iATTRACT: Simultaneous global and local interface optimization for protein-protein docking refinement

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 248-258

  Schindler, Christina E M ^a   de Vries, Sjoerd J ^a   Zacharias, Martin ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Docking minimization; Flexible interface refinement; Induced fit; Protein protein complex formation; Protein protein docking

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; DIELECTRIC CONSTANT; FORCE; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE;

MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; PROTEIN BINDING;

MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84937575796     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24728     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Kortemme T, Baker D. Computational design of protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2004;8:91-97.
2. Wells JA, McClendon CL. Reaching for high-hanging fruit in drug discovery at protein-protein interfaces. Nature 2007;450:1001-1009.
3. Stumpf MPH, Thorne T, de Silva E, Stewart R, An HJ, Lappe M, Wiuf C. Estimating the size of the human interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:6959-6964.
4. Lensink MF, Méndez R, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd edition. Proteins 2007;69:704-718.
5. Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009. Proteins 2010;78:3073-3084.
6. Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Docking, scoring, and affinity prediction in CAPRI. Proteins 2013;81:2082-2095.
7. Bonvin AM. Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:194-200.
8. Andrusier N, Mashiach E, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Principles of flexible protein-protein docking. Proteins 2008;73:271-289.
9. Zacharias M. Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2010;20:180-186.
10. Melquiond AS, Karaca E, Kastritis PL, Bonvin AM. Next challenges in protein-protein docking: from proteome to interactome and beyond. Wiley Interdiscip Rev. Comput Mol Sci 2012;2:642-651.
11. Huang SY. Search strategies and evaluation in protein-protein docking: principles, advances and challenges. Drug Discov Today 2014;19:1081-1096.
12. May A, Zacharias M. Accounting for global protein deformability during protein-protein and protein-ligand docking. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005;1754:225-231.
13. May A, Zacharias M. Energy minimization in low-frequency normal modes to efficiently allow for global flexibility during systematic protein-protein docking. Proteins 2008;70:794-809.
14. Chaudhury S, Gray JJ. Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles. J Mol Biol 2008;381:1068-1087.
15. Chaudhury S, Berrondo M, Weitzner BD, Muthu P, Bergman H, Gray JJ. Benchmarking and analysis of protein docking performance in Rosetta v3.2. PLOS One 2011;6:e22477.
16. Mashiach E, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. FiberDock: a web server for flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:W457-W461.
17. Venkatraman V, Ritchie DW. Flexible protein docking refinement using pose-dependent normal mode analysis. Proteins 2012;80:2262-2274.
18. Moal IH, Bates PA. SwarmDock and the use of normal modes in protein-protein docking. Int J Mol Sci 2010;11:3623-3648.
19. Krivov GG, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins 2009;77:778-795.
20. Fernández-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains. Proteins 2003;52:113-117.
21. De Vries SJ, van Dijk ADJ, Krzeminski M, van Dijk M, Thureau A, Hsu V, Wassenaar T, Bonvin AMJJ. HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: new features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets. Proteins 2007;69:726-733.
22. Méndez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005;60:150-169.
23. Case D, Darden T, Cheatham III T, Simmerling C, Wang J, Duke R, Luo R, Walker R, Zhang W, Merz K, Roberts B, Hayik S, Roitberg A, Seabra G, Swails J, Götz AW, Kolossváry I, Wong KF, Paesani F, Vanicek J, Wolf RM, Liu J, Wu X, Brozell SR, Steinbrecher T, Gohlke H, Cai Q, Ye X, Wang J, Hsieh MJ, Cui G, Roe DR, Mathews DH, Seetin MG, Salomon-Ferrer R, Sagui C, Babin V, Luchko T, Gusarov S, Kovalenko A, Kollman PA. AMBER 12. San Francisco, CA: University of California; 2012.
24. Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins 2006;65:712-725.
25. Hwang H, Vreven T, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins 2010;78:3111-3114.
26. Dolinsky TJ, Nielsen JE, McCammon JA, Baker NA. PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:W665-W667.
27. Dolinsky TJ, Czodrowski P, Li H, Nielsen JE, Jensen JH, Klebe G, Baker NA. PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:W522-W525.
28. Li H, Robertson AD, Jensen JH. Very fast empirical prediction and rationalization of protein pKa values. Proteins 2005;61:704-721.
29. Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc 1988;110:1657-1666.
30. Linge J, Nilges M. Influence of non-bonded parameters on the quality of NMR structures: a new force field for NMR structure calculation. J Biomol NMR 1999;13:51-59.
31. Vriend G. WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J Mol Graphics 1990;8:52-56.
32. Hooft RWW, Sander C, Vriend G. Verification of protein structures: side-chain planarity. J Appl Crystallogr 1996;29:714-716.
33. Hooft RW, Sander C, Vriend G. Objectively judging the quality of a protein structure from a Ramachandran plot. Comput Appl Biosci 1997;13:425-430.
34. Zhou AQ, O'Hern C, Regan L. The power of hard-sphere models for proteins: Understanding side-chain conformations and predicting thermodynamic stability. Bull Am Phys Soc 2013;58:Z46.00011.
35. De Vries SJ, Bonvin AM. CPORT: a consensus interface predictor and its performance in prediction-driven docking with HADDOCK. PLOS One 2011;6:e17695.
36. De Vries SJ, van Dijk M, Bonvin AM. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. Nat Protoc 2010;5:883-897.
37. Król M, Tournier AL, Bates PA. Flexible relaxation of rigid-body docking solutions. Proteins 2007;68:159-169.
38. Guharoy M, Janin J, Robert CH. Side-chain rotamer transitions at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2010;78:3219-3225.
39. Zhang QC, Petrey D, Deng L, Qiang L, Shi Y, Thu CA, Bisikirska B, Lefebvre C, Accili D, Hunter T, Maniatis T, Califano A, Honig B. Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale. Nature 2012;490:556-560.
40. Kundrotas PJ, Zhu Z, Janin J, Vakser IA. Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;9438-9441.
41. Schrödinger, LLC The PyMOL molecular graphics system, version 1.7r0. Schroedinger LLC (Mannheim), 2014.