Spain. PLOS ONE 2013, 8(9):e73249.
78. Schwenk W.S., Donovan T.M., Keeton W.S., Nunery J.S. Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecol. Appl. 2012, 22:1612-1627.
79. Scholes R.J., Reyers B., Biggs R., Spierenburg M.J., Duriappah A. Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social-ecological systems and their ecosystem services. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2013, 5:1-10.
80. Seppelt R., Dormann C.F., Eppink F.V., Lautenbach S., Schmidt S. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:630-636.
81. Seppelt R., Lautenbach S., Volk M. Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: a plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2013, 5:458-463.
82. Schröter M., Barton D.N., Remme R.P., Hein L. Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: a conceptual model and a case study for Telemark Norway. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 36:539-551.
83. Smart S., Dunbar M.J., Emmett B.A., Marks S., Maskell L.C., Norton L.R., Rose P., Simpson I.C. An Integrated Assessment of Countryside Survey Data to Investigate Ecosystem Services in Great Britain, Technical Report No. 10/07 NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology 2010, 230. (CEH Project Number: C03259).
84. Steffan-Dewenter I., Kessler M., Barkmann J., Bos M.M., Buchori D., Erasmi S., Faust H., Gerold G., Glenk K., Gradstein S.R., Guhardja E., Harteveld M., Hertel D., Hohn P., Kappas M., Kohler S., Leuschner C., Maertens M., Marggraf R., Migge-Kleian S., Mogea J., Pitopang R., Schaefer M., Schwarze S., Sporn S.G., Steingrebe A., Tjitrosoedirdjo S.S., Tjitrosoemito S., Twele A., Weber R., Woltmann L., Zeller M., Tscharntke T. Tradeoffs between income, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning during tropical rainforest conversion and agroforestry intensification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:4973-4978.
85. Swallow B.M., Sang J.K., Nyabenge M., Bundotich D.K., Duraiappah A.K., Yatich T.B. Tradeoffs, synergies and traps among ecosystem services in the Lake Victoria basin of East Africa. Environ. Sci. Policy 2009, 12:504-519.
86. TEEB The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Edited by Pushpam Kumar 2010, Earthscan, London and Washington.
87. Ticehurst J.L., Newham L.T.H., Rissik D., Letcher R.A., Jakeman A.J. A Bayesian network approach for assessing the sustainability of coastal lakes in New South Wales, Australia. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22:1129-1139.
88. Viglizzo E.F., Frank F.C. Land-use options for Del Plata Basin in South America: tradeoffs analysis based on ecosystem service provision. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 57:140-151.
89. Vihervaara P., Kumpula T., Tanskanen A., Burkhard B. Ecosystem services - a tool for sustainable management of human-environment systems. Case study Finnish Forest Lapland. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:410-420.
90. Villamagna A.M., Angermeier P.M., Bennett E.M. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol. Complex. 2013, 15:114-121.
91. Wardle D.A., Bardgett R.D., Klironomos J.N., Setala H., van der Putten W.H., Wall D.H. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 2004, 304:1629-1633.
92. White C., Halpern B.S., Kappel C.V. Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109:4696-4701.
93. Willemen L., Hein L., van Mensvoort M.E.F., Verburg P. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecol. Indic. 2010, 10:62-73.
94. Willemen L., Veldkamp A., Verburg P.H., Hein L., Leemans R. A multi-scale modelling approach for analysing landscape service dynamics. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 100:86-95.