The ten most wanted solutions in protein bioinformatics

The Ten Most Wanted Solutions in Protein Bioinformatics

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-194

  Tramontano, Anna ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85057400847     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (131)

1. Berg, J.M., Stryer, L. and Tymoczko, J.L. Biochemistry, 5th ed., W. H. Freeman, New York, 2002.
2. Branden, C. and Tooze, J. Introduction to Protein Structure, 2nd ed., Garland Publishing, New York, 1999.
3. Creighton, T.E. Proteins, 2nd ed., W.H. Freeman, New York, 1993.
4. Nelson, D.L. and Cox, M.M. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 4th ed., W. H. Freeman, New York, 2004.
5. Lesk, A.M. Introduction to Protein Architecture—The Structural Biology of Proteins, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
6. Voet, D. and Voet, J. Biochemistry, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, 2004.
7. Drenth, J. Principles of Protein X-ray Crystallography, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 1999.
8. Rhodes, G. Crystallography Made Crystal Clear, Academic Press, New York, 1999.
9. Wuthrich, K. NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1986.
10. Cavanagh, J., Arthur, W.J.F., Palmer, III, G., and Skelton, N.J. Protein NMR Spectroscopy: Principles and Practice, Academic Press, New York, 1995.
11. Bernstein, F.C., Koetzle, T.F., Williams, G.J., Meyer E.F.J., Brice, M.D., Rodgers, J.R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T., and Tasumi, M. The Protein Data Bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures, Eur. J. Biochem. 80, 319-324, 1977.
12. Lesk, A.M. An Introduction to Bioinformatics, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005.
13. Durbin, R., Eddy, S., Krogh, A., and Mitchison, G. Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, Cambridge University Press, London, 1988.
14. Jorf, I., Yandell, M., and Bledell, J. Blast: An Essential Guide to the Basic Alignment Search Tool, O'Reilly and Associates, Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2003.
15. Orengo, C.A., Jones, D.T., and Thornton, J.M. Bioinformatics: Genes, proteins and computers, BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK, 2002.
16. Eidhammer, I., Jonassen, I., and Taylor, W.R. Protein Bioinformatics: An Algorithmic Approach to Sequence and Structure Analysis, Wiley, New York, 2004.
17. Dayhoff, M.O., Schwartz, R.M., Orcutt, B.C. A model for evolutionary change, in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, Dayhoff, M.O., Ed., Vol. 5, National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 345-358.
18. Smith, T. and Waterman, M. Identification of common molecular subsequences, J. Mol. Biol. 147, 195-197, 1981.
19. Pearson W.R. and Lipman D.J. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA85, 2444-2448, 1988.
20. Altschul, S. Gap costs for multiple sequence alignment, J. Theor. Biol. 138, 297-309, 1989.
21. Lipman, D.J., Altschul, S.F., and Kececioglu, J.D. A tool for multiple sequence alignment, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA86, 4412-4415, 1989.
22. Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., and Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool, J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410, 1990.
23. Henikoff, S. and Henikoff, J.G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA89, 10915-10919, 1992.
24. Schneider T.D. and Stephens, R.M. Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences, Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 6097-6100, 1990.
25. Gonnet G.H., Cohen M.A., and Benner S.A. Analysis of amino acid substitution during divergent evolution: the 400 by 400 dipeptide substitution matrix, Bio-chem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 199, 489-496, 1994.
26. Higgins, D.G., Thompson, J.D., and Gibson, T.J. Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments, Methods Enzymol. 266, 383-402, 1996.
27. Eddy, S.R. Hidden Markov models, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 361-365, 1996.
28. Park, J., Teichmann, S.A., Hubbard, T., and Chothia, C. Intermediate sequences increase the detection of homology between sequences, J. Mol. Biol. 273, 349-354, 1997.
29. Notredame, C., Higgins, D.G., and Heringa, J.T. Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment, J. Mol. Biol. 302, 205-217, 2000.
30. Hofmann, K., Bucher, P., Falquet, L., and Bairoch A. The PROSITE database, its status in 1999, Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 215-219, 1999.
31. Henikoff, J.G., Greene, E.A., Pietrokovski, S., and Henikoff, S. Increased coverage of protein families with the blocks database servers, Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 228-230, 2000.
32. Bateman, A., Birney, E., Durbin, R., Eddy, S.R., Howe, K.L., and Sonnhammer, E.L. The Pfam protein families database, Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 263-266, 2000.
33. Wheelan, S.J., Marchler-Bauer, A., and Bryant, S.H. Domain size distributions can predict domain boundaries, Bioinformatics16, 613-618, 2000.
34. George, R.A. and Heringa, J. SnapDRAGON: a method to delineate protein structural domains from sequence data, J. Mol. Biol. 316, 839-851, 2002.
35. Marsden, R.L., McGuffin, L.J., and Jones, D.T. Rapid protein domain assignment from amino acid sequence using predicted secondary structure, Protein Sci. 11, 2814-2824, 2002.
36. Venter, J.C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J.F., Halpern, A.L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J.A., Wu, D., Paulsen, I., Nelson, K.E., Nelson, W., Fouts, D.E., Levy, S., Knap, A.H., Lomas, M.W., Nealson, K., White, O., Peterson, J., Hoffman, J., Parsons, R., Baden-Tillson, H., Pfannkoch, C., Rogers, Y.H., and Smith, H.O. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea, Science304, 66-74, 2004.
37. Boeckmann B., Bairoch A., Apweiler R., Blatter M.-C., Estreicher A., Gasteiger E., Martin M.J., Michoud K., O'Donovan C., Phan I., Pilbout S., Schneider M. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003, Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 365-370, 2003.
38. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology, Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29, 2000.
39. Quackenbush, J. Computational analysis of microarray data, Nat. Rev. 2, 418, 2001.
40. Celis, J. E. and Gromov, P. 2D protein electrophoresis: can it be perfected?Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10, 16-21, 1999.
41. Karas, M., Bachmann, D., Bahr, U., and Hillenkamp, F. Matrix-assisted ultraviolet laser desorption of non-volatile compounds, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 78, 53, 1987.
42. Burlingame, A. L., Carr, S. A., and Baldwin, M. A. Mass Spectrometry in Biology and Medicine, Humana Press Totowa, NJ, 2000.
43. Covey, T. Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry for the analysis of protein digests, Methods Mol. Biol. 61, 83-99, 1996.
44. Kinoshita, K. and Nakamura, H. Protein informatics towards function identification, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13, 396-400, 2003.
45. Andrade, M. A. and Valencia, A., Automatic annotation for biological sequences by extraction of keywords from MEDLINE abstracts, ISMB97, 5, 25-32, 1997.
46. Anfinsen, C.B., Harrington, W.F., Hvidt, A., and Lindstrom-Lang, K. Studies on the structural basis of ribonuclease activity, Biochim. Biophys. Acta17, 141-142, 1955.
47. Levinthal, C. Molecular model-building by computer, Sci. Am. 214, 42, 1966.
48. Finkelstein, A.V. and Ptitsyn, O.B. Protein Physics, Academic Press, London, 2002.
49. Jones, T. A. and Thirup, S. Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography, EMBO J. 5, 819-822, 1986.
50. Chothia, C. and Lesk, A. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins, EMBO J. 5, 823-826, 1986.
51. Sali, A. and Blundell, T.L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints, J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815, 1993.
52. Dunbrack, R., Jr. and Karplus, M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins: application to side-chain prediction, J. Mol. Biol. 230, 543-574, 1993.
53. Tramontano, A. (1995). The architecture of loops in proteins, in Advances in Computational Biology, Vol. 2, Villar, H.O., Ed., JAI Press, Greenwich, pp. 239-259.
54. Tramontano, A. and Morea, V. Assessment of homology-based predictions in CASP5, Proteins53 (Suppl 6), 352-368, 2003.
55. Finkelstein, A.V., Badretdinov, A.Y., and Gutin, A.M. Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics?Proteins23, 142-150, 1995.
56. Finkelstein, A.V., Gutin, A.M., and Badretdinov, A.Y. Boltzmann-like statistics of protein architectures: origins and consequences, Subcell. Biochem. 24, 1-26, 1995.
57. Sippl, M.J. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5, 229-235, 1995.
58. David, T. and Jones, J.M.T. Potential energy functions for threading, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 210-216, 1996.
59. Chothia, C. Proteins: one thousand families for the molecular biologist, Nature357, 543-544, 1992.
60. Orengo, C. Classification of protein folds, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 4(3), 429-440, 1994.
61. Bowie, J.U., Luthy, R., and Eisenberg, D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure, Science253, 164-170, 1991.
62. Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R., and Thornton, J.M. A new approach to protein fold recognition, Nature358, 86-89, 1992.
63. Bonneau, R., Tsai, J., Ruczinski, I., Chivian, D., Rohl, C., Strauss, C., and Baker, D. Rosetta in CASP4: progress in ab initio protein structure prediction, Proteins Suppl. 5, 119-126, 2001.
64. Dunker A.K., Brown, C.J., and Obradovic Z. Identification and functions of usefully disordered proteins, Adv. Protein Chem. 62, 25-49, 2002.
65. Moult, J., Pedersen, J., Judson, R., and Fidelis, K. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods, Proteins23, ii-v, 1995.
66. Tramontano, A. Of men and machines, Nat. Struct. Biol. 10, 87-90, 2003.
67. Nozaki, Y. and Tanford, C. Solubility of amino acids and 2 glycine peptides in aqueous ethanol and dioxane solutions—establishment of a hydrophobicity scale, J. Biol. Chem. 246, 2211, 1971
68. Chou, P.Y. and Fasman, G.D. Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence, Adv. Enzymol. Mol. Biol. 47, 45-148, 1978
69. Eisenberg, D., Weiss, R.M., and Terwilliger, T.C. The hydrophobic moment detects periodicity in protein hydrophobicity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA81, 140-144, 1984.
70. Rost, B., Casadio, R., Fariselli, P., and Sander, C. Transmembrane helices predicted at 95% accuracy, Protein Sci. 4, 521-533, 1995.
71. Chen, C.P. and Rost, B. State-of-the-art in membrane protein prediction. Appl. Bioinformatics1, 21-35, 2002.
72. Rost, B. Prediction in 1D: secondary structure, membrane helices, and accessibility. Methods Biochem. Anal. 44, 559-587, 2003.
73. Mele, K, Krogh, A. and von Heijne, G. Reliability measures for membrane protein topology, J. Mol. Biol. 327, 735-744, 2003.
74. Pastore, A. and Lesk, A. Comparison of the structures of globins and phycocyanins: evidence for evolutionary relationship, Proteins8, 133-155, 1990.
75. Gibrat, J-F., Madej, T., and Bryant, S.H. Surprising similarities in structure comparison, Curr. Opin. Structural Biol. 6, 377-385, 1996.
76. Holm, L. and Sander, C. Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison, Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 478-480, 1995.
77. Holm, L. and Sander, C. The FSSP database of structurally aligned protein fold families, Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 3600-3609, 1994.
78. Murzin, A., Brenner, S., Hubbard, T., and Chothia, C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures, J. Mol. Biol. 247, 536-540, 1995.
79. Orengo, C.A., Michie, A.D., Jones, S., Jones, D.T., Swindells, M.B., and Thornton, J.M. CATH: a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures, Structure5, 1093-1108, 1997.
80. Zemla, A. LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures, Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3370-3374, 2003.
81. Ortiz A.R., Strauss C.E., and Olmea O. MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison, Protein Sci. 11, 2606-2621, 2002.
82. Taylor, W. and Orengo, C. Protein structure alignment, J. Mol. Biol. 208, 1-22, 1989.
83. Hubbard, T.J. RMS/coverage graphs: a qualitative method for comparing threedimensional protein structure predictions, Proteins Suppl. 3, 15-21, 1999.
84. Godzik, A. The structural alignment between two proteins: Is there a unique answer?Protein Sci. 5, 1325-1338, 1996.
85. Brenner, S.E. and Levitt, M. Expectations from structural genomics, Protein Sci. 9, 197-200, 2000.
86. Blundell, T. and Mizuguchi, K. Structural genomics: an overview, Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 73, 289-295, 2000.
87. Jones, S., and Thornton, J.M. Searching for functional sites in protein structures, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8, 3-7, 2004.
88. George, R.A., Spriggs, R.V., Thornton, J.M., Al-Lazikani, B., and Swindells, M.B. SCOPEC: a database of protein catalytic domains, Bioinformatics20 (Suppl 1), I130-I136, 2004.
89. Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions, Proteins47, 409-443, 2002.
90. Janin, J. and Chothia, C. The structure of protein-protein recognition sites, J. Biol. Chem. 265, 16027-16030, 1990.
91. Perutz, M.F. Stereochemical mechanism of oxygen transport by haemoglobin, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 208, 135-162, 1980.
92. Gobel, U., Sander, C., Schneider, R., and Valencia, A. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins, Proteins18, 309-317, 1994.
93. Chothia, C., Lesk, A., Tramontano, A., Levitt, M., Smith-Gill, S., Air, G., Sheriff, S., Padlan, E., Davies, D., Tulip, W., Colman, P. M., Alzari, P. M., and Poljak, R. J. Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions, Nature342, 877-883, 1989.
94. Janin, J., Henrick, K., Moult, J., Eyck, L.T., Sternberg, M.J., Vajda, S., Vakser, I., and Wodak, S.J. CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions, Proteins52, 2-9, 2003.
95. Smith, G.P. and Petrenko, V.A. Phage display, Chem. Rev. 97, 391-410, 1997.
96. Bartel, P.L. and Fields, S. The Yeast Two-Hybrid System, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1997.
97. Pandey, A. and Mann, M. Proteomics to study genes and genomes, Nature405, 837-846, 2000.
98. Kirmizis A. and Farnham, P.J. Genomic approaches that aid in the identification of transcription factor target genes, Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood)229, 705-721, 2004.
99. Ikubinyi, H. Drug research: myths, hype and reality, Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 2, 665-668, 2003.
100. Davis, A., Teague, S., and Kleywegt, G. Application and limitations of X-ray crystallographic data in structure-based ligand and drug design, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 2718-2736, 2003.
101. Pastor, M., and Cruciani, G. A novel strategy for improving ligand selectivity in receptor-based drug design, J. Med. Chem. 38, 4637-4647, 1995.
102. Morris, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Huey, R., and Olson, A.J. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 10, 293-304, 1996.
103. Bohm, H.J. Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: a fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 12, 309-323, 1998.
104. Kramer, B., Rarey, M., and Lengauer, T. Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking, Proteins37, 228-241, 1999.
105. Stahl, M. and Rarey, M. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening, J. Med. Chem. 44, 1035-1042, 2001.
106. Ewing, T.J., Makino, S., Skillman, A.G., and Kuntz, I.D. DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 15, 411-428, 2001.
107. Abagyan, R. and Totrov, M. High-throughput docking for lead generation, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 5, 375-382, 2001.
108. Lyne, P. D. Structure-based virtual screening: an overview, Drug. Discov. Today7, 1047-1055, 2002.
109. Schneider, B. and Bohm, H. Virtual screening and fast automated docking methods, Drug Discov. Today7, 64-70, 2002.
110. Braun, W. Distance geometry and related methods for protein structure determination from NMR data, Q. Rev. Biophys. 19, 115-157, 1987.
111. Allen, F.H. The Cambridge structural database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising, Acta Crystallogr. B. 58, 380-388, 2002.
112. Crippen, G.M. Prediction of protein folding from amino acid sequence over discrete conformation spaces, Biochemistry30, 4232-4237, 1991.
113. Jones, D.T. De novo protein design using pairwise potentials and a genetic algorithm, Protein Sci. 3, 567-574, 1994.
114. Desjarlais, J.R. and Clarke, N.D. Computer search algorithms in protein modification and design, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 471-475, 1998.
115. Mirny, L., and Shakhnovich, E. Protein folding theory: From lattice to all-atom models, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30, 361-396, 2001.
116. Sander, C., Vriend, C., Bazan, F., Horovitz, A., Nakamura, H., Ribas, L., Finkelstein, A.V., Lockhart, A., Merkl, R., Perry, J.L., Emery, S.C., Gaboriaud, C., Marks, C., Moult, J., Verlinde, J.C., Eberhard, M., Elofsson, A., Hubbard, T.J.P., Regan, L., Banks, J., Jappelli, R., Lesk, A.M., and Tramontano, A. Protein design on computers. Five new proteins: Shpilka, grendel, fingerclasp, leather, and aida, Proteins12, 105-110, 1992.
117. Pessi, A., Bianchi, E., Crameri, A., Venturini, S., Tramontano, A., and Sollazzo, M. A designed metal-binding protein with a novel fold, Nature362, 367-369, 1993.
118. Hill, R.B., Raleigh, D.P., Lombardi, A., and DeGrado, W.F. De novo design of helical bundles as models for understanding protein folding and function, Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 745-754, 2000.
119. Main, E.R., Jackson, S.E., Regan, L. The folding and design of repeat proteins: Reaching a consensus, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13, 482-489, 2003.
120. Kuhlman, B., Dantas, G., Ireton, G.C., Varani, G., Stoddard, B.L., and Baker, D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy, Science302, 1364-1368, 2003.
121. Tramontano, A. A brighter future for protein design, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 4325, 3222-3223, 2004.
122. Brannigan, J.A. and Wilkinson, A.J. Protein engineering 20 years on, Natl. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3, 964-970, 2002.
123. Yano, J.K. and Poulos, T.L. New understandings of thermostable and peizostable enzymes, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14, 360-365, 2003.
124. Fernandez-Gacio, A., Uguen, M., and Fastrez J. Phage display as a tool for the directed evolution of enzymes, Trends Biotechnol. 21, 408-414, 2003.
125. Friboulet, A., Izadyar, L., Avalle, B., Roseto, A., and Thomas, D. Abzyme generation using an anti-idiotypic antibody as the "internal image" of an enzyme active site, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 47, 229-237, 1994.
126. Lerner, R.A. and Janda, K.D. Catalytic antibodies: Evolution of protein function in real time, EXS73, 121-138, 1995.
127. Failla, C., Pizzi, E., De Francesco, R., and Tramontano, A. Redesigning the substrate specificity of the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease, Fold Des. 1, 35-42, 1996.
128. Tramontano, A., Gololobov, G., and Paul, S. Proteolytic antibodies: Origins, selection and induction, Chem. Immunol. 77, 1-17, 2000.
129. Hedstrom, L. Serine protease mechanism and specificity, Chem. Rev. 102, 4501-4524, 2002.
130. Fersht, A.R., Matouschek, A., and Serrano L. The folding of an enzyme. I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding, J. Mol. Biol. 224, 771-782, 1992.
131. Oliveberg, M. Characterisation of the transition states for protein folding: Towards a new level of mechanistic detail in protein engineering analysis, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11, 94-100, 2001.