Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 29, Issue , 2018, Pages 552-565

  Dick, Jan ^a   Turkelboom, Francis ^b   Woods, Helen ^a   Iniesta Arandia, Irene ^c   Primmer, Eeva ^d   Saarela, Sanna Riikka ^d   Bezák, Peter ^e   Mederly, Peter ^f   Leone, Michael ^b   Verheyden, Wim ^b   Kelemen, Eszter ^g,h   Hauck, Jennifer ^i,j   Andrews, Chris ^a   Antunes, Paula ^k   Aszalós, Réka ^l   Baró, Francesc ^m   Barton, David N ⁿ   Berry, Pam ^o   Bugter, Rob ^p   Carvalho, Laurence ^a   Czúcz, Bálint ^l,q   Dunford, Rob ^a,o   Garcia Blanco, Gemma ^r   Geamănă, Nicoleta ^s   Giucă, Relu ^s   Grizzetti, Bruna ^t   Izakovičová, Zita ^e   Kertész, Miklós ^l   Kopperoinen, Leena ^d   Langemeyer, Johannes ^m   Montenegro Lapola, David ^u   Liquete, Camino ^t   Luque, Sandra ^v   Martínez Pastur, Guillermo ^w   Martin Lopez, Berta ^x   Mukhopadhyay, Raktima ^y   Niemela, Jari ^z   Odee, David ^aa   Peri, Pablo Luis ^ab,ac,ad   Pinho, Patricia ^ae   Patrício Roberto, Gleiciani Bürger ^u   Preda, Elena ^s   Priess, Joerg ⁱ   Röckmann, Christine ^p   Santos, Rui ^k   Silaghi, Diana ^af   Smith, Ron ^a   Vădineanu, Angheluţă ^s   van der Wal, Jan Tjalling ^p   Arany, Ildikó ^l   Badea, Ovidiu ^af   Bela, Györgyi ^g,ag   Boros, Emil ^l   Bucur, Magdalena ^s   Blumentrath, Stefan ⁿ   Calvache, Marta ^k   Carmen, Esther ^a   Clemente, Pedro ^k   Fernandes, João ^k   Ferraz, Diogo ^k   Fongar, Claudia ^ah   García Llorente, Marina ^c,ai   Gómez Baggethun, Erik ^m,n,ah   Gundersen, Vegard ⁿ   Haavardsholm, Oscar ^aj   Kalóczkai, Ágnes ^l   Khalalwe, Thalma ^aa   Kiss, Gabriella ^h   Köhler, Berit ⁿ   Lazányi, Orsolya ^g,h   Lellei Kovács, Eszter ^l   Lichungu, Rael ^aa   Lindhjem, Henrik ^aj   Magare, Charles ^aa   Mustajoki, Jyri ^d   Ndege, Charles ^aa   Nowell, Megan ⁿ   Nuss Girona, Sergi ^ak   Ochieng, John ^aa   Often, Anders ⁿ   Palomo, Ignacio ^al   Pataki, György ^g,h   Reinvang, Rasmus ^aj   Rusch, Graciela ⁿ   Saarikoski, Heli ^d   Smith, Alison ^o   Soy Massoni, Emma ^ak   Stange, Erik ⁿ   Vågnes Traaholt, Nora ^am   Vári, Ágnes ^l   Verweij, Peter ^p   Vikström, Suvi ^d   Yli Pelkonen, Vesa ^z   Zulian, Grazia ^t   more..

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^e INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

^f The Philosopher University in Nitra Geoinformatics and Regional Development   (Slovakia)

^g Environmental Social Science Research Group (ESSRG)   (Hungary)

^h Institute of Entrepreneurship and Innovation   (Hungary)

ⁱ HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^j CoKnow Consulting – Coproducing Knowledge for Sustainability ^*  (Germany)

^k UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^l INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY AND BOTANY   (Hungary)

^m INSTITUT DE CIÈNCIA I TECNOLOGIA AMBIENTALS   (Spain)

ⁿ NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^o UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^p WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^q MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^r Parque Tecnologico de Bizkaia   (Spain)

^s UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST   (Romania)

^t JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^u SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^v UMR TETIS   (France)

^w CENTRO AUSTRAL DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTÍFICAS CADIC CONICET   (Argentina)

^x LEUPHANA UNIVERSITY OF LÜNEBURG   (Germany)

^y Indian Institute of Bio Social Research and Development   (India)

^z UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^aa KENYA FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Kenya)

^ab INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGÍA AGROPECUARIA INTA   (Argentina)

^ac UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PATAGONIA AUSTRAL   (Argentina)

^ad Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^ae UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^af Institutul de Cercetari si Amenajari Silvice Romania   (Romania)

^ag SZENT ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^ah NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^ai Madrid Institute for Rural   (Spain)

^aj Vista Analyse and Business School   (Norway)

^ak UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

^al BASQUE CENTRE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE BC3   (Spain)

^am De Økonomiske Råd   (Denmark)

more..

Author keywords

Ecosystem services operationalisation; Evaluation; Place based implementation; Stakeholder perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 85031403911     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Baró, F., Chaparro, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Langemeyer, J., Nowak, D., Terradas, J., Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate change mitigation policies: the case of urban forests in Barcelona, Spain. Ambio 43:4 (2014), 466–479, 10.1007/s13280-014-0507-x.
2. Baró, F., Palomo, I., Zulian, G., Vizcaino, P., Haase, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy 57 (2016), 405–417, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006.
3. Barton, D.N., Kelemen, A., Braat, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Jacobs, S., Martín-López, B., Saarikoski, H., Termansen, M., Bela, G., Demeyer, R., García-Llorente, M., Hauck, J., Keune, H., Luque, S., Palomo, I., Pataki, G., Potschin, M., Schleyer, C., Tenerilli, P., Turkelboom, F., 2018. Dis) integrated valuation – assessing the information gaps in ecosystem service appraisals for governance support. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 529–541.
4. Bezák, P., Mederly, P., Izakovičová, Z., Špulerová, J., Schleyer, Ch., Divergence and conflicts in landscape planning across spatial scales in Slovakia: opportunity for an ecosystem services approach?. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manage. 13 (2017), 119–135, 10.1080/21513732.2017.1305992.
5. Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., Hua, X., Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature 534 (2016), 684–687, 10.1038/nature18315.
6. Cairngorms National Park Authority. 2012. Cairngorms National Park Partnership Plan 2012-2017. Available at: http://www.cairngorms.co.uk/resource/docs/publications/21062012/CNPA.Paper.1827.Cairngorms%20National%20Park%20Partnership%20Plan%202012-2017.pdf.
7. Carberry, P.S., Hochman, Z., McCown, R.L., Dalgliesh, N.P., Foale, M.A., Poulton, P.L., Hargreaves, J.N.G., Hargreaves, D.M.G., Cawthray, S., Hillcoat, N., Robertson, M.J., The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: farmers', advisers', researchers' monitoring, simulation, communication and performance evaluation. Agr. Syst. 74 (2002), 141–177, 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00025-2.
8. Carmen, E., Watt, A., Carvalho, L., Young, J., 2018. Knowledge needs for the operationalisation of the concept of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 441–451.
9. Carpenter, S.R., Folke, C., Norström, A., Olsson, O., Schultz, L., Agarwal, B., Balvanera, P., Campbell, B., Castilla, J.C., Cramer, W., DeFries, R., Eyzaguirre, P., Hughes, T.P., Polasky, S., Sanusi, Z., Scholes, R., Spierenburg, M., Program on ecosystem change and society: an international research strategy for integrated social–ecological systems. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 4 (2012), 134–138, 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.001.
10. Clemente, P., Calvache, M., Antunes, P., Santos, R., 2015. Mapping stakeholders’ perceptions on ecosystem services provision within Sudoeste Alentejano and Costa Vicentina Natural Park. VIII Congresso sobre Planeamento e Gestão das Zonas Costeiras dos Países de Expressão Portuguesa, Associação Portuguesa dos Recursos Hídricos, Aveiro.
11. Crutzen, P.J., Geology of mankind. Nature, 415, 2002, 10.1038/415023a 23-23.
12. Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J.R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., Bartuska, A., Baste, I.A., Bilgin, A., Brondizio, E., Chan, K.M.A., Figueroa, V.E., Duraiappah, A., Fischer, M., Hill, R., Koetz, T., Leadley, P., Lyver, P., Mace, G.M., Martin-Lopez, B., Okumura, M., Pacheco, D., Pascual, U., Pérez, E.S., Reyers, B., Roth, E., Saito, O., Scholes, R.J., Sharma, N., Tallis, H., Thaman, R., Watson, R., Yahara, T., Hamid, Z.A., Akosim, C., Al-Hafedh, Y., Allahverdiyev, R., Amankwah, E., Asah, S.T., Asfaw, Z., Bartus, G., Brooks, L.A., Caillaux, J., Dalle, G., Darnaedi, D., Driver, A., Erpul, G., Escobar-Eyzaguirre, P., Failler, P., Fouda, A.M.M., Fu, B., Gundimeda, H., Hashimoto, S., Homer, F., Lavorel, S., Lichtenstein, G., Mala, W.A., Mandivenyi, W., Matczak, P., Mbizvo, C., Mehrdadi, M., Metzger, J.P., Mikissa, J.B., Moller, H., Mooney, H.A., Mumby, P., Nagendra, H., Nesshover, C., Oteng-Yeboah, A.A., Pataki, G., Roué, M., Rubis, J., Schultz, M., Smith, P., Sumaila, R., Takeuchi, K., Thomas, S., Verma, M., Yeo-Chang, Y., Zlatanova, D., The IPBES Conceptual Framework connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 14 (2015), 1–16, 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002.
13. Dick, J., Andrews, C., Beaumont, D.A., Benham, S., Dodd, N., Pallett, D., Rose, R., Scott, T., Smith, R., Schäfer, S.M., Turner, A., Watson, H., Analysis of temporal change in delivery of ecosystem services over 20 years at long term monitoring sites of the UK Environmental Change Network. Ecol. Indic 68 (2016), 115–125, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.021.
14. Dick, J., Verweij, P., Carmen, E., Rodela, R., Andrews, C., Testing the ecosystem service cascade framework and QUICKScan software tool in the context of land use planning in Glenlivet Estate Scotland. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manage. 13 (2017), 12–25, 10.1080/21513732.2016.1268648.
15. Dunford, R., et al., 2018. Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 499–514.
16. EU FP7 OpenNESS Project. Wijnja, H., van Uden, G., Delbaere, B. (Eds.) 2016. Ecosystem services in operation: case studies. European Commission FP7. Available at: https://issuu.com/ecnc.org/docs/openness_casestudies_brochure.
17. Fey, S., Bregendahl, C., Flora, C., The measurement of community capitals through research. OJRRP, 1(1), 2006, 10.4148/ojrrp.v1i1.29.
18. Fürst, C., Opdam, P., Inostroza, L., Luque, S., Evaluating the role of ecosystem services in participatory land use planning: proposing a balanced score card. Landsc. Ecol. 29 (2014), 1435–1446, 10.1007/s10980-014-0052-9.
19. García-Llorente, M., Harrison, P.A., Berry, P., Palomo, I., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Iniesta-Arandia, I., Montes, C., García del Amo, D., Martín-López, B., What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach? Insights from ecosystem assessments in two Spanish protected areas. Biodivers. Conserv., 1–23, 2016, 10.1007/s10531-016-1152-4.
20. García-Nieto, A.P., Quintas-Soriano, C., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Montes, C., Martín-López, B., Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: the role of stakeholders’ profiles. Ecosyst. Serv. 13 (2015), 141–152, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.006.
21. Gieryn, T.F., Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48 (1983), 781–795, 10.2307/2095325.
22. Gieryn, T.F., Boundaries of science. Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Petersen, J.C., Pinch, T., (eds.) Handbook of science and technology studies, 1995, Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, 393–443.
23. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Kelemen, E., Martín-López, B., Palomo, I., Montes, C., Scale misfit in ecosystem service governance as a source of environmental conflict. Soc. Nat. Resour. 26 (2013), 1202–1216, 10.1080/08941920.2013.820817.
24. Gonzalez-Redin, J., Luque, S., Poggio, L., Smith, R., Gimona, A., Spatial Bayesian belief networks as a planning decision tool for mapping ecosystem services trade-offs on forested landscapes. Environ. Res. 144:Part B (2016), 15–26, 10.1016/j.envres.2015.11.009.
25. Grizzetti, B., Liquete, C., Antunes, P., Carvalho, L., Geamănă, N., Giucă, R., Leone, M., McConnell, S., Preda, E., Santos, R., Turkelboom, F., Vădineanu, A., Woods, H., Ecosystem services for water policy: insights across Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 66 (2016), 179–190, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.006.
26. Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynaud, A., Cardoso, A.C., Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environ. Sci. Policy 61 (2016), 194–203, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008.
27. Guston, D.H., Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 26 (2001), 399–408, 10.1177/016224390102600401.
28. Haase, D., Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., Artmann, M., Borgström, S., Breuste, J., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Hamstead, Z., Hansen, R., Kabisch, N., Kremer, P., Langemeyer, J., Rall, E.L., McPhearson, T., Pauleit, S., Qureshi, S., Schwarz, N., Voigt, A., Wurster, D., Elmqvist, T., A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 43 (2014), 413–433, 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0.
29. Haberl, H., Winiwarter, V., Andersson, K., Ayres, R.U., Boone, C., Castillo, A., Cunfer, G., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Freudenburg, W.R., Furman, E., Kaufmann, R., Krausmann, F., Langthaler, E., Lotze-Campen, H., Mirtl, M., Redman, C.L., Reenberg, A., Wardell, A., Warr, B., Zechmeister, H., From LTER to LTSER: conceptualizing the socioeconomic dimension of long-term socioecological research. Ecol. Soc., 11, 2006, 13 Available via: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art13/.
30. Harrison, P., et al. 2018. Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 481–498.
31. Hauck, J., Potschin, M., Saarela, S.-R., Carmen, E., Dick, J., Martín-López, B., Kelemen, E., Keune, H., 2015. Ecosystem services and transdisciplinarity. In: Potschin, M., Jax, K. (Eds.) OpenNESS Ecosystem Service Reference Book. EC FP7 Grant Agreement no. 308428. Available via: www.openness-project.eu/library/reference-book.
32. Hendriks, K., Braat, L., Deerenberg, C., van Egmond, P., Gaaff, A., van der Heide, M., Jongbloed, R., Klok, C., Leneman, H., Melman, D., Ruijs, A., Tamis, J., 2014. TEEB voor gebieden; Hoofdstudie. Wageningen, Alterra Wageningen UR (University & Research centre), Alterra-rapport 2489. 166 blz.; 30 fig.; 32 tab.; 114 ref. http://www.wur.nl/nl/Publicatie-details.htm?publicationId=publication-way-343531373537.
33. Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J.T., Bruun, H., Hukkinen, J., Analyzing interdisciplinarity: typology and indicators. Res. Policy 39 (2010), 79–88, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011.
34. Jahn, T., Bergmann, M., Keil, F., Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol. Econ. 79 (2012), 1–10, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017.
35. Jax, K., Barton, D.N., Chan, K.M.A., de Groot, R., Doyle, U., Eser, U., Görg, C., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Griewald, Y., Haber, W., Haines-Young, R., Heink, U., Jahn, T., Joosten, H., Kerschbaumer, L., Korn, H., Luck, G.W., Matzdorf, B., Muraca, B., Neßhöver, C., Norton, B., Ott, K., Potschin, M., Rauschmayer, F., von Haaren, C., Wichmann, S., Ecosystem services and ethics. Ecol. Econ. 93 (2013), 260–268, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.008.
36. Jax et al., 2018. Handling a messy world: Lessons learned when trying to make the ecosystem services concept operational. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 415–427.
37. Kelemen, E., Nguyen, G., Gomiero, T., Kovács, E., Choisis, J.-P., Choisis, N., Paoletti, M.G., Podmaniczky, L., Ryschawy, J., Sarthou, J.-P., Herzog, F., Dennis, P., Balázs, K., Farmers’ perceptions of biodiversity: lessons from a discourse-based deliberative valuation study. Land Use Policy 35 (2013), 318–328, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.005.
38. Kelemen, E., Lazányi, O., Arany, I., Aszalós, R., Bela, G., Czúcz, B., Kalóczkai, Á., Kertész, M., Megyesi, B., Gy, P., Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services provided by the Kiskunság sand ridge region. Természetvédelmi Közlemények 21 (2015), 116–129.
39. Khagram, S., Nicholas, K.A., Bever, D.M., Warren, J., Richards, E.H., Oleson, K., Kitzes, J., Katz, R., Hwang, R., Goldman, R., Funk, J., Brauman, K.A., Thinking about knowing: conceptual foundations for interdisciplinary environmental research. Environ. Conserv. 37 (2010), 388–397, 10.1017/s0376892910000809.
40. Kloppenburg, J., Social theory and the de/reconstruction of agricultural science: local knowledge for an alternative agriculture1. Rural Sociol. 56 (1991), 519–548, 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1991.tb00445.x.
41. Kopperoinen, L., Stange, E., Rusch, G., Baró, F., Garcia Blanco, G., Mederly, P., 2015. Integrating nature-based solutions in urban planning [online]. OpenNESS policy brief No. 3. Available via: http://www.openness-project.eu/sites/default/files/OpenNESS_brief_03.pdf.
42. Kovács, E., Kelemen, E., Kalóczkai, Á., Margóczi, K., Pataki, G., Gébert, J., Málovics, G., Balázs, B., Roboz, Á., Krasznai Kovács, E., Mihók, B., Understanding the links between ecosystem service trade-offs and conflicts in protected areas. Ecosyst. Serv. 12 (2015), 117–127, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.012.
43. Kuhn, T.S., 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions fourth ed. 2012. University of Chicago press.
44. Lakatos, I., Falsification and the methodology of scientific research. Lakatos, I., Musgrave, A., (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, 1970, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 91–138.
45. Lang, D.J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., Thomas, C.J., Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain. Sci. 7 (2012), 25–43, 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
46. Langemeyer, J., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Haase, D., Scheuer, S., Elmqvist, T., Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Environ. Sci. Policy 62 (2016), 45–56, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013.
47. Laurans, Y., Rankovic, A., Billé, R., Pirard, R., Mermet, L., Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot. J. Environ. Manage. 119 (2013), 208–219, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.008.
48. Liquete, C., Kleeschulte, S., Dige, G., Maes, J., Grizzetti, B., Olah, B., Zulian, G., Mapping green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: a Pan-European case study. Environ. Sci. Policy 54 (2015), 268–280, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.009.
49. Liquete, C., Cid, N., Lanzanova, D., Grizzetti, B., Reynaud, A., Perspectives on the link between ecosystem services and biodiversity: the assessment of the nursery function. Ecol. Indic. 63 (2016), 249–257, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.058.
50. Liquete, C., Piroddi, C., Macías, D., Druon, J.-N., Zulian, G., Ecosystem services sustainability in the Mediterranean Sea: assessment of status and trends using multiple modelling approaches. Sci. Rep., 6, 2016, 34162, 10.1038/srep34162.
51. Liquete, C., Udias, A., Conte, G., Grizzetti, B., Masi, F., Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits. Ecosyst. Serv. 22 (2016), 392–401, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.011.
52. Lyall, C., Meagher, L., Bruce, A., A rose by any other name? Transdisciplinarity in the context of UK research policy. Futures 65 (2015), 150–162, 10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.009.
53. Maass, M., Balvanera, P., Bourgeron, P., Equihua, M., Baudry, J., Dick, J., Forsius, M., Halada, L., Krauze, K., Nakaoka, M., Orenstein, D.E., Parr, T.W., Redman, C.L., Rozzi, R., Santos-Reis, M., Swemmer, A.M., Vădineanu, A., Changes in biodiversity and trade-offs among ecosystem services, stakeholders, and components of well-being: the contribution of the International LongTerm Ecological Research network (ILTER) to Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS). Ecol. Soc., 21(3), 2016, 31, 10.5751/ES-08587-210331.
54. Maes, J., Zulian, G., Thijssen, M., Castell, C., Baró, F., Ferreira, A.M., Melo, J., Garrett, C.P., David, N., Alzetta, C., Geneletti, D., Cortinovis, C., Zwierzchowska, I., Alves, F.L., Cruz, C.S., Blasi, C., Ortí, M.M.A., Attorre, F., Azzella, M.M., Capotorti, G., Copiz, R., Fusaro, L., Manes, F., Marando, F., Marchetti, M., Mollo, B., Salvatori, E., Zavattero, L., Zingari, P.C., Giarratano, M.C., Bianchi, E., Duprè, E., Barton, D., Stange, E., Perez-Soba, M., Eupen, M.v., verweij, P., Vries, A.d., Kruse, H., Polce, C., Cugny-Seguin, M., Erhard, M., Nicolau, R., Fonseca, A., Fritz, M., Teller, A., 2016. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services. Urban Ecosystems. 4th Report Final. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. doi: 10.2779/625242.
55. Martínez Pastur, G., Peri, P.L., Lencinas, M.V., García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia. Landsc. Ecol. 31 (2016), 383–399, 10.1007/s10980-015-0254-9.
56. Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Amo, D.G.D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Oteros-Rozas, E., Palacios-Agundez, I., Willaarts, B., González, J.A., Santos-Martín, F., Onaindia, M., López-Santiago, C., Montes, C., Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE, 7, 2012, e38970, 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970.
57. Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., García-Llorente, M., Montes, C., Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol. Indic. 37:Part A (2014), 220–228, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003.
58. Martinez-Harms, M.J., Bryan, B.A., Balvanera, P., Law, E.A., Rhodes, J.R., Possingham, H.P., Wilson, K.A., Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biol. Conserv. 184 (2015), 229–238, 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024.
59. Massey, C., Alpass, F., Flett, R., Lewis, K., Morriss, S., Sligo, F., Crossing fields: the case of a multi-disciplinary research team. Qual. Res. 6 (2006), 131–147, 10.1177/1468794106062706.
60. McCown, R.L., Parton, K.A., Learning from the historical failure of farm management models to aid management practice. Part 2. Three systems approaches. Aust. J. Agric Res. 57:2 (2006), 157–172, 10.1071/AR05052.
61. McKenzie, E., Posner, S., Tillmann, P., Bernhardt, J.R., Howard, K., Rosenthal, A., Understanding the use of ecosystem service knowledge in decision making: lessons from international experiences of spatial planning. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Pract. 32 (2014), 320–340, 10.1068/c12292j.
62. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
63. Nelson, R.A., Holzworth, D.P., Hammer, G.L., Hayman, P.T., Infusing the use of seasonal climate forecasting into crop management practice in North East Australia using discussion support software. Agric. Syst. 74 (2002), 393–414, 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00047-1.
64. Nesshöver, C., Vandewalle, M., Wittmer, H., Balian, E.V., Carmen, E., Geijzendorffer, I.R., Görg, C., Jongman, R., Livoreil, B., Santamaria, L., Schindler, S., Settele, J., Sousa Pinto, I., Török, K., van Dijk, J., Watt, A.D., Young, J.C., Zulka, K.P., The Network of Knowledge approach: improving the science and society dialogue on biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe. Biodivers. Conserv. 25 (2016), 1215–1233, 10.1007/s10531-016-1127-5.
65. Obst, C., Hein, L., Edens, B., National accounting and the valuation of ecosystem assets and their services. Environ. Resour. Econ. 64 (2016), 1–23, 10.1007/s10640-015-9921-1.
66. Palomo, I., Martín-López, B., Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Montes, C., National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosyst. Serv. 4 (2013), 104–116, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001.
67. Palomo, I., Martín-López, B., Alcorlo, P., Montes, C., Limitations of protected areas zoning in mediterranean cultural landscapes under the ecosystem services approach. Ecosystems 17 (2014), 1202–1215, 10.1007/s10021-014-9788-y.
68. Posner, S., Getz, C., Ricketts, T., Evaluating the impact of ecosystem service assessments on decision-makers. Environ. Sci. Policy 64 (2016), 30–37, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.003.
69. Potschin et al., 2018. Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: Reading the ecosystem service cascade. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 428–440.
70. Priess, J.A. et al., 2018. New EU-scale environmental scenarios until 2050 – Scenario process and initial scenario applications. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 542–551.
71. Primmer, E., Jokinen, P., Blicharska, M., Barton, D.N., Bugter, R., Potschin, M., Governance of Ecosystem Services: a framework for empirical analysis. Ecosyst. Serv. 16 (2015), 158–166, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.002.
72. Röckmann, C., van Leeuwen, J., Goldsborough, D., Kraan, M., Piet, G., The interaction triangle as a tool for understanding stakeholder interactions in marine ecosystem based management. Mar. Policy 52 (2015), 155–162, 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.10.019.
73. Saarela, S.-R., Rinne, J., Knowledge brokering and boundary work for ecosystem service indicators. An urban case study in Finland. Ecol. Indic. Part 61:Part 1 (2016), 49–62, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.016.
74. Saarikoski et al., 2018. Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 579–598.
75. Smith, R., et al., 2018. Operationalising ecosystem service assessment in Bayesian Belief Networks: Experiences within the OpenNESS project. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 452–464.
76. Tomintoul and Glenlivet Landscape Partnership 2016. Landscape conservation action plan. Grant application to UK National Heritage Lottery Fund 54pp.
77. Tenerelli, P., Demšar, U., Luque, S., Crowdsourcing indicators for cultural ecosystem services: a geographically weighted approach for mountain landscapes. Ecol. Indic. 64 (2016), 237–248, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.12.042.
78. Tenerelli, P., Püffel, C., Luque, S., Spatial assessment of aesthetic services in a complex mountain region: combining visual landscape properties with crowdsourced geographic information. Landscape Ecol., 2017, 10.1007/s10980-017-0498-7.
79. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), Biodiversity, ecosystems and ecosystem services. Kumar, P., (eds.) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundation, 2010, UNEP/Earthscan, London and Washington, 41–112.
80. Turkelboom et al., 2018. When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 566–578.
81. Verweij, P., Simoes, M., Alves, A., Ferraz, R., Cormont, A., 2014. Linking Bayesian Belief Networks and GIS to assess the Ecosystem Integrity in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), 7th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software; 2014. v. 2, p. 864–871.
82. VSN International, GenStat for Windows. 16th ed., 2013, VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK Available via: http://www.vsni.co.uk/software/genstat/.
83. Waylen, K.A., Young, J., Expectations and experiences of diverse forms of knowledge use: the case of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Pract. 32 (2014), 229–246, 10.1068/c1327j.
84. Zulian, G., 2018. Practical application of spatial ecosystem service models to aid decision support. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 465–480.