Efficient flexible backbone protein-protein docking for challenging targets

Bioinformatics

Volumn 34, Issue 20, 2018, Pages 3461-3469

  Marze, Nicholas A ^a   Roy Burman, Shourya S ^a   Sheffler, William ^b   Gray, Jeffrey J ^a,c,d  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; PREDICTION; SOFTWARE; ALGORITHM; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

LIGAND; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ALGORITHMS; LIGANDS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85054892364     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty355     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alford,R.F. et al. (2017) The Rosetta all-atom energy function for macromolecular modeling and design. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 13, 3031-3048
2. Anishchenko,I. et al. (2015) Structural templates for comparative protein docking. Proteins, 83, 1563-1570
3. Atilgan,A.R. et al. (2001) Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys. J., 80, 505-515
4. Baaden,M. and Marrink,S.J. (2013) Coarse-grain modelling of protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 23, 878-886
5. Berman,H.M. et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235-242
6. Changeux,J.-P. and Edelstein,S. (2011) Conformational selection or induced fit? 50 years of debate resolved. F1000 Biol. Rep., 3, 19
7. Chaudhury,S. et al. (2011) Benchmarking and analysis of protein docking performance in Rosetta v3.2. PLoS One, 6, e22477
8. Chaudhury,S. et al. (2007) Incorporating biochemical information and backbone flexibility in RosettaDock for CAPRI rounds 6-12. Proteins, 69, 793-800
9. Chaudhury,S. and Gray,J.J. (2008) Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles. J. Mol. Biol., 381, 1068-1087
10. Chu,X. et al. (2013) Quantifying the topography of the intrinsic energy landscape of flexible biomolecular recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, E2342-E2351
11. Cukuroglu,E. et al. (2014) Non-redundant unique interface structures as templates for modeling protein interactions. PLoS One, 9, e86738
12. Daily,M.D. et al. (2005) CAPRI rounds 3-5 reveal promising successes and future challenges for RosettaDock. Proteins, 60, 181-186
13. DeBartolo,J. et al. (2012) Predictive Bcl-2 family binding models rooted in experiment or structure. J. Mol. Biol., 422, 124-144
14. Fallas,J.A. et al. (2017) Computational design of self-assembling cyclic protein homo-oligomers. Nat. Chem., 9, 353-360
15. Fleishman,S.J. et al. (2011) RosettaScripts: a scripting language interface to the Rosetta macromolecular modeling suite. PLoS One, 6, e20161
16. Gray,J.J. et al. (2003a) Protein-protein docking predictions for the CAPRI experiment. Proteins, 52, 118-122
17. Gray,J.J. et al. (2003b) Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol., 331, 281-299
18. Greener,J.G. et al. (2017) Predicting protein dynamics and allostery using multi-protein atomic distance constraints. Structure, 25, 546-558
19. Grunberg,R. et al. (2004) Complementarity of structure ensembles in protein-protein binding. Structure, 12, 2125-2136
20. Hwang,H. et al. (2010) Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins, 78, 3111-3114
21. Janin,J. and Wodak,S.J. (1978) Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol., 124, 323-342
22. Kilambi,K.P. et al. (2013) Extending RosettaDock with water, sugar, and pH for prediction of complex structures and affinities for CAPRI rounds 20-27. Proteins, 81, 2201-2209
23. Kmiecik,S. et al. (2016) Coarse-grained protein models and their applications. Chem. Rev., 116, 7898-7936
24. Kozakov,D. et al. (2017) The ClusPro web server for protein-protein docking. Nat. Protoc., 12, 255-278
25. Krivov,G.G. et al. (2009) Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins, 77, 778-795
26. Kuroda,D. and Gray,J.J. (2016) Pushing the backbone in protein-protein docking. Structure, 24, 1821-1829
27. Lensink,M.F. et al. (2017) Modeling protein-protein and protein-peptide complexes: cAPRI 6th edition. Proteins, 85, 359-377
28. Lensink,M.F. et al. (2016) Prediction of homoprotein and heteroprotein complexes by protein docking and template-based modeling: a CASP-CAPRI experiment. Proteins, 84, 323-348
29. Li,Z. and Scheraga,H.A. (1987) Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 6611-6615
30. Marze,N.A. et al. (2017) Modeling oblong proteins and water-mediated interfaces with RosettaDock in CAPRI rounds 28-35. Proteins, 85, 479-486
31. Mashiach,E. et al. (2010) FiberDock: a web server for flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking. Nucleic Acids Res., 38, W457-W461
32. Moal,I.H. and Bates,P.A. (2010) SwarmDock and the use of normal modes in protein-protein docking. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 11, 3623-3648
33. Oliwa,T. and Shen,Y. (2015) cNMA: a framework of encounter complex-based normal mode analysis to model conformational changes in protein interactions. Bioinformatics, 31, i151-i160
34. Pallara,C. et al. (2016) Conformational heterogeneity of unbound proteins enhances recognition in protein-protein encounters. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 12, 3236-3249
35. Park,H. et al. (2016) Simultaneous optimization of biomolecular energy functions on features from small molecules and macromolecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 12, 6201-6212
36. Pierce,B.G. et al. (2011) Accelerating protein docking in ZDOCK using an advanced 3D convolution library. PLoS One, 6, e24657
37. Schindler,C.E.M. et al. (2015) iATTRACT: simultaneous global and local interface optimization for protein-protein docking refinement. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 83, 248-258
38. Sircar,A. et al. (2010) A generalized approach to sampling backbone conformations with RosettaDock for CAPRI rounds 13-19. Proteins, 78, 3115-3123
39. Smith,C.A. and Kortemme,T. (2008) Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. J. Mol. Biol., 380, 742-756
40. Trellet,M. et al. (2013) A Unified Conformational Selection and Induced Fit Approach to Protein-Peptide Docking. PLoS One, 8, e58769
41. Tyka,M.D. et al. (2011) Alternate states of proteins revealed by detailed energy landscape mapping. J. Mol. Biol, 405, 607-618
42. Vakser,I.A. (2014) Protein-protein docking: from interaction to interactome. Biophys. J., 107, 1785-1793
43. Vangone,A. et al. (2017) Sense and simplicity in HADDOCK scoring: lessons from CASP-CAPRI round 1. Proteins, 85, 417-423
44. Venkatraman,V. and Ritchie,D.W. (2012) Flexible protein docking refinement using pose-dependent normal mode analysis. Proteins, 80, 2262-2274
45. Vogt,A.D. and Di Cera,E. (2012) Conformational selection or induced fit? A critical appraisal of the kinetic mechanism. Biochemistry, 51, 5894-5902
46. Vreven,T. et al. (2015) Updates to the integrated protein-protein interaction benchmarks: docking benchmark version 5 and affinity benchmark version 2. J. Mol. Biol., 427, 3031-3041
47. Wang,C. et al. (2005) Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci., 14, 1328-1339
48. Wang,C. et al. (2007) Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. J. Mol. Biol., 373, 503-519
49. Wodak,S.J. and Mendez,R. (2004) Prediction of protein-protein interactions: the CAPRI experiment, its evaluation and implications. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 14, 242-249
50. Xu,M. and Lill,M.A. (2012) Utilizing experimental data for reducing ensemble size in flexible-protein docking. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 52, 187-198
51. Zhang,Z. et al. (2017) Monte Carlo replica-exchange based ensemble docking of protein conformations. Proteins, 85, 924-937
52. Zhang,Z. et al. (2013) Replica exchange improves sampling in low-resolution docking stage of RosettaDock. PLoS One, 8, e72096