A tiered approach for mapping ecosystem services

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 13, Issue , 2015, Pages 16-27

  Grêt Regamey, Adrienne ^a   Weibel, Bettina ^a   Kienast, Felix ^b   Rabe, Sven Erik ^a   Zulian, Grazia ^c  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

^c JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Decision making; Ecosystem services assessment; Policy questions; Recreational services; Tiered approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930669977     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Anderson B.J., Armsworth P.R., Eigenbrod F., et al. Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46(4):888-896.
2. Bagstad, K.J., Villa, F. Johnson, G.W. et al. 2011. ARIES-Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services: A Guide to Models and Data, Version 1.0. ARIES Report Series, 1.
3. Beeco J.A., Hallo J.C., Brownlee M.T.J. GPS visitor tracking and recreation suitability mapping: tools for understanding and managing visitor use. Landscape Urban Plann. 2014, 127:136-145.
4. Bennett E.M., Peterson G.D., Gordon L.J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:1394-1404.
5. van Berkel D.B., Verburg P.H. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 37:163-174.
6. Beverly J.L., Uto K., Wilkes J., et al. Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: an internet-based participatory mapping approach. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38:289-303.
7. Brown G. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: methods and applications. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2004, 18:1.
8. Bryan B.A., Raymond C.M., Crossman N.D. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how?. Landscape Urban Plann. 2010, 97(2):111-122.
9. Buchecker M., Kienast F., Degenhardt B., et al. Naherholung räumlich erfassen. Merbl. Prax. 2013, 51. (WSL).
10. Burkhard B., Kroll F., Müller F., et al. Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services - a concept of land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online 2009, 15:1-22.
11. Capistrano D., Samper C.K., Lee.M.J., Raudsepp-Hearne C. Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Multiscale Assessments 2005, 2005:388. Island Press, Washington, DC.
12. Carpenter S.R., Mooney H.A., Agard J., et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. PNAS 2009, 106:1305.
13. Casado-Arzuaga I., Onaindia M., Madariaga I. Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning. Landscape Ecol. 2013, 10.1007/s10980-013-9945-2.
14. Caspersen O.H., Olafsson A.S. Recreational mapping and planning for enlargement of the green structure in greater Copenhagen. Urban For. Urban Green. 2010, 9(2):101-112.
15. Chan K.M., Shaw M.R., Cameron D.R., et al. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4(11):e379.
16. Chhetri P., Arrowsmith C. GIS-based modelling of recreational potential of nature-based tourist destinations. Tourism Geogr. 2008, 10(2):233-257. (An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment). 10.1080/14616680802000089.
17. Clark, R., Stankey, G. 1979. The Recreation Opportunity Spectrum: A Framework for Planning, Management, and Research. U.S. Department of Agriculture and Forest Service. General Technical Report PNW-98.
18. Costanza R., Wilson M., Troy A., et al. The Value of New Jersey's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital 2006, Gund Institute for Ecological Economics, University of Vermont and New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, NJ.
19. Crossman N.D., Burkhard B., Nedkov S. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manage. 2012, 8:1-4.
20. Crossman N.D., Burkhard B., Nedkov S., et al. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4:4-14.
21. Daily G.C., Polasky S., Goldstein J., et al. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:21-28.
22. DeBello F., Lavorel S., Diaz S., et al. Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:2873-2893.
23. Degenhardt B., Frick J., Buchecker M., et al. Influences of personal, social, and environmental factors on workday use frequency of the nearby outdoor recreation areas by working people. Leis. Sci. 2011, 33:420-440.
24. de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., et al. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complexity 2010, 7:260-272.
25. Diaz S., Lavorel S., de Bello F., et al. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. PNAS 2007, 104:20684-20689.
26. Dobbs C., Kendal D., Nitschke C.R. Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 43:44-55.
27. Egoh, B.N., Drakou, E.G., Dunbar, M.B., Maes, J., Willemen, L. 2012. Indicators For Mapping Ecosystem Services: A Review. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
28. Egoh B., Reyers B., Rouget M., et al. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 127(1-2):135-140.
29. Eigenbrod F., Armsworth P.R., Anderson B.J., et al. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47:377-385. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x.
30. Eigenbrod F., Armsworth P.R., Anderson B.J., et al. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47:377-385.
31. Eigenbrod F., Armsworth P.R., Anderson B.J., et al. Error propagation associated with benefits transfer-based mapping of ecosystem services. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143(11):2487-2493.
32. European Commission Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM 2011, 2011:244. (Brussels).
33. Gimona A., van der Horst D. Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland. Landscape Ecol. 2007, 22:1255-1264.
34. Grêt-Regamey A., Bebi P., Bishop I.D., et al. Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region. J. Environ. Manage. 2008, 89:197-208.
35. Grêt-Regamey A., Brunner S.H., Kienast F. Mountain ecosystem services-who cares?. Mt. Res. Dev. 2012, 32:3-34.
36. Grêt-Regamey A., Brunner S.H., Altwegg J., et al. Integrating expert knowledge into mapping ecosystem services trade-offs for sustainable forest management. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18(3):34.
37. Grêt-Regamey A., Brunner S.H., Altwegg J., et al. Facing uncertainty in ecosystem services-based resource management. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 127:145-154.
38. Grêt-Regamey A., Celio E., Klein T.M., et al. Understanding ecosystem services trade-offs with interactive procedural modeling for sustainable urban planning. Landscape Urban Plann. 2013, 109:107-116.
39. Grigulis K., Lavorel S., Krainer U., et al. Relative contributions of plant traits and soil microbial properties to mountain grassland ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 2013, 101:47-57.
40. Grün Stadt Zürich. 2005. Freiraumversorgung der Stadt Zürich. Methodenbeschrieb und Anwendung. Zürich.
41. Gulickx M., Verburg P., Stoorvogel J., et al. Mapping landscape services: a case study in a multifunctional rural landscape in The Netherlands. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 24:273-283.
42. Heffernan J.B., Soranno P.A., Angilletta M.J., et al. Macrosystems ecology: understanding ecological patterns and processes at continental scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2014, 12:5-14.
43. Helfenstein J., Kienast F. Ecosystem service state and trends at the regional to national level: a rapid assessment. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 36:11-18.
44. Hill G.W., Courtney P.R. Demand analysis projections for recreational visits to countryside woodlands in Great Britain. Forestry 2004, 79(2):185-200.
45. InVEST-Tallis H., Polasky S. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1162:265-283.
46. IPCC 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme 2006, Published: IGES, Japan. H.S. Eggleston, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Ngara, K. Tanabe (Eds.).
47. Joyce K., Sutton S. A method for automatic generation of the recreation opportunity spectrum in New Zealand. Appl. Geogr. 2009, 29(3):409-418.
48. Kandziora M., Burkhard B., Müller F. Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001i.
49. Kienast F., Bolliger J., Potschin M., et al. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environ. Manage. 2009, 44:1099-1120.
50. Kienast F., Degenhardt B., Weilenmann B., et al. GIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreation. Landscape Urban Plann. 2012, 105(4):385-399.
51. Klain S.C., Chan K.M. Navigating coastal values: participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 82:104-113.
52. Kliskey A.D. Linking the wilderness perception mapping concept to the recreation opportunity spectrum. J. Environ. Manage. 1998, 22(1):79-88.
53. Kliskey A.D. Recreation terrain suitability mapping: a spatially explicit methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment. Landscape Urban Plann. 2000, 52(1):33-43.
54. Konarska K.M., Sutton P.C., Castellon M. Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41:491-507.
55. Koppen G., Sang A.O., Tveit M.S. Managing the potential for outdoor recreation: Adequate mapping and measuring of accessibility to urban recreational landscapes. Urban For. Urban Green. 2014, 13(1):71-83.
56. Koschke L., Fürst C., Frank S. A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:54-66.
57. Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:468-479.
58. Larondell M., Haase D. Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural-urban gradient: a cross-analysis of European cities. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 29:179-190.
59. Lautenbach S., Kugel C., Lausch A. Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11(2):676-687.
60. Lavorel S., Grigulis K. How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale-up to trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 2012, 100:128-140.
61. Lavorel S., Grigulis K., Lamarque P., et al. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 2011, 99(1):135-147.
62. Lim B., Brown S., Schlamadinger B. Carbon accounting for forest harvesting and wood products: review and evaluation of different approaches. Environ. Sci. Policy 1999, 2(2):207-216.
63. Maes, J., Braat, L.C., Jax, K. et al. 2011. A Spatial Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Europe: Methods, Case Studies and Policy Analysis-Phase 1, Selgraph SRL, Italy.
64. Maes J., Egoh B., Willemen L., et al. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:31-39.
65. Maes, J., Hauck, J., Paracchini, M.L. et al. 2012b. A spatial Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Europe: Methods, Case Studies and Policy Analysis. Synthesis. Phase 2. PEER Report no 4, Ispra.
66. Maes J., Teller A., Erhard M. et al. 2013. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. Indicators and Guidelines for Ecosystem Assessments Under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
67. Martinez-Harms M.J., Balvanera P. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manage. 2012, 8:17-25.
68. Metzger M.J., Rounsevell M.D.A., Acosta-Michlik L., et al. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 114:69-85.
69. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
70. Naidoo R., Ricketts T.H. Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e360.
71. Naidoo R., Balmford A., Costanza R., et al. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. PNAS 2008, 105:9495-9500.
72. Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services 2011, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. P. Kareiva, H. Tallis, T.H. Ricketts (Eds.).
73. Nelson E., Mendoza G., Regetz J., et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:4-11.
74. Ostrom E. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. PNAS 2007, 104:15181-15187.
75. Paracchini M.L., Zulian G., Kopperoinen L., et al. Mapping cultural ecosystem services: a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 45:371-385.
76. Plieninger T., Dijks S., Oteros-Rozas E., et al. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 2013, 33:118-129.
77. Quétier F., Lavorel S., Thuiller W., et al. Plant-trait-based modeling assessment of ecosystem service sensitivity to land-use change. Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17(8):2377-2386.
78. Raudsepp-Hearne C., Peterson G.D., Bennett E.M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:5242-5247.
79. Raymond C.M., Bryan B.A., MacDonald D.H., et al. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68(5):1301-1315.
80. Schägner J.P., Brander L., Maes J., et al. Mapping ecosystem services' values: current practice and future prospects. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4:33-46.
81. Scholes R.J., Reyers B., Biggs R., et al. Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social-ecological systems and their ecosystem services. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 2013, 5:16-25.
82. Seppelt, R., Fath, B., Burkhard, B. et al. 2011. Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecol. Indic. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.003.
83. TEEB The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010, Earthscan, Oxford, UK. P. Kumar (Ed.).
84. Tallis H., Polasky S. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1162:265-283.
85. Termansen M., McClean C.J., Skov-Petersen H. Recreational site choice modelling using high-resolution spatial data. Environ. Plann. A 2004, 36(6):1085-1099.
86. Vollmer D., Grêt-Regamey A. Rivers as municipal infrastructure: demand for environmental services in informal settlements along an Indonesian river. Global Environ. Change 2013, 23(6):1542-1555.
87. Wissen Hayek U. Which is the appropriate 3D visualisation type for participatory landscape planning workshops? A portfolio of their effectiveness. Environ. Plann. B 2011, 38:921-939.
88. Zulian, G., Paracchini, M. - L., Maes, J. et al. 2013. ESTIMAP: Ecosystem Services Mapping at European Scale. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union (JRC Scientific and Technical Report).