Predicting Protein Dynamics and Allostery Using Multi-Protein Atomic Distance Constraints

Structure

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 546-558

  Greener, Joe G ^a   Filippis, Ioannis ^a   Sternberg, Michael J E ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

allostery; catabolite activator protein; cyclin dependent kinase 2; distance geometry; ensemble; protein dynamics; stochastic proximity embedding; T4 lysozyme

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 85012926718     PISSN: 09692126     EISSN: 18784186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2017.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abraham, M.J., Murtola, T., Schulz, R., Páll, S., Smith, J.C., Hess, B., Lindahl, E., GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1 (2015), 19–25.
2. Agrafiotis, D.K., Bandyopadhyay, D., Yang, E., Stochastic proximity embedding: a simple, fast and scalable algorithm for solving the distance geometry problem. Mucherino, A., Lavor, C., Liberti, L., Maculan, N., (eds.) Distance Geometry: Theory, Methods and Applications, 2013, Springer, 291–311.
3. Ahmed, A., Rippmann, F., Barnickel, G., Gohlke, H., A normal mode-based geometric simulation approach for exploring biologically relevant conformational transitions in proteins. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51 (2011), 1604–1622.
4. Atilgan, C., Gerek, Z.N., Ozkan, S.B., Atilgan, A.R., Manipulation of conformational change in proteins by single-residue perturbations. Biophys. J. 99 (2010), 933–943.
5. Bakan, A., Bahar, I., The intrinsic dynamics of enzymes plays a dominant role in determining the structural changes induced upon inhibitor binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 (2009), 14349–14354.
6. Betzi, S., Alam, R., Martin, M., Lubbers, D.J., Han, H., Jakkaraj, S.R., Georg, G.I., Schonbrunn, E., Discovery of a potential allosteric ligand binding site in CDK2. ACS Chem. Biol. 6 (2011), 492–501.
7. Boehr, D.D., Nussinov, R., Wright, P.E., The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5 (2009), 789–796.
8. Bowman, G.R., Geissler, P.L., Equilibrium fluctuations of a single folded protein reveal a multitude of potential cryptic allosteric sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 (2012), 11681–11686.
9. Bowman, G.R., Bolin, E.R., Hart, K.M., Maguire, B.C., Marqusee, S., Discovery of multiple hidden allosteric sites by combining Markov state models and experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 (2015), 2734–2739.
10. Cimermancic, P., Weinkam, P., Rettenmaier, T.J., Bichmann, L., Keedy, D.A., Woldeyes, R.A., Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Demerdash, O.N., Mitchell, J.C., Wells, J.A., et al. CryptoSite: expanding the druggable proteome by characterization and prediction of cryptic binding sites. J. Mol. Biol. 428 (2016), 709–719.
11. Clarke, D., Sethi, A., Li, S., Kumar, S., Chang, R.W., Chen, J., Gerstein, M., Identifying allosteric hotspots with dynamics: application to inter- and intra-species conservation. Structure 24 (2016), 826–837.
12. de Groot, B.L., van Aalten, D.M., Scheek, R.M., Amadei, A., Vriend, G., Berendsen, H.J., Prediction of protein conformational freedom from distance constraints. Proteins 29 (1997), 240–251.
13. de Groot, B.L., Hayward, S., van Aalten, D.M., Amadei, A., Berendsen, H.J., Domain motions in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme: a comparison between molecular dynamics and crystallographic data. Proteins 31 (1998), 116–127.
14. de Groot, B.L., Vriend, G., Berendsen, H.J., Conformational changes in the chaperonin GroEL: new insights into the allosteric mechanism. J. Mol. Biol. 286 (1999), 1241–1249.
15. Esposito, E.X., Tobi, D., Madura, J.D., Comparative protein modeling. Rev. Comp. Chem 22 (2006), 57–168.
16. Furnham, N., Holliday, G.L., de Beer, T.A.P., Jacobsen, J.O.B., Pearson, W.R., Thornton, J.M., The Catalytic Site Atlas 2.0: cataloging catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 42 (2014), D485–D489.
17. Greener, J.G., Sternberg, M.J.E., AlloPred: prediction of allosteric pockets on proteins using normal mode perturbation analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 16, 2015, 335.
18. Gunasekaran, K., Ma, B., Nussinov, R., Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins?. Proteins 57 (2004), 433–443.
19. Hendlich, M., Rippmann, F., Barnickel, G., LIGSITE: automatic and efficient detection of potential small molecule-binding sites in proteins. J. Mol. Graph Model. 15 (1997), 359–363.
20. Henzler-Wildman, K., Kern, D., Dynamic personalities of proteins. Nature 450 (2007), 964–972.
21. Henzler-Wildman, K.A., Thai, V., Lei, M., Ott, M., Wolf-Watz, M., Fenn, T., Pozharski, E., Wilson, M.A., Petsko, G.A., Karplus, M., et al. Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory. Nature 450 (2007), 838–844.
22. csc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation. BMC Struct. Biol., 6, 2006, 19.
23. Huang, W., Lu, S., Huang, Z., Liu, X., Mou, L., Luo, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, Z., Hou, T., Zhang, J., Allosite: a method for predicting allosteric sites. Bioinformatics 29 (2013), 2357–2359.
24. Jacobs, D.J., Rader, A.J., Kuhn, L.A., Thorpe, M.F., Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory. Proteins 44 (2001), 150–165.
25. Kruger, D.M., Ahmed, A., Gohlke, H., NMSim web server: integrated approach for normal mode-based geometric simulations of biologically relevant conformational transitions in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 40 (2012), W310–W316.
26. Lamba, V., Ghosh, I., New directions in targeting protein kinases: focusing upon true allosteric and bivalent inhibitors. Curr. Pharm. Des. 18 (2012), 2936–2945.
27. Laskowski, R.A., MacArthur, M.W., Moss, D.S., Thornton, J.M., PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 26 (1993), 283–291.
28. Le Guilloux, V., Schmidtke, P., Tuffery, P., Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 2009, 168.
29. Louet, M., Seifert, C., Hensen, U., Grater, F., Dynamic allostery of the catabolite activator protein revealed by interatomic forces. PLoS Comput. Biol., 11, 2015, e1004358.
30. Maximova, T., Moffatt, R., Ma, B., Nussinov, R., Shehu, A., Principles and overview of sampling methods for modeling macromolecular structure and dynamics. PLoS Comput. Biol., 12, 2016, e1004619.
31. Mitternacht, S., Berezovsky, I.N., Binding leverage as a molecular basis for allosteric regulation. PLoS Comput. Biol., 7, 2011, e1002148.
32. Motlagh, H.N., Wrabl, J.O., Li, J., Hilser, V.J., The ensemble nature of allostery. Nature 508 (2014), 331–339.
33. Mustard, D., Ritchie, D.W., Docking essential dynamics eigenstructures. Proteins 60 (2005), 269–274.
34. Nussinov, R., Tsai, C.J., Allostery in disease and in drug discovery. Cell 153 (2013), 293–305.
35. Panjkovich, A., Daura, X., Assessing the structural conservation of protein pockets to study functional and allosteric sites: implications for drug discovery. BMC Struct. Biol. 10 (2010), 1–14.
36. Panjkovich, A., Daura, X., Exploiting protein flexibility to predict the location of allosteric sites. BMC Bioinformatics 13 (2012), 1–12.
37. Panjkovich, A., Daura, X., PARS: a web server for the prediction of protein allosteric and regulatory sites. Bioinformatics 30 (2014), 1314–1315.
38. Peyressatre, M., Prével, C., Pellerano, M., Morris, M.C., Targeting cyclin-dependent kinases in human cancers: from small molecules to peptide inhibitors. Cancers 7 (2015), 179–237.
39. Pitt, W.R., Montalvão, R.W., Blundell, T.L., Polyphony: superposition independent methods for ensemble-based drug discovery. BMC Bioinformatics 15 (2014), 1–18.
40. Popovych, N., Sun, S., Ebright, R.H., Kalodimos, C.G., Dynamically driven protein allostery. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13 (2006), 831–838.
41. Rastelli, G., Anighoro, A., Chripkova, M., Carrassa, L., Broggini, M., Structure-based discovery of the first allosteric inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinase 2. Cell Cycle 13 (2014), 2296–2305.
42. Seeliger, D., de Groot, B.L., tCONCOORD-GUI: visually supported conformational sampling of bioactive molecules. J. Comput. Chem. 30 (2009), 1160–1166.
43. Seeliger, D., Haas, J., de Groot, B.L., Geometry-based sampling of conformational transitions in proteins. Structure 15 (2007), 1482–1492.
44. Shen, Q., Wang, G., Li, S., Liu, X., Lu, S., Chen, Z., Song, K., Yan, J., Geng, L., Huang, Z., et al. ASD v3.0: unraveling allosteric regulation with structural mechanisms and biological networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (2016), D527–D535.
45. Totrov, M., Abagyan, R., Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18 (2008), 178–184.
46. Touw, W.G., Baakman, C., Black, J., te Beek, T.A., Krieger, E., Joosten, R.P., Vriend, G., A series of PDB-related databanks for everyday needs. Nucleic Acids Res. 43 (2015), D364–D368.
47. Tribello, G.A., Bonomi, M., Branduardi, D., Camilloni, C., Bussi, G., PLUMED 2: new feathers for an old bird. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014), 604–613.
48. Wei, G., Xi, W., Nussinov, R., Ma, B., Protein ensembles: how does nature harness thermodynamic fluctuations for life? The diverse functional roles of conformational ensembles in the cell. Chem. Rev. 116 (2016), 6516–6551.
49. Weiss, D.R., Levitt, M., Can morphing methods predict intermediate structures?. J. Mol. Biol. 385 (2009), 665–674.
50. Yang, L., Song, G., Jernigan, R.L., How well can we understand large-scale protein motions using normal modes of elastic network models?. Biophys. J. 93 (2007), 920–929.