Imaging the Cemento-Enamel Junction Using a 20-MHz Ultrasonic Transducer

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 333-338

  Nguyen, Kim Cuong T ^a   Le, Lawrence H ^a   Kaipatur, Neelambar R ^a   Major, Paul W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cemento enamel junction; Cementum; Enamel; Gingiva; Micro computed tomography; Periodontal disease; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; ENAMELING; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; TOMOGRAPHY; TRANSDUCERS; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ULTRASONIC TRANSDUCERS; ULTRASONICS;

CEMENTO-ENAMEL JUNCTIONS; CEMENTUM; GINGIVA; MICROCOMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE;

ENAMELS;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CEMENTOENAMEL JUNCTION; DENTIN; ENAMEL; INCISOR; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PIG; RELIABILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TOOTH CEMENTUM; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; ECHOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH CERVIX; TRANSDUCER;

ANIMALS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; MODELS, ANIMAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SWINE; TOOTH CERVIX; TRANSDUCERS; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84988527205     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: 1879291X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Badersten, A., Nilvéaus, R., Egelberg, J., Reproducibility of probing attachment level measurements. J Clin Periodontol 11 (1984), 475–485.
2. Bland, J.M., Altman, D., Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327 (1986), 307–310.
3. Brezniak, N., Goren, S., Zoizner, R., Shochat, T., Dinbar, A., Wasserstein, A., Heller, M., The accuracy of the cementoenamel junction identification on periapical films. Angle Orthod 74 (2004), 496–500.
4. Bushberg, J., Seibert, A., Leidholdt, E., Boone, J., The essential physics of medical imaging. 2011, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 14.
5. Cairo, F., Carnevale, G., Nieri, M., Mervelt, J., Cincinelli, S., Martinolli, C., Pini-Prato, G.P., Tonetti, M.S., Benefits of fibre retention osseous resective surgery in the treatment of shallow infrabony defects: A double-blind, randomized, clinical trial describing clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Periodontol 40 (2013), 163–171.
6. Charalampakis, G., Dahlén, G., Carlén, A., Leonhardt Å. Bacterial markers vs. clinical markers to predict progression of chronic periodontitis: A 2-yr prospective observational study. Eur J Oral Sci 121 (2013), 394–402.
7. Chifor, R., Hedesiu, M., Bolfa, P., Catoi, C., Crisan, M., Serbanescu, A., Badea, A.F., Moga, I., Badea, M.E., The evaluation of 20 MHz ultrasonography, computed tomography scans as compared to direct microscopy for periodontal system assessment. Med Ultrason 13 (2011), 120–126.
8. Culjat, M., Singh, R.S., Yoon, D., Brown, E.R., Imaging of human tooth enamel using ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22 (2003), 526–529.
9. De Faria Vasconcelos, K., Evangelista, K., Rodrigues, C., Estrela, C., De Sousa, T., Silva, M., Detection of periodontal bone loss using cone beam CT and intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41 (2012), 64–69.
10. Ghorayeb, S.R., Bertoncini, C.A., Hinders, M.K., Ultrasonography in dentistry. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 55 (2008), 1256–1266.
11. Hughes, D., Girkin, J., Poland, S., Longbottom, C., Button, T., Elgoyhen, J., Hughes, H., Meggs, C., Cochran, S., Investigation of dental samples using a 35 MHz focussed ultrasound piezocomposite transducer. Ultrasonics 49 (2009), 212–218.
12. Jeffcoat, M., Jeffcoat, R., Jens, S., Captain, K., A new periodontal probe with automated cemento-enamel junction detection. J Clin Periodontol 13 (1986), 276–280.
13. Khaw, A., Liberali, S., Logan, R., Keefe, D., Bartold, P.M., Influence of periodontitis on the experience of oral mucositis in cancer patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy: A pilot study. Supportive Care Cancer 22 (2014), 2119–2125.
14. Nelson, S.J., Wheeler's dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. 2015, Elsevier Health Sciences, St. Louis, MO.
15. Olympus-NDT, Ultrasonic transducers: Technical notes. 2011. Available at: http://www.olympus-ims.com/data/File/panametrics/UT-technotes.en.pdf. Accessed on March 10, 2015.
16. Preshaw, P., Kupp, L., Hefti, A., Mariotti, A., Measurement of clinical attachment levels using a constant-force periodontal probe modified to detect the cementoenamel junction. J Clin Periodontol 26 (1999), 434–440.
17. Salmon, B., Le Denmat, D., Intraoral ultrasonography: Development of a specific high-frequency probe and clinical pilot study. Clin Oral Invest 16 (2012), 643–649.
18. Sindi, K.H., Bubb, N.L., Evans, J.A., Gutteridge, D.L., In vivo reproducibility study of ultrasound for monitoring enamel thickness. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 118 (2014), 126–134.
19. Spitz, S., Seismic trace interpolation in the F-X domain. Geophysics 56 (1991), 785–794.
20. Tsiolis, F.I., Needleman, I.G., Griffiths, G.S., Periodontal ultrasonography. J Clin Periodontol 30 (2003), 849–854.
21. Vandana, K.L., Haneet, R.K., Cementoenamel junction: An insight. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 18, 2014, 549.
22. Watts, T., Constant force probing with and without a stent in untreated periodontal disease: The clinical reproducibility problem and possible sources of error. J Clin Periodontol 14 (1987), 407–411.