Updates on ultrasound research in implant dentistry: A systematic review of potential clinical indications

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2018, Pages

  Bhaskar, Vaishnavi ^a   Chan, Hsun Liang ^a   MacEachern, Mark ^b   Kripfgans, Oliver D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Alveolar bone; Cone beam computed tomography; Dental implants; Peri implantitis; Soft tissue; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HUMANS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 85053630777     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: 1476542X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20180076     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977; 16: 1-132.
2. Lambrecht JT, Filippi A, Künzel AR, Schiel HJ. Long-term evaluation of submerged and nonsubmerged ITI solid-screw titanium implants: a 10-year life table analysis of 468 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 826-34.
3. Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Bosmans H. Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 2637-55. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00330-010-1836-1
4. Correa LR, Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Schropp L, da Silveira HE, Wenzel A. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 690-5. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ clr. 12126
5. Chan HL, Misch K, Wang HL. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning. Implant Dent 2010; 19: 288-98. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ ID. 0b013e3181e59ebd
6. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC, et al. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 113: 817-26. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. oooo. 2012. 03. 005
7. Dagassan-Berndt DC, Zitzmann NU, Walter C, Schulze RK. Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 1010-6. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ clr. 12666
8. Deeb G, Antonos L, Tack S, Carrico C, Laskin D, Deeb JG. Is cone-beam computed tomography always necessary for dental implant placement? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 75: 285-9. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. joms. 2016. 11. 005
9. Rios HF, Borgnakke WS, Benavides E. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in management of patients requiring dental implants: an American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol 2017; 88: 946-59. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1902/ jop. 2017. 160548
10. Joda T, Brägger U, vs D. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 1430-5. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ clr. 12476
11. Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH, Resnik R, Reardon GT, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent 2012; 21: 78-86. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ ID. 0b013e31824885b5
12. Mandelaris GA, Scheyer ET, Evans M, Kim D, McAllister B, Nevins ML, et al. American Academy of Periodontology best evidence consensus statement on selected oral applications for cone-beam computed tomography. J Periodontol 2017; 88: 939-45 doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1902/ jop. 2017. 170234
13. Chan HL, Sinjab K, Chung MP, Chiang YC, Wang HL, Giannobile WV, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of facial crestal bone with ultrasonography. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0171237. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journal. pone. 0171237
14. Chan HL, Wang HL, Fowlkes JB, Giannobile WV, Kripfgans OD. Non-ionizing real-time ultrasonography in implant and oral surgery: A feasibility study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 341-7 doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ clr. 12805
15. Marotti J, Heger S, Tinschert J, Tortamano P, Chuembou F, Radermacher K, et al. Recent advances of ultrasound imaging in dentistry-A review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 1115: 819-32. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. oooo. 2013. 03. 012
16. Nguyen KC, Le LH, Kaipatur NR, Major PW. Imaging the cemento-enamel junction using a 20-MHz ultrasoni transducer. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016; 42: 333-8. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. ultrasmedbio. 2015. 09. 012
17. Nguyen KT, Le LH, Kaipatur NR, Zheng R, Lou EH, Major PW. High-resolution ultrasonic imaging of dento-periodontal tissues using a multi-element phased array system. Ann Biomed Eng 2016; 44: 2874-86. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10439-016-1634-2
18. Chan HL, Lin GH, Suarez F, MacEachern M, Wang HL. Surgical management of peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. J Periodontol 2014; 85: 1027-41. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1902/ jop. 2013. 130563
19. Khoshkam V, Chan HL, Lin GH, MacEachern MP, Monje A, Suarez F, et al. Reconstructive procedures for treating peri-implantitis: a systematic review. J Dent Res 2013; 92(12 Suppl): 131S-8. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 0022034513509279
20. Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol 2015; 42(Suppl 16): S158-S171. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jcpe. 12334
21. Ghorayeb SR, Bertoncini CA, Hinders MK. Ultrasonography in dentistry. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2008; 55: 1256-66. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1109/ TUFFC. 2008. 788
22. Kämmerer PW, Kumar VV, Brüllmann D, Götz H, Kann PH, Al-Nawas B, et al. Evaluation of ultrasound transmission velocity and 3-dimensional radiology in different bone types for dental implantology: a comparative ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116: e77-e84. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. oooo. 2011. 11. 028
23. Klein MO, Grötz KA, Manefeld B, Kann PH, Al-Nawas B. Ultrasound transmission velocity for noninvasive evaluation of jaw bone quality in vivo before dental implantation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34: 1966-71. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. ultrasmedbio. 2008. 04. 016
24. Mathieu V, Anagnostou F, Soffer E, Haiat G. Numerical simulation of ultrasonic wave propagation for the evaluation of dental implant biomechanical stability. J Acoust Soc Am 2011; 129: 4062-72. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1121/ 1. 3586788
25. Mathieu V, Anagnostou F, Soffer E, Haïat G. Ultrasonic evaluation of dental implant biomechanical stability: an in vitro study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011; 37: 262-70. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. ultrasmedbio. 2010. 10. 008
26. Vayron R, Karasinski P, Mathieu V, Michel A, Loriot D, Richard G, et al. Variation of the ultrasonic response of a dental implant embedded in tricalcium silicate-based cement under cyclic loading. J Biomech 2013; 46: 1162-8. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. jbiomech. 2013. 01. 003
27. Bertram S, Emshoff R. Sonography of periimplant buccal bone defects in periodontitis patients: A pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 99-103. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. tripleo. 2007. 01. 014
28. Culjat MO, Choi M, Singh RS, Grundfest WS, Brown ER, White SN. Ultrasound detection of submerged dental implants through soft tissue in a porcine model. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99: 218-24. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0022-3913(08)60046-3
29. Culjat MO, Choi M, Singh RS, White SN. Ultrasound imaging of dental implants. 2012. Conference proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference; 2012. pp. 456-9.
30. De Bruyckere T, Eghbali A, Younes F, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. Horizontal stability of connective tissue grafts at the buccal aspect of single implants: a 1-year prospective case series. J Clin Periodontol 2015; 42: 876-82. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jcpe. 12448
31. Degen K, Habor D, Radermacher K, Heger S, Kern JS, Wolfart S, et al. Assessment of cortical bone thickness using ultrasound. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 520-8. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ clr. 12829
32. Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J, Kerckaert I, Van Hoof T. Ultrasonic assessment of mucosal thickness around implants: validity, reproducibility, and stability of connective tissue grafts at the buccal aspect. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016; 18: 51-61. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ cid. 12245
33. Kumar VV, Sagheb K, Klein MO, Al-Nawas B, Kann PH, Kämmerer PW. Relation between bone quality values from ultrasound transmission velocity and implant stability parameters-an ex vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 975-80. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ j. 1600-0501. 2011. 02250.x
34. Lustig JP, London D, Dor BL, Yanko R. Ultrasound identification and quantitative measurement of blood supply to the anterior part of the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96: 625-9. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. tripleo. 2003. 08. 015
35. Machtei EE, Zigdon H, Levin L, Peled M. Novel ultrasonic device to measure the distance from the bottom of the osteotome to various anatomic landmarks. J Periodontol 2010; 81: 1051-5. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1902/ jop. 2010. 090621
36. Ossi Z, Abdou W, Reuben RL, Ibbetson RJ. In vitro assessment of bone-implant interface using an acoustic emission transmission test. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2012; 226: 63-9. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 0954411911428696
37. Ossi Z, Abdou W, Reuben RL, Ibbetson RJ. Transmission of acoustic emission in bones, implants and dental materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2013; 227: 1237-45. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 0954411913500204
38. Rosenberg N, Craft A, Halevy-Politch J. Intraosseous monitoring and guiding by ultrasound: a feasibility study. Ultrasonics 2014; 54: 710-9. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. ultras. 2013. 09. 008
39. Salmon B, Le Denmat D. Intraoral ultrasonography: development of a specific high-frequency probe and clinical pilot study. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 643-9. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00784-011-0533-z
40. Traxler M, Solar P, Ulm C, Gritzmann N. Ultrasonographic measurement of the soft-tissue of the upper jaw. Acta Radiol 1991; 32: 3-5. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 028418519103200102
41. Traxler M, Ulm C, Solar P, Lill W. Sonographic measurement versus mapping for determination of residual ridge width. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 358-61. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0022-3913(92)90246-7
42. Vayron R, Mathieu V, Michel A, Haïat G. Assessment of in vitro dental implant primary stability using an ultrasonic method. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014; 40: 2885-94. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. ultrasmedbio. 2014. 03. 035
43. Vayron R, Nguyen VH, Bosc R, Naili S, Haïat G. Finite element simulation of ultrasonic wave propagation in a dental implant for biomechanical stability assessment. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2015; 14: 1021-32. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10237-015-0651-7
44. Vayron R, Nguyen VH, Bosc R, Naili S, Haïat G. Assessment of the biomechanical stability of a dental implant with quantitative ultrasound: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Acoust Soc Am 2016; 139: 773-80. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1121/ 1. 4941452
45. Vayron R, Soffer E, Anagnostou F, Haïat G. Ultrasonic evaluation of dental implant osseointegration. J Biomech 2014; 47: 3562-8. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. jbiomech. 2014. 07. 011
46. Veltri M, Valenti R, Ceccarelli E, Balleri P, Nuti R, Ferrari M. The speed of sound correlates with implant insertion torque in rabbit bone: an in vitro experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 751-5. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ j. 1600-0501. 2009. 01873.x
47. Zigdon-Giladi H, Saminsky M, Elimelech R, Machtei EE. Intraoperative measurement of the distance from the bottom of osteotomy to the mandibular canal using a novel ultrasonic device. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016; 18: 1034-41. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ cid. 12362
48. Fu JH, Yeh CY, Chan HL, Tatarakis N, Leong DJ, Wang HL. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology. J Periodontol 2010; 81: 569-74. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1902/ jop. 2009. 090591
49. De Rouck T, Collys K, Wyn I, Cosyn J. Instant provisionalization of immediate single-tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 566-570. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ j. 1600-0501. 2008. 01674.x
50. Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010; 30: 237-43.
51. Bashutski JD, Wang HL, Rudek I, Moreno I, Koticha T, Oh TJ,. Effect of flapless surgery on single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 2013; 84: 1747-54. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1902/ jop. 2013. 120575
52. Hsu YT, Chan HL, Rudek I, Bashutski J, Oh WS, Wang HL, et al. Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes of platform-switched implants with a rough collar and platform-matched implants with a smooth collar: a 1-year randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016; 31: 382-90. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 11607/ jomi. 4189
53. Oh TJ, Shotwell J, Billy E, Byun HY, Wang HL. Flapless implant surgery in the esthetic region: advantages and precautions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27: 27-33.
54. Chan HL, El-Kholy K, Fu JH, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Implant primary stability determined by resonance frequency analysis in surgically created defects: a pilot cadaver study. Implant Dent 2010; 19: 509-19. doi: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ ID. 0b013e3181fa7f6a